A potentially neuroprotective role for erythropoietin with paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer patients: a prospective phase II GINECO trial.

PURPOSE: A prospective phase II multicenter study was performed in two steps in paclitaxel-treated ovarian cancer patients in France. A French version of the four-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire was validated. This was then used to evaluate neurotoxicity in relation to erythropoietin treatment. METHODS: Patients received standard second-line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and erythropoietin for anemia. Neurotoxicity and hemoglobin levels were evaluated every cycle with the FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE. The translated questionnaire was tested in 20 patients to confirm the translation accuracy. The final questionnaire was validated in 98 patients with internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient) and item correlation (Pearson's r coefficient) tests. Neurotoxicity severity was analyzed according to erythropoietin intake (first three cycles versus no or late intake) and correlated with anemia. RESULTS: Patients received a median of six paclitaxel cycles (range 1-9). Neurotoxicity was validated in 484 questionnaires. Internal consistency was excellent with Cronbach's coefficients of ≥0.89 at inclusion, after 3 cycles and at study end. Inter-question correlation was high with Pearson's coefficients of 0.65-0.85. FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE severity scoring was similar. Globally, the incidence of severe neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx and NCI-CTCAE) was found significantly higher in patients with severe anemia. Of 98 evaluable patients, 31 received erythropoietin during the first three cycles. Mean hemoglobin level was significantly lower in this group from baseline to cycle 4; however, these anemic patients with early EPO intake did not develop an increase rate of severe neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The French FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. This study raises the possibility that erythropoietin might play a neuroprotective role when administered with paclitaxel.

Everolimus-induced pulmonary toxicity: Findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

The everolimus-exemestane combination is indicated in advanced breast cancer treatment and usually well tolerated. The objective of the study was to determine the frequency of everolimus lung side effects and investigate their imaging characteristics on positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose combined with computerized tomography (F-FDG PET/CT).Our single-center retrospective descriptive study systematically included all patients with metastatic breast cancer treated by this combination (n = 29 representing 57 F-FDG PET/CT). Number of segments involved was quantified. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic target volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Severe pneumopathy was studied by subgroup analysis.Pleuroparenchymal anomalies rate detected on F-FDG PET/CT was 62%. Alveolar-interstitial lesions were mainly observed (89%) and affected 2.8 segments (0.5-11.5) with a median of 2 segments. S7 and S10 were the most involved segments with SUVmax 3.9 (1.3-8.8) and SUVmean 2.2 (0.7-4.9). Statistically significant difference (P = .02) was found with number of segment involved to characterize severe pneumopathy (average of 6.3 segments [2.5-11.5] vs 1.9 segments [0.5-8] for interstitial lung disease) but not with SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG (P = .14, 0.22, 0.22, and 0.17, respectively).The F-FDG PET/CT could highlight pulmonary everolimus side effects, with a typical imaging pattern: alveolar-interstitial opacities associated with moderate uptake, more or less extensive, mainly affecting the lower lobes. Rarely, a pseudotumoral aspect may be detected, corresponding to a pitfall. MTV or TLG showed a tendency to differentiate severe pneumopathy vs interstitial lung disease but no statistically significant differences was observed contrarily to the number of segments involved. Further studies are necessary to determine if the F-FDG PET/CT could early predict adverse effects of mTOR inhibitors.

[Granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) use in clinical practice in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer: The Opaline Study]. / Description des modalités pratiques de prescription d'un facteur de croissance de la lignée granulocytaire (G-CSF) chez les patientes recevant une chimiothérapie pour un cancer du sein : étude Opaline.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the French routine use of G-CSF in patients treated for breast cancer as per the EORTC recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter observational study conducted between February 2008 and September 2009 in 869 breast cancer patients treated by chemotherapy (CT) and for whom G-CSF treatment will be delivered in primary (PP) or secondary prophylaxis. RESULTS: The mean age was 55 years. A total of 80.3% of CT was in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting (NAS). PP was delivered in 78.9% of the NAS patients and 67.5% in metastatic situation. Of the 702 evaluable patients, incidences of severe (SN) and febrile neutropenias (FN) in patients who received PP were 9.3% and 4.2%, respectively. In patients who did not received G-CSF at first cycle, SN and FN were 12.4% and 7.3%, respectively. The use of PP was mainly driven by the type of CT for patients treated in the NAS and by patient or disease related risk factors in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that the use of G-CSF was in accordance with the 2010 updates of the EORTC recommendations. However, G-CSF appears more widely used in the routine practice.

Granocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has significant efficacy as secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumors: results of a prospective study.

AIM: To carry out a prospective, multicenter and observational study describing prophylactic strategies [cycle delay, dose-reduction, (G-CSF) prescription] to prevent recurrence of neutropenic events (NE) in patients with solid tumors, and identify potential predictive factors of NE recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with an NE in a previous chemotherapy cycle (cycle A) without G-CSF support, followed for four cycles (B to E) were included in the study. NE was defined as any neutropenia grade 1-4, febrile or not, which impacted on subsequent chemotherapy cycles (cycle delay, or reduction, or prophylactic G-CSF). RESULTS: Data of 548 patients were analyzed, 378 (69%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 61.7 (12.3) years. WHO PS: 0-1: 88.3%, incidence of breast cancer: 40%, metastatic disease: 53.3%. Following the first NE episode, 44.5% of patients had cycle delay, 22.3% dose reduction and 466 (85%) received prophylactic G-CSF. NE recurrence rates were: 21.2% at cycle B, 18.6% at cycle C, 11.5% at cycle D and 12.9% at cycle E. G-CSF support (hazard ratio: 0.32, 0.24-0.43, p<0.001) was associated with lower NE recurrence. Pegfilgrastim seemed to offer the highest protection (hazard ratio; HR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.32; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Secondary G-CSF prophylaxis has significant efficacy in reducing the incidence of NE and should be considered as a valuable option.