Arteriovenous Access Type and Risk of Mortality, Hospitalization, and Sepsis Among Elderly Hemodialysis Patients: A Target Trial Emulation Approach.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Evidence is mixed regarding the optimal choice of the first permanent vascular access for elderly patients receiving hemodialysis (HD). Lacking data from randomized controlled trials, we used a target trial emulation approach to compare arteriovenous fistula (AVF) versus arteriovenous graft (AVG) creation among elderly patients receiving HD. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Elderly patients included in the US Renal Data System who initiated HD with a catheter and had an AVF or AVG created within 6 months of starting HD. EXPOSURE: Creation of an AVF versus an AVG as the incident arteriovenous access. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality, all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization, and sepsis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Target trial emulation approach, high-dimensional propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting, and instrumental variable analysis using the proclivity of the operating physician to create a fistula as the instrumental variable. RESULTS: A total of 19,867 patients were included, with 80.1% receiving an AVF and 19.9% an AVG. In unweighted analysis, AVF creation was associated with significantly lower risks of mortality and hospitalization, especially within 6 months after vascular access creation. In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, AVF creation was associated with lower incidences of mortality and hospitalization within 6 months after creation (hazard ratios of 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.91] and 0.82 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87] for mortality and all-cause hospitalization, respectively), but not between 6 months and 3 years after access creation. No association between AVF creation and mortality, sepsis, or all-cause, cardiovascular disease-related, or infection-related hospitalization was found in instrumental variable analyses. However, AVF creation was associated with a lower risk of access-related hospitalization not due to infection. LIMITATIONS: Potential for unmeasured confounding, analyses limited to elderly patients, and absence of data on actual access use during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Using observational data to emulate a target randomized controlled trial, the type of initial arteriovenous access created was not associated with the risks of mortality, sepsis, or all-cause, cardiovascular disease-related, or infection-related hospitalization among elderly patients who initiated HD with a catheter.

Catheter Dependence After Arteriovenous Fistula or Graft Placement Among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), compared with an arteriovenous graft (AVG), is associated with longer initial catheter dependence after starting hemodialysis (HD) but longer access survival and lower long-term catheter dependence. The extent of these potential long-term benefits in elderly patients is unknown. We assessed catheter dependence after AVF or AVG placement among elderly patients who initiated HD without a permanent access in place. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients≥67 years of age identified in the US Renal Data System who had a first AVF (n=14,532) or AVG (n=3,391) placed within 1 year after HD initiation between May 2012 and May 2017. EXPOSURE: AVF versus AVG placement in the first year of HD. OUTCOME: Catheter dependence after AVF or AVG placement assessed using CROWNWeb data. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Generalized estimating equations and negative binomial regression for catheter use over time and Cox proportional hazards models for mortality. RESULTS: Creation of an AVF versus AVG placement was associated with greater catheter dependence at 1 month (95.6% vs 92.5%) and 3 months (82.8% vs 41.2%), but lower catheter dependence at 12 months (14.2% vs 15.8%) and 36 months (8.2% vs 15.0%). Creation of an AVF, however, remained significantly associated with greater cumulative catheter-dependent days (80.1 vs 54.6 days per person-year) and a lower proportion of catheter-free survival time (78.1% vs 85.1%) after 3 years of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Potential for unmeasured confounding and analyses limited to elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Creation of an AVF was associated with significantly greater cumulative catheter dependence than placement of an AVG in an elderly population initiating HD without a permanent access. As the long-term benefits in terms of catheter dependence of an AVF are not realized in many elderly patients, specific patient characteristics should be considered when making decisions regarding vascular access.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update.

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Vascular Calcification Markers and Hemodialysis Vascular Access Complications.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous (AV) access dysfunction is a common complication in hemodialysis patients. Markers of vascular calcification are associated with cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in this population, but their association with vascular access outcomes is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between selected vascular calcification makers and vascular access complications in a cohort of hemodialysis patients. METHOD: Fetuin-A, osteopontin (OPN), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7) were measured in blood samples from 219 dialysis patients in the Choice for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for end-stage renal disease study; these patients were using a permanent vascular access. Participants were followed for up to 1 year or until the occurrence of a vascular access intervention or replacement. Associations with AV fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) intervention-free survival were assessed in models adjusted for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and inflammation. RESULTS: A total of 24 out 103 participants with an AVF and 43 out of 116 participants with an AVG had an intervention during follow-up. Lower fetuin-A, higher OPN, and higher BMP-7 were associated with a higher risk of AVF intervention (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] for highest versus lowest tertile = 0.30 [95% CI 0.10-0.94]) for fetuin-A, 3.84 (95% CI 1.16-12.74) for OPN, and 3.49 (95% CI 1.16-10.52) for BMP-7. OPG was not significantly associated with the risk of AVF intervention. The associations of OPN and BMP-7 with AVF intervention appeared stronger among participants without diabetes (aHR 8.06; 95% CI 1.11-58.57 for OPN and aHR 2.55; 95% CI 1.08-6.08 for BMP-7, respectively) than among their counterparts with diabetes (p interaction = 0.06). None of the markers studied were significantly associated with AVG interventions. CONCLUSION: Lower fetuin-A and higher OPN and BMP-7 are associated with complications in AVF but not in AVG, suggesting a role for calcification in the pathogenesis AVF failure.

Hand Ischemia in a Patient With an Arteriovenous Fistula.

An ischemic digit causes significant morbidity due to its associated discomfort and potential for tissue necrosis. Historically, when this phenomenon was peripheral to an ipsilateral arteriovenous access in a hemodialysis patient, it was called "steal syndrome" and was usually treated with access ligation, resulting in loss of the access. We present a dialysis patient with hand pain due to ischemia that was referred for access ligation. Instead, a minimally invasive banding procedure was performed that resulted in access salvage and resolution of symptoms. We present images and a discussion of the diagnosis and treatment of distal hypoperfusion ischemia syndrome in this Imaging Teaching Case.

A Prospective, Randomized Study of an Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Stent Graft versus Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis in Arteriovenous Grafts and Fistulae: Two-Year Results of the RESCUE Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in the venous outflow of hemodialysis access grafts and fistulae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventy-five patients were randomized at 23 US sites to stent-graft placement or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Primary study endpoints were access circuit primary patency (ACPP) at 6 months and safety through 30 days; secondary endpoints were evaluated through 24 months. RESULTS: ACPP at 6 months was significantly higher in the stent-graft group (18.6%) versus the PTA group (4.5%; P < .001), and freedom from safety events (30 days) was comparable (stent graft, 96.9%; PTA, 96.4%; P = .003 for noninferiority). The separation in ACPP survival curves remained through 12 months (stent graft, 6.2%; PTA, 1.5%). Treatment area primary patency (TAPP) was superior for the stent-graft group (66.4%) versus the PTA group (12.3%) at 6 months (P < .001), with a survivorship difference in favor of stent-graft placement maintained through 24 months (stent graft, 15.6%; PTA, 2.2%). ACPP and TAPP for the stent-graft group were better than those for the PTA group when compared within central and peripheral vein subgroups (P < .001). In central veins, TAPP was 13.6% in the stent-graft group versus 4.3% in the PTA group at 24 months (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Stent-graft use provided better ACPP and TAPP than PTA when treating in-stent restenosis in patients receiving dialysis with arteriovenous grafts and fistulae.

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator for dialysis patients: a strategy to reduce central vein stenoses and infections.

Central venous stenosis is a common complication of the transvenous leads associated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Although epicardial leads have been reported to bypass this complication, their placement is much more invasive than the subcutaneous ICDs (SICDs) and requires the services of a cardiothoracic surgeon. Recent data have demonstrated successful defibrillation using an SICD. In this report, we present 4 long-term hemodialysis patients treated successfully with an SICD. 3 patients received the device for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (cardiomyopathy with low ejection fraction). The patient in the fourth case had a prolonged QT interval and received the device for secondary prevention. 3 patients had an arteriovenous fistula, whereas 1 patient was dialyzing with a tunneled dialysis catheter. Insertion of an SICD is a minimally invasive procedure. By virtue of leaving the venous system untouched, this approach might offer the advantage of reduced risk of central venous stenosis and infection over an endocardial ICD with transvenous leads. SICD is not experimental; it has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and is currently being used in the United States and Europe.

A Meta-analysis of Stent Placement vs. Angioplasty for Dialysis Vascular Access Stenosis.

Dysfunction of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) contribute significantly to morbidity and hospitalization in the dialysis population. Despite advances in endovascular techniques, the incidence of vascular access stenosis remains problematic. Currently, the role of endovascular stent placement in the treatment of vascular access stenosis is poorly defined. This meta-analysis compares the primary patency rates of stenotic vascular access treated with stent placement vs. angioplasty. We searched Medline for English language publications from 1980 through December 2013, along with national conference proceedings and reference lists of all included publications. Inclusion criteria were a measure of primary patency, secondary patency, or access dysfunction. Studies were excluded if they were not in English or if they included pediatric patients. Ten studies with a total of 860 subjects met the inclusion criteria, including six experimental studies and four observational studies. There was significantly higher overall primary patency in those receiving stent placement than in those treated with angioplasty (pooled relative risk [RR] = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.96). The estimate did not differ by study design. The effect of treatment differed significantly (p = 0.001) by the type of stents used, however. In studies including nitinol stents (six studies, 678 patients), 6-month patency was significantly better for stent placement than angioplasty (pooled RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84), whereas there was no significant differences between stent placement and angioplasty in those studies using bare metal stents exclusively (four studies, 182 patients; pooled RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.91-1.32). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I(2)  = 70.6%; p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that stent placement may confer an advantage over balloon angioplasty in primary patency of dialysis access stenoses.

Prediction of Arteriovenous Fistula Dysfunction: Can it be Taught?

Physical examination (PE) is an excellent means of predicting arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dysfunction. Although quick and inexpensive, PE is seldom used as a tool to assess stenosis by general nephrologists, dialysis nurses, and dialysis technicians. Previous studies have demonstrated that PE can be taught to interventional specialists, but the perception remains that it is too complex to be performed by other health care professionals. We hypothesized that the physical exam can be taught to a nonmedical professional, and that, with time, it would be comparable to the physical exam performed by a full-time interventional specialist. An undergraduate student and an interventional specialist (MD) examined AVF for dysfunction in a tertiary care hospital over a 6-month period. PE was performed on patients who were suspected of having dialysis access dysfunction and were referred for angiography and intervention (n = 49). Physical exam findings were categorized blindly by each examiner into four categories of lesion location: inflow, outflow, both, or neither. Data were privately recorded and compared to the gold standard of angiographic results. Potential confounding variables, including age, gender, diabetic status, and location of AVF were recorded. Weighted Cohen's kappa value was used as a measurement of the level of agreement beyond chance between the diagnoses made by physical exam and angiography. The full-time interventional specialist demonstrated correct prediction of lesion location of 89.8% (kappa = 0.850), while the undergraduate student had a correct prediction of 77.6% (kappa = 0.625). The student's performance, however, differed significantly over time. The student correctly predicted the location of the lesion in 6 (42.9%) of the first 14 patients (kappa = 0.082), compared to 32 (91.4%) of the last 35 patients (kappa = 0.855). We suggest that physical exam of AVF can be taught to a nonmedical professional in a short duration of time and the predictive value of the exam can be similar to that of an interventional specialist.

The effect of buttonhole cannulation vs. rope-ladder technique on hemodialysis access patency.

The rope-ladder (RL) technique is the most common technique used for cannulation of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF). Buttonhole cannulation (BHC), or constant-site technique, is recommended by the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQI) vascular access guidelines. We compared outcomes of primary patency, episodes of bacteremia, access blood flow (Qa), and quality of life (QoL) scores between RL and BHC patients. Using a prospectively collected, vascular access database, a total of 45 prevalent dialysis patients using BHC were compared with 38 patients using the RL technique over a median of 12 months (inter-quartile range: 4-27 months). The two groups did not differ significantly in demographics except that diabetes was more common in those using BHC as compared to rope-ladder (69% vs. 34%; p = 0.002). Risk factors associated with lack of primary patency were age (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.02 per decade; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03; p = 0.04) and female gender (HR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.08-3.40; p = 0.03). Use of the buttonhole technique was not associated with improved primary patency (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.65-2.28; p = 0.53). Episodes of bacteremia and mean scores from KDQOL-36 did not differ significantly between the groups. This study demonstrates for the first time that BHC use is not associated with improved access patency.

A case series of real-time hemodynamic assessment of high output heart failure as a complication of arteriovenous access in dialysis patients.

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is an important source of morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease patients. Although CHF is commonly associated with low cardiac output (CO), it may also occur in high CO states. Multiple conditions are associated with increased CO including congenital or acquired arteriovenous fistulae or arteriovenous grafts. Increased CO resulting from permanent AV access in dialysis patients has been shown to induce structural and functional cardiac changes, including the development of eccentric left ventricle hypertrophy. Often, the diagnosis of high output heart failure requires invasive right heart monitoring in the acute care setting such as a medical or cardiac intensive care unit. The diagnosis of an arteriovenous access causing high output heart failure is usually confirmed after the access is ligated surgically. We present for the first time, a case for real-time hemodynamic assessment of high output heart failure due to AV access by interventional nephrology in the cardiac catheterization suite.

Cell-based approaches for the treatment of systemic inflammation.

Acute and chronic solid organ failures are costly disease processes with high mortality rates. Inflammation plays a central role in both acute and chronic organ failure, including heart, lung and kidney. In this regard, new therapies for these disorders have focused on inhibiting the mediators of inflammation, including cytokines and free radicals, with little or no success in clinical studies. Recent novel treatment strategies have been directed to cell-based rather than mediator-based approaches, designed to immunomodulate the deleterious effects of inflammation on organ function. One approach, cell therapy, replaces cells that were damaged in the acute or chronic disease process with stem/progenitor technology, to rebalance excessive inflammatory states. As an example of this approach, the use of an immunomodulatory role of renal epithelial progenitor cells to treat acute renal failure (ARF) and multiorgan failure arising from acute kidney injury is reviewed. A second therapeutic pathway, cell processing, does not incorporate stem/progenitor cells in the device, but rather biomimetic materials that remove and modulate the primary cellular components, which promote the worsening organ tissue injury associated with inflammation. The use of an immunomodulating leukocyte selective cytopheretic inhibitory device is also reviewed as an example of this cell processing approach. Both of these unconventional strategies have shown early clinical efficacy in pilot clinical trials and may transform the therapeutic approach to organ failure disorders.

Diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in CKD patients.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent and is a common problem in chronic kidney disease patients. Unlike in the general population, PAD in CKD occurs due to medial calcification as opposed to intimal atherosclerotic process. PAD intervention should be performed in select symptomatic patients, as described by the guidelines, and CVD risk factor modification should occur in all CKD patient, regardless of the presence of PAD. As a discipline, Interventional Nephrology has emerged out of a desire to create better outcomes for our patients and to "fix a problem." The core values of our discipline have evolved out of this fundamental desire to meet an unmet clinical need, to provide insight into a disease state specific to our patients, and to offer clinical/academic excellence in doing so. We must endeavor to follow a similar path in our approach to PAD. The purpose of this review is to educate interventional nephrologists in the diagnosis and treatment of PAD in their CKD patients.

The effect of the selective cytopheretic device on acute kidney injury outcomes in the intensive care unit: a multicenter pilot study.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterized by deterioration in kidney function resulting in multisystem abnormalities. Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with AKI result from a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). This study described herein is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter US study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) treatment on AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the ICU. The study enrolled 35 subjects. The mean age was 56.3±15. With regard to race, 71.4% of the subjects were Caucasian, 22.9% were Black, and 5.7% were Hispanic. Average SOFA score was 11.3±3.6. Death from any cause at Day 60 was 31.4%. Renal recovery, defined as dialysis independence, was observed in all of the surviving subjects at Day 60. The results of this pilot study indicate the potential for a substantial improvement in patient outcomes over standard of care therapy, which is associated with a greater than 50% 60-day mortality in the literature. The SCD warrants further study in scientifically sound, pivotal trial to demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.

Chronic total occlusion and successful drug-eluting stent placement in Takayasu arteritis-induced renal artery stenosis.

Takayasu arteritis-induced renal artery stenosis (TARAS) is a condition rarely described in the literature. Although percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting has been well-described in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, its role has not been established in non-atherosclerotic TARAS. We report a case of a female, age 17 years, with Takayasu arteritis who presented to the hospital with seizures and hypertensive crisis. A renal angiogram showed chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the left renal artery. Renal angioplasty and stenting was successfully performed after multiple attempts to deliver a wire distal to the CTO. After sequential balloon predilation, a drug-eluting stent was deployed, resulting in full reperfusion of the kidney. The patient's blood pressure improved dramatically, and patency of the stent was demonstrated with magnetic resonance angiography over 9 months after the procedure.

Catheter-related blood stream infection in hemodialysis patients with symmetric tunneled non-side-hole hemodialysis catheters.

BACKGROUND: Tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease patients. Side holes positioned near the tip of catheters have been linked to formation of thrombi, which, in turn, have been implicated in predisposition to infection. In addition, side holes allow spillage of catheter locking solution, including antibiotics, thereby minimizing the lock solution's effect on the catheter tip. This study assessed the infection events that occurred in a series of hemodialysis patients using a non-side-hole catheter. METHODS: Over a period of 2 years, a novel symmetric-tip non-side-hole catheter was placed in 60 patients. Hemodialysis was performed thrice weekly. Prescribed dialyzer flows were 300-350 mL/min. Catheters were routinely locked with heparin 5000 units/mL between treatments. Patients were followed up for any catheter related complications, specifically infection events. RESULTS: Seven events of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred for a rate of 0.76 events per 1000 catheter-days, with the first event occurring 9 weeks after insertion. These events were treated by locking the affected catheter with 2 g of clindamycin in 2 mL of heparin 1000 units/mL and administration of intravenous antibiotics, in most cases, for 7-14 days. Two catheters were removed due to infection. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter-related bloodstream infections with non-side-hole hemodialysis catheters do occur at a relatively low rate and in this initial preliminary study it seems that most of these infections can be successfully treated without removal of the affected catheters.

Staphylococcus aureus accumulation at the tip of hemodialysis catheters with or without tip side holes in catheter related bloodstream infection in a large animal.

BACKGROUND: Eighty percent of hemodialysis patients start their dialysis with a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Catheter related bacteremia is the second most common cause of death in these patients. Side holes near the tips of the tunneled cuffed central venous catheters are associated with accumulation of thrombus, which can lead to catheter dysfunction and, possibly, also to catheter-related infection. To assess the hypothesis that a catheter without side holes would be associated with less bacterial growth, this study compared the susceptibility of a side-hole-free catheter to accumulation of pathogenic bacteria at the catheter tip with that of two catheters which have side holes. METHODS: Eight tunneled cuffed double-lumen central venous catheters were inserted into both jugular veins of four sheep; one side-hole-free and one control catheter with side holes at the tip in each animal. Staphylococcus aureus bacteria were then infused intravenously to cause bacteremia. Six hours later, the catheters were removed, the clots that accumulated in their tips were collected and cultured, and the bacterial colonies were counted after additional 12 h of incubation. RESULTS: Bacteria grew on culture plates seeded with the clot homogenate obtained from the tips of all catheters. The colony counts from the catheters with side holes at the tip exceeded the colony counts of bacteria accumulated in the tips of the side-hole-free hemodialysis catheters by one or more orders of magnitude, with a difference of at least two orders of magnitude observed in three of the four intra-animal comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In paired intra-animal post-inoculation comparison made in this limited study, fewer colony forming units of pathogenic bacteria accumulated at the tip of the side-hole-free catheters than at the tips of the catheters which have side holes. This may translate to a decreased rate of catheter-related blood stream infections in the side-hole-free catheters.

Comprehensive renal artery stenosis management by nephrology: a more selective approach.

The impact of renal artery stenosis (RAS) and resulting ischemic nephropathy on kidney function has been well described. Based on several recent randomized, multicenter trials that revealed limitations to the utility of nonselective renal artery intervention, the general nephrology community has recently taken a conservative stance on this disease state. The purpose of this report is to summarize some recent contributions to our understanding of renal artery stenosis, which may cast RAS intervention in a new light.

Cell-based strategies for the treatment of kidney dysfunction: a review.

Conventional treatment of acute and chronic renal diseases has focused on solute removal. Novel strategies aim to treat the multifactorial disease states of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease by mitigating inflammation. Cell-based technologies for the treatment of kidney dysfunction fall under two broad categories: cell therapy and cell processing. Cell therapy utilizes cells that are isolated, cultured outside of the body, and reintroduced as therapy, leveraging beneficial metabolic and synthetic functions. For example, renal tubule cells have been used to provide gluconeogenesis, ammoniagenesis, metabolism of glutathione, catabolism of important peptide hormones, growth factors, and cytokines critical to multiorgan homeostasis and immunomodulation to treat renal dysfunction. Cell processing focuses on altering the characteristics of cell populations inside the body to provide therapy. The selective cytopheretic device is an example of this novel therapeutic strategy that aims to modulate the innate immune response during organ dysfunction, additional organ injury, by binding and deactivating leukocytes. In this review, both cell therapy and cell processing approaches will be discussed in the context of acute kidney injury and chronic renal disease.

The use of intravascular ultrasound to assist angiography in diagnosis and management of hemodialysis access.

Vascular access continues to be a management challenge for nephrologists. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a tool that has been used in cardiology to obtain intraluminal imaging that can lead to better assessment of lesion morphology, composition of tissues, and adequacy of intervention such as precision of stent placement. Past reports have explored this tool in hemodialysis vascular access but owing to its expense and inconvenience, it is not routinely used. Here, we present a commonly encountered case where IVUS provided additional information to assist in decision making on management. More studies are needed to define the role of IVUS in hemodialysis vascular access.