The impact of COVID-19 and associated measures on health, police, and non-government organisation service utilisation related to violence against women and children.

BACKGROUND: Globally, concerns have been raised that the priority implementation of public health measures in response to COVID-19 may have unintended negative impacts on a variety of other health and wellbeing factors, including violence. This study examined the impact of COVID-19 response measures on changes in violence against women and children (VAWC) service utilisation across European countries. METHODS: A rapid assessment design was used to compile data including a survey distributed across WHO Europe Healthy Cities Networks and Violence Injury Prevention Focal Points in WHO European Region member states, and a scoping review of media reports, journal articles, and reports. Searches were conducted in English and Russian and covered the period between 1 January 2020 and 17 September 2020. Data extracted included: country; violence type; service sector; and change in service utilisation during COVID-19. All data pertained to the period during which COVID-19 related public health measures were implemented compared to a period before restrictions were in place. RESULTS: Overall, findings suggested that there was a median reported increase in VAWC service utilisation of approximately 20% during the COVID-19 pandemic. Crucially, however, change in service utilisation differed across sectors. After categorising each estimate as reflecting an increase or decrease in VAWC service utilisation, there was a significant association between sector and change in service utilisation; the majority of NGO estimates (95.1%) showed an increase in utilisation, compared to 58.2% of law enforcement estimates and 42.9% of health and social care estimates. CONCLUSIONS: The variation across sectors in changes in VAWC service utilisation has important implications for policymakers in the event of ongoing and future restrictions related to COVID-19, and more generally during other times of prolonged presence in the home. The increased global attention on VAWC during the pandemic should be used to drive forward the agenda on prevention, increase access to services, and implement better data collection mechanisms to ensure the momentum and increased focus on VAWC during the pandemic is not wasted.

Features Constituting Actionable COVID-19 Dashboards: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal of 158 Public Web-Based COVID-19 Dashboards.

BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the development of dashboards as dynamic, visual tools for communicating COVID-19 data has surged worldwide. Dashboards can inform decision-making and support behavior change. To do so, they must be actionable. The features that constitute an actionable dashboard in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic have not been rigorously assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of public web-based COVID-19 dashboards by assessing their purpose and users ("why"), content and data ("what"), and analyses and displays ("how" they communicate COVID-19 data), and ultimately to appraise the common features of highly actionable dashboards. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive assessment and scoring using nominal group technique with an international panel of experts (n=17) on a global sample of COVID-19 dashboards in July 2020. The sequence of steps included multimethod sampling of dashboards; development and piloting of an assessment tool; data extraction and an initial round of actionability scoring; a workshop based on a preliminary analysis of the results; and reconsideration of actionability scores followed by joint determination of common features of highly actionable dashboards. We used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to explore the findings by research question. RESULTS: A total of 158 dashboards from 53 countries were assessed. Dashboards were predominately developed by government authorities (100/158, 63.0%) and were national (93/158, 58.9%) in scope. We found that only 20 of the 158 dashboards (12.7%) stated both their primary purpose and intended audience. Nearly all dashboards reported epidemiological indicators (155/158, 98.1%), followed by health system management indicators (85/158, 53.8%), whereas indicators on social and economic impact and behavioral insights were the least reported (7/158, 4.4% and 2/158, 1.3%, respectively). Approximately a quarter of the dashboards (39/158, 24.7%) did not report their data sources. The dashboards predominately reported time trends and disaggregated data by two geographic levels and by age and sex. The dashboards used an average of 2.2 types of displays (SD 0.86); these were mostly graphs and maps, followed by tables. To support data interpretation, color-coding was common (93/158, 89.4%), although only one-fifth of the dashboards (31/158, 19.6%) included text explaining the quality and meaning of the data. In total, 20/158 dashboards (12.7%) were appraised as highly actionable, and seven common features were identified between them. Actionable COVID-19 dashboards (1) know their audience and information needs; (2) manage the type, volume, and flow of displayed information; (3) report data sources and methods clearly; (4) link time trends to policy decisions; (5) provide data that are "close to home"; (6) break down the population into relevant subgroups; and (7) use storytelling and visual cues. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 dashboards are diverse in the why, what, and how by which they communicate insights on the pandemic and support data-driven decision-making. To leverage their full potential, dashboard developers should consider adopting the seven actionability features identified.

The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the World Health Organization European Region: A qualitative study.

Background: Governments across the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region have prioritised dashboards for reporting COVID-19 data. The ubiquitous use of dashboards for public reporting is a novel phenomenon. Objective: This study explores the development of COVID-19 dashboards during the first year of the pandemic and identifies common barriers, enablers and lessons from the experiences of teams responsible for their development. Methods: We applied multiple methods to identify and recruit COVID-19 dashboard teams, using a purposive, quota sampling approach. Semi-structured group interviews were conducted from April to June 2021. Using elaborative coding and thematic analysis, we derived descriptive and explanatory themes from the interview data. A validation workshop was held with study participants in June 2021. Results: Eighty informants participated, representing 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams across the WHO European Region. Most dashboards were launched swiftly during the first months of the pandemic, February to May 2020. The urgency, intense workload, limited human resources, data and privacy constraints and public scrutiny were common challenges in the initial development stage. Themes related to barriers or enablers were identified, pertaining to the pre-pandemic context, pandemic itself, people and processes and software, data and users. Lessons emerged around the themes of simplicity, trust, partnership, software and data and change. Conclusions: COVID-19 dashboards were developed in a learning-by-doing approach. The experiences of teams reveal that initial underpreparedness was offset by high-level political endorsement, the professionalism of teams, accelerated data improvements and immediate support with commercial software solutions. To leverage the full potential of dashboards for health data reporting, investments are needed at the team, national and pan-European levels.

Emerging responses implemented to prevent and respond to violence against women and children in WHO European member states during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of online media reports.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the strategies that governments and civil society organisations implemented to prevent and respond to the anticipated rise in violence against women and/or children (VAWC) during the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. DESIGN: A scoping review and content analysis of online media reports. SETTING: WHO European region. METHODS: A scoping review of media reports and publications and a search of other grey literature (published from 1 January to 17 September 2020). Primary and secondary outcome measures included measures implemented by governments, public services and non-governmental and civil organisations to prevent or respond to VAWC during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Our study found that in 52 of the 53 member states there was at least one measure undertaken to prevent or respond to VAWC during the pandemic. Government-led or government-sponsored measures were the most common, reported in 50 member states. Non-governmental and other civil society-led prevention and response measures were reported in 40 member states. The most common measure was the use of media and social media to raise awareness of VAWC and to provide VAWC services through online platforms, followed by measures taken to expand and/or maintain helpline services for those exposed to violence. CONCLUSION: The potential increase in VAWC during COVID-19-imposed restrictions and lockdowns resulted in adaptations and/or increases in prevention and response strategies in nearly all member states. The strength of existing public health systems influenced the requirement and choice of strategies and highlights the need for sustaining and improving violence prevention and response services. Innovative strategies employed in several member states may offer opportunities for countries to strengthen prevention and responses in the near future and during similar emergencies.

Глоссарий терминов: Инструмент мониторинга воздействия, показателей деятельности и потенциала первичной медико-санитарной помощи (PHC-IMPACT) в Европейском регионе ВОЗ

В настоящем глоссарии приведены определения терминов и понятий, имеющих отношение к Инструменту мониторинга воздействия, показателей деятельности и потенциала первичной медико-санитарной помощи (PHC-IMPACT) в Европейском регионе ВОЗ. PHC-IMPACT используется как вспомогательный инструмент в процессах мониторинга и улучшения качества первичной медико-санитарной помощи в Европейском регионе, а также для оценки работы по выполнению глобальных целей всеобщего охвата услугами здравоохранения в части предоставления услуг.Рамочная основа PHC-IMPACT разрабатывалась в соответствии с Европейской рамочной основой для действий по организации интегрированного предоставления услуг здравоохранения. Настоящий глоссарий подготовлен вместе с Паспортами индикаторов PHC-IMPACT, где приводится подробная информация, необходимая для использования полного комплекса индикаторов, из которых состоит инструмент. Определения в настоящем глоссарии разработаны на основе терминологии, используемой в международных системах классификации, включая Международную классификацию счетов здравоохранения, Международную стандартную классификацию занятий и Международную стандартную классификацию образования.

Паспорта индикаторов: Инструмент мониторинга воздействия, показателей деятельности и потенциала первичной медико-санитарной помощи (PHC-IMPACT) в Европейском регионе ВОЗ: ред. 1

Настоящий документ разработан с целью подробного технического описания индикаторов, применяемых в Инструменте мониторинга воздействия, показателей деятельности и потенциала первичной медико-санитарной помощи (PHC-IMPACT) в Европейском регионе ВОЗ. PHC-IMPACT используется как вспомогательный инструмент в процессах мониторинга и повышения качества первичной медико-санитарной помощи в Европейском регионе, а также для оценки работы по выполнению глобальных целей всеобщего охвата услугами здравоохранения в части предоставления услуг.Рамочная основа PHC-IMPACT разрабатывалась в соответствии с Европейской рамочной основой для действий по организации интегрированного предоставления услуг здравоохранения. Для каждого паспорта индикатора, включенного в данный документ, приведены следующие сведения: отношение к рамочной основе (сфера, подсфера, характеристика), название индикатора/вопроса, определение индикатора/вопроса, числитель/знаменатель или выбор ответа, единица измерения, обоснование целесообразности, связанные определения, дезагрегация, известные ограничения и возможные источники сведений. Ключевые термины, выделенные в паспортах подчеркиванием, приведены в Глоссарии терминов, в котором дается разъяснение терминов в максимально возможном соответствии с существующими определениями и международными классификациями.

Glossary of terms: WHO European Primary Health Care Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT)

This glossary of terms aims to provide clarifying definitions related to the WHO European Primary Health Care Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT). PHC-IMPACT sets out to support the monitoring and improvement of primary health care in the European Region and the measurement of progress towards the services delivery component of global universal health coverage targets.The framework underpinning PHC-IMPACT has been guided by the WHO European Framework for Integrated Health Services Delivery. This glossary of terms accompanies PHC-IMPACT’s Indicator Passports – a resource providing detailed information for the use of the full suite of indicators that make up the tool. Importantly, the definitions included here have relied as far as possible on existing international classifications including the International Classification for Health Accounts, International Standard Classification of Occupations and International Standard Classification of Education.

Indicator passports: WHO European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT): version 1

This document of indicator passports aims to provide a detailed technical description of indicators for use in the WHO European Primary Health Care Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHCIMPACT). PHC-IMPACT sets out to support the monitoring and improvement of primary health care in the European Region and measurement of progress towards the services delivery component of global universal health coverage targets.The framework underpinning PHC-IMPACT has been guided by the WHO European Framework for Integrated Health Services Delivery. For each indicator passport included here, the following details are specified: alignment to the framework (domain, subdomain, feature), indicator/question title, indicator/question definition, numerator/denominator or answer choices, unit of measurement, rationale, relevant definitions, disaggregation, known limitations and possible data sources. Key terms underlined in the passports are found an accompanied Glossary of terms – a resource providing clarifying definitions according to existing definitions and international classifications as far as possible.