Parkinson's Disease Gene Screening in Familial Cases from Central and South America.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease following Alzheimer's disease. Nearly 30 causative genes have been identified for PD and related disorders. However, most of these genes were identified in European-derived families, and little is known about their role in Latin American populations. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic variants in known PD genes in familial PD patients from Latin America. METHODS: We selected 335 PD patients with a family history of PD from the Latin American Research Consortium on the Genetics of PD. We capture-sequenced the coding regions of 26 genes related to neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Of the 335 PD patients, 324 had sufficient sequencing coverage to be analyzed. RESULTS: We identified pathogenic variants in 41 individuals (12.7%) in FBXO7, GCH1, LRRK2, PARK7, PINK1, PLA2G6, PRKN, SNCA, and TARDBP, GBA1 risk variants in 25 individuals (7.7%), and variants of uncertain significance in another 24 individuals (7.4%) in ATP13A2, ATP1A3, DNAJC13, DNAJC6, GBA1, LRKK2, PINK1, VPS13C, and VPS35. Of the 70 unique variants identified, 19 were more frequent in Latin Americans than in any other population. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first screening of known PD genes in a large cohort of patients with familial PD from Latin America. There were substantial differences in the spectrum of variants observed in comparison to previous findings from PD families of European origin. Our data provide further evidence that differences exist between the genetic architecture of PD in Latinos and European-derived populations. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The Parkinson's Disease Composite of Executive Functioning: A Measure for Detecting Cognitive Decline in Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Executive functioning is one of the first domains to be impaired in Parkinson disease (PD), and the majority of patients with PD eventually develop dementia. Thus, developing a cognitive endpoint measure specifically assessing executive functioning is critical for PD clinical trials. The objective of this study was to develop a cognitive composite measure that is sensitive to decline in executive functioning for use in PD clinical trials. METHODS: We used cross-sectional and longitudinal follow-up data from PD participants enrolled in the PD Cognitive Genetics Consortium, a multicenter setting focused on PD. All PD participants with Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol, Letter-Number Sequencing, Semantic Fluency, and Phonemic Fluency neuropsychological data collected from March 2010 to February 2020 were included. Baseline executive functioning data were used to create the Parkinson's Disease Composite of Executive Functioning (PaCEF) through confirmatory factor analysis. We examined the changes in the PaCEF over time, how well baseline PaCEF predicts time to cognitive progression, and the required sample size estimates for PD clinical trials. PaCEF results were compared with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), individual tests forming the PaCEF, and tests of visuospatial, language, and memory functioning. RESULTS: A total of 841 participants (251 no cognitive impairment [NCI], 480 mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 110 dementia) with baseline data were included, of which the mean (SD) age was 67.1 (8.9) years and 270 were women (32%). Five hundred forty five PD participants had longitudinal neuropsychological data spanning 9 years (mean [SD] 4.5 [2.2] years) and were included in analyses examining cognitive decline. A 1-factor model of executive functioning with excellent fit (comparative fit index = 0.993, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.989, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.044) was used to calculate the PaCEF. The average annual change in PaCEF ranged from 0.246 points per year for PD-NCI participants who remained cognitively unimpaired to -0.821 points per year for PD-MCI participants who progressed to dementia. For PD-MCI, baseline PaCEF, but not baseline MoCA, significantly predicted time to dementia. Sample size estimates were 69%-73% smaller for PD-NCI trials and 16%-19% smaller for PD-MCI trials when using the PaCEF rather than MoCA as the endpoint. DISCUSSION: The PaCEF is a sensitive measure of executive functioning decline in PD and will be especially beneficial for PD clinical trials.

Association of CSF α-Synuclein Seeding Amplification Assay Results With Clinical Features of Possible and Probable Dementia With Lewy Bodies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) depends on identifying significant cognitive decline accompanied by core features of parkinsonism, visual hallucinations, cognitive fluctuations, and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Hyposmia is one of the several supportive features. α-Synuclein seeding amplification assays (αSyn-SAAs) may enhance diagnostic accuracy by detecting pathologic αSyn seeds in CSF. In this study, we examine how different clinical features associate with CSF αSyn-SAA positivity in a large group of clinically diagnosed participants with DLB. METHODS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal CSF samples from the multicentered observational cohort study of the DLB Consortium and similar studies within the Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Program, contributed by academic medical centers in the United States, underwent αSyn-SAA testing. Participants included those clinically diagnosed with DLB and 2 control cohorts. Associations between core DLB features and olfaction with αSyn-SAA positivity were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: CSF samples from 191 participants diagnosed with DLB (mean age 69.9 ± 6.8, 15% female), 50 age-matched and sex-matched clinical control participants, and 49 younger analytical control participants were analyzed. Seventy-two percent (137/191) of participants with DLB had positive αSyn-SAAs vs 4% of the control groups. Among participants with DLB, those who were αSyn-SAA-positive had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (18.8 ± 5.7 vs 21.2 ± 5.2, p = 0.01), had worse parkinsonism on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (33.8 ± 15.1 vs 25.6 ± 16.4, p = 0.001), were more likely to report RBD (114/133 [86%] vs 33/53 [62%], p < 0.0001), and had worse hyposmia on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (94/105 [90%] below 15th percentile vs 14/44 [32%], p < 0.0001). UPSIT percentile had the highest area under the curve (0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) in predicting αSyn-SAA positivity and participants scoring at or below the 15th percentile of age and sex normative values had 18.3 times higher odds (95% CI 7.52-44.6) of having a positive αSyn-SAA test. Among 82 participants with longitudinal CSF samples, 81 (99%) had the same αSyn-SAA result for initial and follow-up specimens. DISCUSSION: A substantial proportion of clinically diagnosed participants with DLB had negative αSyn-SAA results. Hyposmia was the strongest clinical predictor of αSyn-SAA positivity. Hyposmia and αSyn-SAA may have utility in improving the diagnostic assessment of individuals with potential DLB. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provided Class III evidence that CSF αSyn-SAA distinguishes patients with clinically diagnosed DLB from normal controls.

Diagnostic prediction model for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease / Modelo de predição diagnóstica para discinesias induzidas por levodopa na doença de Parkinson

Abstract Background: There are currently no methods to predict the development of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), a frequent complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. Clinical predictors and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have been associated to LID in PD. Objective: To investigate the association of clinical and genetic variables with LID and to develop a diagnostic prediction model for LID in PD. Methods: We studied 430 PD patients using levodopa. The presence of LID was defined as an MDS-UPDRS Part IV score ≥1 on item 4.1. We tested the association between specific clinical variables and seven SNPs and the development of LID, using logistic regression models. Results: Regarding clinical variables, age of PD onset, disease duration, initial motor symptom and use of dopaminergic agonists were associated to LID. Only CC genotype of ADORA2A rs2298383 SNP was associated to LID after adjustment. We developed two diagnostic prediction models with reasonable accuracy, but we suggest that the clinical prediction model be used. This prediction model has an area under the curve of 0.817 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.77‒0.85) and no significant lack of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test p=0.61). Conclusion: Predicted probability of LID can be estimated with reasonable accuracy using a diagnostic clinical prediction model which combines age of PD onset, disease duration, initial motor symptom and use of dopaminergic agonists.

Resumo Introdução: No momento, não há métodos para se predizer o desenvolvimento de discinesias induzidas por levodopa (DIL), uma frequente complicação do tratamento da doença de Parkinson (DP). Preditores clínicos e polimorfismos de nucleotídeo único (SNP) têm sido associados às DIL na DP. Objetivo: Investigar a associação entre variáveis clínicas e genéticas com as DIL e desenvolver um modelo de predição diagnóstica de DIL na DP. Métodos: Foram avaliados 430 pacientes com DP em uso de levodopa. A presença de DIL foi definida como escore ≥1 no item 4.1 da MDS-UPDRS Parte IV. Nós testamos a associação entre variáveis clínicas específicas e sete SNPs com o desenvolvimento de DIL, usando modelos de regressão logística. Resultados: Em relação às variáveis clínicas, idade de início da doença, duração da doença, sintomas motores iniciais e uso de agonistas dopaminérgicos estiveram associados às DIL. Apenas o genótipo CC do SNP rs2298383 no gene ADORA2A esteve associado com DIL após o ajuste. Nós desenvolvemos dois modelos preditivos diagnósticos com acurácia razoável, mas sugerimos o uso do modelo preditivo clínico. Esse modelo de predição tem uma área sob a curva de 0,817 (intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] 0,77‒0,85) e sem perda significativa de ajuste (teste de qualidade de ajuste de Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0,61). Conclusão: A probabilidade prevista de DIL pode ser estimada, com acurácia razoável, por meio do uso de um modelo preditivo diagnóstico clínico, que combina a idade de início da doença, duração da doença, sintomas motores iniciais e uso de agonistas dopaminérgicos.

Some aspects of the validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)for evaluating cognitive impairment in Brazilian patients with Parkinson's disease / Alguns aspectos da validade da MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment - MoCA) para avaliação de comprometimento cognitivo em pacientes brasileiros com doença de Parkinson

ABSTRACT Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a short global cognitive scale, and some studies suggest it is useful for evaluating cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, its accuracy has been questioned in studies involving patients with low education. Objective: We sought to assess whether some of the MoCA subtests contribute to the low accuracy of the test. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of clinical data in a cohort of 71 patients with PD, most with less than 8 years of education. Patients were examined using the MDS-UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr and the MoCA. The data were analyzed using mainly descriptive statistics. Results: We analyzed the data of 66 patients that were not demented according to the clinical evaluation and classified them using the proposed cut-off MoCA scores for diagnosis of MCI and dementia. Thirteen patients (19.7%) were classified as having normal cognition, 24 (36.3%) MCI and 29 (43.9%) dementia. Patients with dementia had longer disease duration (p=0.016) and lower education (p=0.0001). Total MoCA scores had a an almost normal distribution with a wide range of scores and only one maximum score. Performance on the MoCA was highly correlated with education (correlation coefficient=0.66, p=0.0001). At least five of the 10 MoCA subtests showed significant floor effects. Conclusion: We believe that some of the MoCA subtests may be too difficult to be completed by PD patients with low educational level, thus contributing to the test's poor diagnostic accuracy.

RESUMO Embasamento: A MoCA é uma escala cognitiva global breve, e alguns estudos sugerem que ela seria útil para avaliar a cognição em pacientes com doença de Parkinson (DP). No entanto, sua acurácia foi questionada em estudos em pacientes com baixa escolaridade. Objetivo: Pretendeu-se avaliar se alguns dos subtestes da MoCA poderiam contribuir para a baixa precisão do teste. Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise transversal e retrospectiva de dados clínicos de uma coorte de 71 pacientes com DP, a maioria com menos de 8 anos de escolaridade. Os pacientes foram examinados usando o MDS-UPDRS, a Hoehn e Yahr e a MoCA. Os dados foram principalmente analisados pela estatística descritiva. Resultados: Foram analisados os dados de 66 pacientes que não foram diagnosticados com demência de acordo com a avaliação clínica. Eles foram em seguida classificados, usando as notas de corte MoCA propostos para diagnóstico de comprometimento cognitivo leve (CCL) e demência. Dessa forma, treze pacientes (19,7%) foram classificados como com a cognição normal, 24 pacientes (36,3%) com CCL e 29 pacientes (43,9%) como com demência. Os pacientes com demência tiveram maior duração da doença (p=0,016) e menor escolaridade (p=0,0001). A distribuição dos escores totais da MoCA apresentaram forma de distribuição normal com uma vasta gama de pontuações e apenas uma pontuação máxima. O desempenho no MoCA foi altamente correlacionado à escolaridade (coeficiente de correlação=0,66, p=0,0001). Pelo menos cinco dos 10 subtestes da MoCA mostraram efeitos piso significativos. Conclusão: Alguns dos subtestes MoCA podem ser muito difíceis de completar por pacientes com DP com baixa escolaridade, contribuindo assim para a baixa precisão diagnóstica do teste.

Screening of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease: diagnostic validity of the Brazilian versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised / Rastreio de comprometimento cognitivo em pacientes com doença de Parkinson: validade diagnóstica das versões brasileiras da Montreal Cognitive Assessment e do Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised

ABSTRACTObjective The aim of the present study is to examine the accuracy of the Brazilian versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) to screen for mild cognitive impairment (PDMCI) and dementia (PDD) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Method Both scales were administered to a final convenience sample of 79 patients with PD. Patients were evaluated by a neurologist, a psychiatrist and a neuropsychologist using UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr and Schwab and England scales, global deterioration scale, a psychiatric structured interview, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and other cognitive tests.Results There were 32 patients with PDMCI and 17 patients with PDD. The MoCA and the ACE-R were able to discriminate patients with PDD from the others.Conclusion Both scales showed to be useful to screen for dementia but not for mild cognitive impairment in patients with PD.

RESUMOObjetivo O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a acurácia das versões Brasileiras das escalas: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) e Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), no rastreamento de comprometimento cognitivo leve (CCL) e demência em pacientes com doença de Parkinson (DP).Método As duas escalas foram aplicadas a uma amostra de conveniência de 79 pacientes com DP. Os pacientes foram avaliados por um neurologista, um psiquiatra e uma neuropsicóloga que utilizaram a UPDRS, a escala de Hoehn e Yahr, a escala de Schwab e England, a escala de deterioração global, uma entrevista psiquiátrica estruturada, a escala de demência de Mattis e outros testes cognitivos.Resultados 32 pacientes foram diagnosticados com CCL e 17 com demência. A MoCA e o ACE-R foram capazes de discriminar pacientes com demência dos demais.Conclusão As duas escalas se mostraram úteis para rastrear demência, mas não CCL, em pacientes com DP.