Pediatric minor head injury imaging practices: results from an ESPR survey.

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) for minor head injury exposes a large number of children to ionizing radiation, with an associated increased lifetime risk of malignancy. To study imaging practices for children with minor head injury and the level of awareness of radiologists of the current clinical decision rules for minor traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 17 questions was distributed electronically to 472 ESPR members. The questionnaire covered demographic information, employment status, years of experience and the current practice setting of the participants, the number of CTs performed for pediatric head trauma, awareness of clinical decision rules and use of shielding, pediatric CT protocol and MRI. RESULTS: The response rate was 18.4%. The majority of participants was aged over 50 years and was full-time consultants. Regarding decision rules, 73.8% of respondents cited the NICE head injury guidelines, and 79% reported that the decision to perform CT was agreed between specialists. Shielding was used by 58.3% and 67.4% applied a specific pediatric protocol. MRI was not used for pediatric head trauma by 70.6% of respondents, although always available in 68.6% of cases. The reported obstacles to MRI use were machine availability (42.7%), the long acquisition time (39%) and patients' intolerance (18.3%), and less frequently the cost and the need for sedation. CONCLUSION: There is room for decreasing the use of CT for pediatric minor TBI. The use of shielding and application of pediatric CT protocols constitute areas for improvement.

Diagnostic performance of diffusion and perfusion MRI in differentiating high from low-grade meningiomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present meta-analysis and systematic review was to evaluate the currently published data on the potential role of perfusion (PWI) and diffusion (DWI) weighted imaging for the assessment of meningioma grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and relative reference lists was conducted to identify all the eligible studies assessing the diagnostic performance of DWI and PWI in grading meningiomas. Meta-Disc and Rev-Man were used for the statistical analysis. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with the use of the updated Quality assessment of the diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated individually for DWI and PWI to demonstrate the diagnostic performance of each modality. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 1063 patients were included. The 8 studies evaluating DWI showed a pooled sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 74%-86%) and a pooled specificity of 76% (95% CI, 72%-79%). As for the 6 remaining studies concerning PWI, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were found 80% (95% CI, 71%-88%) and 91% (95% CI, 87%-94%), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI) for PWI and 0.91 (95% CI) for DWI. The comparison of the two AUCs showed that neither technique was superior with regards to the diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence proves that both techniques are efficient at differentiating high from low-grade meningiomas.