Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 592, 2019 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Norovirus (NoV) is recognized as a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) outbreaks in settings globally. Studies have shown that employees played an important role in the transmission mode during some NoV outbreaks. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of NoV infection and duration of NoV shedding among employees during NoV outbreaks, as well as factors affecting shedding duration. METHODS: Specimens and epidemiological data were collected from employees who were suspected of being involved in the transmission or with AGE symptoms during NoV outbreaks in Xuhui District, Shanghai, from 2015 to 2017. Specimens were detected using real-time RT-PCR to determine whether or not employees had become infected with NoV. Specimens were collected every 3-7 days from NoV-infected employees until specimens became negative for NoV. RESULTS: A total of 421 employees were sampled from 49 NoV outbreaks, and nearly 90% of them (377/421) were asymptomatic. Symptomatic employees showed significantly higher prevalence of NoV infection than asymptomatic ones (70.5% vs. 17.0%, P < 0.01). The average duration of NoV shedding was 6.9 days (95% confidence interval: 6.1-7.7 days) among 88 NoV-infected individuals, and was significantly longer in symptomatic individuals than in asymptomatic ones (9.8 days vs. 5.6 days, P < 0.01). In Cox proportional-hazards model, after adjusting age and gender, symptoms was the only factor associated with duration of NoV shedding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with asymptomatic employees, symptomatic employees had higher prevalence of NoV infection and longer durations of NoV shedding. Since NoV shedding duration among NoV-infected employees tends to be longer than their isolation time during outbreaks, reinforcement of hygiene practices among these employees is especially necessary to reduce the risk of virus secondary transmissions after their return to work.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Caliciviridae , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastroenteritis , Norovirus/genética , Adulto , Canal Anal/virología , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Caliciviridae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Caliciviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Caliciviridae/virología , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Gastroenteritis/diagnóstico , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , ARN Viral/análisis , ARN Viral/genética , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 89: 72-78, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31521857

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate varicella outbreak trends among schoolchildren during the voluntary single-dose varicella vaccine (VarV) era in Shanghai, China. METHODS: Trends in school varicella outbreaks from 2006 to 2017 were assessed using joinpoint regression models. The impacts of changes in single-dose VarV coverage among schoolchildren and implementation of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) strategies on outbreak trends were further analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 265 varicella outbreaks involving 3263 cases were reported in Shanghai from 2006 to 2017. The number of outbreaks showed an increasing trend from 2006 to 2017 (t=2.62, p=0.026), especially in kindergartens. The proportion of breakthrough varicella cases among all outbreak-related cases showed an increasing trend from 30.4% in 2008 to 85.7% in 2017 (t=7.45, p<0.001). Single-dose VarV coverage among schoolchildren was 88.1%, and showed a significant increase from the 1996 to the 2008 birth cohorts, followed by a non-significant decline from the 2008 to the 2014 birth cohorts. During school outbreaks in which PEP campaigns were conducted, the varicella attack rate was significantly lower than those in outbreaks without PEP campaigns (1.2% vs. 1.4%; Chi-square=23.35, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even with high coverage, single-dose VarV is insufficient to prevent school outbreaks. The administration of VarV as PEP is an appropriate intervention for varicella outbreak control prior to implementing a two-dose VarV schedule.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Varicela/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Adolescente , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/virología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , China/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Herpesvirus Humano 3/genética , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Incidencia , Masculino , Profilaxis Posexposición , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA