RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For people with atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapies, treatment with phototherapy and systemic therapies can be considered. Multiple biologic therapies and Janus kinase (JAK)inhibitors have been approved since 2014 to treat AD. These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of AD with phototherapy and systemic therapies. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD in adults. METHODS: A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS: The workgroup developed 11 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with phototherapy and systemic agents, including biologics, oral JAK inhibitors, and other immunomodulatory medications. LIMITATIONS: Most randomized controlled trials of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD are of short duration with subsequent extension studies, limiting comparative long-term efficacy and safety conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: We make strong recommendations for the use of dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. We make conditional recommendations in favor of using phototherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate, and against the use of systemic corticosteroids.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Adulto , Humanos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , FototerapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The summarized guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for the management of AD with phototherapy and systemic therapies. METHODS: A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS: The workgroup developed 11 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics, oral Janus Kinase inhibitors, and other immunomodulatory medications. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supported strong recommendations for the use of dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib and conditional recommendations in favor of using phototherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate, and against the use of systemic corticosteroids.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , FototerapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris commonly affects adults, adolescents, and preadolescents aged 9 years or older. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne. METHODS: A work group conducted a systematic review and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS: This guideline presents 18 evidence-based recommendations and 5 good practice statements. Strong recommendations are made for benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, and oral doxycycline. Oral isotretinoin is strongly recommended for acne that is severe, causing psychosocial burden or scarring, or failing standard oral or topical therapy. Conditional recommendations are made for topical clascoterone, salicylic acid, and azelaic acid, as well as for oral minocycline, sarecycline, combined oral contraceptive pills, and spironolactone. Combining topical therapies with multiple mechanisms of action, limiting systemic antibiotic use, combining systemic antibiotics with topical therapies, and adding intralesional corticosteroid injections for larger acne lesions are recommended as good practice statements. LIMITATIONS: Analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time of the systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of acne vulgaris.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Antibacterianos , Peróxido de Benzoílo , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Ácidos Dicarboxílicos , Doxiciclina , Isotretinoína , Ácido Salicílico , Espironolactona , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Isotretinoína/administración & dosificación , Isotretinoína/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Peróxido de Benzoílo/administración & dosificación , Peróxido de Benzoílo/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Dicarboxílicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Dicarboxílicos/uso terapéutico , Espironolactona/administración & dosificación , Espironolactona/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/administración & dosificación , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Salicílico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Salicílico/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Administración Oral , Retinoides/administración & dosificación , Retinoides/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Tetraciclinas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Minociclina/administración & dosificación , Minociclina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Administración Cutánea , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Adulto , Cortodoxona/análogos & derivados , PropionatosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemical hair relaxers are widely utilized by black women, yet little research exists on the allergens present in these products. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate allergen prevalence in the most popular chemical hair relaxers. METHODS: We analysed 41 products from five major retailers, identifying allergens through ingredient lists and comparing them to the 2020 American Contact Dermatitis Group Core allergen series. RESULTS: The most common contact allergens in chemical relaxers include propylene glycol, cetyl steryl alcohol, fragrance, D/L-a-tocopherol, tea tree oil and cocamidopropyl betaine. CONCLUSION: Understanding allergen exposure in products used by individuals with textured hair is needed for managing contact dermatitis in diverse populations. This analysis underscores the presence of potential allergens in hair relaxers, emphasizing the importance of dermatologists' awareness and patient scrutiny of ingredient lists.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Preparaciones para el Cabello , Humanos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/química , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/análisis , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Betaína/análogos & derivados , Betaína/efectos adversos , Betaína/análisis , Aceite de Árbol de Té/efectos adversos , Aceite de Árbol de Té/análisis , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Perfumes/análisis , Propilenglicol/efectos adversos , Propilenglicol/análisis , FemeninoRESUMEN
These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. A multidisciplinary workgroup employed best practices for guideline development, including a systematic review of the evidence and application of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. The evidence on atopic dermatitis treatment supported strong recommendations for the use of nonprescription moisturizers, topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, and topical PDE-4 and JAK inhibitors. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of bathing and wet wrap therapy and against the use of topical antimicrobials, antiseptics, and antihistamines.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Dermatología , Adulto , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , GlucocorticoidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New evidence has emerged since the 2014 guidelines that further informs the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) with topical therapies. These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of AD with topical therapies. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based recommendations related to management of AD in adults using topical treatments. METHODS: A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS: The workgroup developed 12 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with topical therapies, including nonprescription agents and prescription topical corticosteroids (TCS), calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (PDE-4), antimicrobials, and antihistamines. LIMITATIONS: The pragmatic decision to limit the literature review to English-language randomized trials may have excluded data published in other languages and relevant long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations are made for the use of moisturizers, TCIs, TCS, and topical PDE-4 and JAK inhibitors. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of bathing and wet wrap therapy and against the use of topical antimicrobials, antiseptics, and antihistamines.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Dermatitis Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Adulto , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Administración Tópica , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically UV-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: In 2021, the American Academy of Dermatology published guidelines to assist in clinical decision-making for the management of AK. The purpose of this focused guideline update is to incorporate recently available evidence on the use of topical tirbanibulin to treat AK. METHODS: A multidisciplinary work group conducted a systematic review to evaluate data on the use of tirbanibulin for AK and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading a clinical recommendation. The graded recommendation was voted on to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Two trials were identified, and analysis of the evidence resulted in 1 recommendation. LIMITATIONS: This analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. Long-term efficacy and safety data are not currently available. CONCLUSIONS: A strong recommendation for the use of topical tirbanibulin to join the currently recommended list of topical therapies for AK was made on the basis of the available evidence.
Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Acetamidas , Humanos , Queratosis Actínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratosis Actínica/patología , Morfolinas , Piridinas , Piel/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prolonged wear of facial protective equipment can lead to occupational dermatoses. OBJECTIVE: To identify important causes of occupational dermatoses from facial protective equipment. METHODS: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. Articles were included if they reported occupational dermatoses caused by surgical/procedure masks or N95 respirators, or both. RESULTS: We identified 344 articles, and 16 were suitable for inclusion in this review. Selected articles focused on facial occupational dermatoses in health care workers. Allergic contact dermatitis to the elastic straps, glue, and formaldehyde released from the mask fabric was reported. Irritant contact dermatitis was common on the cheeks and nasal bridge due to pressure and friction. Irritant dermatitis was associated with personal history of atopic dermatitis and prolonged mask wear (>6 hours). Acneiform eruption was reported due to prolonged wear and occlusion. Contact urticaria was rare. LIMITATIONS: Only publications listed in PubMed or Embase were included. Most publications were case reports and retrospective studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review from members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society highlights cases of occupational dermatitis to facial protective equipment, including potential offending allergens. This work may help in the diagnosis and treatment of health care workers with facial occupational dermatitis.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatosis Facial/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Máscaras/efectos adversos , Respiradores N95/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/terapia , Dermatosis Facial/diagnóstico , Dermatosis Facial/etiología , Dermatosis Facial/terapia , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. Treatment options for AK include topical medications, photodynamic therapy, cryosurgery, and laser ablation. OBJECTIVE: This executive summary provides a synopsis of the 18 evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of AK detailed in the Guidelines of Care for the Management of Actinic Keratosis. METHODS: A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations, suggesting there are several effective treatments available for AK. LIMITATIONS: The analysis informing the recommendations was based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The results of future studies may necessitate a revision of current recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations are presented for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are presented for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.
Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Criocirugía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Imiquimod/uso terapéutico , Queratosis Actínica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fotoquimioterapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: This analysis examined the literature related to the management of AK to provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment. Grading, histologic classification, natural history, risk of progression, and dermatologic surveillance of AKs are also discussed. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Work Group conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations. LIMITATIONS: This analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The pragmatic decision to limit the literature review to English language randomized trials may have excluded data published in other languages or limited identification of relevant long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations are made for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.
Asunto(s)
Queratosis Actínica , Fotoquimioterapia , Diclofenaco/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Imiquimod/uso terapéutico , Queratosis Actínica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatments for early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) include topical steroids, topical nitrogen mustard, topical bexarotene, narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB), psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA), and local radiation. The relative cost-effectiveness of each treatment given the differences in treatment failure, disease progression, and therapy escalation is not established. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness (CE) of treatment options for stage IA MF. METHODS: A state-transition model was constructed with health states of stage IA to stage IV disease, no MF, and death. Treatment-specific remission and relapse rates were obtained from the literature. Lifetime costs were calculated by accounting for medications, office visits, laboratory monitoring, related procedures, work absences, and travel. RESULTS: The order of CE of the study treatments was determined to be as follows: local radiation, $225,399 for 15.40 life-years (LYs); NBUVB, $344,728 for 15.17 LYs; PUVA, $371,741 for 15.07 LYs; topical corticosteroids, $469,354 for 14.65 LYs; topical nitrogen mustard, $951,662 for 14.29 LYs; and topical bexarotene, 11,892,496 for 13.55 LYs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the CE rankings. LIMITATIONS: We assumed a constant probability of response, relapse rates, and 3-month treatment intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Local radiation is the most cost-effective treatment for limited local disease, whereas phototherapy (NBUVB or PUVA) is cost-effective for generalized disease. Our findings can serve to inform future studies and recommendations regarding selection of therapy for stage IA MF.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Micosis Fungoide/terapia , Fototerapia/economía , Radioterapia/economía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Micosis Fungoide/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Terapia PUVA/economía , Terapia PUVA/métodos , Fototerapia/métodos , Pronóstico , Radioterapia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is an uncommon cause of folliculitis. We present a case of a 29-year-old woman who presented with an atypical follicularly-based eruption localized to her inner thigh with an associated pain in her lower back and inner thigh prior to the papular eruption. She was successfully treated with valacyclovir 1,000 mg three times daily with no complications.
Asunto(s)
Aciclovir/análogos & derivados , Foliculitis/etiología , Herpes Zóster/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Piel/patología , Valina/análogos & derivados , Aciclovir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Femenino , Foliculitis/diagnóstico , Foliculitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpes Zóster/complicaciones , Herpes Zóster/virología , Humanos , Muslo , Valaciclovir , Valina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Allium sativum (garlic) can cause an irritant contact dermatitis, secondary to naturopathic practices. We report an unusually severe case of chemical burn following garlic applied under occlusion.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras Químicas/etiología , Ajo/efectos adversos , Neurodermatitis/terapia , Apósitos Oclusivos , Fitoterapia/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Plantas/efectos adversos , Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Vesícula/diagnóstico , Vesícula/etiología , Quemaduras Químicas/diagnóstico , Celulitis (Flemón)/diagnóstico , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Masculino , Naturopatía , Preparaciones de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Background: Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible. Objective: With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures. Methods: Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020. Results: Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol. Conclusions: Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Perfumes , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Parabenos/efectos adversos , Emolientes , Vehículos Farmacéuticos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible. OBJECTIVE: With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures. METHODS: Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020. RESULTS: Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol. CONCLUSIONS: Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Systemic corticosteroids are commonly used as a short-term management option for inflammatory skin conditions, such as contact dermatitis. The purpose of our systematic review was to compare presence and degree of patch test reactions with or without different doses of systemic corticosteroid therapy. The relationship between 20, 30, and 40 mg daily doses of prednisone and retained, diminished, and negated reactions was not linear, whereas the reaction ratings for all patches placed with or without corticosteroid therapy revealed trends toward lower intensity reactions while receiving prednisone ( P < 0.0001, χ 2 , for all doses of prednisone). Our review provides insight into directions for future studies that examine the effect of corticosteroids on patch testing.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Dermatitis por Contacto , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the number and uses for targeted therapies such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) increase, so does the need to recognize and treat the dermatologic side-effects of these agents. Although agents such as gefitinib, erlotinib, cetuximab, lapatinib, and panitumumab have less systemic side-effects than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, dermatologic adverse events from EGFRIs are significantly more common. These dermatologic toxicities have previously led to reduction or cessation of therapy and recently have been shown to decrease patients' quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS: This review provides a symptom-based treatment approach to the common dermatologic adverse effects seen with the epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists: papulopustular rash, xerosis, pruritus as well as hair, nail, and mucosal changes. Each dermatologic toxicity is described; prophylaxis and treatment options, from topical to systemic, are presented based on a review of the current literature with emphasis on new clinical trials results. We also provide specific recommendations based on our practice in a specialty clinic. SUMMARY: Although the field continues to evolve, this review presents the most up-to-date information on managing dermatologic adverse effects of EGFRIs. Practitioners should find this article to be a practical resource in approaching patients on EGFRIs with dermatologic toxicities. As we learn how to optimally manage the adverse effects of these agents, we practitioners have the opportunity to increase patients' quality of life and decrease reductions or cessations of life-prolonging therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib , Gefitinib , Humanos , Lapatinib , Panitumumab , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Dermatología/métodos , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/patología , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Piel/patología , Biopsia/métodos , Humanos , New England , Médicos/psicología , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación , Espera VigilanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a cutaneous lymphoma; most patients present with early, skin-limited disease and are managed by dermatologists. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and assess the evidence on topical treatments for early-stage (IA, IB, IIA) MF. METHODS: We performed a literature search via MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the certainty of the data. RESULTS: Two searches yielded 1252 references; 26 met the inclusion criteria and included literature on nitrogen mustard, retinoids, corticosteroids, carmustine, fluorouracil, methotrexate-laurocapram, hexadecylphosphocholine, peldesine, ingenol mebutate, topical methotrexate with oxygen flow-assisted LP3 carrier, and resiquimod. Most studies were single intervention, observational series. Nitrogen mustard, with the most published reports, was effective with 12%-82% early-stage MF patients (total n > 1000) achieving complete remission (CR) (low certainty evidence). Clinical CR was achieved among 10%-60% treated with topical retinoids (low certainty evidence). Two moderate-sized retrospective case series on topical steroids had 18%-63% CR (low certainty evidence). Only single studies were available for the other therapies. CONCLUSIONS: For most outcomes of interest, the GRADE certainty for topical therapies for early-stage MF was low. Further randomized controlled trials and inclusion of quality of life indicators are needed.