Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(4): 693-706, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Race and socioeconomic status incompletely identify patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) at the highest risk for screening, treatment, and mortality disparities. Social vulnerability index (SVI) was designed to delineate neighborhoods requiring greater support after external health stressors, summarizing socioeconomic, household, and transportation barriers by census tract. SVI is implicated in lower cancer center use and increased complications after colectomy, but its influence on long-term prognosis is unknown. Herein, we characterized relationships between SVI and CRC survival. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing resection of stage I to IV CRC from January 2010 to May 2023 within an academic health system were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics were abstracted using institutional National Cancer Database and NSQIP. Addresses from electronic health records were geocoded to SVI. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients were identified, comprising 573 (66%) patients with colon tumor and 299 (34%) with rectal tumor. Patients in the top SVI quartile (32%) were more likely to be Black (41% vs 13%, p < 0.001), carry less private insurance (39% vs 48%, p = 0.02), and experience greater comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III: 86% vs 71%, p < 0.001), without significant differences by acuity, stage, or CRC therapy. In multivariable analysis, high SVI remained associated with higher all-cause (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.96, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific survival mortality (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.67, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: High SVI was independently associated with poorer prognosis after CRC resection beyond the perioperative period. Acknowledging needs for multi-institutional evaluation and elaborating causal mechanisms, neighborhood-level vulnerability may inform targeted outreach in CRC care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Supervivencia , Vulnerabilidad Social , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 228(4): 570-580, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2017, our hospital was identified as a high outlier for postoperative Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP semi-annual report. The Department of Surgery initiated a CDI task force with representation from Surgery, Infectious Disease, Pharmacy, and Performance Services to analyze available data, identify opportunities for improvement, and implement strategies to reduce CDIs. STUDY DESIGN: Strategies to reduce CDIs were reviewed from the literature and the following multidisciplinary strategies were initiated: antimicrobial stewardship optimization of perioperative order sets to avoid cefoxitin and fluoroquinolone use was completed; penicillin allergy assessment and skin testing were implemented concomitantly; increased use of ultraviolet disinfectant strategies for terminal cleaning of CDI patient rooms; increased hand hygiene and personal protection equipment signage, as well as monitoring in high-risk CDI areas; improved diagnostic stewardship by an electronic best practice advisory to reduce inappropriate CDI testing; education through surgical grand rounds; and routine data feedback via NSQIP and National Healthcare Safety Network CDI reports. RESULTS: The observed rate of CDIs decreased from 1.27% in 2016 to 0.91% in 2017. Cefoxitin and fluoroquinolone use decreased. Clostridium difficile infection testing for patients on laxatives decreased. Terminal cleaning with ultraviolet light increased. Handwashing compliance increased. Data feedback to stakeholders was established. CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary CDI reduction program has demonstrated significant reductions in CDIs. It is effective, straightforward to implement and monitor, and can be generalized to high-outlier institutions.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/etiología , Terapia Combinada , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , North Carolina , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA