Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.

BACKGROUND: Polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited. METHODS: In an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. RESULTS: A total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).

30-Day Outcomes With the Portico Transcatheter Heart Valve: Insights From a Multi-Centre Australian Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy for the treatment of aortic valve disease in appropriately selected patients. Previous studies using the self-expanding Portico transcatheter heart valve (THV), (Abbott Structural Heart, St Paul, MN, USA) have demonstrated the technical feasibility of this system albeit in the hands of relatively inexperienced Portico users. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world safety and efficacy of the Portico THV (with and without the FlexNav delivery system, Abbott Structural Heart) at the 30-day timepoint in an Australian cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a retrospective real-world cohort analysis of 269 consecutive patients with severe aortic valve disease who underwent TAVI at multiple centres within Australia between February 2015 and April 2021. Of the 269 patients, 51.7% were female, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 5.2 (±6.8) and 98.5% had successful implantations. Thirty (30)-day post-implantation all-cause mortality was observed in one (0.4%) patient, major vascular complications in two (0.7%) patients, more-than-mild paravalvular leak in six (2.2%) patients and requirement for new permanent pacemaker implantation in 27 (10.2%) patients. Haemodynamic parameters at 30 days included mean effective orifice area (EOA) of 2.3 (±0.9) cm2 and mean aortic valve gradient (AVG) of 9.6 (±6.2) mmHg. CONCLUSION: This analysis of the Portico THV in a real-world setting suggested that the system is associated with satisfactory safety and efficacy parameters. Previously published datasets may not have found similar findings owing to lower operator experience with the Portico THV system.

Clinical outcomes according to lesion complexity in high bleeding risk patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI: Analysis from the Onyx ONE clear study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with and without complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) after 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). BACKGROUND: PCI with 1-month DAPT has been demonstrated to be safe in HBR patients treated with Resolute Onyx ZES. Whether these outcomes are consistent in patients with complex lesions is uncertain. METHODS: Among HBR patients who were event-free 1 month after PCI with ZES and treated thereafter with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), the clinical outcomes between 1 month and 1 year were compared after complex PCI (3 vessels treated, ≥ 3 lesions treated, total stent length > 60 mm, bifurcation with ≥ 2 stents implanted, atherectomy, or left main, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion PCI) versus noncomplex PCI. Propensity score adjustment was performed to adjust for baseline differences among complex and noncomplex patients. RESULTS: Complex patients (N = 401, 26.6% of total) had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction (MI). Between 1 month and 1 year, rates of MI (7.1% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.02) and cardiac death/MI (9.3% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.04) were higher among complex versus noncomplex patients, although stent thrombosis rates were similar. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, differences in outcomes were no longer significant between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of ischemic outcomes in complex PCI patients were largely explained by baseline clinical differences, rather than lesion complexity, among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT following PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES.

Changes in R-wave amplitude at implantation are associated with gender and orientation of insertable cardiac monitor: observations from the confirm Rx™ body posture and physical activity study.

BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are small subcutaneously implanted devices that detect changes in R-wave amplitudes (RWAs), effective in arrhythmia-monitoring. Although ICMs have proven to be immensely successful, electrical artefacts are frequent and can lead to misdiagnosis. Thus, there is a growing need to sustain and increase efficacy in detection rates by gaining insight into various patient-specific factors such as body postures and activities. METHODS: RWAs were measured in 15 separate postures, including supine, lying on the right-side (RS) or left-side (LS) and sitting, and two separate ICM orientations, immediately after implantation of Confirm Rx™ ICM in 99 patients. RESULTS: The patients (53 females and 46 males, mean ages 66.62 ± 14.7 and 66.40 ± 12.25 years, respectively) had attenuated RWAs in RS, LS and sitting by ~ 26.4%, ~ 27.8% and ~ 21.2% respectively, compared to supine. Gender-based analysis indicated RWAs in RS (0.32 mV (0.09-1.03 mV), p < 0.0001) and LS (0.37 mV (0.11-1.03 mV), p = 0.004) to be significantly attenuated compared to supine (0.52 mV (0.20-1.03 mV) for female participants. Similar attenuation was not evident for male participants. Further, parasternally oriented ICMs (n = 44), attenuated RWAs in RS (0.37 mV(0.09-1.03 mV), p = 0.05) and LS (0.34 mV (0.11-1.03 mV), p = 0.02) compared to supine (0.48 mV (0.09-1.03 mV). Similar differences were not observed in participants with ICMs in the 45°-relative-to-sternum (n = 46) orientation. When assessing the combined effect of gender and ICM orientation, female participants demonstrated plausible attenuation in RWAs for RS and LS postures compared to supine, an effect not observed in male participants. CONCLUSION: This is the first known study depicting the effects on RWA due to body postures and activities immediately post-implantation with an overt impact by gender and orientation of ICM. Future work assessing the cause of gender-based differences in RWAs may be critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials, NCT03803969. Registered 15 January 2019 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03803969.

Self-expanding intra-annular versus commercially available transcatheter heart valves in high and extreme risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (PORTICO IDE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Randomised trial data assessing the safety and efficacy of the self-expanding intra-annular Portico transcatheter aortic valve system (Abbott Structural Heart, St Paul, MN, USA) compared with any commercially available valves are needed to compare performance among designs. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (the Portico Re-sheathable Transcatheter Aortic Valve System US Investigational Device Exemption trial [PORTICO IDE]), high and extreme risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were recruited from 52 medical centres experienced in performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the USA and Australia. Patients were eligible if they were aged 21 years or older, in New York Heart Association functional class II or higher, and had severe native aortic stenosis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted block randomisation (block sizes of 2 and 4) and stratified by clinical investigational site, surgical risk cohort, and vascular access method, to transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the first generation Portico valve and delivery system or a commercially available valve (either an intra-annular balloon-expandable Edwards-SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, or SAPIEN 3 valve [Edwards LifeSciences, Irvine, CA, USA]; or a supra-annular self-expanding CoreValve, Evolut-R, or Evolut-PRO valve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA]). Investigational site staff, implanting physician, and study participant were unmasked to treatment assignment. Core laboratories and clinical event assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, life-threatening bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, or major vascular complication at 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 1 year. Clinical outcomes and valve performance were assessed up to 2 years after the procedure. Primary analyses were by intention to treat and the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate event rates. The non-inferiority margin was 8·5% for primary safety and 8·0% for primary efficacy endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02000115, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between May 30 and Sept 12, 2014, and between Aug 21, 2015, and Oct 10, 2017, with recruitment paused for 11 months by the funder, we recruited 1034 patients, of whom 750 were eligible and randomly assigned to the Portico valve group (n=381) or commercially available valve group (n=369). Mean age was 83 years (SD 7) and 395 (52·7%) patients were female. For the primary safety endpoint at 30 days, the event rate was higher in the Portico valve group than in the commercial valve group (52 [13·8%] vs 35 [9·6%]; absolute difference 4·2, 95% CI -0·4 to 8·8 [upper confidence bound {UCB} 8·1%]; pnon-inferiority=0·034, psuperiority=0·071). At 1 year, the rates of the primary efficacy endpoint were similar between the groups (55 [14·8%] in the Portico group vs 48 [13·4%] in the commercial valve group; difference 1·5%, 95% CI -3·6 to 6·5 [UCB 5·7%]; pnon-inferiority=0·0058, psuperiority=0·50). At 2 years, rates of death (80 [22·3%] vs 70 [20·2%]; p=0·40) or disabling stroke (10 [3·1%] vs 16 [5·0%]; p=0·23) were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION: The Portico valve was associated with similar rates of death or disabling stroke at 2 years compared with commercial valves, but was associated with higher rates of the primary composite safety endpoint including death at 30 days. The first-generation Portico valve and delivery system did not offer advantages over other commercially available valves. FUNDING: Abbott.

The REMEDEE trial: 5-Year results on a novel combined sirolimus-eluting and endothelial progenitor cells capturing stent.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the novel combined sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture Combo stent (OrbusNeich, Fort Lauderdale, FL) at 5 years in the REMEDEE (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coated bio-Engineered stEnt) trial. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents have limited restenosis and reintervention but are complicated by late and very late thrombosis and accelerated neoatherosclerosis. Alternative or adjunctive technologies are needed to address these limitations. METHODS: A total of 183 patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries were randomized 2:1 to Combo (n = 124) or Taxus Liberté (n = 59). Primary endpoint was 9 month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss and the secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse events (MACE) through 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with Taxus, after 5 years the Combo stent was associated with similar rates of MACE (18.3% vs. 16.9%, p = .89), cardiac death (0.8% vs. 5.1%, p = .07), myocardial infarction (4.1% vs. 3.4%, p = .81), target lesion (9.4% vs. 10.2%, p = .78), and target vessel revascularization (14.4% vs. 11.9%, p = .73). No cases of definite stent thrombosis were reported in the Combo group. The follow-up rate at 5 years was 97.7%. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, the Combo stent remained clinically safe and effective with an overall low rate of MACE comparable to Taxus.

Performance and Safety of Transfemoral TAVI With SAPIEN XT in Australian Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: SOLACE-AU Trial.

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety and performance of the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve (THV) in Australian patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and intermediate surgical risk. METHODS: Eligible patients in this multi-centre, prospective, consecutively enrolled, non-randomised, clinical trial, received transcatheter aortic valve replacement via femoral artery access. Follow-up visits were at discharge, 30 days, and 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 composite safety at 30 days: all-cause mortality, all stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury-Stage 3, coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, major vascular complication, and valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure. Other endpoints were device success (successful vascular access, delivery, and deployment; correct position; intended performance mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg, mild or less paravalvular aortic regurgitation [PAR]; and only one valve implanted) and New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates were calculated for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: At baseline, mean patient (N=199) age was 85.5 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeon score was 5.9, and 78.4% were in NYHA class III/IV. The primary composite endpoint KM estimate was 12.1%. Device success was 88.8%. SAPIEN XT was implanted in the proper location in 98.5% (n=2: valve-in-valve procedures, n=1: no implant due to left main coronary artery occlusion). No device malfunctions were reported. The post procedure PAR was mild or less in 93.8% of patients. Mean aortic gradient decreased from baseline (50.0 mmHg) to 2 years (10.3 mmHg). Most patients (90.9%) were in NYHA class I/II at 30 days. New permanent pacemaker rate was 8.1%. Stroke at 30 days was 3.5% (1.5% disabling). CONCLUSION: SAPIEN XT was safe and improved heart failure symptoms and valve haemodynamics in this cohort of Australian patients.

Aortic distensibility is associated with both resting and hyperemic coronary blood flow.

A large body of evidence demonstrates an independent association between arterial stiffness and prospective risk of cardiovascular events. A reduction in coronary perfusion is presumed to underscore this association; however, studies confirming this are lacking. This study compared invasive measures of coronary blood flow (CBF) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived aortic distensibility (AD). Following coronary angiography, a Doppler FloWire and infusion microcatheter were advanced into the study vessel. Average peak velocity (APV) was acquired at baseline and following intracoronary adenosine to derive coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR = hyperemic APV/resting APV) and CBF [π × (diameter)2 × APV × 0.125]. Following angiography, patients underwent CMR to evaluate distensibility at the ascending aorta (AA), proximal descending aorta (PDA) and distal descending aorta (DDA). Fifteen participants (53 ± 13 yr) with minor epicardial disease (maximum stenosis <30%) were enrolled. Resting CBF was 44.1 ± 11.9 mL/min, hyperemic CBF was 143.8 ± 37.4 mL/min, and CFVR was 3.15 ± 0.48. AD was 3.89 ± 1.72·10-3mmHg-1 at the AA, 4.08 ± 1.80·10-3mmHg-1 at the PDA, and 4.42 ± 1.67·10-3mmHg-1 at the DDA. All levels of distensibility correlated with resting CBF (R2 = 0.350-0.373, P < 0.05), hyperemic CBF (R2 = 0.453-0.464, P < 0.01), and CFVR (R2 = 0.442-0.511, P < 0.01). This study demonstrates that hyperemic and, to a lesser extent resting CBF, are significantly associated with measures of aortic stiffness in patients with only minor angiographic disease. These findings provide further in vivo support for the observed prognostic capacity of large artery function in cardiovascular event prediction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived aortic distensibility is associated with invasive measures of coronary blood flow. Large artery function is more strongly correlated with hyperemic than resting blood flow. Increased stiffness may represent a potential target for novel antianginal medications.

Rationale and design of the Onyx ONE global randomized trial: A randomized controlled trial of high-bleeding risk patients after stent placement with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Polymer-free drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in combination with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has shown superior safety and efficacy outcomes compared with bare-metal stents among patients with high-bleeding risk (HBR) treated with 1-month DAPT. The safety and efficacy of the newer-generation durable-polymer DES Resolute Onyx compared with polymer-free DES among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT is unknown. TRIAL DESIGN: The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is an international, prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study enrolling HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The trial will randomize up to 2,000 patients in a 1:1 fashion to receive either the durable-polymer Resolute Onyx DES or the polymer-free Biosensors BioFreedom DES. After index procedure, patients in both arms will be treated with 1 month of DAPT (aspirin and oral P2Y12 inhibitor), followed by single antiplatelet therapy thereafter. The primary end point is the composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1-year follow-up. The powered secondary end point is target lesion failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. Patient follow-up is planned for 1, 2, and 6 months and 1 and 2 years after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The Onyx ONE global randomized trial is the first study to directly compare the safety and efficacy of a durable polymer DES (Resolute Onyx) with a polymer-free DES (BioFreedom) in HBR patients treated with 1 month of DAPT.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a new standard of care.

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular lesion requiring intervention and with an ageing population, its burden is likely to increase. Increasing comorbidity and a desire for less invasive treatment strategies has facilitated the expansion of percutaneous aortic valve therapies. Robust clinical trial data are now available to support the role of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients of prohibitive, high and now intermediate surgical risk. The introduction of a Medicare Benefits Schedule reimbursement is likely to see TAVI use grow exponentially in Australia over the next 5 years. Clinical trials evaluating low risk patients may be the final frontier to see TAVI become the standard of care for most patients with severe aortic stenosis.

The predictive capabilities of a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived marker of cardiopulmonary reserve on established prognostic surrogate markers in patients with pulmonary vascular disease: results of a longitudinal pilot study.

BACKGROUND: No unified method exists to effectively predict and monitor progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We assessed the longitudinal relationship between a novel marker of cardiopulmonary reserve and established prognostic surrogate markers in patients with pulmonary vascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty participants with confirmed (n = 14) or at high risk (n = 6) for PAH underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline and after ~6 months of guideline-appropriate management. Ten PAH participants underwent RHC within 48 h of each CMR. RHC (mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mPAP; pulmonary vascular resistance index, PVRI; cardiac index, CI) and phase-contrast CMR (mean pulmonary arterial blood flow velocity, meanPAvel) measurements were taken at rest and during continuous adenosine infusion (70/140/210 mcg/kg/min). Initial meanPAvel's (rest and hyperemic) were correlated with validated surrogate prognostic parameters (CMR: RV ejection fraction, RVEF; RV end systolic volume indexed, RVESVI; RHC: PVRI, CI; biomarker: NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide, NTpBNP; clinical: 6-min walk distance, 6MWD), a measure of pulmonary arterial stiffness (elastic modulus) and volumetric estimation of RV ventriculoarterial (VA) coupling. Changes in meanPAvel's were correlated with changes in comparator parameters over time. At initial assessment, meanPAvel at rest correlated significantly with PVRI (inversely), CI (positively) and elastic modulus (inversely) (R 2 > 0.37,P < 0.05 for all), whereas meanPAvel at peak hyperemia correlated significantly with PVRI, RVEF, RVESVI, 6MWD, elastic modulus and VA coupling (R 2 > 0.30,P < 0.05 for all). Neither resting or hyperemia-derived meanPAvel correlated with NTpBNP levels. Initial meanPAvel at rest correlated significantly with RVEF, RVESVI, CI and VA coupling at follow up assessment (R 2 > 0.2,P < 0.05 for all) and initial meanPAvel at peak hyperemia correlated with RVEF, RVESVI, PVRI and VA coupling (R 2 > 0.37,P < 0.05 for all). Change in meanPAvel at rest over time did not show statistically significant correlation with change in prognostic parameters, while change in meanPAvel at peak hyperemia did show a significant relationship with ΔRVEF, ΔRVESVI, ΔNTpBNP and ΔCI (R 2 > 0.24,P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: MeanPAvel during peak hyperemia correlated with invasive, non-invasive and clinical prognostic parameters at different time points. Further studies with predefined clinical endpoints are required to evaluated if this novel tool is a marker of disease progression in patients with pulmonary vascular disease.

Improving Guideline Compliance in Australia With a National Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Registry.

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) include statins and dual anti-platelet therapy, however there are significant gaps between guidelines and practice. Contemporary PCI practice requires comprehensive data collection to allow dynamic auditing and benchmarking of key performance and safety indices. Genesis HeartCare is Australia's largest collaborative venture of cardiologists, practising at over 40 public and private hospitals. We hypothesised that measurement and local reporting of data would improve patient outcomes through improving compliance with guideline therapies. METHODS: Real-time benchmarking via a national clinical quality and outcomes register, the Genesis Cardiovascular Outcomes Registry (GCOR-PCI). GCOR-PCI prospectively collected clinical, procedural, medication and outcomes data for 6720 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 10 private hospitals across Australia. Key performance outcomes benchmarked against the aggregated study cohort and international standards were reported to individual sites. The main outcome measure was compliance with guideline medications (statins, anti-platelet agents). RESULTS: Early data identified specific practice patterns associated with lower rates of statin therapy post-PCI, which led to changes in practice. Between the first and latest year of data collection there was significant improvement in the rates of statin therapy at discharge (92.1 vs. 94.4% p<0.03) and 12 months post-PCI (87.0 vs. 92.2% p<0.001) and of antiplatelet therapy at 12 months (90.7 vs. 94.3% p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale collaboration provides a platform for the development of quality improvement initiatives. Establishment of this clinical quality registry improved patient care by identifying and monitoring gaps in delivery of appropriate therapies, driving key practice change.

One-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation in diabetics enrolled in the worldwide e-SELECT registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus has worse outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. AIM: We assessed stent thrombosis (ST), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and major bleeding rates at 1 year after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with diabetes mellitus in a large multicenter registry. METHODS: From May 2006 to April 2008, 15,147 unselected consecutive patients were enrolled at 320 centers in 56 countries in a prospective, observational registry after implantation of ≥ 1 SES. Source data were verified in 20% randomly chosen patients at > 100 sites. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee. RESULTS: Complete follow-up at 1 year was obtained in 13,693 (92%) patients, 4,577 (30%) of whom were diabetics. Within diabetics, 1,238 (9%) were insulin-treated diabetics (ITD). Diabetics were older (64 vs. 62 years, P < 0.001), with higher incidence of major coronary risk factors, co-morbidities, and triple-vessel coronary artery disease. Coronary lesions had smaller reference vessel diameter (2.88 ± 0.46 vs. 2.93 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.001) and were more often heavily calcified (26.1% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001). At 1 year, diabetics had higher MACE rate (6.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001) driven by ITD (10.6% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001). Finally, diabetics had significant increase in ST (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001), principally owing to ITD (3.4% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). There was an overall low risk of major bleeding during follow-up, without significant difference among subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In the e-SELECT registry, diabetics represented 30% of patients undergoing SES implantation and had significantly more co-morbidities and complex coronary lesions. Although 1-year follow-up documented good overall outcome in diabetics, higher ST and MACE rates were observed, mainly driven by ITD. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Portico System: 10 Things to Remember.

The Portico system (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA) consists of a self-expanding valve prosthesis and a delivery system designed for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We describe this system, its 10-steps implantation procedure, and provide tips and tricks based on our personal experience with this system.

Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Therapy for Acute Basilar Artery Ischemic Stroke Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can now be considered a standard of care for inoperable and high-risk surgical patients with severe aortic stenosis, and its uptake worldwide is rapidly increasing. Indeed, many centers performing the procedure have now moved towards treating intermediate-risk patients with TAVI rather than referring them for surgical aortic valve replacement. Although the incidence of peri-procedural acute and subacute stroke following TAVI has fallen to 2-5%, its occurrence can be life-threatening and life-changing, and every effort must be made to improve patient outcome should stroke occur. Many cardiologists would not instinctively consider the use of thrombolytic therapy for post-transfemoral TAVI ischemic stroke because of concern about the risk of major bleeding from the access site, despite it being a standard of care for ischemic stroke in other circumstances. The present case highlights the benefit of using intravenous thrombolytic therapy for an acute basilar artery thrombotic stroke after transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI) that would otherwise have almost certainly resulted in the patient's death. The case may also prompt interventional cardiologists to consider performing TF-TAVI under conscious sedation rather than general anesthesia, as this can result in an earlier detection of acute stroke and allow an earlier intervention with thrombolytic agents, with an improved outcome.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Solution for the Young, Inoperable and Regurgitant.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. Ten years of technological advances in valve structure and delivery systems alongside growing operator and centre experience has opened TAVR implantation to an increasingly broad range of patients. The extension to off-label use however needs careful consideration and monitoring. Through discussion of our case involving an inoperable 24-year-old male with severe aortic regurgitation (AR), we highlight the need for an experienced and multidisciplinary team, together with early and extensive patient and family disclosure and engagement, prior to considering any off-label application of TAVR.

Characterisation of Myocardial Injury via T1 Mapping in Early Reperfused Myocardial Infarction and its Relationship with Global and Regional Diastolic Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) advances in imaging techniques, permits the ability to accurately characterise tissue injury post myocardial infarction. Pre-contrast T1 mapping enables this through measurement of pre-contrast T1 relaxation times. We investigate the relationship between T1 characterisation of myocardial injury with global and regional diastolic function. METHODS: Revascularised acute myocardial infarction patients with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function on TTE were assessed by 1.5T CMR. Acute regional diastolic wall motion abnormalities, global diastolic function measurements, acute segmental damage fraction with LGE and mean segmental pre-contrast T1 values were assessed on matching short axis slices. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were analysed. Mean LVEF was 62.1±9.4%. No difference between NSTEMI (22/44) and STEMI in mean pre-contrast T1 values of infarcted (1025.0±109.2 vs 1011.0±81.6ms, p=0.70), adjacent (948.3±45.3 vs 941.1±46.6ms, p=0.70) and remote (888.8±52.8 vs 881.2±54.5ms, p=0.66) segments was detected. There was no correlation between pre-contrast T1 of infarcted segments with global diastolic dysfunction (E/A, r2=0.216, p=0.06; S/D, r2=0.243, p=0.053; E/E', r2=0.240, p=0.072), but there was significantly positive, moderate correlation with circumferential diastolic strain rate, (r2=0.579, p<0.01) with excellent agreement and reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation of pre-contrast T1 values revealed no difference between NSTEMI and STEMI patients in terms of tissue characterisation post-myocardial infarction. However, pre-contrast T1 of infarcted tissue is significantly correlated with regional diastolic circumferential strain rate.

Impact of weight reduction on pericardial adipose tissue and cardiac structure in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and pericardial adipose tissue are independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF) and adverse cardiac structural remodeling. The effect of weight reduction on pericardial adipose tissue and cardiac structure remains unknown. METHODS: We prospectively performed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on 87 participants with AF undergoing either structured weight management (intervention) or general lifestyle advice (control). We measured pericardial adipose tissue, atrial and ventricular volumes, and myocardial mass at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 69 participants underwent baseline and 12-month follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (intervention n = 36 and controls n = 33). From baseline to 12 months, weight loss (kg, mean [95% CI]) was greater in the intervention group from 101.5 kg (97.2-105.8 kg) to 86.5 kg (81.2-91.9 kg) as compared with controls from 102.6 kg (97.2-108.1 kg) to 98.7 kg (91.0-106.3 kg) (time-group interaction P < .001). The intervention group showed a reduction in left atrial volumes (mL) from 105.0 mL (98.9-111.1 mL) to 96.4 mL (91.6-101.1 mL), whereas the change in the control group was from 108.8 mL (99.6-117.9 mL) to 108.9 mL (99.8-118.0 mL) (time-group interaction P < .001). There was a decline in pericardial adipose tissue (cm(3)) from 140.9 cm(3) (129.3-152.4 cm(3)) to 118.8 cm(3) (108.1-129.6 cm(3)) and myocardial mass (g) from 137.6 g (128.1-147.2 g) to 123.1 g (114.5-131.7 g) in the intervention group, whereas the change in the control group was from 143.2 cm(3) (124.6-161.7 cm(3)) to 147.2 cm(3) (128.9-165.4 cm(3)) for pericardial adipose tissue and 138.3 g (124.8-151.8 g) to 140.7 g (127.4-154.1 g) for myocardial mass (both variables, time-group interaction P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Weight reduction results in favorable structural remodeling and a reduction in pericardial adipose tissue burden.

Mid-term outcomes in patients following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the CoreValve Australia and New Zealand Study.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous studies have reported the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), integration of this therapy into standard of care varies widely by region. We evaluated mid-term follow-up in 540 patients with severe symptomatic AS at high risk of surgical AV replacement, enrolled in the ongoing Medtronic CoreValve Australia-New Zealand Study. METHODS: Between August 2008 and July 2013, 10 centres in Australia/New Zealand enrolled 540 patients, which includes initial use of the CoreValve System for all investigators. Patients were deemed suitable for TAVI based on consensus of a multidisciplinary Heart Team. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days. Data were fully monitored, and an independent Clinical Events Committee employed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics include; 45% female, mean age 84 years, EuroSCORE 17.3±10.7%, and 74.9% had New York Heart Association III/IV symptoms. At 30 days, all deaths were cardiovascular (4.1%); MACCE was 11.5%. At one and two years, all-cause mortality was 11.9% and 21.2%; cardiovascular mortality, 9.9% and 15.2%; and stroke, 8.2% and 10.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early experience with the CoreValve System in a large cohort of fully-monitored patients was associated with good early- and mid-term safety outcomes.

Incremental benefits of repeated mesenchymal stromal cell administration compared with solitary intervention after myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Traditionally, stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction (MI) has been administered as a single treatment in the acute or subacute period after MI. These time intervals coincide with marked differences in the post-infarct myocardial environment, raising the prospect that repeat cell dosing could provide incremental benefit beyond a solitary intervention. This prospect was evaluated with the use of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). METHODS: Three groups of rats were studied. Single-therapy and dual-therapy groups received allogeneic, prospectively isolated MSCs (1 × 10(6) cells) by trans-epicardial injection immediately after MI, with additional dosing 1 week later in the dual-therapy cohort. Control animals received cryopreservant solution only. Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and ejection fraction (EF) were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance immediately before MI and at 1, 2 and 4 weeks after MI. RESULTS: Immediate MSC treatment attenuated early myocardial damage with EF of 35.3 ± 3.1% (dual group, n = 12) and 35.2 ± 2.2% (single group, n = 15) at 1 week after MI compared with 22.1 ± 1.9% in controls (n = 17, P < 0.01). In animals receiving a second dose of MSCs, EF increased to 40.7 ± 3.1% by week 4, which was significantly higher than in the single-therapy group (EF 35.9 ± 1.8%, P < 0.05). Dual MSC treatment was also associated with greater myocardial mass and arteriolar density, with trends toward reduced myocardial fibrosis. These incremental benefits were especially observed in remote (non-infarct) segments of LV myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated stem cell intervention in both the acute and the sub-acute period after MI provides additional improvement in ventricular function beyond solitary cell dosing, largely owing to beneficial changes remote to the area of infarction.