Organic anion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 and their genetic variants influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raloxifene.

BACKGROUND: Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, exhibits quite large and unexplained interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The aim of this study was to determine the role of organic-anion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 and their genetic variants in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raloxifene. METHODS: To test the role of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 transporters on hepatic uptake of raloxifene and its metabolites an in vitro model of Chinese Hamster Ovary cells expressing OATP1B1 or OATP1B3 was employed. The influence of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 genetic variants on in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was evaluated in 53 osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene. RESULTS: Our in vitro results showed that raloxifene and two of the three metabolites, raloxifene-4'-ß-glucuronide (M2) and raloxifene-6,4'-diglucuronide (M3), interact with OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Higher M3 and total raloxifene serum concentrations in patients correlated with lower serum levels of bone resorption marker, serum C-terminal telopeptide fragments of type I collagen, indicating a higher antiresorptive effect of raloxifene. Higher concentrations of M2 correlated with higher increase of lumbar spine bone mineral density supporting the raloxifene vertebral fracture specific protection effect. Finally, raloxifene, M3 and total raloxifene serum concentrations were significantly higher in patients with SLCO1B1 c.388A > G polymorphism and *1b haplotype implicating a considerable genetic effect on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raloxifene. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that SLCO1B1 c.388A > G polymorphism could play an important role in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raloxifene.

Effects of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on raloxifene pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

AIMS: Raloxifene concentrations were reported to correlate approximately with serum bilirubin levels. Bilirubin is a typical UGT1A1 substrate. Based on these facts, we postulated a hypothesis that UGT1A1 is the key enzyme for metabolic clearance of raloxifene and that the common UGT1A1*28 polymorphism significantly contributes to the large pharmacokinetic variability of raloxifene. METHODS: Serum samples from postmenopausal osteoporotic patients treated with raloxifene were assayed for the concentrations of raloxifene and its glucuronides by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry. The same samples were also genotyped for the presence of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism by the single-strand conformation polymorphism method. The pharmacodynamic effect was evaluated by measuring the change in bone mineral density (BMD) in femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine after 12 months' raloxifene therapy. RESULTS: Patients homozygous for the *28 allele showed significantly, twofold higher raloxifene glucuronide concentrations compared with the hetero- and homozygotes for the wild-type allele: 558 +/- 115 nmol l(-1) compared with 295 +/- 43 nmol l(-1), respectively (P = 0.012). This indicates a higher raloxifene exposure in the *28/*28 group. Consequently, a significantly greater increase in hip BMD was observed in subjects homozygous for the *28 allele compared with the group carrying at least one copy of the wild-type allele: 4.4 +/- 2.4% compared with 0.3 +/- 1.4% (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In this study it is shown that a relatively common UGT1A1*28 polymorphism may considerably influence raloxifene pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Underlying mechanisms and clinical implications of our findings are also discussed.

Exonic, but not intronic polymorphisms of ESR1 gene might influence the hypolipemic effect of raloxifene.

UNLABELLED: Studies have shown that selective modulator of estrogen receptor raloxifene, exerts hypolipemic properties at least partially through estrogen receptor alpha activation. To test the hypothesis that polymorphisms of estrogen receptor alpha are associated with the influence of 6 months raloxifene treatment on serum lipids, two intronic (PvuII and XbaI), and one exonic polymorphism (P325P) were analyzed in 49 postmenopausal women, mean age 62.5+/-5.7 years. In all subjects, the total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were determined before and after 6 months of raloxifene treatment. We were unable to find any relationship between estrogen receptor alpha genotype and serum lipids at baseline. At the end of 6 months treatment with raloxifene, the mean decrease of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, independently of genotypes, was highly significant, but no influence on HDL and triglycerides concentrations was found. Neither the PvuII nor XbaI ESR1 gene polymorphisms were associated with the magnitude of lipid changes after 6 months treatment, whereas the subjects with non-CC genotype of P325P mutation had significantly lower total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations, and higher decline of total cholesterol (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that exonic, but not intronic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor alpha gene might intensify the cholesterol lowering effect of raloxifene.

Self-reported Hypoglycaemia in Patients treated with Insulin: A Large Slovenian Retrospectively-prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycaemia is the major barrier for glycaemic target achievement in patients treated with insulin. The aim of the present study was to investigate real-world incidence and predictors of hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated patients. METHODS: More than 300 consecutive patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes treated with insulin were enrolled during regular out-patient visits from 36 diabetes practices throughout the whole country. They completed a comprehensive questionnaire on hypoglycaemia knowledge, awareness, and incidence in the last month and last six months. In addition, in the prospective part, patients recorded incidence of hypoglycaemic events using a special diary prospectively on a daily basis, through 4 weeks. RESULTS: At least one hypoglycaemic event was self-reported in 84.1%, and 56.4% of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, during the prospective period of 4 weeks. 43.4% and 26.2% of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, experienced a nocturnal hypoglycaemic event. In the same time-period, severe hypoglycaemia was experienced by 15.9% and 7.1% of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. Lower glycated haemoglobin was not a significant predictor of hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of self-reported hypoglycaemia in patients treated with insulin in the largest and most comprehensive study in Slovenia so far are higher than reported from randomised control trials, but comparable to data from observational studies. Hypoglycaemia incidence was high even with high glycated haemoglobin values.

Raloxifene pharmacodynamics is influenced by genetic variants in the RANKL/RANK/OPG system and in the Wnt signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulator (SERM) used for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, its efficacy and also its safety vary greatly among treated patients, and it might be influenced by the individuals' genetic background. As the receptor activator of the nuclear factor κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL)/RANK/osteoprotegerin (OPG) system is essential for osteoclastogensis and Wnt signaling pathway for osteoblastogenesis, we decided to evaluate the raloxifene treatment in regard to selected polymorphisms in key genes of these two main bone regulatory pathways. METHODS: Fifty-six osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene were genotyped for 11 polymorphisms located in six genes: -290C>T, -643C>T, and -693G>C in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11 (TNFSF11), +34694C>T, +34901G>A, and +35966insdelC in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A (TNFRSF11A), K3N and 245T>G in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11B (TNFRSF11B), A1330V in LRP5, I1062V in LRP6, and -1397_-1396insGGA in SOST. For evaluation of treatment efficacy, bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured. RESULTS: One-year change in total hip BMD was associated with +34901G>A in TNFRSF11A (p=0.040), whereas, for lumbar spine BMD, the association was shown for -1397_-1396insGGA in SOST (p=0.015). C-terminal crosslinking telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) concentrations showed significant association with -643C>T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in TNFSF11 (p=0.049) and +34694C>T in TNFRSF11A (p=0.022). No other association was found between 1-year change in BMDs or biochemical markers and the studied SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with raloxifene, the efficacy of raloxifene treatment might be influenced by +34901G>A in TNFRSF11A gene and -1397_-1396insGGA in the SOST gene as well as -643C>T in TNFSF11 gene and +34694C>T in TNFRSF11A gene. However, these findings need additional functional and clinical confirmation for potential pharmacogenetic use in the future.

Inverse correlation of carotid intima-media thickness with raloxifene serum levels in osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Raloxifene is a selective oestrogen receptor modulator with effects on bone and breast cancer and cardiovascular disease risk. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of raloxifene treatment on surrogate markers of atherosclerosis and the correlation of these markers with raloxifene serum concentrations. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial on 53 postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with raloxifene was performed. Surrogate markers of atherosclerosis (flow-mediated vasodilatation, glyceryltrinitrate-induced vasodilatation of the brachial artery, carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT), inter-cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular-cell adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin) were measured before and after 6 months of treatment. Serum concentrations of raloxifene and raloxifene metabolites were assessed after 12 months of treatment. The tested markers were correlated with measured serum concentrations of raloxifene species. RESULTS: Among the tested surrogate markers of atherosclerosis c-IMT, E-selectin and ICAM changed significantly during treatment. A negative correlation of the non-metabolized raloxifene serum levels with the percentage change of c-IMT during treatment (r = - 0.315, p = 0.048) was found. Likewise, the sum of the levels of three raloxifene metabolites, raloxifene-6-b-glucuronide (M1), raloxifene-4'-b-glucuronide (M2) and raloxifene-6,4'-diglucuronide (M3) in serum showed a negative correlation with the percentage change of c-IMT during treatment (r = - 0.375, p = 0.017). For the other tested parameters, no correlation with raloxifene serum levels was found. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study correlating raloxifene species serum concentrations with changes in the surrogate markers of atherosclerosis. A greater decrease of c-IMT in patients with higher raloxifene concentrations could contribute to a lower risk of cardiovascular events in these patients.

Influence of hepatic and intestinal efflux transporters and their genetic variants on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raloxifene in osteoporosis treatment.

Raloxifene exhibits a large and unexplained interindividual variability in its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The aim of our study was to identify transporters involved in the efflux of raloxifene and its glucuronide metabolites by various in vitro models and by an in vivo study to explore the possible involvement of P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP)1, MRP2, MRP3, and breast cancer resistance protein in the observed high interindividual variability. Experiments with the parallel artificial membrane permeability assay showed the highest passive permeability for raloxifene, followed by raloxifene-6-ß-glucuronide (M1), raloxifene-4'-ß-glucuronide (M2), and raloxifene-6,4'-diglucuronide (M3). Caco-2 cell monolayer experiments indicated an interaction of raloxifene with Pgp. The ATPase assay confirmed the raloxifene interaction with Pgp and indicated interactions of all raloxifene species with MRP1, MRP2, MRP3, and breast cancer resistance protein, except for M1, which did not show any interactions with MRP2. Furthermore, the vesicular experiments confirmed the interaction of M2 and M3 with MRP2. Although the in vivo study on osteoporotic postmenopausal women on raloxifene could not confirm a significant influence of ABCB1 and ABCC2 genetic polymorphisms on its pharmacokinetics, a clear trend toward higher total raloxifene concentrations was observed in carriers of at least 1 ABCB1 c.3435T allele. Moreover, the same polymorphism effect was also observed as a significant increase in total hip bone mineral density after 1 year of treatment. The results of our study support the involvement of efflux transporters in disposition of raloxifene and its metabolites and may partially explain the observed raloxifene variability by the influence of the ABCB1 c.3435C>T polymorphism.

XbaI polymorphism of the estrogen receptor alpha gene influences the effect of raloxifene on the endothelial function.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in postmenopausal women and estrogen deficiency may be an important factor in its development. The selective estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene, exerts a part of its actions through the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) activation. We explored if polymorphisms of the ESR1 modify the effects of 6 months raloxifene treatment on endothelial function. METHODS: A total of 53 postmenopausal women, mean age 59.7+/-6.2, finished the prospective clinical trial. The PvuII, XbaI, and P325P polymorphisms of the ESR1 gene were analyzed. In all subjects endothelium-dependent flow mediated dilatation (FMD) and cell adhesion molecules (CAM) ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin were measured before and after 6 months of raloxifene treatment. RESULTS: There was no difference in FMD between the ESR1 genotypes, at baseline. After raloxifene treatment, the FMD was significantly greater in subjects with XX genotype of XbaI polymorphism compared to xx (p=0.03) and borderline greater when compared to Xx genotype (p=0.053). The FMD increased significantly with raloxifene treatment in women with Xx genotype of XbaI and Pp genotype of PvuII polymorphisms (p=0.027 and p=0.034, respectively). The P325P polymorphism did not influence the FMD after raloxifene. None of the ESR1 gene polymorphisms had any impact on the levels of CAM before or after the treatment. When analysing the whole group, a significant decrease in E-selectin (p<0.001) and a small increase in ICAM-1 levels (p=0.029) was observed with raloxifene treatment, but no influence on VCAM-1 levels or FMD overall was seen. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that XbaI and possibly PvuII polymorphisms of the ESR1 gene influence the impact of raloxifene treatment on endothelial function. This effect could be of pharmacogenomic and clinical importance.