Editorial Commentary: High Tibial Osteotomy and Distal Femoral Osteotomy Address Biologics and Biomechanics.

Osteotomies were historically a common treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This has given way to arthroplasty in many patients. However, osteotomies are still an excellent treatment for younger patients with malignment and joint pain. High tibial and distal femoral osteotomy are both mechanical and biological surgeries. Osteotomies about the knee result in both mechanical correction and modulation of the inflammatory environment in the joint resulting from correction of malalignment. This reinforces their importance in the treatment of the knee joint as an organ in which a complex interplay of factors is required for homeostasis. Osteotomy is a critical part of comprehensive treatment of young patients with knee pain, malignment, and cartilage disorders.

Combined Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia and Increased Femoral Anteversion Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Female Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship of increased femoral anteversion and borderline acetabular dysplasia on the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in a female cohort of patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of female patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. All patients had preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans from which lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and femoral anteversion were measured. Patient outcome was quantified by preoperative and postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool 12-item instrument (iHOT-12). All patients had follow-up at 2 to 4 years postoperatively. Published values for minimum clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and a normal or abnormal hip were used to determine outcome as well as the final score and delta of the iHOT-12. RESULTS: There were 243 female patients included in the cohort (83% follow-up) who had iHOT-12 scores at 2- to 4-year follow-up (mean 36.9 months). Female patients with combined LCEA ≤25° and femoral anteversion >20° had lower final IHOT-12 scores (P = .001) and delta iHOT-12 (P = .010) and were less likely to achieve a normal hip (P = .013), minimum clinically important difference (P = .018), SCB (P < .001), or PASS (P < .001) and more likely to have an abnormal hip (P = .002). In addition, patients with an LCEA ≤25° and normal femoral version were less likely to achieve a normal hip (P = .013), SCB (P < .001), and PASS (P < .001) compared with those with normal acetabular coverage (all P < .05). There was no difference in these outcome measures between the groups with an LCEA >25° with or without increased femoral version. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients with femoral anteversion >20° and borderline acetabular dysplasia did poorly after hip arthroscopy. However, those with increased femoral anteversion and normal acetabular coverage had outcomes similar to control hips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

How Common Is Femoral Retroversion and How Is it Affected by Different Measurement Methods in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

BACKGROUND: Although femoral retroversion has been linked to the onset of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), and may result from a rotation of the femoral epiphysis around the epiphyseal tubercle leading to femoral retroversion, femoral version has rarely been described in patients with SCFE. Furthermore, the prevalence of actual femoral retroversion and the effect of different measurement methods on femoral version angles has yet to be studied in SCFE. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do femoral version and the prevalence of femoral retroversion differ between hips with SCFE and the asymptomatic contralateral side? (2) How do the mean femoral version angles and the prevalence of femoral retroversion change depending on the measurement method used? (3) What is the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of these measurement methods? METHODS: For this retrospective, controlled, single-center study, we reviewed our institutional database for patients who were treated for unilateral SCFE and who had undergone a pelvic CT scan. During the period in question, the general indication for obtaining a CT scan was to define the surgical strategy based on the assessment of deformity severity in patients with newly diagnosed SCFE or with previous in situ fixation. After applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 79 patients. The mean age was 15 ± 4 years, 48% (38 of 79) of the patients were male, and 56% (44 of 79) were obese (defined as a BMI > 95th percentile (mean BMI 34 ± 9 kg/m2). One radiology resident (6 years of experience) measured femoral version of the entire study group using five different methods. Femoral neck version was measured as the orientation of the femoral neck. Further measurement methods included the femoral head's center and differed regarding the level of landmarks for the proximal femoral reference axis. From proximal to distal, this included the most-proximal methods (Lee et al. and Reikerås et al.) and most-distal methods (Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al.). Most proximally (Lee et al. method), we used the most cephalic junction of the greater trochanter as the landmark and, most distally, we used the center base of the femoral neck superior to the lesser trochanter (Murphy et al.). The orientation of the distal femoral condyles served as the distal reference axis for all five measurement methods. All five methods were compared side-by-side (involved versus uninvolved hip), and comparisons among all five methods were performed using paired t-tests. The prevalence of femoral retroversion (< 0°) was compared using a chi-square test. A subset of patients was measured twice by the first observer and by a second orthopaedic resident (2 years of experience) to assess intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability; for this assessment, we used intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The mean femoral neck version was lower in hips with SCFE than in the contralateral side (-2° ± 13° versus 7° ± 11°; p < 0.001). This yielded a mean side-by side difference of -8° ± 11° (95% CI -11° to -6°; p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of femoral retroversion in hips with SCFE (58% [95% CI 47% to 69%]; p < 0.001) than on the contralateral side (29% [95% CI 19% to 39%]). These differences between hips with SCFE and the contralateral side were higher and ranged from -17° ± 11° (95% CI -20° to -15°; p < 0.001) based on the method of Tomczak et al. to -22° ± 13° (95% CI -25° to -19°; p < 0.001) according to the method of Murphy et al. The mean overall femoral version angles increased for hips with SCFE using more-distal landmarks compared with more-proximal landmarks. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was higher in hips with SCFE for the proximal methods of Lee et al. and Reikerås et al. (91% [95% CI 85% to 97%] and 84% [95% CI 76% to 92%], respectively) than for the distal measurement methods of Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al. (47% [95% CI 36% to 58%] and 60% [95% CI 49% to 71%], respectively [all p < 0.001]). We detected mean differences ranging from -19° to 4° (all p < 0.005) for 8 of 10 pairwise comparisons in hips with SCFE. Among these, the greatest differences were between the most-proximal methods and the more-distal methods, with a mean difference of -19° ± 7° (95% CI -21° to -18°; p < 0.001), comparing the methods of Lee et al. and Tomczak et al. In hips with SCFE, we found excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, ICC 0.93 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.95 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods. Analogously, we found excellent agreement (ICC > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, range 0.91 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (range 0.89 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods in healthy contralateral hips. CONCLUSION: We showed that femoral neck version is asymmetrically decreased in unilateral SCFE, and that differences increase when including the femoral head's center. Thus, to assess the full extent of an SCFE deformity, femoral version measurements should consider the position of the displaced epiphysis. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was high in patients with SCFE and increased when using proximal anatomic landmarks. Since the range of femoral version angles was wide, femoral version cannot be predicted in a given hip and must be assessed individually. Based on these findings, we believe it is worthwhile to add evaluation of femoral version to the diagnostic workup of children with SCFE. Doing so may better inform surgeons as they contemplate when to use isolated offset correction or to perform an additional femoral osteotomy for SCFE correction based on the severity of the slip and the rotational deformity. To facilitate communication among physicians and for the design of future studies, we recommend consistently reporting the applied measurement technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Editorial Commentary: Complete Capsular Closure During Hip Arthroscopy Provides the Most Reliable and Durable Outcome . . . Capsule Closed . . . Case Closed!

The management of the hip capsule has been a recent area of controversy in hip arthroscopy. Over the past 5 years, there has been mounting biomechanical and clinical evidence that complete capsular closure is an important step to achieve the best and most durable outcome from hip arthroscopy. Numerous studies in the laboratory have shown that repairing the capsulotomy during simulated hip arthroscopy establishes normal hip biomechanics. Multiple studies have also reported improved clinical outcomes and less conversion to total hip arthroplasty in patients undergoing capsular repair. We have published that patients improve after revision hip arthroscopy for repair of capsular defects. I think it is safe to say that complete capsular closure after hip arthroscopy is becoming the standard of care in our field.

Acetabular Coverage Decreases at the End of Skeletal Growth: A 3DCT Study of Healthy Hips.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in size and position of the acetabulum have been linked to both developmental dysplasia of the hip and femoroacetabular impingement. Owing to its 3-dimensional (3D) complexity, plain radiography and cross-sectional studies [computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging] have limitations in their ability to capture the complexity of the acetabular 3D anatomy. The goal of the study was to use 3D computed tomography reconstructions to identify the acetabular lunate cartilage and measure its size at varying ages of development and between sexes. METHODS: Patients aged 10 to 18 years with asymptomatic hips and a CT pelvis for appendicitis were reviewed. Patients were stratified by sex and age: preadolescent (10 to 12), young adolescent (13 to 15), and old adolescent (16 to 18) in equal proportions. Materialise 3-matic was used to generate a 3D pelvic model, and the acetabular lunate cartilage surface area was calculated. The lunate cartilage was divided into anatomic segments: superior (11:00 to 1:00), anterior (1:00 to 4:00), and posterior (8:00 to 11:00). The femoral head surface area was calculated to control for patient size. Mixed effects models were generated predicting segment size where side was treated as a repeated measure. Absolute and relative (lunate cartilage to femoral head) models were generated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (124 hips) were included. Females showed a significant decrease in femoral head coverage as age increased overall and in the 3 subsegments. The majority of changes occurred between the preadolescent and young adolescent groups. Males did not show an overall change, but the superior and anterior anatomic subgroups showed a significant decrease in coverage between the young and old adolescent groups. Male lunate cartilages were absolutely, but not relatively, larger than females. No clinically significant side-to-side differences were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The relative femoral head coverage by the acetabular lunate cartilage reduced with increasing age, suggesting the growth of the femoral head outpaces the acetabular lunate cartilage's growth. This was more prominent in females. This study has important implications for expected acetabular coverage changes in the latter aspects of pediatric and adolescent development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-diagnostic study.

Editorial Commentary: The First Hip Arthroscopy Is the Best Hip Arthroscopy, Capsular Defect or Not.

Hip arthroscopy has evolved significantly over the last 5 to 10 years. With this comes the burden of patients with continued pain after their index procedure. Reasons for the need for revision surgery can be many, including incomplete resection of impingement morphology, unrecognized/unaddressed acetabular dysplasia or hip instability, failure to manage the soft tissue appropriately (i.e., labrum or capsule/ligament), or other unrecognized cause of pain, like femoral retroversion or subspine impingement. Like many other orthopaedic procedures, revision hip arthroscopy with or without a defect in the hip capsule has significantly worse outcomes at 2 years compared with primary hip arthroscopy. This emphasizes the importance of proper diagnosis, well-done surgery, and proper rehabilitation the first time to avoid the need for revision hip surgery in the young adult altogether.

Periacetabular Osteotomy Improves Pain and Function in Patients With Lateral Center-edge Angle Between 18° and 25°, but Are These Hips Really Borderline Dysplastic?

BACKGROUND: The treatment of mild or borderline acetabular dysplasia is controversial with surgical options including both arthroscopic labral repair with capsular closure or plication and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The degree to which improvements in pain and function might be achieved using these approaches may be a function of acetabular morphology and the severity of the dysplasia, but detailed radiographic assessments of acetabular morphology in patients with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 18° to 25° who have undergone PAO have not, to our knowledge, been performed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with an LCEA of 18° to 25° undergoing PAO have other radiographic features of dysplasia suggestive of abnormal femoral head coverage by the acetabulum? (2) What is the survivorship free from revision surgery, THA, or severe pain (modified Harris hip score [mHHS] < 70) and proportion of complications as defined by the modified Dindo-Clavien severity scale at minimum 2-year followup? (3) What are the functional patient-reported outcome measures in this cohort at minimum 2 years after surgery as assessed by the UCLA Activity Score, the mHHS, the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the SF-12 mental and physical domain scores? METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2014, a total of 91 patients with hip pain and LCEA of 18° to 25° underwent a hip preservation surgical procedure at our institution. Thirty-six (40%) of the 91 patients underwent hip arthroscopy, and 56 hips (60%) were treated by PAO. In general, patients were considered for hip arthroscopy when symptoms were predominantly associated with femoroacetabular impingement (that is, pain aggravated by sitting and hip flexion activities) and physical examination showed a positive anterior impingement test with negative signs of instability (negative anterior apprehension test). In general, patients were considered for PAO when symptoms suggested instability (that is, pain with upright activities, abductor fatigue now aggravated by sitting) and clinical examinations demonstrated a positive anterior apprehension test. Bilateral surgery was performed in six patients and only the first hip was included in the study. One patient was excluded because PAO was performed to address dysplasia caused by surgical excision of a proximal femoral tumor associated with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia during childhood yielding a total of 49 patients (49 hips). There were 46 of 49 females (94%), the mean age was 26.5 years (± 8), and the mean body mass index was 24 kg/m (± 4.5). Radiographic analysis of preoperative films included the LCEA, Tönnis acetabular roof angle, the anterior center-edge angle, the anterior and posterior wall indices, and the Femoral Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index. Thirty-nine of the 49 patients (80%) were followed for a minimum 2-year followup (mean, 2.2 years; range, 2-4 years) and were included in the analysis of survivorship after PAO, complications, and functional outcomes. Kaplan-Meier modeling was used to calculate survivorship defined as free from revision surgery, THA, or severe pain (mHHS < 70) at minimum 2 years after surgery. Complications were graded according to the modified Dindo-Clavien severity. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at minimum 2 years after surgery and included the UCLA Activity Score, the mHHS, the HOOS, and the SF-12 mental and physical domain scores. RESULTS: Forty-six of 49 hips (94%) had at least one other radiographic feature of dysplasia suggestive of abnormal femoral head coverage by the acetabulum. Seventy-three percent of the hips (36 of 49) had two or more radiographic features of hip dysplasia aside from a LCEA of 18° to 25°. The survivorship of PAO at minimum 2 years for the 39 of 49 (80%) patients available was 94% (95% confidence interval, 80%-90%). Three of 39 patients (8%) developed a complication. At a mean of 2.2 years of followup, there was improvement in level of activity (preoperative UCLA score 7 ± 2 versus postoperative UCLA score 6 ± 2; p = 0.02). Hip symptoms and function improved postoperatively, as reflected by a higher mean mHHS (86 ± 13 versus 64 ± 19; p < 0.001) and mean HOOS (386 ± 128 versus 261 ± 117; p < 0.001). Quality of life and overall health assessed by the physical domain of the SF-12 improved (47 ± 11 versus 39 ± 12; p < 0.001). However, with the numbers available, no improvement was observed for the mental domain of the SF-12 (52 ± 8 versus 51 ± 11; p = 0.881). CONCLUSIONS: Hips with LCEA of 18° to 25° frequently have other radiographic features of dysplasia suggestive of abnormal femoral head coverage by the acetabulum. These hips may be inappropriately labeled as "borderline" or "mild" dysplasia on consideration of LCEA alone. A more comprehensive imaging analysis in these hips by the radiographic features of dysplasia included in this study is recommended to identify hips with abnormal coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum and to plan treatment accordingly. Patients with LCEA of 18° to 25° showed improvement in hip pain and function after PAO with minimal complications and low proportions of persistent pain or reoperations at short-term followup. Future studies are recommended to investigate whether the benefits of symptomatic and functional improvement are sustained long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

What Is the Reliability and Accuracy of Intraoperative Fluoroscopy in Evaluating Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Coverage During Periacetabular Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for acetabular dysplasia in the skeletally mature individual. Fluoroscopy is used intraoperatively for osteotomy completion and to judge fragment correction. However, a comprehensive study validating fluoroscopy to judge anterior, lateral, and posterior coverage in PAO has not been reported. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are radiographic and fluoroscopic measures of anterior, lateral, and posterior acetabular coverage reliable? (2) Do fluoroscopic measures of fragment correction accurately measure anterior, lateral, and posterior coverage when compared with postoperative radiographs? METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing PAO with a primary diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia. Between 2012 and 2014 two surgeons performed 287 PAOs with fluoroscopy. To be included in this retrospective study, patients had to be younger than 35 years old, have a primary diagnosis of dysplasia (not retroversion, Perthes, or skeletal dysplasia), have adequate radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging, be a primary PAO (not revision), and in the case of bilateral patients, only the first hip operated on in the study period was included. Based on these criteria, 46% of the PAOs performed were included here (133 of 287). A total of 109 (82%) of the patients were females (109 of 133), and the mean age of the patients represented was 24 years (SD, 7 years). Pre- and postoperative standing radiographs as well as intraoperative fluoroscopic images were reviewed and lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), anterior wall index (AWI), and posterior wall index (PWI) were measured. Two fellowship-trained hip preservation surgeons completed all measurements with one reader performing a randomized sample of 49 repeat measurements 4 weeks after the initial reading for purposes of calculating intraobserver reliability. Intra- and interrater reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. Agreement between intraoperative fluoroscopic and postoperative radiographic measures was determined by estimating the ICC with 95% confidence intervals and by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.75) for all measures and good for postoperative AWI (ICC = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.85). Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.75) for all measures except intraoperative TA (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84). Accuracy of fluoroscopy was good (0.60 < ICC < 0.75) for LCEA (ICC = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.83), TA (ICC = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79), AWI (ICC = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.74), and PWI (ICC = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.35-0.85) and excellent (ICC > 0.75) for ACEA (ICC = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). Bland-Altman analysis for systematic bias in the comparison between intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiography found the effect of such bias to be negligible (mean difference: LCEA 2°, TA 2°, ACEA 1°, AWI 0.02, PWI 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy is accurate in measuring correction in PAO. However, surgeons should take care not to undercorrect the posterior wall. Based on our study, intraoperative fluoroscopy may be used as an alternative to an intraoperative AP pelvis radiograph to judge final acetabular fragment correction with an experienced surgeon. However, more studies are needed including a properly powered direct comparative study of intraoperative fluoroscopy and intraoperative radiographs. Moreover, the impact of radiographic correction achieved during surgery should be studied to determine the implications for patient-reported outcomes and long-term survival of the hip. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.

Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The time-consuming and user-dependent postprocessing of biochemical cartilage MRI has limited the use of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC). An automated analysis of biochemical three-dimensional (3-D) images could deliver a more time-efficient and objective evaluation of cartilage composition, and provide comprehensive information about cartilage thickness, surface area, and volume compared with manual two-dimensional (2-D) analysis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How does the 3-D analysis of cartilage thickness and dGEMRIC index using both a manual and a new automated method compare with the manual 2-D analysis (gold standard)? (2) How does the manual 3-D analysis of regional patterns of dGEMRIC index, cartilage thickness, surface area and volume compare with a new automatic method? (3) What is the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of software-assisted manual 3-D and automated 3-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface, and volume for two readers on two time points? METHODS: In this IRB-approved, retrospective, diagnostic study, we identified the first 25 symptomatic hips (23 patients) who underwent a contrast-enhanced MRI at 3T including a 3-D dGEMRIC sequence for intraarticular pathology assessment due to structural hip deformities. Of the 23 patients, 10 (43%) were male, 16 (64%) hips had a cam deformity and 16 (64%) hips had either a pincer deformity or acetabular dysplasia. The development of an automated deep-learning-based approach for 3-D segmentation of hip cartilage models was based on two steps: First, one reader (FS) provided a manual 3-D segmentation of hip cartilage, which served as training data for the neural network and was used as input data for the manual 3-D analysis. Next, we developed the deep convolutional neural network to obtain an automated 3-D cartilage segmentation that we used as input data for the automated 3-D analysis. For actual analysis of the manually and automatically generated 3-D cartilage models, a dedicated software was developed. Manual 2-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices and cartilage thickness was performed at each "full-hour" position on radial images and served as the gold standard for comparison with the corresponding measurements of the manual and the automated 3-D analysis. We measured dGEMRIC index, cartilage thickness, surface area, and volume for each of the four joint quadrants and compared the manual and the automated 3-D analyses using mean differences. Agreement between the techniques was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The overlap between 3-D cartilage volumes was assessed using dice coefficients and means of all distances between surface points of the models were calculated as average surface distance. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the software-assisted manual 3-D and the automated 3-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface and volume was assessed for two readers on two different time points using ICCs. RESULTS: Comparable mean overall difference and almost-perfect agreement in dGEMRIC indices was found between the manual 3-D analysis (8 ± 44 ms, p = 0.005; ICC = 0.980), the automated 3-D analysis (7 ± 43 ms, p = 0.015; ICC = 0.982), and the manual 2-D analysis.Agreement for measuring overall cartilage thickness was almost perfect for both 3-D methods (ICC = 0.855 and 0.881) versus the manual 2-D analysis. A mean difference of -0.2 ± 0.5 mm (p < 0.001) was observed for overall cartilage thickness between the automated 3-D analysis and the manual 2-D analysis; no such difference was observed between the manual 3-D and the manual 2-D analysis.Regional patterns were comparable for both 3-D methods. The highest dGEMRIC indices were found posterosuperiorly (manual: 602 ± 158 ms; p = 0.013, automated: 602 ± 158 ms; p = 0.012). The thickest cartilage was found anteroinferiorly (manual: 5.3 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001; automated: 4.3 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.001). The smallest surface area was found anteroinferiorly (manual: 134 ± 60 mm; p < 0.001, automated: 155 ± 60 mm; p < 0.001). The largest volume was found anterosuperiorly (manual: 2343 ± 492 mm; p < 0.001, automated: 2294 ± 467 mm; p < 0.001). Mean average surface distance was 0.26 ± 0.13 mm and mean Dice coefficient was 86% ± 3%. Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability was near perfect for overall analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface area, and volume (ICC range, 0.962-1). CONCLUSIONS: The presented deep learning approach for a fully automatic segmentation of hip cartilage enables an accurate, reliable and reproducible analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface area, and volume. This time-efficient and objective analysis of biochemical cartilage composition and morphology yields the potential to improve patient selection in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery and to aid surgeons with planning of acetabuloplasty and periacetabular osteotomies in pincer FAI and hip dysplasia. In addition, this validation paves way to the large-scale use of this method for prospective trials which longitudinally monitor the effect of reconstructive hip surgery and the natural course of osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Editorial Commentary: Acetabular Paralabral Cysts It's All About Location, Location, Location .

With our increased understanding about the causes of young adult hip pain and femoroacetabular impingement, magnetic resonance imaging has become an important diagnostic tool for identifying labral pathology. However, arthroscopic evaluation is paramount to understanding whether a labral tear truly exists in these patients. Orthopaedic dogma suggests that acetabular paralabral cysts form due to an associated acetabular labral tear. Nevertheless, a cause and effect relationship has not yet been proven in the literature. The location of these paralabral cysts may influence the clinical symptoms that they cause and their diagnostic utility. Further work is needed to fully understand the relevance of acetabular paralabral cysts in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy decreases ACL-graft forces and anterior tibial translation under axial load.

PURPOSE: Posterior tibial slope (PTS) represents an important risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure, as seen in clinical studies. An anterior closing wedge osteotomy for slope reduction was performed to investigate the effect on ACL-graft forces and femoro-tibial kinematics in an ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee in a biomechanical setup. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees with a relatively high native slope (mean ± SD): (slope 10° ± 1.4°, age 48.2 years ± 5.8) were selected based on prior CT measurements. A 10° anterior closing-wedge osteotomy was fixed with an external fixator in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee (quadruple Semi-T/Gracilis-allograft). Each condition was randomly tested with both the native tibial slope and the post-osteotomy reduced slope. Axial loads (200 N, 400 N), anterior tibial draw (134 N), and combined loads were applied to the tibia while mounted on a free moving and rotating X-Y table. Throughout testing, 3D motion tracking captured anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (ITR). Change of forces on the reconstructed ACL-graft (via an attached load-cell) were recorded, as well. RESULTS: ATT was significantly decreased after slope reduction in the ACL-deficient knee by 4.3 mm ± 3.6 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and 6.2 mm ± 4.3 (p < 0.001) at 400N of axial load. An increase of ITR of 2.3° ±2.8 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and by 4.0° ±4.1 (p < 0.001) at 400 N was observed after the osteotomy. In the ACL-reconstructed knee, ACL-graft forces decreased after slope reduction osteotomy by a mean of 14.7 N ± 9.8 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and 33.8 N ± 16.3 (p < 0.001) at 400N axial load, which equaled a relative decrease by a mean of 17.0% (SD ± 9.8%), and 33.1% (SD ± 18.1%), respectively. ATT and ITR were not significantly changed in the ACL-reconstructed knee. Testing of a tibial anterior drawing force in the ACL-deficient knee led to a significantly increased ATT by 2.7 mm ± 3.6 (p < 0.001) after the osteotomy. The ACL-reconstructed knee did not show a significant change (n.s.) in ATT after the osteotomy. However, ACL-graft forces detected a significant increase by 13.0 N ± 8.3 (p < 0.001) after the osteotomy with a tibial anterior drawer force, whereas the additional axial loading reduced this difference due to the osteotomy (5.3 N ± 12.6 (n.s.)). CONCLUSIONS: Slope-reducing osteotomy decreased anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee under axial load, while internal rotation of the tibia increased in the ACL-deficient status after osteotomy. Especially in ACL revision surgery, the osteotomy protects the reconstructed ACL with significantly lower forces on the graft under axial load.

The Natural History of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

BACKGROUND: Structural hip abnormalities have long been suspected of causing hip osteoarthritis. The concept of deformity of the proximal femur as a cause of osteoarthritis (OA) started with description of the tilt deformity and progressed to the pistol grip, then eventually cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Acetabular over-coverage or retroversion as a cause of impingement is commonly referred to as pincer-type FAI. The primary research question we asked was: what is the natural history of hips with FAI? METHODS: We reviewed the literature to identify studies with cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence of the effect of FAI on the development of or association with hip OA. RESULTS: In cross-sectional and longitudinal natural history studies of hip OA, cam-type FAI has consistently shown an association with developing OA. In regard to pincer-type FAI, the data are less convincing with some studies suggesting an increased risk and others showing a protective effect of the acetabular over-coverage. It is clear that not all patients with cam FAI get OA but the altered anatomy does increase the relative risk of developing OA. CONCLUSIONS: Cam-type FAI is associated with the development of hip OA; however, there is no role for prophylactic surgery in the asymptomatic hip with the anatomy predisposing to FAI. Further interventional studies are needed to determine whether surgical correction of cam-type FAI in the symptomatic hip alters the natural history of the condition.

Computed Tomography Scans in Patients With Young Adult Hip Pain Carry a Lifetime Risk of Malignancy.

PURPOSE: To calculate the lifetime risk of malignancy in young adult patients with hip pain using 5 different imaging and radiation dose protocols with or without pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Radiographic and CT patient radiation doses were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging protocols for hip pain composed of radiographs with or without pre- and postoperative CT scans were modeled and radiation doses were estimated using the PCXMC computer code. Based on these radiation doses, lifetime attributable risks of cancer and mortality for a 10- through 60-year-old male and female were calculated as published by the committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) in the BEIR VII report. Relative risks and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated for each protocol. RESULTS: Based on a review of our institutional database, 2 CT scan doses were used for this study: a high 5.06 mSv and a low 2.86 mSv. Effective doses of radiation ranged from 0.59 to 0.66 mSv for radiographs alone to 10.71 to 10.78 mSv for radiographs and CT both pre- and postoperatively at the higher dose. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs alone was 0.006% and 0.011% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for radiographs along with pre- and postoperative CT scans at higher dose was 0.105% and 0.177% for a 20-year-old male and female, respectively. Radiographs alone lead to an NNH of 16,667 for males and 9,090 for females, whereas the protocol with pre- and postoperative CT scans at the higher dose led to an NNH of 952 for males and 564 for females. The relative risk of this protocol compared to radiographs alone was 17.5 for males and 16.1 for females. CONCLUSION: Protocols with CT scans of the hip/pelvis pose a small lifetime attributable risk (0.034%-0.177% for a 20-year-old) but a large relative risk (5-17 times) of cancer compared with radiographs alone in the imaging evaluation for hip pain that decreases with increasing age. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study illustrates the need for clinicians to understand the imaging protocols used at their institution to understand the risks and benefits of using those protocols in their practice.

Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly used to both guide the osteotomy and judge correction of the acetabular fragment in periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Prior studies that have compared intraoperative fluoroscopic correction with postoperative radiographic correction were small studies that did not report intra- or interreader reliability. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the correlation between intraoperative fluoroscopic correction in PAO compared with the correction seen on postoperative radiographs? (2) What is the reliability of radiographic measures of correction in PAO? METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 121 patients (141 hips) who underwent PAO for symptomatic hip dysplasia at a tertiary referral center. Patients were included in the study if they had preoperative radiographs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, and minimum 6-week postoperative radiographs. Of the 272 PAO procedures performed in this time period, 61 patients who underwent PAO for retroversion and five patients with a history of Perthes disease were excluded as a result of the inability for these radiographic measures to judge fragment correction in PAOs for retroversion and the difficulty in measurement in post-Perthes deformity. Of the 206 PAOs performed for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia, 65 (32%) could not be analyzed because they lacked appropriate preoperative films, leaving 141 PAOs in 121 patients for analysis. The patients lacking appropriate preoperative films had them performed at an outside facility or had plain films that have since been destroyed. The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) on the fluoroscopic views and postoperative radiographs were measured by two authors. The concordance between the amount of correction on intraoperative fluoroscopy and minimum 6-week postoperative measurements was analyzed using the concordance correlation coefficient (rc) and a Bland-Altman analysis. Intra- and interrater reliability was calculated between measurements. RESULTS: The amount of intraoperative correction of LCEA as measured on fluoroscopic images demonstrated substantial agreement with postoperative radiographs (rc = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.85; p < 0.001) as did the AI (rc = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.84; p < 0.001). The mean difference between intraoperative correction was only -0.38° (SD 3.6°) for LCEA and -0.84° (SD 3.4°) for AI. Interrater reliability for both LCEA and AI also demonstrated substantial agreement (all, rc = 0.70-0.90) for preoperative, operative, and postoperative imaging. Furthermore, intrarater reliability for both LCEA and AI demonstrated almost perfect agreement for all measures (all, rc > 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is an accurate and reliable measure of correction of lateral coverage of the acetabular fragment during PAO. Further studies on measures of anterior coverage and acetabular version are needed to validate intraoperative fluoroscopic correction in these planes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Accuracy and Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With True Anatomic Femoral Version.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal torsion of the femur is correlated to lower extremity pathologies. Although computed tomography (CT) scan is the gold standard torsional measurement, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proposed as a viable alternative. Our aim was to determine the accuracy and consistency of MRI and CT femur rotational studies based on 4 described protocols. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric femora were stripped of soft tissue before imaging and physical assessment of torsion. Four advanced imaging series were obtained for each specimen: CT with axial cuts of the femoral neck (CT-axial); CT with oblique cuts of the femoral neck (CT-oblique); MRI with axial cuts of the femoral neck (MR-axial); MRI with oblique cuts of the femoral neck (MR-oblique). Anatomic specimens were placed with the posterior femoral condyles flat on a dissection table for assessment of true torsion with digital images. Three independent reviewers performed all measurements, including true torsion, using imaging software. Bland-Altman analysis was repeated with the data from each reviewer. RESULTS: Interobserver repeatability for all groups was high at 0.95, 0.87, 0.90, 0.97, and 0.92 for CT-axial, CT-oblique, MR-axial, MR-oblique, and true torsion, respectively. CT-axial had the lowest mean difference from clinical imaging for all three observers (all <1 degree) and held the tightest 95% limits of agreement for 2/3 observers. As torsion increases from neutral, MR-oblique linearly overestimates the rotation compared with true torsion. CT-oblique and MR-axial showed slightly greater differences from true torsion compared with CT-axial, but did not reach clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: CT-axial was both most accurate and reproducible when compared with true torsion of the femur and should be the gold standard imaging modality; however, both MR-axial and CT-oblique were accurate to a level that is likely less than clinical significance. MR-axial images should be used in clinical situations where radiation exposure needs to be limited. MR-oblique images can overestimate true antetorsion and should not be used. CLINIC SIGNIFICANCE: CT-axial followed by MRI-axial is the most accurate and consistent in measuring true torsion of the femur.

Failures and Reoperations After Matrix-Assisted Cartilage Repair of the Knee: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To quantify the reported failures and reoperations for the emerging technique of matrix-assisted cartilage repair at short-term and midterm follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of 3 databases from March 2004 to February 2014 using keywords important for articular cartilage repair. Two authors reviewed the articles, the study exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were determined to be relevant (or not) to the research question. All studies with a minimum of 2 years' clinical follow-up were reviewed for all reported reoperations. The reasons for reoperations were recorded. RESULTS: We reviewed 66 articles from the 301 articles identified in the original systematic search. There were 60 articles on matrix-assisted cartilage transplantation and 6 articles on matrix-induced chondrogenesis. The matrix-assisted cartilage transplantation studies reported on a total of 1,380 patients at 2 to 5 years' follow-up. Among these, there were 72 reoperations (5%) including 46 treatment failures (3%). These numbers increased to an 11% reoperation rate and 9% treatment failure rate at minimum 5-year follow-up of 961 patients. The most common procedures performed other than revision cartilage surgery or arthroplasty were manipulation under anesthesia for arthrofibrosis (0.7%) and debridement for graft hypertrophy (1.2%). The matrix-induced chondrogenesis studies reported on 163 patients. Among these, there were 15 reoperations (9%) that included 4 treatment failures (2%), 9 manipulations under anesthesia (6%), and 2 debridements for graft hypertrophy (1%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failure rates for matrix-assisted cartilage repair increase from short-term to midterm follow-up, with 11% of patients having undergone further surgery at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. These data can be used to counsel patients on the potential need for further operative intervention after this emerging cartilage repair technique.

Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee: Medial Closing Wedge Versus Lateral Opening Wedge: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the radiographic correction/healing rate, patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rate, and complication rate after distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) for the valgus knee with lateral compartment pathology. (2) To summarize the reported results of medial closing wedge and lateral opening wedge DFO. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL to identify studies reporting outcomes of DFOs for the valgus knee. Keywords included "distal femoral osteotomy," "chondral," "cartilage," "valgus," "joint restoration," "joint preservation," "arthritis," and "gonarthrosis." Two authors first reviewed the articles; our study exclusion criteria were then applied, and the articles were included on the basis relevance defined by the aforementioned criteria. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies scale judged the quality of the literature. Sixteen studies were relevant to the research questions out of 191 studies identified by the original search. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified reporting on 372 osteotomies with mean follow-up of 45 to 180 months. All studies reported mean radiographic correction to a near neutral mechanical axis, with 3.2% nonunion and 3.8% delayed union rates. There was a 9% complication rate and a 34% reoperation rate, of which 15% were converted to arthroplasty. There were similar results reported for medial closing wedge and lateral opening wedge techniques, with a higher conversion to arthroplasty in the medial closing wedge that was confounded by longer mean follow-up in this group (mean follow-up 100 v 58 months). CONCLUSIONS: DFOs for the valgus knee with lateral compartment disease provide improvements in patient-reported knee health-related quality of life at midterm follow-up but have high rates of reoperation. No evidence exists proving better results of either the lateral opening wedge or medial closing wedge techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress.

BACKGROUND: Patients with shoulder and rotator cuff pathology who exhibit greater levels of psychological distress report inferior preoperative self-assessments of pain and function. In several other areas of orthopaedics, higher levels of distress correlate with a higher likelihood of persistent pain and disability after recovery from surgery. To our knowledge, the relationship between psychological distress and outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has not been similarly investigated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with differences in outcome scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (2) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with less improvement in outcome scores (VAS for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (3) Does the prevalence of psychological distress in a population with full-thickness rotator cuff tears change when assessed preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? METHODS: Eighty-five patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled; 70 patients (82%) were assessed at 1-year followup. During the study period, the three participating surgeons performed 269 rotator cuff repairs; in large part, the low overall rate of enrollment was related to two surgeons enrolling only two patients total in the initial 14 months of the study. Psychological distress was quantified using the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire, and patients completed self-assessments including the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Fifty of 85 patients (59%) had normal levels of distress, 26 of 85 (31%) had moderate levels of distress, and nine of 85 (11%) had severe levels of distress. Statistical models were used to assess the effect of psychological distress on patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: With the numbers available, distressed patients were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of postoperative VAS for pain (1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.0-2.8] versus 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5-1.4], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (9 [95% CI, 8.1-10.4] versus 11 [95% CI, 10.0-11.0], p = 0.06), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (80 [95% CI, 72-88] versus 88 [95% CI, 84-92], p = 0.08) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. With the numbers available, distressed patients also were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of the amount of improvement in scores between preoperative assessment and 1-year followup on the VAS for pain (3 [95% CI, 2.2-4.1] versus 2 [95% CI, 1.4-2.9], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (5.2 [95% CI, 3.7-6.6] versus 5.0 [95% CI, 4.2-5.8], p = 0.86), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (38 [95% CI, 29-47] versus 30 [95% CI, 25-36], p = 0.16). The prevalence of psychological distress in our patient population was lower at 1 year after surgery 14 of 70 (20%) versus 35 of 85 (41%) preoperatively (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Mild to moderate levels of distress did not diminish patient-reported outcomes to a clinically important degree in this small series of patients with rotator cuff tears. This contrasts with reports from other areas of orthopaedic surgery and may be related to a more self-limited course of symptoms in patients with rotator cuff disease or possibly to a beneficial effect of rotator cuff repair on sleep quality or other unrecognized determinants of psychosocial status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study.

What is the effect of matrices on cartilage repair? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Articular cartilage has minimal endogenous ability to undergo repair. Multiple chondral restoration strategies have been attempted with varied results. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of our review was to determine: (1) Does articular chondrocyte transplantation or matrix-assisted articular chondrocyte transplantation provide better patient-reported outcomes scores, MRI morphologic measurements, or histologic quality of repair tissue compared with microfracture in prospective comparative studies of articular cartilage repair; and (2) which available matrices for matrix-assisted articular chondrocyte transplantation show the best patient-reported outcomes scores, MRI morphologic measurements, or histologic quality of repair tissue? METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from March 2004 to February 2014 using keywords determined to be important for articular cartilage repair, including "cartilage", "chondral", "cell source", "chondrocyte", "matrix", "augment", "articular", "joint", "repair", "treatment", "regeneration", and "restoration" to find articles related to cell-based articular cartilage repair of the knee. The articles were reviewed by two authors (JDW, MKH), our study exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were determined to be relevant (or not) to the research questions. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) scale was used to judge the quality of nonrandomized manuscripts used in this review and the Jadad score was used to judge the quality of randomized trials. Seventeen articles were reviewed for the first research question and 83 articles were reviewed in the second research question from 301 articles identified in the original systematic search. The average MINORS score was 9.9 (62%) for noncomparative studies and 16.1 (67%) for comparative studies. The average Jadad score was 2.3 for the randomized studies. RESULTS: Articular chondrocyte transplantation shows better patient-reported outcomes at 5 years in patients without chronic symptoms preoperatively compared with microfracture (p = 0.026). Matrix-assisted articular chondrocyte transplantation consistently showed improved patient-reported functional outcomes compared with microfracture (p values ranging from < 0.001 to 0.029). Hyalograft C(®) (Anika Therapeutics Inc, Bedford, MA, USA) and Chondro-gide(®) (Genzyme Biosurgery, Kastrup, Denmark) are the matrices with the most published evidence in the literature, but no studies comparing different matrices met our inclusion criteria, because the literature consists only of uncontrolled case series. CONCLUSIONS: Matrix-assisted articular chondrocyte transplantation leads to better patient-reported outcomes in cartilage repair compared with microfracture; however, future prospective research is needed comparing different matrices to determine which products optimize cartilage repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Arthroscopic treatment of mild to moderate deformity after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: intra-operative findings and functional outcomes.

PURPOSE: To identify intra-articular pathology during arthroscopic osteochondroplasty for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE)-related femoroacetabular impingement and determine functional outcomes after treatment. METHODS: Nine hips in 9 patients (6 male and 3 female patients; mean age, 17.5 years; age range, 13.5 to 26.9 years) underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement after in situ pinning of the SCFE. Medical records, radiographs, and intraoperative images were reviewed to determine the severity of disease and damage to the hip joints. For all patients, we obtained the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) preoperatively and at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively, as well as a Likert scale of perceived change in physical activity. RESULTS: All 9 treated patients had some degree of labral or acetabular cartilage injury at the time of arthroscopy, which was a mean of 58.6 months (range, 18 to 169 months) after in situ pinning. The alpha angle improved from 75° preoperatively to 46° postoperatively (P < .001). The mean follow-up period was 28.6 months (range, 12.6 to 55.6 months). The mean modified Harris Hip Score improved from 63.6 preoperatively to 91.4 postoperatively (P = .005). Similarly, the mean HOS activities-of-daily living scale improved from 70.2 to 93.3 (P = .010), and the HOS sports scale improved from 53.4 to 88.9 (P = .004). Most patients reported significant improvement on a physical-activity Likert scale, with 4 reporting much improved, 3 reporting improved, and 1 reporting slightly improved physical activity. One patient reported an unchanged activity level. No patients reported a worse activity level after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Post-SCFE cartilage and/or labral damage develops in patients with symptomatic mild to moderate SCFE deformity, and arthroscopic treatment improved functional outcomes in a small cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.