Laparoscopic Anatomic Bi-segmentectomy (S5 and S6) Using Takasaki's Approach and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation.

BACKGROUND: To date, most laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy practices have been performed vertically, such as the resection of segments 6 and 7, segments 5 and 8, and segments 2 and 3;1-3 however, transversal hepatectomy may be more appropriate for certain lesions that are located in a specific area.4,5 Herein, we present a video of a pure laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy (S5 and S6) using Takasaki's approach and indocyanine green fluorescence navigation. METHOD: A 58-year-old male with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was admitted to our institution. The preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed a 5 × 4 cm tumor located between segments 5 and 6. Right hepatectomy was not adopted because of severe cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Therefore, laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy (5 and 6) was planned. After cholecystectomy, G5 and G6 were dissected and ligated using Takasaki's Glissonean pedicle approach.6 The ischemic line then appeared on the liver surface. An intraoperative ultrasound was used to confirm that the tumor was within the ischemic line. Afterwards, intraoperative fluorescence navigation (negative stained) was performed to detect the demarcation line and guide the transection of liver parenchymal. RESULTS: The operative time was 225 min and the estimated blood loss was 150 mL. The total Pringle time was 75 min. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of HCC and the surgical margin was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anatomic bi-segmentectomy (S5 and S6) is technically feasible and safe, which may be a beneficial alternative to formal right hepatectomy in some cases.

Caudo-dorsal approach combined with the occlusion of right hepatic vein and Pringle maneuver in laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment 7.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomical resection of segment 7 (LARS7) remains a technically challenging procedure due to the deep anatomical location and the potential risk of injury to the right hepatic vein (RHV). Herein, we initiated an innovative technique of caudo-dorsal approach combined with the occlusion of the RHV and Pringle maneuver for LARS7 and presented the outcomes of our initial series. METHOD: Since January 2021, the patients who underwent LARS7 by using this novel technique were enrolled in this study. The critical aspect of this technique was the interruption of communication between the RHV and the inferior vena cava. Meanwhile, the Pringle maneuver was adopted to control the hepatic inflow. RESULT: A total of 11 patients underwent LARS7 by using this novel technique, which included 8 hepatocellular carcinoma, 2 bile duct adenocarcinoma and one focal nodular hyperplasia. The median operative time was 199 min (range of 151-318 min) and the median blood loss was 150 ml (range of 50-200 ml). The main trunk of the RHV was fully exposed on the cutting surface in all cases and no patient received perioperative blood transfusion. No procedure was converted to open surgery. Of note, no indications of CO2 gas embolism were observed in these cases after the introduction of double occlusion. Only one patient suffered from postoperative complications and healed after treatment. The median postoperative stay was 5 days (range of 4-7 days). The 90-day mortality was nil. At a median follow-up period of 19 months, all of the patients were alive without any evidence of tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: The caudo-dorsal approach combined with the occlusion of RHV and the Pringle maneuver may be a feasible and expected technique for safe exposure of RHV in LARS7. Further validation of the feasibility and efficacy of this technique is needed.

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive hepatectomy for difficult lesions located in posterosuperior segments (segments I, IVa, VII and VIII) remains challenging. The value of robotic liver resection (RLR) compared with laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for posterosuperior segments is controversial. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to validate the safety and efficacy of RLR in posterosuperior segments. METHODS: The Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to identify available research published up to October 2023. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan software version 5.3. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 2289 patients (RLR: n = 749; LLR: n = 1540) were included in this meta-analysis. The RLR group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = -119.54 ml, 95% CI: -178.89 to -60.19, P < 0.0001), fewer blood transfusions (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.80, P = 0.001), a lower conversion rate (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.61, P < 0.0001), and a shorter operative time (WMD = -27.16 min, 95% CI: -35.95 to -18.36, P < 0.00001). DISCUSSION: Compared with LLR, RLR for lesions in the posterosuperior segments could be safe and effective, and it has superior surgical outcomes.