Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of overactive bladder in men and women: A pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: This pooled analysis of randomized controlled studies investigated the safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in male and female patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Data were pooled from four similarly designed trials in North America and Europe. Adults with idiopathic OAB for ≥6 months inadequately managed by at least one anticholinergic were randomized 1:1 or 2:1 to receive onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U or matched placebo in Cycle 1 and could request open-label retreatment with onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U at ≥12 weeks. Efficacy outcomes at Week 12 included the primary endpoint of mean urinary incontinence (UI) episodes per day and other variables, such as the proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction in daily UI episodes. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Analyses by sex were descriptive. Males were further analyzed by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) diagnosis status. RESULTS: In the pooled population (N = 1564), there were 194 males (12.4%) and 1370 females (87.6%). Mean number of baseline UI episodes per day was 4.9 in males and 5.5 in females. At Week 12, numerically greater mean reductions from baseline in number of daily UI episodes were observed with the onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U group (females: -3.0; males: -2.2) versus placebo (females: -1.1; males: -1.3). Achievement of ≥50% reduction in daily UI episodes was numerically greater with onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (females: 64.8%; males: 61.2%) versus placebo (females: 30.6%; males: 44.8%), and numerically higher in males without BPH (onabotulinumtoxinA: 65.1%; placebo: 50.9%) versus with BPH (onabotulinumtoxinA: 54.3%; placebo: 36.6%). A total of 34.7% of males and 39.4% of females experienced at least one TEAE in the first 12 weeks during treatment Cycle 1. Urinary tract infection rate was 13.1% in females and 4.2% in males; incidence of hematuria was 6.8% in males and 1.1% in females. Incidence of urinary retention (defined as incomplete emptying, requiring catheterization) was 2.7% in females and 4.7% in males. CONCLUSION: OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was efficacious and well tolerated in men and women with OAB, including in males with and without BPH. No new safety findings were identified when data were analyzed by sex.

Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Repeated Treatments With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Children With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.

PURPOSE: OnabotulinumtoxinA is an approved treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity in adults inadequately managed with anticholinergics, and more recently was approved in children on the basis of a phase 3, 48-week, single-treatment study (NCT01852045). Given the paucity of long-term pediatric data, we report on the continued safety in these patients after repeated onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, repeat-treatment extension study (NCT01852058) in patients who entered from the preceding single-treatment study. Data were integrated across both studies. All patients (5-17 years) used clean intermittent catheterization and could receive dose escalations based on response to preceding treatment (50 U, 100 U, or 200 U onabotulinumtoxinA [not to exceed 6 U/kg]). RESULTS: Overall, 95, 90, 55, and 11 patients received 1, 2, 3, and 4 treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA, respectively, and median (quartiles) duration of follow-up was 82 (65, 94) weeks. The safety profile was similar across doses and after repeat treatments. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event during cycles 1, 2, and 3 was urinary tract infection (31%, 34%, 22%). Three serious treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment (3/95; 3.2%) were reported during the study, which were all cases of urinary tract infection. Annualized urinary tract infection rates post-treatment were similar to pre-screening rates. There were no cases of autonomic dysreflexia, neutralizing antibodies, and treatment-emergent adverse events related to distant spread of toxin. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA continued to be well tolerated after repeated treatments in pediatric neurogenic detrusor overactivity patients with similar safety profiles across dose groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were primarily urological with no new safety concerns.

Phase 3 Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA Distributed Between Frontalis, Glabellar Complex, and Lateral Canthal Areas for Treatment of Upper Facial Lines.

BACKGROUND: Although commonly practiced, simultaneous onabotulinumtoxinA injections to multiple facial areas have not been investigated in prospective studies. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of forehead lines (FHL) distributed between the frontalis (20 U) and glabellar complex (20 U), with or without simultaneous lateral canthal areas (crow's feet lines [CFL], 24 U) treatment. METHODS: Subjects with moderate to severe FHL were randomized (2:2:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, onabotulinumtoxinA 64 U, or placebo. After 180 days, subjects could receive up to 2 additional open-label onabotulinumtoxinA 64 U treatments. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 787 subjects, and the modified ITT (mITT) population (subjects with psychological impact) comprised 568. After 30 days, onabotulinumtoxinA 40 U and 64 U significantly improved investigator- and subject-assessed FHL severity by at least 2 Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) grades in 45.6% and 53.0% of ITT subjects, respectively, versus 0.6% receiving placebo (both, p < .0001). Significantly more mITT subjects receiving onabotulinumtoxinA achieved investigator- and subject-assessed FWS ratings of none/mild versus placebo (p < .0001). OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: OnabotulinumtoxinA distributed between the frontalis and glabellar complex, with or without additional CFL injections, was safe and effective for treatment of moderate to severe FHL.

Forehead Line Treatment With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Subjects With Forehead and Glabellar Facial Rhytids: A Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Effacement of horizontal forehead lines (FHL) with onabotulinumtoxinA has not been investigated in prospective Phase 3 studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment of FHL together with glabellar lines (GL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 12-month, Phase 3 study randomized subjects with moderate-to-severe FHL and GL to onabotulinumtoxinA 40 U or placebo, distributed between the frontalis (20 U) and glabellar complex (20 U). After Day 180, subjects could receive up to 2 additional open-label onabotulinumtoxinA treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) and Facial Line Outcomes questionnaire. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 391 subjects, and the modified ITT (mITT) population (subjects with psychological impact) included 254 subjects. After 30 days, onabotulinumtoxinA significantly improved the investigator- and subject-assessed appearance of FHL severity by at least 2 FWS grades in 61.4% of ITT subjects versus 0% of placebo subjects (p < .0001). In the mITT population, 94.8% of onabotulinumtoxinA subjects and 1.7% of placebo subjects achieved investigator- and subject-assessed FWS ratings of none/mild (p = .0003). Patient-reported outcomes were consistent with FWS ratings. OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U distributed between the frontalis and glabellar complex was safe and effective for treatment of moderate-to-severe FHL.

Pregnancy outcomes following exposure to onabotulinumtoxinA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes following onabotulinumtoxinA (US Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category C product) exposure using the Allergan safety database. METHODS: The Allergan Global Safety Database contains reports of onabotulinumtoxinA administration before/during pregnancy, including both prospective (reported before outcome) and retrospective (outcome already known) cases. The database was searched from 1/1/90 to 12/31/13 for eligible cases where treatment occurred during pregnancy or ≤3 months before conception. To minimize reporting bias, prevalence rates were focused on prospective cases. RESULTS: Of 574 pregnancies with maternal onabotulinumtoxinA exposure, 232 were eligible with known outcomes. Patients received onabotulinumtoxinA most frequently for cosmetic indications (50.5%), movement disorders (16.8%), and pain disorders (14.2%). Of the 137 with dose information, 40.1% received <50U, 14.6% 50U to <100U, 27.7% 100U to <200U, and 17.5% ≥200U. Among 146 cases with known maternal age, 47.9% were ≥35 years. Most (96.0%) fetal exposures occurred during/before the first trimester. Of the 137 prospective cases (139 fetuses), 110 (79.1%) were live births; 29 (20.9%; 95% CI, 14.0-30.0%) ended in fetal loss (21 spontaneous, 8 induced abortions). Among live births, 106 (96.4%) were normal, with four abnormal birth outcomes (1 major fetal defect, 2 minor fetal malformations, 1 birth complication), giving a 2.7% (3/110; 95% CI, 0.6-8.0%) prevalence rate for overall fetal defects. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-year retrospective review of the Allergan safety database shows that the prevalence of fetal defects in onabotulinumtoxinA-exposed mothers before/during pregnancy (2.7%) is comparable with background rates in the general population. Pregnancy outcome monitoring in onabotulinumtoxinA-exposed women continues.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Exposed to OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment: A Cumulative 29-Year Safety Update.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A previous publication of pregnancy outcomes in onabotulinumtoxinA-exposed mothers demonstrated that the prevalence of major fetal defects (0.9%, 1/110) was comparable with background rates in the general population. There is continued interest to better understand the safety of onabotulinumtoxinA during pregnancy. This analysis evaluated pregnancy outcomes after onabotulinumtoxinA exposure to provide a cumulative 29-year update. METHODS: The Allergan Global Safety Database was searched from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2018. Data from women (younger than 65 years or unknown) during pregnancy or ≤3 months before conception treated with onabotulinumtoxinA were assessed to estimate birth defect prevalence rates of live births only from prospective pregnancies. RESULTS: Of 913 pregnancies, 397 (43.5%) were eligible with known outcomes. Maternal age was known in 215 pregnancies: 45.6% were 35 years or older. Indication was known in 340 pregnancies: most frequent were aesthetic (35.3%) and migraine/headache (30.3%). The timing of exposure was known in 318 pregnancies: 94.6% were before conception or during the first trimester. OnabotulinumtoxinA dose information was known in 242 pregnancies; most (83.5%) were exposed to <200 U. Of 195 prospective pregnancies with 197 fetuses, there were 152 (77.2%) live births and 45 (22.8%) fetal losses (32 spontaneous, 13 elective). Of 152 live births, 148 (97.4%) had normal outcomes and 4 had abnormal outcomes. Among the 4 abnormal outcomes, there were 1 major birth defect, 2 minor fetal defects, and 1 birth complication. The prevalence rate for overall fetal defects was 2.6% (4/152, 95% CI 1.0%-6.6%) and 0.7% (1/152, 95% CI 0.1%-3.6%) for major fetal defects (3%-6% in the general population). Among cases of live births and known determinable exposure times, there was 1 birth defect with preconception exposure and 2 with first-trimester exposure. DISCUSSION: Although subject to reporting bias due to the nature of the postmarketing database review, this 29-year retrospective analysis of safety data in pregnant women exposed to onabotulinumtoxinA demonstrates that the prevalence rate of major fetal defects among live births is consistent with the rates reported in the general population. Although there are limited data available for second-trimester and third-trimester exposure, this updated and expanded safety analysis provides important real-world evidence to health care providers and their patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This analysis provides Class III data that demonstrate that the prevalence rate of major fetal defects among live births subsequent to in utero onabotulinumtoxinA exposure is comparable with the reported background rates.

Neutralizing Antibody Formation with OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) Treatment from Global Registration Studies across Multiple Indications: A Meta-Analysis.

Though the formation of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) during treatment with botulinum neurotoxin is rare, their presence may nonetheless affect the biological activity of botulinum toxin and negatively impact clinical response. The goal of this updated meta-analysis was to evaluate and characterize the rate of NAb formation using an expanded dataset composed of 33 prospective placebo-controlled and open-label clinical trials with nearly 30,000 longitudinal subject records prior to and following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in 10 therapeutic and aesthetic indications. Total onabotulinumtoxinA doses per treatment ranged from 10 U to 600 U administered in ≤15 treatment cycles. The NAb formation at baseline and post-treatment was tested and examined for impact on clinical safety and efficacy. Overall, 27 of the 5876 evaluable subjects (0.5%) developed NAbs after onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. At study exit, 16 of the 5876 subjects (0.3%) remained NAb positive. Due to the low incidence of NAb formation, no clear relationship was discernable between positive NAb results and gender, indication, dose level, dosing interval, treatment cycles, or the site of injection. Only five subjects who developed NAbs post-treatment were considered secondary nonresponders. Subjects who developed NAbs revealed no other evidence of immunological reactions or clinical disorders. This comprehensive meta-analysis confirms the low NAb formation rate following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment across multiple indications, and its limited clinical impact on treatment safety and efficacy.

Cardiovascular safety of exenatide BID: an integrated analysis from controlled clinical trials in participants with type 2 diabetes.

UNLABELLED: It is important for patients that treatments for diabetes not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk. The objective of this analysis was to examine retrospectively the CV safety of exenatide BID, a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for treating hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with diet and exercise. Individual participant data was pooled to assess the relative risk (RR) of CV events with exenatide BID versus a pooled comparator (PC) group treated with either placebo or insulin from 12 controlled, randomized, clinical trials ranging from 12-52 weeks. Mean baseline values for HbA1c (8.33-8.38%), BMI (31.3-31.5 kg/m2), and duration of diabetes (8 y) were similar between groups. Trials included patients with histories of microvascular and/or macrovascular disease. Customized primary major adverse CV events (MACE) included stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac mortality, acute coronary syndrome, and revascularization procedures. The Primary MACE RR (0.7; 95% CI 0.38, 1.31), calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method (stratified by study), suggested that exenatide use (vs. PC) did not increase CV risk; this result was consistent across multiple analytic methods. Because the trials were not designed to assess CV outcomes, events were identified retrospectively from a list of preferred terms by physicians blinded to treatment. Other limitations included the low number of CV events, the short duration of trials (≤1 y), and a single active comparator (insulin). The results of these analyses are consistent with those of a recent retrospective analysis of a large insurance database that found that patients treated with exenatide twice daily were less likely to have a CV event than were patients treated with other glucose-lowering therapies. KEYWORDS: GLP-1 receptor agonist, diabetes, cardiovascular safety.

Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA with Concomitant Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Muscle Spasticity: A Retrospective Pooled Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Studies.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA is approved as a treatment across multiple indications. For the treatment of spasticity, onabotulinumtoxinA is injected directly into affected muscles. Intramuscular injections may result in local bleeding and related complications, especially in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy. Despite anticoagulants being commonly used, there is limited information in the medical literature regarding the safety of intramuscular medications in patients receiving oral anticoagulants. This retrospective analysis included pooled safety data from Allergan-sponsored studies evaluating onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of patients with muscle spasticity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of bleeding complications in patients with post-stroke spasticity receiving antithrombotic therapy and intramuscular onabotulinumtoxinA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pooled safety data from 16 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Allergan-sponsored studies of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of post-stroke upper or lower limb muscle spasticity, including adult patients with at least moderate upper or lower limb spasticity and receiving at least one dose of the study drug. Bleeding-related adverse events starting within 4 weeks of study treatment were assessed. The incidence rates of bleeding complications were compared for patients receiving classes of antithrombotic therapy vs those not receiving antithrombotic therapy and for those receiving onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo (with or without antithrombotic therapy). RESULTS: Of 1877 patients, 1182 received antithrombotic therapy. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was < 2%. In those receiving any antithrombotic therapy, the incidence of bleeding was 1.0% vs 1.4% (no antithrombotic therapy); after onabotulinumtoxinA, it was 0.9% for those receiving antithrombotic therapy vs 1.4% (no antithrombotic therapy), and for placebo 1.2% vs 1.4%, respectively. Subgroup results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: No apparent increased risk of bleeding complications was observed following administration of onabotulinumtoxinA to patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Nonetheless, patient education and careful observation of the injection site in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy remains warranted.

Safety and Stability of Pulmonary Function in Patients with Decreased Respiratory Function Treated for Spasticity with OnabotulinumtoxinA.

Two randomized, placebo-controlled studies evaluated the pulmonary function safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) for treatment of upper and/or lower limb spasticity. Patients with stable baseline respiratory status received one or two treatments with placebo, 240 U, or 360 U of onabotA. Pulmonary function tests, adverse events, and efficacy were measured at least every 6 weeks for 18 weeks (Study 1) or 30 weeks (Study 2). Study 1 enrolled 109 patients (n = 36-37/group) and Study 2 enrolled 155 patients (n = 48-54/group). Mean baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) was 76-78% of predicted per group in Study 1 and 71% of predicted per group in Study 2. In Study 1, change from baseline FVC values were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased vs. placebo at weeks 3 (240 U -57 mL vs. placebo +110 mL) and 12 (360 U -6 mL vs. +167 mL placebo). In Study 2, change from baseline FVC values were significantly decreased in the 360 U group vs. placebo at weeks 6 (-78 mL vs. +49 mL placebo), 13 (-60 mL vs. +119 mL placebo), 18 (-128 mL vs. +80 mL placebo), and 24 (-82 mL vs. +149 mL placebo). Individual pulmonary function-related adverse events were not correlated with PFT decreases. The most frequent pulmonary-related adverse events were nasopharyngitis (Study 1) and upper respiratory tract infection (Study 2). Ashworth scores were significantly improved at multiple time points in both studies. Injection of onabotA for spasticity in patients with decreased pulmonary function, at single and repeated doses of up to 360 U, was associated with small but statistically significant decreases in FVC or forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1) (>12% and 200 mL) that were subclinical and not correlated with any adverse clinical pulmonary events.

Real-World Safety And Effectiveness Of OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment Of Crow's Feet Lines And Glabellar Lines: Results Of A Korean Postmarketing Surveillance Study.

PURPOSE: OnabotulinumtoxinA is approved in the Republic of Korea for the treatment of moderate-to-severe crow's feet lines (CFL) and glabellar lines (GL), separately or in combination. We assessed safety and effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA in real-world clinical practice. PATIENT AND METHODS: This 4-year postmarketing surveillance study was conducted in the Republic of Korea in subjects with moderate-to-severe CFL. Subjects aged 18 to 75 years received onabotulinumtoxinA injections for CFL alone or in combination with GL. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and unexpected AEs (not noted in Korean prescribing information). Investigators assessed effectiveness via change from baseline in CFL. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 695 subjects; 667 were in the safety set and 376 in the effectiveness set. In the safety set, mean ± SD age was 40.9±13.0 years; most subjects (87.3%) were female. More subjects were treated for CFL (69.9%) than CFL and GL simultaneously (30.1%). Eleven subjects experienced 14 AEs; 12 were mild in severity and 11 resolved without sequelae. Two cases of injection site pain in 2 subjects each were deemed possibly related to onabotulinumtoxinA. One unexpected SAE (acute renal failure) occurred in 1 subject (0.15%). All unexpected AEs (n=4) were mild and considered unrelated to treatment. Overall change from baseline showed CFL was improved in 375 subjects (99.7%) and unchanged in 1 subject (0.3%). CONCLUSION: OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated and effective for treatment of CFL with or without GL in a real-world Korean population. No new safety concerns were identified.