A centre-based ambulatory care concept for hidradenitis suppurativa improves disease activity, disease burden and patient satisfaction: results from the randomized controlled EsmAiL trial.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the inverse skin regions that occurs in young women, in particular, and affects approximately 1% of the population. Outpatient care is often inadequate and usually cannot prevent progression. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in the EsmAiL ('Evaluation eines strukturierten und leitlinienbasierten multmodalen Versorgungskonzepts für Menschen mit Akne inversa') trial whether an innovative care concept can decrease disease activity and burden, and improve patient satisfaction. METHODS: EsmAiL was conducted as a two-arm, multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 553 adults with HS. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of three inflammatory lesions and at least a moderate impact of the disease on quality of life. The control group (CG) remained under standard care, while patients in the intervention group (IG) were treated according to a trial-specific, multimodal concept. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4). RESULTS: In total, 274 patients were randomized to the IG and 279 to the CG. Altogether, 377 attended the final assessment after 12 months of intervention. Participants in the IG (n = 203) achieved a mean improvement in IHS4 of 9.3 points, while the average decrease in IHS4 in patients in the CG (n = 174) was 5.7 points (P = 0.003). Patients treated under the new care concept also reported a statistically significantly higher decrease in pain, Dermatology Life Quality Index and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores compared with those in the CG (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also statistically significantly higher in the IG compared with the CG (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of standardized treatment algorithms in so-called 'acne inversa centres' in the ambulatory setting has a substantial, positive impact on the course of HS and significantly improves patient satisfaction.

Low Skeletal Muscle Mass Predicts Relevant Outcomes in Palliative Urological Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) can be assessed by cross-sectional imaging. LSMM is associated with several clinically relevant factors in various disorders with predictive and prognostic implications. METHODS: Our aim was to establish the effect of computed tomography (CT)-defined LSMM on mortality in renal cell cancer (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) undergoing palliative treatment. The MEDLINE library, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between CT-defined LSMM up to May 2022. In total, 11 studies were suitable for the analysis. RESULTS: The included studies comprised 481 patients with RCC and 394 patients with UC. The pooled hazard ratio for the association between LSMM and overall survival was 1.64 (95% CI: 0.90-2.99), p = 0.10 in univariable analysis and 1.55 (95% CI: 0.91-2.63), p = 0.10 in multivariable analysis for RCC. For UC, the pooled hazard ratio was 2.75 (95% CI: 1.77-4.28), p < 0.00001 in univariable, and 2.77 (95% CI: 1.91-4.02), p < 0.00001 in multivariable analysis. For progression-free survival, it was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.24-3.27), p = 0.004 for RCC and 2.43 (95% CI: 1.59-3.74), p < 0.0001 for UC (univariable analysis). CONCLUSIONS: CT-defined LSMM predicts OS and PFS in RCC and UC in the palliative setting. The effect was higher in UC. Therefore, LSMM assessment should be included as a relevant prognostic biomarker in clinical routine.

Drivers of disease severity and burden of hidradenitis suppurativa: a cross-sectional analysis on 553 German patients.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the inverse skin regions with an age peak at around 40 years and an estimated prevalence of 1%. Nodules and abscesses can develop into fistules and scarring, which cause severe pain. HS is a progressive, life-defining disease that leads to physical limitations, inability to work, and social isolation. There is still little data on the drivers of disease severity and burden. METHOD: The cross-sectional study is based on the baseline data of 553 participants of the health care research project "EsmAiL," which was carried out as a multicenter randomized controlled trial. It included adult HS-patients presenting with at least three inflammatory lesions and at least a moderate impact on quality of life. RESULTS: Disease activity increases with age. Men are more severely affected than women but feel less burdened. Obesity negatively influences disease activity and disease burden. Affected individuals have a higher level of education than the age adjusted population, but the unemployment rate is significantly higher. Disease activity significantly reduces quality of life and promotes depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: HS is a severe and debilitating dermatosis. As a result of the well-established factors involved, HS requires a multi-causal approach to management, in addition to medical and surgical treatment. This must take into account all available therapeutic options, as well as patient education to reduce risk factors and pain, and psychological support. HS requires interdisciplinary and multi-professional care. To prevent disease progression, a structured treatment plan is needed.

Sarcopenia is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer - a Meta-analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia is defined as skeletal muscle loss and can be assessed by cross-sectional imaging. Our aim was to establish the effect of sarcopenia on relevant outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in curative and palliative settings based on a large patient sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE library, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases were screened for the associations between sarcopenia and mortality in patients with PDAC up to March 2022. The primary endpoint of the systematic review was the hazard ratio of Sarcopenia on survival. 22 studies were included into the present analysis. RESULTS: The included 22 studies comprised 3958 patients. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 38.7%. Sarcopenia was associated with a higher prevalence in the palliative setting (OR 53.23, CI 39.00-67.45, p<0.001) compared to the curative setting (OR 36.73, CI 27.81-45.65, p<0.001). Sarcopenia was associated with worse OS in the univariable (HR 1.79, CI 1.41-2.28, p<0.001) and multivariable analysis (HR 1.62, CI 1.27-2.07, p<0.001) in the curative setting. For the palliative setting the pooled hazards ratio showed that sarcopenia was associated with overall survival (HR 1.56, CI 1.21-2.02, p<0.001) as well as in multivariable analysis (HR 1.77, CI 1.39-2.26, p<0.001). Sarcopenia was not associated with a higher rate of post-operative complications in univariable analysis (OR 1.10, CI 0.70-1.72, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia occurs in 38.7% of patients with pancreatic cancer, significantly more in the palliative setting. Sarcopenia is associated with overall survival in both settings. The assessment of sarcopenia is therefore relevant for personalized oncology. Sarcopenia is not associated with postoperative complications.

A center-based, ambulatory care concept for hidradenitis suppurativa improves patient outcomes and is also cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting approximately 1% of the population. The patient journey through the German health care system leads to high disease burden and substantial treatment costs. The EsmAiL study showed that an innovative, interprofessional, multimodal care-concept reduces disease activity and burden of HS compared to standard care. This paper examines the costs of treating HS in Germany and compares them with those of the innovative care concept implemented in EsmAiL. METHODS: EsmAiL was a two-arm, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial including 553 adults with HS. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00022135). The control group (CG) remained in standard care, whereas the intervention group (IG) was referred to specialized so-called 'acne-inversa-centres (AiZ)' where patients were treated with a structured, interdisciplinary approach. The present paper analyses the treatment costs for a subpopulation based on health insurance cost data from the two largest German health insurers. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) was assessed based on Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: Total annual treatment costs per patient were €3,966.07 in standard care (n = 89) and €3,974.37 in the innovative care (n = 93). The costs per additional QALY amounted to €12,698.72 in the IG. Given the conventional and established threshold of €22,600 to €33,900 per QALY, the innovative treatment in AiZ proved to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Treatment costs of HS are substantial and increase with disease severity. The new form of care is cost-effective and is expected to decrease costs in the long run.

A structured, multimodal form of care reduces costs in the treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa compared to standard care.