Effects of Bedtime Dosing With Suvorexant and Zolpidem on Balance and Psychomotor Performance in Healthy Elderly Participants During the Night and in the Morning.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: This study was designed as an early assessment of the safety of the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant, but also included exploratory assessments of balance and psychomotor performance that are the focus of this report. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This was a double-blind, randomized, 3-period, crossover, phase 1 study. Balance and psychomotor performance were evaluated during the night in 12 healthy elderly participants after bedtime administration of suvorexant 30 mg (a supratherapeutic dose), the GABAergic agonist zolpidem 5 mg (the recommended dose in the elderly), or placebo. Balance (body sway measured by platform stability) and psychomotor performance (measured by choice reaction time) were assessed predose and at 1.5, 4, and 8 hours postdose in each period. Memory (measured by word recall) was assessed predose and at 4 hours postdose. FINDINGS/RESULTS: At 1.5 hours after nighttime administration of each drug (the approximate time of their anticipated maximal plasma concentrations), both zolpidem and suvorexant increased body sway versus placebo, with a greater increase for zolpidem than suvorexant. Suvorexant increased choice reaction time compared with placebo or zolpidem at 1.5 hours. There were no treatment differences on body sway or choice reaction time at 4 or 8 hours, or on word recall at 4 hours. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory data suggest that a 30-mg dose of suvorexant (supratherapeutic) and a 5-mg dose of zolpidem (recommended dose in the elderly) impaired balance at 1.5 hours in healthy elderly people, with potentially less impairment for suvorexant relative to zolpidem, but no treatment differences on body sway or psychomotor performance at 4 and 8 hours. Because of their exploratory nature, these findings and their clinical relevance, if any, require confirmation in a prospective study.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis To Evaluate a Switch to Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in People Living with HIV-1.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for treatment-naive participants in doravirine clinical studies was updated with data from switch participants in the DRIVE-SHIFT trial and used to estimate individual post hoc PK parameter values and evaluate the efficacy exposure-response relationship. The results support the 100-mg dose for people living with HIV switching to a doravirine-based regimen (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT02397096.).

Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of long-acting parenteral intramuscular injection formulations of doravirine.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection. This phase 1 study in healthy adults investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of long-acting parenteral (LAP) microsuspension formulations of doravirine administered as an intramuscular (IM) injection. METHODS: After confirmation of tolerability and safety of oral doravirine, 36 participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive IM doravirine 200 mg as Treatment A (1 × 1 mL, 20% [200 mg/mL] suspension), B (1 × 0.66 mL, 30% [300 mg/mL] suspension) or C (2 × 0.5 mL, 20% suspension). Blood samples were taken as venous plasma, venous dried blood spots (DBS) and fingerstick DBS. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Plasma concentration-time profiles following IM treatments demonstrated rapid initial doravirine release, with initial peak ~4 days post-injection, followed by decline over the next ~6 days; a second peak was reached at ~24-36 days, corresponding to prolonged and sustained release, with measurable concentrations up to Day 183. Treatment C was associated with highest peak concentrations and shortest time to maximum concentration. Elimination half-lives for all IM formulations were prolonged versus oral administration (~46-58 days vs ~11-15 hours). Oral doravirine and IM doravirine were generally well tolerated; injection-site pain was the most common adverse event for IM doravirine. Doravirine concentrations from DBS samples showed strong correlations to venous plasma concentrations. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Novel doravirine LAP IM injection formulations investigated in this study demonstrated sustained plasma doravirine concentrations over a course of >20 weeks.

A time-to-event analysis of the exposure-response relationship for bezlotoxumab concentrations and CDI recurrence.

Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). In a previous exposure-response (E-R) analysis of bezlotoxumab exposure and rCDI, based on data from two phase 3 trials in participants who received placebo or bezlotoxumab 10 mg/kg, rCDI was treated as a binary endpoint and discontinued subjects were imputed as not having rCDI, resulting in an apparent positive E-R trend between rCDI rates and bezlotoxumab exposure. Therefore, a time-to-event (TTE) analysis was applied to investigate the E-R relationship, accounting for the time to rCDI occurrence and participant discontinuation. A TTE model, applying a time-dependent hazard function and right-censoring of data based on rCDI, discontinuation, or study end was developed. Exposure effects and covariates effects were evaluated as predictors affecting the hazard. The TTE model consisted of a Gompertz function with age, endogenous immunoglobulin G to C. difficile toxin B (IgG-B), history of CDI, hospitalization, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and concomitant use of systemic antibiotics affecting the hazard. Exposure effects were characterized with a maximum effect (Emax) E-R relationship on the baseline parameter, and bezlotoxumab exposures achieved at the 10 mg/kg dose were found to be on the plateau of the E-R curve. Endogenous IgG-B significantly impacted the Emax, indicating that low-titer participants derive a greater benefit from bezlotoxumab treatment compared with high-titer participants. The results support the conclusions of the previous E-R analysis, where exposures achieved at the 10 mg/kg dose are on the plateau of the E-R curve.

Comparative Bioavailability of Oral Granule Formulations of the HIV Antiretroviral Drugs Doravirine, Lamivudine, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection, available as a single tablet in combination with other antiretroviral agents or as a fixed-dose regimen with lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Alternative formulations of these drugs are being developed for individuals who have difficulty swallowing tablets. Two phase 1 trials were conducted, both in 24 healthy adults, to assess the pharmacokinetics of uncoated and coated oral granule formulations of doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF administered alone and with vanilla pudding or apple sauce. The pharmacokinetics for all uncoated granules, and of coated lamivudine and TDF granules, were similar to those of currently marketed tablets (geometric mean ratios [GMRs] 0.92-1.04). Coated doravirine granules had decreased AUC0-∞ (11%) and Cmax (23%) values versus the tablet. The pharmacokinetics were similar for uncoated and coated doravirine granules administered with or without pudding (GMRs 0.96-1.10); administration with apple sauce increased doravirine AUC0-∞ (26-29%), Cmax (56-59%), and C24 (20-21%) versus administration of granules alone. Lamivudine granules administered with pudding or apple sauce decreased AUC0-∞ and Cmax (14-25%) versus granules alone. Tenofovir AUC0-∞, Cmax, and C24 increased for TDF granules administered with pudding or apple sauce versus alone (11-23%). Pharmacokinetic differences when administering doravirine, lamivudine, or TDF as uncoated or coated granules versus tablets, or when granules were administered with (versus without) pudding or apple sauce, are not considered clinically meaningful, supporting further development of these granule formulations.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Doravirine and Exposure-Response Analysis in Individuals with HIV-1.

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for doravirine using pooled data from densely sampled phase 1 trials and from sparsely sampled phase 2b and phase 3 trials evaluating doravirine administered orally as a single entity or as part of a fixed-dose combination of doravirine-lamivudine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. A one-compartment model with linear clearance from the central compartment adequately described the clinical PK of doravirine. While weight, age, and healthy versus HIV-1 status were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting doravirine PK, the magnitude of their effects was not clinically meaningful. Other intrinsic factors (gender, body mass index, race, ethnicity, and renal function) did not have statistically significant or clinically meaningful effects on doravirine PK. Individual exposure estimates for individuals in the phase 2b and 3 trials obtained from the final model were used for subsequent exposure-response analyses for virologic response (proportion of individuals achieving <50 copies/ml) and virologic failure. The exposure-response relationships between these efficacy endpoints and doravirine PK were generally flat over the range of exposures achieved for the 100 mg once-daily regimen in the phase 3 trials, with a minimal decrease in efficacy in individuals in the lowest 10th percentile of steady-state doravirine concentration at 24 h values. These findings support 100 mg once daily as the selected dose of doravirine, with no dose adjustment warranted for the studied intrinsic factors.

Doravirine exposure and HIV-1 suppression after switching from an efavirenz-based regimen to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1. In a phase 1 trial, doravirine exposure was transiently decreased when treatment was started immediately after stopping efavirenz. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of participants who switched from an efavirenz-based regimen to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the phase 3 DRIVE-SHIFT trial, doravirine plasma levels at week 4 were similar to non-induced levels, and HIV-1 suppression was maintained at weeks 24 and 48.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bezlotoxumab in Adults with Primary and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.

The fully human monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab is indicated for preventing the recurrence of Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infection (CDI) in adults who receive antibacterial treatment for CDI and who are at high risk for a CDI recurrence. The efficacy and safety of 10-mg/kg of body weight bezlotoxumab were demonstrated in two phase 3 trials: the MODIFY I (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01241552) and MODIFY II (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01513239) trials. Here, a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis, performed using data from the MODIFY I and II trials (n = 1,515) and from three phase 1 trials (n = 72) to characterize bezlotoxumab pharmacokinetics (PK) in phase 3 clinical trial participants and in healthy subjects, is reported. A stepwise covariate search was conducted to identify factors influencing PK. Post hoc-estimated bezlotoxumab exposures from the popPK model were used to conduct an exposure-response analysis for CDI recurrence. Bezlotoxumab PK were described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination and allometric scaling for clearance and the volume of distribution by body weight. Although the final popPK model included gender, ethnicity (Japanese descent), race (black versus nonblack), and albumin level as significant covariates, the impact of these factors was not clinically meaningful, based on the totality of the PK and clinical experience. Exposure-response analysis of CDI recurrence demonstrated a similar low rate of CDI recurrence over the entire range of exposures achieved in the phase 3 trials, indicating that exposures were on the maximal response plateau of the exposure-response curve. Overall, the analyses confirmed the appropriateness of the 10-mg/kg dose across the phase 3 trial population with no dose adjustments necessary over a broad demographic background.

Investigation of Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Doravirine and Elbasvir-Grazoprevir and Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir.

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Due to the high prevalence of HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and coadministration of HIV-1 and HCV treatment, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between doravirine and two HCV treatments were investigated in two phase 1 drug interaction trials in healthy participants. Trial 1 investigated the effect of multiple-dose doravirine and elbasvir + grazoprevir coadministration (N = 12), and trial 2 investigated the effect of single-dose doravirine and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir coadministration (N = 14). Doravirine had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of elbasvir, grazoprevir, ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, or the sofosbuvir metabolite GS-331007. Coadministration of elbasvir + grazoprevir with doravirine moderately increased doravirine area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24), maximal concentration (Cmax), and concentration 24 h postdose (C24), with geometric least-squares mean ratio (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals (CI) of 1.56 (1.45, 1.68), 1.41 (1.25, 1.58), and 1.61 (1.45, 1.79), respectively. Doravirine AUC0-∞, Cmax, and C24 values increased slightly following coadministration with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (GMR [90% CI] of 1.15 [1.07, 1.24], 1.11 [0.97, 1.27], and 1.24 [1.13, 1.36], respectively). The modest increases in doravirine exposure are not clinically meaningful based on the therapeutic profile of doravirine. Effects are likely secondary to cytochrome P450 3A and P-glycoprotein inhibition by grazoprevir and ledipasvir, respectively. Coadministration of doravirine with elbasvir + grazoprevir or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was generally well tolerated. Clinically relevant DDIs are not expected to occur between doravirine and elbasvir-grazoprevir or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir at the therapeutic doses.

Doravirine and the Potential for CYP3A-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

Identifying and understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are vital for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. This article discusses DDIs between doravirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) substrates and drugs that modulate CYP3A activity. Consistent with previously published in vitro data and DDI trials with the CYP3A substrates midazolam and atorvastatin, doravirine did not have any meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A substrates ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. Coadministration of doravirine with CYP3A inhibitors (ritonavir or ketoconazole) increased doravirine exposure approximately 3-fold. However, these increases were not considered clinically meaningful. Conversely, previously published trials showed that coadministered CYP3A inducers (rifampin and rifabutin) decreased doravirine exposure by 88% and 50%, respectively (K. L. Yee, S. G. Khalilieh, R. I. Sanchez, R. Liu, et al., Clin Drug Investig 37:659-667, 2017 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0513-4]; S. G. Khalilieh, K. L. Yee, R. I. Sanchez, R. Liu, et al., J Clin Pharmacol 58:1044-1052, 2018 [https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1103]), while doravirine exposure following prior efavirenz administration led to an initial reduction in doravirine exposure of 62%, but the reduction became less pronounced with time (K. L. Yee, R. I. Sanchez, P. Auger, R. Liu, et al., Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01757-16, 2017 [https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01757-16]). Overall, the coadministration of doravirine with CYP3A inhibitors and substrates is, therefore, supported by these data together with efficacy and safety data from clinical trials, while coadministration with strong CYP3A inducers, such as rifampin, cannot be recommended. Concomitant dosing with rifabutin (a CYP3A inducer less potent than rifampin) is acceptable if doravirine dosing is adjusted from once to twice daily; however, the effect of other moderate inducers on doravirine pharmacokinetics is unknown.

Characterisation of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and mass balance of doravirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in humans.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of doravirine (MK-1439), a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were investigated. Two clinical trials were conducted in healthy subjects: an oral single dose [14 C]doravirine (350 mg, ∼200 µCi) trial (n = 6) and an intravenous (IV) single-dose doravirine (100 µg) trial (n = 12). In vitro metabolism, protein binding, apparent permeability and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transport studies were conducted to complement the clinical trials. Following oral [14 C]doravirine administration, all of the administered dose was recovered. The absorbed dose was eliminated primarily via metabolism. An oxidative metabolite (M9) was the predominant metabolite in excreta and was the primary circulating metabolite (12.9% of circulating radioactivity). Following IV administration, doravirine clearance and volume of distribution were 3.73 L/h (95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.09, 4.49) and 60.5 L (95% CI 53.7, 68.4), respectively. In vitro, doravirine is not highly bound to plasma proteins (unbound fraction 0.24) and has good passive permeability. The metabolite M9 was generated by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A)4/5-mediated oxidation. Doravirine was a P-gp substrate but P-gp efflux is not expected to play a significant role in limiting doravirine absorption or to be involved in the elimination of doravirine. In conclusion, doravirine is a low clearance drug, primarily eliminated by CYP3A-mediated metabolism.

Severe Renal Impairment Has Minimal Impact on Doravirine Pharmacokinetics.

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in development for use with other antiretroviral therapies to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Doravirine metabolism predominantly occurs via cytochrome P450 3A with <10% of elimination occurring via the renal pathway. As severe renal impairment can alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of metabolically eliminated drugs, the effect of severe renal impairment on doravirine PK was assessed. A single dose of doravirine 100 mg was administered to subjects aged 18 to 75 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (severe renal impairment group) and healthy controls with an eGFR of ≥80 ml/min/1.73 m2, matched to the mean of the renal impairment group by age (±10 years) and weight (±10 kg). Doravirine plasma concentrations were determined at regular intervals, and safety was monitored throughout. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for severe renal impairment/healthy subjects were 1.43 (1.00, 2.04), 1.38 (0.99, 1.92), and 0.83 (0.61, 1.15) for the plasma doravirine area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), plasma concentration at 24 h postdose (C24), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), respectively. Doravirine was generally well tolerated in both groups. Based on the overall efficacy, safety, and PK profile of doravirine, the minor effect of severe renal impairment on doravirine PK observed in this study is not considered clinically meaningful. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02641067.).

Results of a Doravirine-Atorvastatin Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

Doravirine is a novel, highly potent, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is administered once daily and that is in development for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. In vitro and clinical data suggest that doravirine is unlikely to cause significant drug-drug interactions via major drug-metabolizing enzymes or transporters. As a common HIV-1 infection comorbidity, hypercholesterolemia is often treated with statins, including the commonly prescribed atorvastatin. Atorvastatin is subject to drug-drug interactions with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors. Increased exposure due to CYP3A4 inhibition may lead to serious adverse events (AEs), including rhabdomyolysis. Furthermore, atorvastatin is a substrate for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), of which doravirine may be a weak inhibitor; this may increase atorvastatin exposure. The potential of doravirine to affect atorvastatin pharmacokinetics was investigated in a two-period, fixed-sequence study in healthy individuals. In period 1, a single dose of atorvastatin at 20 mg was administered followed by a 72-h washout. In period 2, doravirine at 100 mg was administered once daily for 8 days, with a single dose of atorvastatin at 20 mg concomitantly being administered on day 5. Sixteen subjects were enrolled, and 14 completed the trial; 2 discontinued due to AEs unrelated to the treatment. The atorvastatin area under the curve from time zero to infinity was similar with and without doravirine (geometric mean ratio [GMR] for doravirine-atorvastatin/atorvastatin, 0.98; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.06), while the maximum concentration decreased by 33% (GMR for doravirine-atorvastatin/atorvastatin, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.52 to 0.85). These changes were deemed not to be clinically meaningful. Both of the study drugs were generally well tolerated. Doravirine had no clinically relevant effect on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, providing support for the coadministration of doravirine and atorvastatin.

Evaluation of Doravirine Pharmacokinetics When Switching from Efavirenz to Doravirine in Healthy Subjects.

Doravirine is a novel, potent nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection that demonstrates a high genetic barrier to resistance and that has been well tolerated in studies to date. Doravirine is a candidate for patients switching from less-well-tolerated NNRTIs, such as efavirenz. While doravirine is a cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) substrate, efavirenz induces CYP3A4; therefore, the pharmacokinetics of both drugs following a switch from efavirenz to doravirine were assessed. This was a 3-period, fixed-sequence, open-label study. Healthy adults were dosed with doravirine at 100 mg for 5 days once daily (QD) (period 1). Following a 7-day washout, efavirenz was administered at 600 mg QD for 14 days (period 2). Subsequently, doravirine was administered at 100 mg QD for 14 days (period 3). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled, and 17 completed the study. One day after efavirenz cessation, the doravirine area under the concentration-time curve from predosing to 24 h postdosing (AUC0-24), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and observed plasma concentration at 24 h postdosing (C24) were reduced by 62%, 35%, and 85%, respectively, compared with the values with no efavirenz pretreatment. These decreases recovered to 32%, 14%, and 50% for AUC0-24, Cmax, and C24, respectively, by day 14 after efavirenz cessation. The doravirine C24 reached projected therapeutic trough concentrations, based on in vitro efficacy, on day 2 following efavirenz cessation. Geometric mean efavirenz concentrations were 3,180 ng/ml on day 1 and 95.7 ng/ml on day 15, and efavirenz was present at therapeutic concentrations (>1,000 ng/ml) until day 4. Though doravirine exposure was transiently decreased following efavirenz treatment cessation, dose adjustment may not be necessary to maintain therapeutic concentrations of at least one drug during switching in a virologically suppressed population.

In vitro and in vivo characterisation of the metabolism and disposition of suvorexant in humans.

1. Suvorexant (MK-4305, Belsomra®) is a first-in-class dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in the USA and Japan for the treatment of insomnia. The current studies describe suvorexant's absorption, disposition and potential for CYP-mediated drug interactions in humans. 2. Following single oral administration of [(14)C]suvorexant to healthy human subjects, 90% of the radioactivity was recovered (66% in faeces, 23% in urine), primarily as oxidative metabolites. 3. In plasma, suvorexant and M9 were predominant, accounting for 30 and 37% of the total radioactivity, respectively. Metabolite M17 became more prominent (approaching 10%) following multiple daily doses of unlabelled suvorexant. M9 and M17 are not expected to contribute to the pharmacological activity of suvorexant due to reduced orexin receptor binding affinity and limited brain penetration. 4. CYP3A was determined to be the predominant enzyme mediating suvorexant oxidation. In vitro, suvorexant demonstrated reversible inhibition of CYP3A4 and 2C19 (IC50 ∼ 4-5 µM), and weak time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 (KI = 12 µM, kinact = 0.14 min(-1)). Suvorexant was also a weak inducer of CYP3A4, 1A2 and 2B6. Given the low plasma concentrations at clinical doses, suvorexant was not anticipated to cause significant drug interactions via inhibition and/or induction of major CYPs in vivo.

Predicted serotype-specific effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines V114 and PCV20 against invasive pneumococcal disease in children.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation, higher-valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), 15-valent PCV V114 and 20-valent PCV (PCV20), have been assessed by comparing their immune responses across serotypes shared with the 13-valent PCV (PCV13). Without efficacy or real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) it becomes important to relate IgG titers to VE to aid in the interpretation of the immune response elicited by V114 and PCV20. METHODS: We estimated the protective antibody concentrations for each serotype in 7-valent PCV (PCV7) and PCV13 which were then used to predict the serotype-specific VE for each PCV7 and PCV13 non PCV7 serotype present in V114 and PCV20. RESULTS: The predicted effectiveness of V114 was comparable to PCV7 and PCV13 for 11 of the 13 shared serotypes (1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9 V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, and 23F), with improved effectiveness against serotype 3 and decreased effectiveness against serotype 6A. PCV20 had predicted effectiveness comparable to PCV7 and PCV13 for 7 of the 13 shared serotypes (5, 6A, 7F, 9 V, 18C, 19F, and 23F), with decreased effectiveness against the remaining serotypes (1, 3, 4, 6B, 14, and 19A). CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of serotype-specific VE values suggests that V114 retains greater effectiveness than PCV20 toward most serotypes present in PCV7 and PCV13.

Pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) first became available in 2000, when the seven-valent PCV (PCV7) was approved. Since then, PCV7 has been replaced by higher-valency vaccines, including the ten-valent (PCV10) and thirteen-valent (PCV13) vaccines and, more recently, fifteen- and twenty-valent vaccines (V114 and PCV20, respectively). The increase in valency provides broader serotype coverage against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children. However, IPD due to serotypes contained in PCV7 and PCV13 continue to be observed. In the current study, we used a previously published method to estimate the vaccine effectiveness of V114 and PCV20 in a US and Puerto Rican pediatric population that is recommended to receive a 3 + 1 dosing schedule.

Potential serotype-specific effectiveness against IPD of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines V114 and PCV20 in children given a 2+1 dosing regimen.

BACKGROUND: Next generation, higher valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are assessed and licensed by comparing the immune response across serotypes shared with the PCVs that are standard of care for prevention of pneumococcal disease. METHODS: Using a previously qualified method we predicted the serotype-specific vaccine effectiveness (VE) against invasive pneumococcal disease of V114 and PCV20 for the serotypes shared with PCV13 in an EU, Russian, and Australian pediatric population that is recommended to receive a 2 + 1 dosing regimen. RESULTS: The estimated protective antibody concentrations ranged from 0.03 (serotype 23F) to 1.49 µg/mL (serotype 19F). Predicted VE values for V114 ranged from 79% (serotype 5) to 100% (serotype 23F). V114 had comparable effectiveness to PCV13 for all but one of shared serotypes, with predicted higher effectiveness (in V114) against serotype 3 (93% vs. 65%). Predicted VE values for PCV20 ranged from 47% (serotype 3) to 91% (serotype 14). PCV20 predicted VE was lower than PCV13's for serotypes 4, 19F, 23F, 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, and 19A. CONCLUSIONS: Predicted serotype-specific VE values suggest that, with a 2 + 1 dosing regimen, V114 will have greater effectiveness than PCV20 against PCV13 serotypes, particularly for the still-prevalent serotype 3. Real-world VE studies will ultimately provide clarity on the effectiveness of novel PCVs and support further confidence in and/or improvements to modeling efforts.

Pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) were first introduced in Europe in the early 2000s and their incorporation into national immunization programs has helped decrease the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Europe and globally. However, some IPD persists, due both to the emergence of non-vaccine pneumococcal serotypes and to the persistence of certain vaccine-targeted serotypes. Higher valency vaccines have been developed to help prevent IPD arising from these serotypes. The goal of the present study is to employ a previously developed model to predict the serotype-specific vaccine effectiveness of higher valency PCVs in a pediatric population that is recommended to receive a 2 + 1 dosing schedule.

Dealing With Variable Drug Exposure Due to Variable Hepatic Metabolism: A Proof-of-Concept Application of Liquid Biopsy in Renal Impairment.

Precision dosing strategies require accounting for between-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), affecting drug exposure, and in pharmacodynamics (PD), affecting response achieved at the same drug concentration at the site of action. Although liquid biopsy for assessing different levels of molecular drug targets has yet to be established, individual characterization of drug elimination pathways using liquid biopsy has recently been demonstrated. The feasibility of applying this approach in conjunction with modeling tools to guide individual dosing remains unexplored. In this study, we aimed to individualize physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models based on liquid biopsy measurements in plasma from 25 donors with different grades of renal function who were previously administered oral midazolam as part of a microdose cocktail. Virtual twin models were constructed based on demographics, renal function, and hepatic expression of relevant pharmacokinetic pathways projected from liquid biopsy output. Simulated exposure (AUC) to midazolam was in agreement with observed data (AFE = 1.38, AAFE = 1.78). Simulated AUC variability with three dosing approaches indicated higher variability with uniform dosing (14-fold) and stratified dosing (13-fold) compared with individualized dosing informed by liquid biopsy (fivefold). Further, exosome screening revealed mRNA expression of 532 targets relevant to drug metabolism and disposition (169 enzymes and 361 transporters). Data related to these targets can be used to further individualize PBPK models for pathways relevant to PK of other drugs. This study provides additional verification of liquid biopsy-informed PBPK modeling approaches, necessary to advance strategies that seek to achieve precise dosing from the start of treatment.

Characterization of ascending dose canine telemetry model supports its use in E14/S7B QT integrated risk assessments.

INTRODUCTION: Nonclinical evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of novel chemical or biological entities (NCE, NBEs) is crucial for supporting first-in-human clinical trials. One important aspect of these evaluations is the assessment of potential QT/QTc prolongation risk, as drug-induced QT prolongation can have catastrophic effects. The recent publication of E14/S7B Q&As allows for the situational incorporation of nonclinical QTc data as part of an integrated risk assessment for a Thorough QT (TQT) waiver application provided certain best practice criteria are met. Recent publications provided detailed characterization of nonclinical QTc telemetry data collected from the commonly used Latin square study design. METHODS: To understand whether data from alternate telemetry study designs were sufficient to serve as part of the E14/S7B integrated risk assessment, we report the performance and translational sensitivity to identify clinical risk of QTc prolongation risk for an ascending dose telemetry design. RESULTS: The data demonstrated low variability in QTci interval within animals from day to day, indicating a well-controlled study environment and limited concern for uncontrolled effects across dosing days. Historical study variances of the ascending dose design with n = 4 subjects, measured by least significant difference (LSD) and root mean square error (RMSE) values, were low enough to detect a + 10 ms QTci interval change, and the median minimum detectable difference (MDD) for QTci interval changes was <10 ms. Furthermore, concentration-QTci (C-QTci) assessments to determine +10 ms QTci increases for known hERG inhibitors were comparable to clinical CC values listed in the E14/S7B training materials, supporting the use of the ascending dose design in an E14/S7B integrated risk assessment. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the ascending dose design can be a valuable tool in nonclinical evaluation of QT/QTc prolongation risk and the support of TQT waiver applications.

The duration of sleep promoting efficacy by dual orexin receptor antagonists is dependent upon receptor occupancy threshold.

BACKGROUND: Drugs targeting insomnia ideally promote sleep throughout the night, maintain normal sleep architecture, and are devoid of residual effects associated with morning sedation. These features of an ideal compound are not only dependent upon pharmacokinetics, receptor binding kinetics, potency and pharmacodynamic activity, but also upon a compound's mechanism of action. RESULTS: Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) block the arousal-promoting activity of orexin peptides and, as demonstrated in the current work, exhibit an efficacy signal window dependent upon oscillating levels of endogenous orexin neuropeptide. Sleep efficacy of structurally diverse DORAs in rat and dog was achieved at plasma exposures corresponding to orexin 2 receptor (OX2R) occupancies in the range of 65 to 80%. In rats, the time course of OX2R occupancy was dependent upon receptor binding kinetics and was tightly correlated with the timing of active wake reduction. In rhesus monkeys, direct comparison of DORA-22 with GABA-A modulators at similar sleep-inducing doses revealed that diazepam produced next-day residual sleep and both diazepam and eszopiclone induced next-day cognitive deficits. In stark contrast, DORA-22 did not produce residual effects. Furthermore, DORA-22 evoked only minimal changes in quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) activity during the normal resting phase in contrast to GABA-A modulators which induced substantial qEEG changes. CONCLUSION: The higher levels of receptor occupancy necessary for DORA efficacy require a plasma concentration profile sufficient to maintain sleep for the duration of the resting period. DORAs, with a half-life exceeding 8 h in humans, are expected to fulfill this requirement as exposures drop to sub-threshold receptor occupancy levels prior to the wake period, potentially avoiding next-day residual effects at therapeutic doses.