A phase I study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of contezolid acefosamil after intravenous and oral administration in healthy Chinese subjects.

Contezolid acefosamil (also known as MRX-4), a prodrug of contezolid, is under development for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. A phase I single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-dose placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of contezolid acefosamil in healthy Chinese subjects following intravenous (IV) and oral administration. Adverse events (AEs) and PK parameters were assessed appropriately. All subjects (n = 70) completed the trial. Overall, 67 cases of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 49.1% (27 of 55) of the subjects receiving contezolid acefosamil. All TEAEs were mild in severity. No serious AEs or deaths were reported. After IV SAD (500-2,000 mg), the corresponding C max of the active drug contezolid increased from 1.95 ± 0.57 to 15.61 ± 4.88 mg/L, AUC0-inf from 40.25 ± 10.12 to 129.41 ± 38.30 h·mg/L, median T max from 2.00 to 2.75 h, and mean t 1/2 from 13.33 to 16.74 h. Plasma contezolid reached steady state on day 6 after multiple IV doses, with an accumulation ratio of 2.20-2.96. Oral SAD of 500 and 1,500 mg resulted in contezolid C max of 8.66 ± 2.60 and 37.10 ± 8.66 mg/L, AUC0-inf of 30.44 ± 7.33 and 162.36 ± 47.08 h·mg/L, and median T max of 2.50 and 2.98 h. Contezolid reached steady state on day 5 after multiple oral doses of 1,500 mg without significant accumulation. Contezolid C max and AUC0-inf increased with the dose of contezolid acefosamil. The good safety and PK profiles in this SAD and multiple-dose study can support further clinical development of contezolid acefosamil.

Dose adjustment not required for contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

Objective: Contezolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent newly approved for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. It is primarily metabolized by the liver. This study aimed to assess whether it is required to adjust the dose of contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment for clinicians to use the drug more rationally. Methods: A single-center, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of contezolid and its metabolite M2 between the patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls with normal liver function after oral administration of 800 mg contezolid tablets. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of contezolid based on the PK and pharmacodynamic data. Results: Oral treatment with 800 mg contezolid tablets was safe and well tolerated in both the patients with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls. Moderate hepatic impairment did not result in substantial difference in the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h, 106.79 vs. 97.07 h µg/mL) of contezolid even though lower maximum concentration (Cmax, 19.03 vs. 34.49 µg/mL) compared with healthy controls. The mean cumulative amount excreted in urine from 0 to 48 h (Ae0-48h) and renal clearance (CLR) of contezolid did not show significant difference between the two groups. Moderate hepatic impairment was associated with lower Cmax, slightly lower AUC and Ae0-48h of M2 compared to the healthy controls. fAUC/MIC was the best PK/PD index to predict the clinical efficacy of contezolid. Monte Carlo simulation results indicated that at the proposed fAUC/MIC target value of 2.3, the dosing regimen of oral contezolid 800 mg q12h could achieve satisfactory PTA and CFR (both >90%) for the target pathogen (methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MIC ≤4 mg/L) in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggest that dose adjustment is not required for contezolid in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. Clinical Trial Registration: https://chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier: CTR20171377.

Effect of Chinese patent medicine Si-Mo-Tang oral liquid for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Si-Mo-Tang oral liquid (SMT) has been widely used to treat functional dyspepsia (FD), but the effectiveness is still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of SMT for FD. METHODS: Investigators searched for articles with publication dates to June 21, 2016, from 9 English and Chinese electronic databases. Comparisons were SMT alone or SMT in combination with western medicine as experimental intervention, and western medicine or placebo as the control. We used the Cochrane collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias to evaluate methodologies. Data were synthesized with RevMan 5.3 software. (PROSPERO Registration #CRD42016042003). RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs were included in the review, involving 2,713 participants: 1,383 subjects were in the experimental group and 1,330 in the control group. SMT showed a significant improvement in clinical efficacy (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09, 1.20; P<0.00001), but the heterogeneity was also significant (P = 0.0002, I2 = 56%). Because of the different interventions in the 2 groups, we performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. The heterogeneity was smaller after subgroup analysis and the exclusion of a study by Zhu from 2009. The corresponding pooled RR has no obvious change (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.13, 1.21; P<0.00001). Subgroup analysis by age and drugs administered in control interventions between SMT and western medicine also showed improvement in the efficacy rate. But a data synthesis that excluded high risk of bias in the blinding of participants and personnel showed no significant difference (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.97, 1.35; P = 0.12). Three studies measured gastric emptying. Two of these studies reported no significant difference between the experimental and control groups, while 1 study showed that SMT reduced the time of gastric emptying. The relapse rate and adverse effects had no difference between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that SMT is an effective and safe therapy option for patients with FD. However, because of the high clinical heterogeneity, poor quality, high risk of bias and small sample size of some included studies, further standardized large-scale and strictly designed studies are needed.