Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ASAS-defined active sacroiliitis in patients with inflammatory back pain and suspected axial spondyloarthritis: a study of reliability.

OBJECTIVES: The main purpose was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) definition of positive MRI for active sacroiliitis (ASAS-positive MRI), in a sample of patients with inflammatory back pain (IBP) and suspected axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), who underwent sacroiliac joints (SIJ) MRI. We also evaluated the intra- and inter-rater reliability for the detection of the recently ASAS-refined findings indicating inflammatory activity. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 105 consecutive patients with IBP and suspected axSpA who underwent SIJ MRI. Two radiologists in two distinct reading sessions assessed the prevalence of ASAS-positive MRI and of ASAS-defined signs of inflammatory activity. We determined the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the above-mentioned variables by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) statistic, and verified whether there was any significant difference in providing the diagnosis of ASAS-positive MRI on an inter-rater basis (McNemar test). RESULTS: We observed substantial reliability in assessing a SIJ MRI as ASAS-positive both on intra-rater basis (PABAK ranging 0.70-0.77) and inter-rater basis (PABAK 0.71 for the first reading, and 0.64 for the second reading). No significant difference in the rate of diagnosis between raters was found (p>0.99 for both reading sets). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for inflammatory activity signs ranged from moderate to almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial intra- and inter-rater reliability in assessing the ASAS-positive MRI supports its use for classification purposes. The variable reliability of inflammatory activity signs suggests they are suboptimal as a complement to the current definition of ASAS-positive MRI.

Asymptomatic sacroiliitis detected by magnetic resonance enterography in patients with Crohn's disease: prevalence, association with clinical data, and reliability among radiologists in a multicenter study of adult and pediatric population.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) usually undergo magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) for evaluating small bowel involvement. Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most frequent extraintestinal manifestation in inflammatory bowel diseases, especially in CD, with sacroiliitis at imaging occurring in about 6-46% of patients and possibly correlating with axial spondyloarthritis. The primary study aim was to assess the prevalence of sacroiliitis in adult and pediatric patients with CD performing an MRE. We also evaluated the inter-rater agreement for MRE sacroiliitis and the association between sacroiliitis and patients' clinical data. METHOD: We retrospectively identified 100 adult and 30 pediatric patients diagnosed with CD who performed an MRE between December 2012 and May 2020 in three inflammatory bowel disease centers. Two radiologists assessed the prevalence of sacroiliitis at MRE. We evaluated the inter-rater agreement for sacroiliitis with Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient statistics and assessed the correlation between sacroiliitis and demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data (Chi-square and Fisher's tests). RESULTS: The prevalence of sacroiliitis at MRE was 20% in adults and 6.7% in pediatric patients. The inter-rater agreement for sacroiliitis was substantial (k = 0.62, p < 0.001) in the adults and moderate (k = 0.46, p = 0.011) in the pediatric cohort. Age ≥ 50 years and the time between CD diagnosis and MRE (≥ 86.5 months) were significantly associated with sacroiliitis in adult patients (p = 0.049 and p = 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sacroiliitis is a frequent and reliable abnormality at MRE in adult patients with CD, associated with the age of the patients ≥ 50 years and CD duration.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients ≥ 75 years of age: Are there any differences with other age ranges in oncological and surgical outcomes? Results from a tertiary referral center.

AIM: To compare surgical and oncological outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients ≥ 75 years of age with two younger cohorts of patients. METHODS: The prospectively maintained Institutional database of pancreatic resection was queried for patients aged ≥ 75 years (late elderly, LE) submitted to PD for any disease from January 2010 to June 2015. We compared clinical, demographic and pathological features and survival outcomes of LE patients with 2 exact matched cohorts of younger patients [≥ 40 to 64 years of age (adults, A) and ≥ 65 to 74 years of age (young elderly, YE)] submitted to PD, according to selected variables. RESULTS: The final LE population, as well as the control groups, were made of 96 subjects. Up to 71% of patients was operated on for a periampullary malignancy and pancreatic cancer (PDAC) accounted for 79% of them. Intraoperative data (estimated blood loss and duration of surgery) did not differ among the groups. The overall complication rate was 65.6%, 61.5% and 58.3% for LE, YE and A patients, respectively, P = NS). Reoperation and cardiovascular complications were significantly more frequent in LE than in YE and A groups (P = 0.003 and P = 0.019, respectively). When considering either all malignancies and PDAC only, the three groups did not differ in survival. Considering all benign diseases, the estimated mean survival was 58 and 78 mo for ≥ and < 75 years of age (YE + A groups), respectively (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Age is not a contraindication for PD. A careful selection of LE patients allows to obtain good surgical and oncological results.