Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artif Organs ; 46(5): 763-774, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34897748

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2 R) provides respiratory support to patients suffering from hypercapnic respiratory failure by utilizing an extracorporeal shunt and gas exchange membrane to remove CO2 from either the venous (VV-ECCO2 R) or arterial (AV-ECCO2 R) system before return into the venous site. AV-ECCO2 R relies on the patient's native cardiac function to generate pressures needed to deliver blood through the extracorporeal circuit. VV-ECCO2 R utilizes a mechanical pump and can be used to treat patients with inadequate native cardiac function. We sought to evaluate the existing evidence comparing the subgroups of patients supported on VV and AV-ECCO2 R devices. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify all relevant studies published between 2000 and 2019. Demographic information, medical indications, perioperative variables, and clinical outcomes were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies including 826 patients were reviewed. 60% of patients (497/826) were supported on VV-ECCO2 R. The most frequent indications were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [69%, (95%CI: 53%-82%)] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [49%, (95%CI: 37%-60%)]. ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in patients supported on VV-ECCO2 R compared to AV-ECCO2 R [15 (95%CI: 7-23) vs. 42 (95%CI: 17-67) days, p = 0.05]. In-hospital mortality was not significantly different [27% (95%CI: 18%-38%) vs. 36% (95%CI: 24%-51%), p = 0.26]. CONCLUSION: Both VV and AV-ECCO2 R provided clinically meaningful CO2 removal with comparable mortality.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Dióxido de Carbono , Circulación Extracorporea , Humanos , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia
3.
Clin J Gastroenterol ; 16(3): 387-391, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37029881

RESUMEN

The utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) in the setting of an obstructed (ingrown) duodenal stent as a bridge to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains undescribed. Herein, we report a case study of a 51-year-old patient who underwent EUS-GJ using lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) for an obstructed duodenal stent during neoadjuvant treatment for duodenal adenocarcinoma. The patient ultimately underwent surgical resection by a classic PD 14 weeks after LAMS placement. EUS-GJ using LAMS represents a potential option as a salvage bridge to surgery for duodenal obstruction in the setting of an obstructed duodenal stent.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Duodenales , Obstrucción Duodenal , Derivación Gástrica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Duodenal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Duodenal/etiología , Obstrucción Duodenal/cirugía , Stents , Neoplasias Duodenales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Duodenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA