Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Public Health ; 108(S2): S158-S164, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29698098

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the carbon footprint of various sustainability interventions used for laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: We designed interventions for laparoscopic hysterectomy from approaches that sustainable health care organizations advocate. We used a hybrid environmental life cycle assessment framework to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed interventions. We conducted the study from September 2015 to December 2016 at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). RESULTS: The largest carbon footprint savings came from selecting specific anesthetic gases and minimizing the materials used in surgery. Energy-related interventions resulted in a 10% reduction in carbon footprint per case but would result in larger savings for the whole facility. Commonly implemented approaches, such as recycling surgical waste, resulted in less than a 5% reduction in greenhouse gases. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the environmental emissions of surgeries, health care providers need to implement a combination of approaches, including minimizing materials, moving away from certain heat-trapping anesthetic gases, maximizing instrument reuse or single-use device reprocessing, and reducing off-hour energy use in the operating room. These strategies can reduce the carbon footprint of an average laparoscopic hysterectomy by up to 80%. Recycling alone does very little to reduce environmental footprint. Public Health Implications. Health care services are a major source of environmental emissions and reducing their carbon footprint would improve environmental and human health. Facilities seeking to reduce environmental footprint should take a comprehensive systems approach to find safe and effective interventions and should identify and address policy barriers to implementing more sustainable practices.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos por Inhalación , Huella de Carbono , Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Laparoscopía/métodos , Conservación de los Recursos Energéticos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/instrumentación , Histerectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Eliminación de Residuos Sanitarios , Pennsylvania , Reciclaje
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 425: 191-8, 2012 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22482785

RESUMEN

This study introduces life cycle assessment as a tool to analyze one aspect of sustainability in healthcare: the birth of a baby. The process life cycle assessment case study presented evaluates two common procedures in a hospital, a cesarean section and a vaginal birth. This case study was conducted at Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, which delivers over 10,000 infants per year. The results show that heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), waste disposal, and the production of the disposable custom packs comprise a large percentage of the environmental impacts. Applying the life cycle assessment tool to medical procedures allows hospital decision makers to target and guide efforts to reduce the environmental impacts of healthcare procedures.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Ambiente , Cesárea , Suministros de Energía Eléctrica , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Eliminación de Residuos/métodos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA