Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 107
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 32(11): 1299-1305, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37344984

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Inpatient mortality is an important variable in epidemiology studies using claims data. In 2016, MarketScan data began obscuring specific hospital discharge status types for patient privacy, including inpatient deaths, by setting the values to missing. We used a machine learning approach to correctly identify hospitalizations that resulted in inpatient death using data prior to 2016. METHODS: All hospitalizations from 2011 to 2015 with discharge status of missing, died, or one of the other subsequently obscured values were identified and divided into a training set and two test sets. Predictor variables included age, sex, elapsed time from hospital discharge until last observed claim and until healthcare plan disenrollment, and absence of any discharge diagnoses. Four machine learning methods were used to train statistical models and assess sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Overall 1 307 917 hospitalizations were included. All four machine learning approaches performed well in all datasets. Random forest performed best with 88% PPV and 93% sensitivity for the training set and both test sets. The two factors with the highest relative importance for identifying inpatient mortality were having no observed claims for the patient on days 2-91 following hospital discharge and patient disenrollment from the healthcare plan within 60 days following hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: We successfully developed machine learning algorithms to identify inpatient mortality. This approach can be applied to obscured data to accurately identify inpatient mortality among hospitalizations with missing discharge status.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Algoritmos , Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(10): 1755-1761, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34338816

RESUMEN

The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic resulted in major disruptions to medical care. We aimed to understand changes in outpatient care delivery and use of telemedicine in U.S. rheumatology practices during this period. Rheumatology Informatics System Effectiveness (RISE) is a national, EHR-enabled registry that passively collects data on all patients seen by participating practices. Included practices were required to have been participating in RISE from January 2019 through August 2020 (N = 213). We compared total visit counts and telemedicine visits during March-August 2020 to March-August 2019 and stratified by locations in states with shelter-in-place (SIP) orders. We assessed characteristics of patients within each practice, including primary rheumatic diagnosis and disease activity scores, where available. We included 213 practices with 945,160 patients. Overall, we found visit counts decreased by 10.9% (from 1,302,455 to 1,161,051) between March and August 2020 compared to 2019; this drop was most dramatic during the month of April (- 22.3%). Telemedicine visits increased from 0% to a mean of 12.1%. Practices in SIP states had more dramatic decreases in visits, (11.5% vs. 5.3%). We found no major differences in primary diagnoses or disease activity across the two periods. We detected a meaningful decrease in rheumatology visits in March-August 2020 during the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic compared to the year prior with a concomitant increase in the use of telemedicine. Future work should address possible adverse consequences to patient outcomes due to decreased contact with clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Reumatología/organización & administración , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Sistema de Registros , Reumatología/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 173(11): 870-878, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32956604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-dose glucocorticoids are frequently used for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic conditions, but the safety of long-term use remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk for hospitalized infection with long-term use of low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with RA receiving stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Medicare claims data and Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from 2006 to 2015. PATIENTS: Adults with RA receiving a stable DMARD regimen for more than 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Associations between glucocorticoid dose (none, ≤5 mg/d, >5 to 10 mg/d, and >10 mg/d) and hospitalized infection were evaluated using inverse probability-weighted analyses, with 1-year cumulative incidence predicted from weighted models. RESULTS: 247 297 observations were identified among 172 041 patients in Medicare and 58 279 observations among 44 118 patients in Optum. After 6 months of stable DMARD use, 47.1% of Medicare patients and 39.5% of Optum patients were receiving glucocorticoids. The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Medicare patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 8.6% versus 11.0% (95% CI, 10.6% to 11.5%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 14.4% (CI, 13.8% to 15.1%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 17.7% (CI, 16.5% to 19.1%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids). The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Optum patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 4.0% versus 5.2% (CI, 4.7% to 5.8%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 8.1% (CI, 7.0% to 9.3%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 10.6% (CI, 8.5% to 13.2%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids). LIMITATION: Potential for residual confounding and misclassification of glucocorticoid dose. CONCLUSION: In patients with RA receiving stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk for serious infection, with small but significant risks even at doses of 5 mg or less per day. Clinicians should balance the benefits of low-dose glucocorticoids with this potential risk. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 79(11): 1400-1413, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32759265

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ulcerative colitis, and has been investigated in psoriasis (PsO). Routine pharmacovigilance of an ongoing, open-label, blinded-endpoint, tofacitinib RA trial (Study A3921133; NCT02092467) in patients aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor identified a higher frequency of pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality for patients receiving tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus those receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and resulted in identification of a safety signal for tofacitinib. Here, we report the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), PE, venous thromboembolism (VTE; DVT or PE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) from the tofacitinib RA (excluding Study A3921133), PsA and PsO development programmes and observational studies. Data from an ad hoc safety analysis of Study A3921133 are reported separately within. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis used data from separate tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years' exposure) were calculated for DVT, PE, VTE and ATE, including for populations stratified by defined baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. Observational data from the US Corrona registries (including cardiovascular risk factor stratification), IBM MarketScan research database and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were analysed. RESULTS: 12 410 tofacitinib-treated patients from the development programmes (RA: n=7964; PsO: n=3663; PsA: n=783) were included. IRs (95% CI) of thromboembolic events among the all tofacitinib cohorts' average tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily treated patients for RA, respectively, were: DVT (0.17 (0.09-0.27) and 0.15 (0.09-0.22)); PE (0.12 (0.06-0.22) and 0.13 (0.08-0.21)); ATE (0.32 (0.22-0.46) and 0.38 (0.28-0.49)). Among PsO patients, IRs were: DVT (0.06 (0.00-0.36) and 0.06 (0.02-0.15)); PE (0.13 (0.02-0.47) and 0.09 (0.04-0.19)); ATE (0.52 (0.22-1.02) and 0.22 (0.13-0.35)). Among PsA patients, IRs were: DVT (0.00 (0.00-0.28) and 0.13 (0.00-0.70)); PE (0.08 (0.00-0.43) and 0.00 (0.00-0.46)); ATE (0.31 (0.08-0.79) and 0.38 (0.08-1.11)). IRs were similar between tofacitinib doses and generally higher in patients with baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. IRs from the overall Corrona populations and in Corrona RA patients (including tofacitinib-naïve/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-treated and tofacitinib-treated) with baseline cardiovascular risk factors were similar to IRs observed among the corresponding patients in the tofacitinib development programme. No signals of disproportionate reporting of DVT, PE or ATE with tofacitinib were identified in the FAERS database. CONCLUSIONS: DVT, PE and ATE IRs in the tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes were similar across tofacitinib doses, and generally consistent with observational data and published IRs of other treatments. As expected, IRs of thromboembolic events were elevated in patients with versus without baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors, and were broadly consistent with those observed in the Study A3921133 ad hoc safety analysis data, although the IR (95% CI) for PE was greater in patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in Study A3921133 (0.54 (0.32-0.87)), versus patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in the RA programme (0.24 (0.13-0.41)).


Asunto(s)
Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
5.
Med Care ; 58(5): 419-426, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31985584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Discontinuation of bisphosphonates (BP) or a "drug holiday" after several years of treatment is increasingly common. However, the association of drug holiday duration with future fracture risk is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the rate of fracture in relation to various lengths of drug holidays among women receiving long-term BP therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN: Observational cohort study using US Medicare data 2006-2016. Incidence rates (IRs) and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the rate and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) controlling for potential confounders. SUBJECTS: Women aged 65 years and above enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare who had been adherent (≥80%) to alendronate, risedronate, or zoledronate for ≥3 years. MEASURES: Hip, humerus, distal forearm, and clinical vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Among 81,427 eligible women observed for a median (interquartile range) of 4.0 (2.5, 5.3) years, 28% of women underwent a drug holiday. In the alendronate cohort (73% overall), the IR of hip fracture among women who discontinued BP for >2 years was 13.2 per 1000 person-years. Risk was increased (aHR=1.3, 1.1-1.4) versus continuing therapy (IR=8.8, referent). Rates were elevated for humerus fracture with discontinuation >2 years (aHR=1.3, 1.1-1.66) and for clinical vertebral fracture with discontinuation >2 years (aHR=1.2, 1.1-1.4). Results were similar for risedronate, zoledronate, and ibandronate for hip and clinical vertebral fracture. CONCLUSION: Discontinuing alendronate beyond 2 years was associated with increased risk of hip, humerus, and clinical vertebral fractures.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas del Húmero/epidemiología , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Anciano , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/prevención & control , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/inducido químicamente , Fracturas del Fémur/prevención & control , Humanos , Medicare , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Privación de Tratamiento
6.
Am J Public Health ; 110(3): 385-390, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31944848

RESUMEN

Objectives. To determine rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine adherence to the 2011 and 2016 Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations in the United States.Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using the 2011 to 2017 Marketscan data for beneficiaries aged 9 to 26 years who had at least 1 claim for HPV vaccination between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2017. According to the 2011 ACIP recommendation, adherence is defined as 30 to 90 days between the first and second vaccination and 168 to 212 days between the first and third vaccination. According to the 2016 recommendation, preadolescents are classified as adherent if they had 2 claims of vaccination within 168 to 212 days. We calculated proportions of completion and adherence by recommendation.Results. Among patients classified under the 2011 ACIP recommendation (n = 2 164 096), 8.3% completed all 3 doses of the vaccine series. Of those who completed, 69.6% were considered adherent to the recommended schedule. Completion and adherence increased to 9.6% and 70.8%, respectively, among patients who were classified under the 2016 ACIP recommendation.Conclusions. Simpler recommendations lead to better adherence to the HPV vaccination schedule.


Asunto(s)
Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(7): 778-785, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31802568

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the capture of biologics (originator and biosimilar) in the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) Distributed Research Network (DRN), with a focus on medical claim National Drug Code (NDC), a new data field, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) modifier. METHODS: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study among patients with medical and pharmacy benefits enrolled in insurance plans participating in the BBCIC DRN between 1 January 2013 and 30 September 2017. We calculated the proportion of medical claims with ≥1 NDC and identified select biologics using four different approaches: (a) specific HCPCS alone, (b) specific HCPCS and NDC, (c) non-specific HCPCS with NDC, and (d) HCPCS with modifiers (applicable to biosimilars). Numbers of dispensings were calculated for each biologic by approach and select patient and claim characteristics. RESULTS: More than 1.5 million eligible participants contributed approximately 4 million person-years of data, including 1.2 billion medical claims. The proportion of medical claims with ≥1 NDC increased from 1.2% in 2013 to 3.0% in 2017. Medical claim NDCs identified 39% and 28% of vedolizumab dispensed in 2014 and 2015 and 30% of Epogen/Procrit dispensed overall. Out of 26,381 filgrastim biosimilar dispensings identified, 51% had a HCPCS modifier and 12% had a medical claim NDC for Zarxio. HCPCS modifiers and medical claim NDCs were present for 38% and 3% of all infliximab biosimilars dispensed (total n = 1,244). CONCLUSIONS: Medical claim NDC and HCPCS modifier improves identification of select biologics without product-specific HCPCS code, thereby facilitating product-specific biologic research.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Estados Unidos
8.
Women Health ; 60(9): 1032-1039, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654623

RESUMEN

In this study authors aimed to investigate the barriers to participation of a sample of Jamaican women in mammography screening. The data were obtained from a previous survey that was conducted in Jamaica from June to August 2013 in the four parishes (Hanover, St. James, Trelawny, and Westmoreland) served by the Western Regional Health Authority (WRHA). WRHA served four hospitals, five non-randomized health centers, and five sites of community events. The sample consisted of women ranging in age between 35 and 83 years, with the mean age of 50.2 (SD = 10.6). The authors used a logistic regression to determine the extent to which variables were associated with breast cancer screening. The level of significace was 0.1 for the bivariate and multivariable analysis. The main factors associated with the lack of breast cancer screening among the women were: being less than 50 years old, single, never thought about breast cancer screening, in need of childcare, and having more than three children. We identified significant barriers to participation in mammography screening experienced by a sample of Jamaican women. Our results suggest that it is necessary to increase the awareness of the importance of breast screening importance among the women who may never have thought about mammography.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Autoexamen de Mamas , Estudios Transversales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Jamaica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 113(3): 405-417, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336432

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) that compromise quality of life and may increase mortality. This study compared the mortality risk with prolonged corticosteroid use vs. antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF) drugs in IBD. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries from 2001 to 2013 with IBD prescribed either >3,000 mg of prednisone or equivalent within a 12-month period or new initiation of anti-TNF therapy, each treated as time-updating exposures. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included common causes of death. Marginal structural models were used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for anti-TNF use relative to corticosteroids. RESULTS: Among patients with CD, 7,694 entered the cohort as prolonged corticosteroid users and 1,879 as new anti-TNF users. Among patients with UC, 3,224 and 459 entered the cohort as prolonged CS users and new anti-TNF users, respectively. The risk of death was statistically significantly lower in patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for CD (21.4 vs. 30.1 per 1,000 person-years, OR 0.78, 0.65-0.93) but not for UC (23.0 vs. 30.9 per 1,000 person-years, OR 0.87, 0.63-1.22). Among the CD cohort, anti-TNF therapy was also associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.68, 0.55-0.85) and hip fracture (OR 0.54, 0.34-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with prolonged corticosteroid exposure, anti-TNF drug use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with CD that may be explained by lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and hip fracture.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Mortalidad , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(3): 386-392, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29269418

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and associated systemic inflammation has been associated with serious infection (SIEs), myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary heart disease (CHD) events based on a few registry studies or clinical trials. There are few data from large-scale population-based studies given feasibility challenges in conducting such investigations. METHODS: Multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) test scores (n=77 641) were linked to Medicare for US patients with RA. Outcomes of interest were hospitalised pneumonia/sepsis (SIE), MI and a composite CHD outcome. The MBDA score ranges from 1 to 100 and was analysed as time-varying. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association between MBDA score and SIEs, MI and CHD events, controlling for potential confounders. A sensitivity analysis excluded C reactive protein (CRP) from the MBDA score. RESULTS: There were 17 433 and 16 796 patients eligible for the SIE and MI/CHD analyses, respectively. Mean (SD) age was 69 (11) years, 79% were women, 81% were white and 38% were disabled. Over 16 424 person-years of follow-up, there were 452 SIE events, 132 MIs and 181 CHD events. Higher MBDA scores were associated with SIEs (HR=1.32, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.41 per 10 unit MBDA score change). For MI/CHD events, a threshold effect was present; higher disease activity by MBDA score was associated with increased MI (HR=1.52, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.49) and CHD rates (HR=1.54, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.34, comparing scores ≥30 vs <30). Analyses of the MBDA score without CRP yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Higher MBDA scores were associated with hospitalised infection, MI and CHD events in a large, predominantly older, US RA population.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Biomarcadores/análisis , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad Coronaria/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Med Care ; 56(12): 1051-1059, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30363020

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assess the validity of Medicare claims for identifying myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: We used data from 9951 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and above in the Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study. Between 2003 and 2012, 669 participants had an MI identified and adjudicated through study procedures (ie, the gold standard), and 552 had an overnight inpatient claim with a code for MI (ICD-9 code 410.x0 or 410.x1) in any discharge diagnosis position. RESULTS: Using Medicare claims with a discharge diagnosis code for MI in any position, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 84.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 80.9%-87.3%] and the sensitivity was 49.0% (95% CI, 44.9%-53.1%). Sensitivity was lower for men (45.8%) versus women (55.1%), microsize MIs (13.7%) versus other MIs (64.7%), type 2 (30.9%), and 4-5 MIs (11.1%) versus type 1 MIs (76.6%), and MIs occurring in-hospital (28.8%) versus out-of-hospital (66.7%). Using Medicare claims with a code for MI in the primary discharge diagnosis position, the PPV was 89.7% (95% CI, 86.3%-92.5%) and sensitivity was 40.1% (95% CI, 36.1%-44.2%). The sensitivity of claims with a code for MI in the primary discharge diagnosis position was lower for microsize versus other MIs, type 2 and 4-5 MIs versus type 1 MIs and MIs occurring in-hospital versus out-of-hospital. Hazard ratios for MI associated with participant characteristics were similar using adjudicated MIs identified through study procedures or claims for MI without further adjudication. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare claims have a high PPV but low sensitivity for identifying MI and can be used to investigate individual-level characteristics associated with MI.


Asunto(s)
Geografía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etnología , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/clasificación , Alta del Paciente , Estados Unidos/etnología
12.
Med Care ; 55(12): e144-e149, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29135778

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We had previously developed an algorithm for Medicare claims data to detect bone metastases associated with breast, prostate, or lung cancer. This study was conducted to examine whether this algorithm accurately documents bone metastases on the basis of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims data. METHODS: We obtained data from Medicare claims and electronic medical records of patients 65 years or older with a breast, prostate, or lung cancer diagnosis at a teaching hospital and/or affiliated clinics during 2005 or 2006. We calculated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of our algorithm using medical records as the "gold standard." The κ statistic was used to measure agreement between claims and medical record data. RESULTS: The agreement between claims and medical record data for bone metastases among breast, prostate, and lung cancer patients was 0.93, 0.90, and 0.69, respectively. The sensitivities of our algorithm for bone metastasis in patients with breast, prostate, and lung were 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)=83.8% to 99.4%], 91.7% (95% CI=78.2% to 97.1%), and 74.1% (95% CI=55.3% to 86.8%), respectively; and the PPVs were 90.9% (95% CI=76.4% to 96.9%), 91.7% (95% CI=78.2% to 97.1%), and 71.4% (95% CI=52.9% to 84.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm for detecting bone metastases in claims data had high sensitivity and PPV for breast and prostate cancer patients. Sensitivity and PPV were lower but still moderate for lung cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Medicare/organización & administración , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Estados Unidos
13.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(3): 310-319, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28028867

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treat to target guidelines recommend achieving remission or low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the reduction in adverse events and costs associated with lower disease activity is unclear. METHODS: We used Corrona linked to Medicare data to identify RA patients. Time varying disease activity was measured using Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, a composite of hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visits, mortality, and medical costs. Outcome-specific Cox proportional models evaluated the adjusted hazard ratios between disease activity and outcomes, controlling for potential confounders including comorbidities grouped into four patient phenotypes. Costs were analyzed with mixed models using a Gaussian distribution with log transformation. RESULTS: Depending on outcome, 4593 RA patients contributed up to 12 001 person years. Median age was 71 years, 75% women. At baseline, approximately 50-60% of patients were in remission or low disease activity. There was a dose-response relationship between RA disease activity (remission, low, moderate, and high) and the incidence of hospitalizations (13.1, 17.8, 21.2, 27.5 per 100 py, respectively); all adjusted hazard ratios were significant: 0.68 (remission), 0.87 (low), and 1.24 (high) compared with moderate disease activity. Similar trends were observed for ED visits and mortality. The crude difference in annual medical costs between remission ($11 145) and moderate disease activity ($17 646) was $-6 500; the adjusted difference (95%CI) was $-3133 (-4737.72, -1528.43). CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of linking registry and administrative data together, lower disease activity in RA was associated with incrementally reduced risks of all-cause hospitalization, ED visits, mortality, and medical costs in a dose-dependent fashion. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Tiempo
14.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 75(10): 1843-7, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27113415

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risks of herpes zoster (HZ) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection associated with tofacitinib compared with biologic agents among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Using health plan data from 2010 to 2014, patients with RA initiating tofacitinib or biologics with no history of HZ or HSV were identified, as were incident cases of HZ or HSV. Crude incidence rates were calculated by drug exposure. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the adjusted association between tofacitinib and HZ, and a composite outcome of HZ or HSV. RESULTS: A total of 2526 patients initiating tofacitinib were compared with initiations of other biologics: anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) (n=42 850), abatacept (n=12 305), rituximab (n=5078) and tocilizumab (n=6967). Patients receiving tofacitinib were somewhat younger (mean age 55 years) versus those on other biologics, and somewhat less likely to use concomitant methotrexate (MTX) (39% vs 43%-56%, depending on drug). Crude incidence of HZ associated with tofacitinib was 3.87/100 patient-years (py). After multivariable adjustment, HZ risk was significantly elevated, HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.40 to 2.88) compared with abatacept. Rates and adjusted HRs for all other RA biologics were comparable with each other and abatacept. Older age, female sex, prednisone >7.5 mg/day, prior outpatient infection and greater number of hospitalisations were also associated with increased HZ risk. Incidence rates for the combined outcome were greatest for tofacitinib (7.61/100 py) and also significantly elevated after adjustment (HR=1.40, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.81). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of zoster associated with tofacitinib was approximately double that observed in patients using biologics.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/inducido químicamente , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Herpes Simple/inducido químicamente , Herpes Simple/epidemiología , Herpes Simple/virología , Herpes Zóster/inducido químicamente , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/virología , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/virología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
15.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 75(10): 1813-8, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26792814

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the coronary heart disease risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating common biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs of different mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with RA enrolled in Medicare, a public health plan covering >90% of US residents 65 years or older, from 2006 to 2012 who (1) initiated a biologic, (2) had complete medical and pharmacy coverage for at least 12 months before biologic initiation and (3) were free of coronary heart disease at the time of initiation. We compared the incidence rates (IRs) of (1) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and (2) a composite outcome of AMI or coronary revascularisation and used multivariable adjusted Cox regression models to examine the associations between the type of biologic and the two outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 47 193 eligible patients with RA with mean age 64 (SD 13) years; 85% were women. Crude IRs for AMI ranged from 5.7 to 8.8 cases per 1000 person-years (PYs). AMI risk was significantly elevated among antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) initiators overall (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6) and individually among etanercept (aHR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.8) and infliximab (aHR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6) compared with abatacept initiators. Crude IRs for the composite outcome ranged from 7.6 to 14.5 per 1000 PYs. Tocilizumab initiators were at reduced risk of the composite outcome compared with abatacept initiators (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.99). DISCUSSION: Findings from this observational study of patients with RA suggested that anti-TNF biologics may be associated with higher AMI risk compared with abatacept.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 74(6): 1065-71, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24608404

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk of subsequent infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who receive biologic therapy after a serious infection is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the subsequent risk of hospitalised infections associated with specific biologic agents among RA patients previously hospitalised for infection while receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. METHODS: Using 2006-2010 Medicare data for 100% of beneficiaries with RA enrolled in Medicare, we identified patients hospitalised with an infection while on anti-TNF agents. Follow-up began 61 days after hospital discharge and ended at the earliest of: next infection, loss of Medicare coverage or 18 months after start of follow-up. We calculated the incidence rate of subsequent hospitalised infection for each biologic and used Cox regression to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: 10 794 eligible hospitalised infections among 10183 unique RA patients who contributed at least 1 day of biologic exposure during follow-up. We identified 7807 person-years of exposure to selected biologics--333 abatacept, 133 rituximab and 7341 anti-TNFs (1797 etanercept, 1405 adalimumab, 4139 infliximab)--and 2666 associated infections. Mean age across biologic exposure cohorts was 64-69 years. The crude incidence rate of subsequent hospitalised infection ranged from 27.1 to 34.6 per 100 person-years. After multivariable adjustment, abatacept (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99) and etanercept (HR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96) users had significantly lower risks of subsequent infection compared to infliximab users. CONCLUSIONS: Among RA patients who experienced a hospitalised infection while on anti-TNF therapy, abatacept and etanercept were associated with the lowest risk of subsequent infection compared to other biologic therapies.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Abatacept , Adalimumab , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Etanercept , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Infliximab , Masculino , Medicare , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Riesgo , Rituximab , Estados Unidos
17.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(6): 1447-57, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26130274

RESUMEN

AIMS: Older and disabled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are often not present in large numbers in clinical trials or registries. A novel, claims-based clinical effectiveness algorithm provides the potential to compare the effectiveness of different biologics among this population using large administrative databases. METHOD: Using Medicare 2006-2010 data for 100% of patients with RA, we identified biologic naïve users of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab, defined as no biologic use during the 12 months before the biologic initiation. The effectiveness was evaluated at 365 days after biologic initiation, determined using a validated claims-based algorithm. We compared the proportion meeting effectiveness criteria for each biologic using robust Poisson regression to compute risk ratios (RRs) adjusted for potential confounders. One year cost per effectively treated patient was calculated by different biologics. RESULTS: The study included biologic naïve users of abatacept (n = 2129), adalimumab (n = 2944), etanercept (n = 3517) and infliximab (n = 5654). The algorithm classified the medications as 26% effective for abatacept, 24% for adalimumab, 28% for etanercept and 23% for infliximab, indicating comparable effectiveness. However, after adjustment and compared with infliximab, the RRs for effectiveness were 1.17 (95% CI 1.06, 1.30) for abatacept, 1.11 (95% CI 1.02, 1.23) for adalimumab and 1.27 (95% CI 1.17, 1.39) for etanercept. Older patients had a higher effectiveness than patients who were disabled (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.08, 1.28). Infliximab had highest cost per effectively treated patient. CONCLUSION: Abatacept, adalimumab and etanercept are more effective than infliximab among RA patients initiating biologics. Effectiveness was significantly higher among older patients compared with disabled RA Medicare patients.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 33(3): 302-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25068266

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of different drugs for osteoporosis (OP). We aimed to determine if fracture and mortality rates vary among patients initiating different OP medications. METHODS: We used the Medicare 5% sample to identify new users of intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (n=1.674), oral bisphosphonates (n=32.626), IV ibandronate (n=492), calcitonin (n=2.606), raloxifene (n=1.950), or parathyroid hormone (n=549). We included beneficiaries who were ≥65 years of age, were continuously enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and initiated therapy during 2007-2009. Outcomes were hip fracture, clinical vertebral fracture, and all-cause mortality, identified using inpatient and physician diagnosis codes for fracture, procedure codes for fracture repair, and vital status information. Cox regression models compared users of each medication to users of IV zoledronic acid, adjusting for multiple confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up (median, 0.8-1.5 years depending on the drug), 787 subjects had hip fractures, 986 had clinical vertebral fractures, and 2.999 died. Positive associations included IV ibandronate with hip fracture (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-4.51), calcitonin with vertebral fracture (HR=1.59, 95%CI 1.04-2.43), and calcitonin with mortality (HR=1.31; 95%CI 1.02-1.68). Adjusted HRs for other drug-outcome comparisons were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: IV ibandronate and calcitonin were associated with higher rates of some types of fracture when compared to IV zolendronic acid. The relatively high mortality associated with use of calcitonin may reflect the poorer health of users of this agent.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/mortalidad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/mortalidad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Causas de Muerte , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
19.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 112, 2014 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24684864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low adherence to bisphosphonate therapy is associated with increased fracture risk. Factors associated with discontinuation of osteoporosis medications have not been studied in-depth. This study assessed medication discontinuation and switching patterns among Medicare beneficiaries who were new users of bisphosphonates and evaluated factors possibly associated with discontinuation. METHODS: We identified patients initiating bisphosphonate treatment using a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with at least 24 months of traditional fee-for-service and part D drug coverage from 2006 through 2009. We classified medication status at the end of follow-up as: continued original bisphosphonate, discontinued without switching or restarting, restarted the same drug after a treatment gap (≥ 90 days), or switched to another anti-osteoporosis medication. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify baseline characteristics associated with discontinuation and a case-crossover analysis to identify factors that precipitate discontinuation. RESULTS: Of 21,452 new users followed respectively for 12 months, 44% continued their original therapy, 36% discontinued without switching or restarting, 8% restarted the same drug after a gap greater than 90 days, and 11% switched to another anti-osteoporosis medication. Factors assessed during the 12-month period before initiation were weakly associated with discontinuation. Several Factors measured during follow-up were associated with discontinuation, including more physician visits, hospitalization, having a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry test, higher Charlson comorbidity index scores, higher out-of-pocket drug payments, and upper gastrointestinal problems. Patterns were similar for 4,738 new users followed for 30 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among new bisphosphonates users, switching within and across drug classes and extended treatment gaps are common. Robust definitions and time-varying considerations should be considered to characterize medication discontinuation more accurately.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos/tendencias , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Medicare , Oportunidad Relativa , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 76(4): 559-569, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37986017

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to update a method to identify comorbid conditions using only medication information in circumstances in which diagnosis codes may be undercaptured, such as in single-specialty electronic health records (EHRs), and to compare the distribution of comorbidities across Rx-Risk versus other traditional comorbidity indices. METHODS: Using First Databank, RxNorm, and its web-based clients, RxNav and RxClass, we mapped Drug Concept Unique Identifiers (RxCUIs), National Drug Codes (NDCs), and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes to Rx-Risk, a medication-focused comorbidity index. In established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) cohorts within the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry, we then compared Rx-Risk with other comorbidity indices, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI), and Elixhauser. RESULTS: We identified 965 unique ingredient RxCUIs representing the 46 Rx-Risk comorbidity categories. After excluding dosage form and ingredient related RxCUIs, 80,911 unique associated RxCUIs were mapped to the index. Additionally, 187,024 unique NDCs and 354 ATC codes were obtained and mapped to the index categories. When compared to traditional comorbidity indices in the RA cohort, the median score for Rx-Risk (median 6.00 [25th percentile 2, 75th percentile 9]) was much greater than for Charlson (median 0 [25th percentile 0, 75th percentile 0]), RDCI (median 0 [25th percentile 0, 75th percentile 0]), and Elixhauser (median 1 [25th percentile 1, 75th percentile 1]). Analyses of the OA cohort yielded similar results. For patients with a Charlson score of 0 (85% of total), both the RDCI and Elixhauser were close to 1, but the Rx-Risk score ranged from 0 to 16 or more. CONCLUSION: The misclassification and under-ascertainment of comorbidities in single-specialty EHRs can largely be overcome by using a medication-focused comorbidity index.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Osteoartritis , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Multimorbilidad , Comorbilidad , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA