Does the presence of preoperative neck pain impact clinical outcomes after posterior decompression in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how preoperative neck pain influences clinical outcomes following posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SETTING: Fourteen medical institutions in Japan. METHODS: We enrolled 90 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for a minimum of two years. We collected demographic data, medical history, and imaging findings. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative neck pain presence (Pre-op. neck pain (-) and (+) groups), and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the Pre-op. neck pain (-) and (+) groups. Both groups showed similar distributions of ossification types and K-line positivity. Perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant differences in C2-7 angles or cervical range of motion, pre- and postoperatively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scores, but there were no significant differences in scores or recovery rates. In the Pre-op. neck pain (-) group, factors associated with appearance of postoperative neck pain included pre- and postoperative lower JOA scores and larger C2-7 angles in neutral and extension positions. CONCLUSIONS: It emerges that lower pre- and postoperative JOA scores or larger C2-7 angles in neutral and extension positions predispose to postoperative neck pain even in those patients without preoperative neck pain. Therefore, this is worth discussing at the time of consenting patients for surgical decompression and fixation.

Neurological recovery rate and predictive factors of incomplete AIS grade C spinal cord injury in the older aged population.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To define the prognosis and predictive factors for neurological improvement in older patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C (AIS-C). SETTINGS: Multi-institutions in Japan. METHODS: We included patients aged ≥65 years with traumatic SCI of AIS-C who were treated conservatively or surgically with >3 follow-up months. To identify factors related to neurological improvement, patients were divided into three groups according to their neurological status at the final follow-up, with univariate among-group comparisons of demographics, radiographic, and therapeutic factors. Significant variables were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 296 older patients with SCI of AIS-C on admission were identified (average age: 75.2 years, average follow-up: 18.7 months). Among them, 190 (64.2%) patients improved to AIS-D and 21 (7.1%) patients improved to AIS-E at final follow-up. There were significant among-group differences in age (p = 0.026), body mass index (p = 0.007), status of pre-traumatic activities of daily living (ADL) (p = 0.037), and serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.011). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in variables in the stratified group of patients who improved to AIS-D. Meanwhile, serum albumin was a significant variable in patients who improved to AIS-E (p = 0.026; OR: 6.20, pre-traumatic ADL was omitted due to data skewness). CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients with incomplete AIS-C SCI demonstrated at least 1 grade of neurological improvement. However, <10% of patients achieved complete recovery. Key predictors of complete recovery were high serum albumin levels on admission and independent pre-traumatic ADL. SPONSORSHIP: No funding was received for this study.

Influence of the timing of surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury in the elderly: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of early surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), the appropriate surgical timing for cervical SCIs (CSCIs) without bone injury remains controversial. Here, we investigated the influence of relatively early surgery within 48 h of injury on the neurological recovery of elderly patients with CSCI and no bone injury. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we reviewed data from 159 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with CSCI without bone injury who underwent surgery in participating centers between 2010 and 2020. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months following CSCI. We divided patients into relatively early (≤48 h after CSCI, n = 24) and late surgery (>48 h after CSCI, n = 135) groups, and baseline characteristics and neurological outcomes were compared between them. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with neurological recovery. RESULTS: The relatively early surgery group demonstrated a lower prevalence of cardiac disease, poorer baseline American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade, and lower baseline ASIA motor score (AMS) than those of the late surgery group (P < 0.030, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Although the AMS was lower in the relatively early surgery group at 6 months following injury (P = 0.001), greater improvement in this score from baseline to 6-months post injury was observed (P = 0.010). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that relatively early surgery did not affect postoperative improvement in AMS, rather, lower baseline AMS was associated with better AMS improvement (P < 0.001). Delirium (P = 0.006), pneumonia (P = 0.030), and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.039) negatively influenced postoperative improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation by future studies is required, relatively early surgery did not show a positive influence on neurological recovery after CSCI without bone injury in the elderly.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of posterior surgeries between cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes and complications of posterior decompression between individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SETTING: Seventeen medical institutions in Japan. METHODS: This study included 814 individuals with CSM (n = 636) and OPLL (n = 178) who underwent posterior decompression. Propensity score matching of the baseline characteristics was performed to compare surgical outcomes and perioperative complications between the CSM and OPLL groups. RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the OPLL group had higher percentage of male individuals, body mass index, and number of stenosis levels and longer duration of symptoms (P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). After matching, the baseline characteristics were comparable between the CSM (n = 98) and OPLL (n = 98) groups. The postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, preoperative-to-postoperative changes in the JOA scores, and JOA score recovery rates were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.42, P = 0.47, and P = 0.09, respectively). The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain and preoperative-to-postoperative changes in the VAS score for neck pain were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.25 and P = 0.50, respectively). The incidence of perioperative complications was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Neurological improvement and complication rates after surgery were comparable between individuals with CSM and those with OPLL, suggesting similar effectiveness and safety of posterior decompression for both conditions.

Does surgery improve neurological outcomes in older individuals with cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury? A multicenter study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the neurological outcomes of older individuals treated with surgery versus conservative treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone injury. SETTING: Thirty-three medical institutions in Japan. METHODS: This study included 317 consecutive persons aged ≥65 years with CSCI without bone injury in participating institutes between 2010 and 2020. The participants were followed up for at least 6 months after the injury. Individuals were divided into surgery (n = 114) and conservative treatment (n = 203) groups. To compare neurological outcomes and complications between the groups, propensity score matching of the baseline factors (characteristics, comorbidities, and neurological function) was performed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the surgery and conservative treatment groups comprised 89 individuals each. Surgery was performed at a median of 9.0 (3-17) days after CSCI. Baseline factors were comparable between groups, and the standardized difference in the covariates in the matched cohort was <10%. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade and ASIA motor score (AMS) 6 months after injury and changes in the AMS from baseline to 6 months after injury were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.63, P = 0.24, and P = 0.75, respectively). Few participants who underwent surgery demonstrated perioperative complications such as dural tear (1.1%), surgical site infection (2.2%), and C5 palsy (5.6%). CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is suggested to be a more favorable option for older individuals with CSCI without bone injuries, but this finding requires further validation.

Rare case of real-time observation of paralytic deterioration after cervical dislocation in the hyperacute phase.

BACKGROUND: There have been no prior reports of real-time detailed records leading to complete quadriplegia immediately after fracture dislocation in high-energy trauma. Here, we report a case of cervical dislocation in which the deterioration to complete motor paralysis (modified Frankel B1) and complete recovery (Frankel E) could be monitored in real time after reduction in the hyperacute phase. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man was involved in a car accident and sustained a dislocation at the C5/6 level (Allen-Ferguson classification: distractive flexion injury stage IV). His paralysis gradually deteriorated from Frankel D to C 2 hours after the injury and from Frankl C to B 5 hours after the injury. His final neurological status immediately before reduction was Frankel B1 (complete motor paralysis with sensation only in the perianal region). Reduction was completed within 6 h and 5 min after injury, and spinal fusion was subsequently performed. The patient exhibited rapid motor recovery immediately after surgery, and was able to walk independently on postoperative day 14. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that there is a mixture of cases in which the spinal cord has not been catastrophically damaged, even if the patient has complete motor paralysis. Prompt reduction has the potential to improve neurological function in such cases.

Baseline severity of myelopathy predicts neurological outcomes after posterior decompression surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To identify the usefulness of the baseline severity of myelopathy for predicting surgical outcomes for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SETTING: Seventeen institutions in Japan. METHODS: This study included 675 persons with CSM who underwent posterior decompression. According to baseline severity, the individuals were divided into the mild (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score ≥ 14.5), moderate (JOA score = 10.5-14), and severe (JOA score ≤ 10) groups. Surgical outcomes and clinical variables were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model for unsatisfactory symptom state (postoperative JOA score ≤ 14, residual moderate or severe myelopathy). RESULTS: The mean (±standard deviation) age was 67 ± 12 years. The participants in the severe group were older than those in the mild group. Postoperative JOA scores were higher in the mild group than in the severe group. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, the prediction model included preoperative JOA scores (odds ratio [OR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.67) and age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08). On the basis of the model, a representative combination of the thresholds to maximize the value of "sensitivity - (1 - specificity)" demonstrated a preoperative JOA score of 11.5 as a predictor of postoperative unsatisfactory symptom state in people around the mean age of the study cohort (67 years). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the baseline severity of myelopathy and age can predict postoperative symptom states after posterior decompression surgery for CSM.

Analysis of the impact of spinopelvic radiographic parameters on the severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: The correlation between spinal radiographic parameters and severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the associations between spinal radiographic parameters and CSM severity, as well as between cervical and other spinopelvic radiographic parameters. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CSM (N = 118; 77 men) at our hospital from March 2013 to February 2017 were included. The patients' demographic data and the following radiographic parameters were investigated: cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA), T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Cervical cord compression ratio (CCCR) was evaluated on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system was used for clinical evaluation. Correlation analyses were performed among the clinical and radiographic parameters. RESULTS: The JOA score had the strongest correlation with SVA (r = -0.46, p < 0.01), followed by CCCR (r = -0.33, p < 0.01), CL (r = -0.29, p < 0.01), T1 slope (r = -0.29, p = 0.01), and C2-C7 SVA (r = -0.20, p = 0.03). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a model predicting the JOA score; JOA = 13.6 - 0.24 × SVA - 4.2 × CCCR (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Although there was no significant correlation between the cervical and lumbopelvic radiographic parameters, the sequential correlation among the investigated spinopelvic parameters was identified. CONCLUSIONS: CSM severity worsened with spinal malalignment, such as a larger SVA. Though lumbopelvic radiographic parameters did not significantly impact cervical alignment and CSM severity, the sequential correlations among cervical-thoracic-lumbopelvic radiographic parameters were observed. Therefore, SVA is the most relevant radiographic parameter for CSM, but we cannot preclude the possibility that lumbopelvic alignment also affects cervical alignment and CSM severity.

Extremely high preoperative C7 slope limits compensatory cervical lordosis after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy.

PURPOSE: A high C7 slope induces C2-C7 lordosis to compensate for cervical sagittal balance adjustments. A muscle-preserving selective laminectomy (SL) can maintain this compensation postoperatively. This study evaluated the effect of an extremely high C7 slope on C2-C7 lordotic compensation following SL. METHODS: This study enrolled 151 cervical compressive myelopathy patients who underwent SL. Lateral cervical spine radiographs were taken before surgery and during final follow-up. Patients were divided into extremely high C7 slope (≥ 30°) (EH) and non-high C7 slope (< 30°) (NH) groups and the influence of a high C7 slope on radiological and surgical outcomes was examined. RESULTS: Mean age was higher in group EH (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, patients in group EH had a larger C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p = 0.001) and greater cervical lordosis (p < 0.001). Although C2-C7 SVA increased after surgery, mean C2-C7 angle of group EH decreased. Mismatches between C7 slope and C2-C7 angle increased for group EH postoperatively (p = 0.015). Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (RR) were slightly lower in group EH (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that extremely high C7 slope, not age, affected the RR of JOA score (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in group EH were older and had highly compensated cervical sagittal alignment preoperatively. They demonstrated postoperative cervical sagittal balance mismatch increases and slightly worse functional recovery. An extremely high C7 slope limited compensatory cervical lordosis following SL. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of late decompression surgery for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) with pre-existing cord compression. SETTING: Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo, Japan. METHODS: In total 78 patients with traumatic CSCI without bone injury hospitalized in 2012-2015 in our institute for rehabilitation after initial emergency care were divided into four groups according to the compression rate (CR) of the injured level and whether or not decompression surgery was performed. Neurological status was evaluated by American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), Barthel index, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). RESULTS: In the severe compression group (CR ≥ 40%), >2 grade improvement in the AIS was observed in 30% of patients with surgical treatment, although it was not observed in any patient without surgery. The SCIM improvement rate at discharge was 60% in the surgical treatment group and 20% in the non-surgical treatment group. In the minor compression group (CR < 40%), >2 grade improvement in the AIS was observed in 18% of patients with surgical treatment and in 11% without surgery. The SCIM improvement rate at discharge was 52% in the surgical treatment group and 43% in the non-surgical treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that surgical treatment has an advantage for patients following traumatic CSCI with severe cord compression. In contrast, surgical efficacy is not proved for CSCI patients without severe cord compression.