Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 88
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1473-1481, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297916

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel treatments are needed for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, particularly for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Exebacase is a first-in-class antistaphylococcal lysin that is rapidly bactericidal and synergizes with antibiotics. METHODS: In Direct Lysis of Staph Aureus Resistant Pathogen Trial of Exebacase (DISRUPT), a superiority-design phase 3 study, patients with S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous exebacase or placebo in addition to standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response at day 14 in the MRSA population. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were randomized before the study was stopped for futility based on the recommendation of the unblinded Data Safety Monitoring Board. Clinical response rates at day 14 in the MRSA population (n = 97) were 50.0% (exebacase + antibiotics; 32/64) versus 60.6% (antibiotics alone; 20/33) (P = .392). Overall, rates of adverse events were similar across groups. No adverse events of hypersensitivity related to exebacase were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Exebacase + antibiotics failed to improve clinical response at day 14 in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. This result was unexpected based on phase 2 data that established proof-of-concept for exebacase + antibiotics in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. In the antibiotics-alone group, the clinical response rate was higher than that seen in phase 2. Heterogeneity within the study population and a relatively small sample size in either the phase 2 or phase 3 studies may have increased the probability of imbalances in the multiple components of day 14 clinical outcome. This study provides lessons for future superiority studies in S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis. Clinical Trials Registration.NCT04160468.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Anciano , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nivel de Atención , Quimioterapia Combinada , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(11): e704-e710, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32945856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relationship of health disparities and comorbidities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes are an ongoing area of interest. This report assesses risk factors associated with mortality in patients presenting with COVID-19 infection and healthcare disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to emergency departments within an integrated health system who tested positive for COVID-19 between 7 March and 30 April 2020 in metropolitan Detroit. The primary outcomes were hospitalization and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3633 patients with a mean age of 58 years were included. The majority were female and Black non-Hispanic. Hospitalization was required for 64% of patients, 56% of whom were Black. Hospitalized patients were older, more likely to reside in a low-income area, and had a higher burden of comorbidities. By 30 days, 433 (18.7%) hospitalized patients died. In adjusted analyses, the presence of comorbidities, an age >60 years, and more severe physiological disturbance were associated with 30-day mortality. Residence in low-income areas (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], .76-1.36) and public insurance (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, .76-2.01) were not independently associated with a higher risk of mortality. Black female patients had a lower adjusted risk of mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, .27-.78). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of COVID-19 patients, those with comorbidities, advanced age, and physiological abnormalities on presentation had higher odds of death. Disparities in income or source of health insurance were not associated with outcomes. Black women had a lower risk of dying.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Población Blanca
3.
Clin Transplant ; 35(4): e14239, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527453

RESUMEN

The impact of pre-transplant (SOT) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization or infection on post-SOT outcomes is unclear. We conducted a multi-center, international, cohort study of SOT recipients, with microbiologically diagnosed CRE colonization and/or infection pre-SOT. Sixty adult SOT recipients were included (liver n = 30, hearts n = 17). Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 47, 78%) was the most common pre-SOT CRE species. Median time from CRE detection to SOT was 2.32 months (IQR 0.33-10.13). Post-SOT CRE infection occurred in 40% (n = 24/60), at a median of 9 days (IQR 7-17), and most commonly due to K pneumoniae (n = 20/24, 83%). Of those infected, 62% had a surgical site infection, and 46% had bloodstream infection. Patients with post-SOT CRE infection more commonly had a liver transplant (16, 67% vs. 14, 39%; p =.0350) or pre-SOT CRE BSI (11, 46% vs. 7, 19%; p =.03). One-year post-SOT survival was 77%, and those with post-SOT CRE infection had a 50% less chance of survival vs. uninfected (0.86, 95% CI, 0.76-0.97 vs. 0.34, 95% CI 0.08-1.0, p =.0204). Pre-SOT CRE infection or colonization is not an absolute contraindication to SOT and is more common among abdominal SOT recipients, those with pre-SOT CRE BSI, and those with early post-SOT medical and surgical complications.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 70(8): 1536-1545, 2020 04 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31157370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the most commonly administered antibiotic in hospitalized patients, but optimal exposure targets remain controversial. To clarify the therapeutic exposure range, this study evaluated the association between vancomycin exposure and outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter (n = 14), observational study of 265 hospitalized adults with MRSA bacteremia treated with vancomycin. The primary outcome was treatment failure (TF), defined as 30-day mortality or persistent bacteremia ≥7 days. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI). The study was powered to compare TF between patients who achieved or did not achieve day 2 area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) thresholds previously found to be associated with lower incidences of TF. The thresholds, analyzed separately as co-primary endpoints, were AUC/MIC by broth microdilution ≥650 and AUC/MIC by Etest ≥320. RESULTS: Treatment failure and AKI occurred in 18% and 26% of patients, respectively. Achievement of the prespecified day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds was not associated with less TF. Alternative day 2 AUC/MIC thresholds associated with lower TF risks were not identified. A relationship between the day 2 AUC and AKI was observed. Patients with day 2 AUC ≤515 experienced the best global outcomes (no TF and no AKI). CONCLUSIONS: Higher vancomycin exposures did not confer a lower TF risk but were associated with more AKI. The findings suggest that vancomycin dosing should be guided by the AUC and day 2 AUCs should be ≤515. As few patients had day 2 AUCs <400, further study is needed to define the lower bound of the therapeutic range.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(27): 882-886, 2020 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32644985

RESUMEN

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are focal points of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, among SNF residents and health care personnel have been described (1-3). Repeated point prevalence surveys (serial testing of all residents and health care personnel at a health care facility irrespective of symptoms) have been used to identify asymptomatic infections and have reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission during SNF outbreaks (1,3). During March 2020, the Detroit Health Department and area hospitals detected a sharp increase in COVID-19 diagnoses, hospitalizations, and associated deaths among SNF residents. The Detroit Health Department collaborated with local government, academic, and health care system partners and a CDC field team to rapidly expand SARS-CoV-2 testing and implement infection prevention and control (IPC) activities in all Detroit-area SNFs. During March 7-May 8, among 2,773 residents of 26 Detroit SNFs, 1,207 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 were identified during three periods: before (March 7-April 7) and after two point prevalence surveys (April 8-25 and April 30-May 8): the overall attack rate was 44%. Within 21 days of receiving their first positive test results, 446 (37%) of 1,207 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, and 287 (24%) died. Among facilities participating in both surveys (n = 12), the percentage of positive test results declined from 35% to 18%. Repeated point prevalence surveys in SNFs identified asymptomatic COVID-19 cases, informed cohorting and IPC practices aimed at reducing transmission, and guided prioritization of health department resources for facilities experiencing high levels of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. With the increased availability of SARS-CoV-2 testing, repeated point prevalence surveys and enhanced and expanded IPC support should be standard tools for interrupting and preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in SNFs.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Prevalencia
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(6): 861-868, 2018 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29726892

RESUMEN

Background: Most nursing facilities (NFs) lack methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) surveillance programs due to limited resources and high costs. We investigated the utility of environmental screening of high-touch surfaces in patient rooms as a way to circumvent these challenges. Methods: We compared MRSA and VRE culture data from high-touch surfaces in patients' rooms (14450 samples from 6 NFs) and ranked each site's performance in predicting patient colonization (7413 samples). The best-performing sites were included in a MRSA- and a VRE-specific panel that functioned as a proxy for patient colonization. Molecular typing was performed to confirm available concordant patient-environment pairs. Results: We identified and validated a MRSA panel that consisted of the bed controls, nurse call button, bed rail, and TV remote control. The VRE panel included the toilet seat, bed controls, bed rail, TV remote control, and top of the side table. Panel colonization data tracked patient colonization. Negative predictive values were 89%-92% for MRSA and 82%-84% for VRE. Molecular typing confirmed a strong clonal type relationship in available concordant patient-environment pairs (98% for MRSA, 91% for VRE), pointing to common epidemiological patterns for environmental and patient isolates. Conclusions: Environmental panels used as a proxy for patient colonization and incorporated into facility surveillance protocols can guide decolonization strategies, improve awareness of MRSA and VRE burden, and inform efforts to reduce transmission. Targeted environmental screening may be a viable surveillance strategy for MRSA and VRE detection in NFs.


Asunto(s)
Fómites/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Aparatos Sanitarios/microbiología , Lechos/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Contaminación de Equipos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/transmisión , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Diseño Interior y Mobiliario , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Tipificación Molecular , Casas de Salud , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/genética
7.
J Med Virol ; 90(2): 212-218, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28892181

RESUMEN

Obesity was identified as a risk factor for severe influenza during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1)pandemic, but evidence of this association has been mixed since. Post-pandemic antiviral treatment guidelines may have increased antiviral treatment among obese individuals. A prospective study of adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza in Detroit, Michigan in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 was conducted. Patient information was collected from interviews and medical chart abstraction. Obese (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese (BMI < 30) participants were compared. Late antiviral treatment (>2 days from symptom onset), obesity (30 ≤ BMI < 40), and morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) were evaluated as predictors of lower respiratory tract disease (LRD), ICU admission, and length of stay (LOS) using logistic regression and inverse probability weighted models. Forty-eight participants were included in the study after exclusions and all patients received antiviral treatment. Participants who were obese were significantly more likely to have a cough and to take steroids than non-obese participants, and had a shorter time from hospital admission to antiviral treatment (median time from admission to treatment of 0 days for obese patients and 1 day for non-obese patients [P = 0.001]). In all models, late antiviral treatment was associated with increased odds of LRD (OR: 3.9 [1.1,15.9] in fully adjusted model). After adjustment for treatment timing, the odds of ICU admission (OR: 6.4 [0.8,58.2] to 7.9 [0.9, 87.1]) and LRD (OR: 3.3 [0.5, 23.5] to 4.0 [0.6, 35.0]) associated with morbid obesity increased. Obese individuals were treated with antivirals earlier than others. Late antiviral treatment was associated with severe influenza in the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/patología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Michigan , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
8.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 29(3): 449-86, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27029594

RESUMEN

Pertussis is a severe respiratory infection caused by Bordetella pertussis, and in 2008, pertussis was associated with an estimated 16 million cases and 195,000 deaths globally. Sizeable outbreaks of pertussis have been reported over the past 5 years, and disease reemergence has been the focus of international attention to develop a deeper understanding of pathogen virulence and genetic evolution of B. pertussis strains. During the past 20 years, the scientific community has recognized pertussis among adults as well as infants and children. Increased recognition that older children and adolescents are at risk for disease and may transmit B. pertussis to younger siblings has underscored the need to better understand the role of innate, humoral, and cell-mediated immunity, including the role of waning immunity. Although recognition of adult pertussis has increased in tandem with a better understanding of B. pertussis pathogenesis, pertussis in neonates and adults can manifest with atypical clinical presentations. Such disease patterns make pertussis recognition difficult and lead to delays in treatment. Ongoing research using newer tools for molecular analysis holds promise for improved understanding of pertussis epidemiology, bacterial pathogenesis, bioinformatics, and immunology. Together, these advances provide a foundation for the development of new-generation diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/inmunología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Masculino , Vacunación
9.
Malar J ; 16(1): 313, 2017 08 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28778206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malaria is considered a public health priority in Haiti, with a goal to eliminate by year 2020. Chloroquine is the first-line treatment recommended by the Ministry of Public Health and Population. In order to verify the suitability of chloroquine for uncomplicated malaria treatment, an in vivo study of susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine was conducted from January 2013 to March 2015 in six localities in the south of Haiti. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients who presented with confirmed P. falciparum malaria were included in the study and followed until day 28 after having taken 25 mg/kg of chloroquine orally over 3 days. The sample included 28 children under the age of 10, 9 adolescents aged 10-19 years, and 24 adults aged 20 years and over. Among them, 30 were monitored on day 3 (49%) and 33 on day 28 (59%). Clinical and parasitological monitoring was carried out on day 7 on 28 subjects, on day 14 on 13 subjects and on day 21 on 18 subjects. Residual parasitaemia with presence of trophozoites was found in 7 of 30 subjects on day 3 (23%), and in 6 of 28 subjects on day 7 (21%) who had a temperature less than 37.5 °C. These patients can be considered as late parasitological failures. All monitoring performed on day 28 was negative. Gametocytes were found in 3 patients (9%) despite the use of primaquine. The continuing low parasitaemia on day 3 and 7 in more than one fifth of cases raises the question of the efficacy of chloroquine in southern Haiti. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a decrease of chloroquine susceptibility for treatment of P. falciparum malaria cases in southern Haiti. Consequently, there is a need to strengthen malaria treatment surveillance and to study the effectiveness of chloroquine in Haiti by monitoring patients after treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Cloroquina/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Haití , Humanos , Lactante , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 62(12): 1514-1520, 2016 06 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27045126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Daptomycin has become a front-line antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections (BSIs). We previously showed that E. faecium strains with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the higher end of susceptibility frequently harbor mutations associated with daptomycin resistance. We postulate that patients with E. faecium BSIs exhibiting daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL treated with daptomycin are more likely to have worse clinical outcomes than those exhibiting daptomycin MICs ≤2 µg/mL. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study that included adult patients with E. faecium BSI for whom initial isolates, follow-up blood culture data, and daptomycin administration data were available. A central laboratory performed standardized daptomycin MIC testing for all isolates. The primary outcome was microbiologic failure, defined as clearance of bacteremia ≥4 days after the index blood culture. The secondary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included. Thirty-one patients were infected with isolates that exhibited daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL. Overall, 34 patients had microbiologic failure and 25 died during hospitalization. In a multivariate logistic regression model, daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL (odds ratio [OR], 4.7 [1.37-16.12]; P = .014) and immunosuppression (OR, 5.32 [1.20-23.54]; P = .028) were significantly associated with microbiologic failure. Initial daptomycin dose of ≥8 mg/kg was not significantly associated with evaluated outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin MICs of 3-4 µg/mL in the initial E. faecium blood isolate predicted microbiological failure of daptomycin therapy, suggesting that modification in the daptomycin breakpoint for enterococci should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/farmacología , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Infection ; 44(6): 803-805, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27246719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcus meningoencephalitis is a serious opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts, particularly patients with advanced AIDS disease. The diagnosis is established through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cryptococcus antigen detection and cultures. Cryptococcus antigen testing is usually the initial test of choice due its high sensitivity and specificity along with the quick availability of the results. CASE REPORT: We hereby report a case of a false-positive CSF cryptococcus antigen assay in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus presenting with acute confusion. While initial CSF evaluation revealed a positive cryptococcus antigen assay, the patient's symptoms were inconsistent with cryptococcus meningoencephalitis. A repeat CSF evaluation, done 3 days later, revealed a negative CSF cryptococcus antigen assay. CONCLUSION: Given the patient's active lupus disease and the elevated antinuclear antibody titers, we believe that the initial positive result was a false positive caused by interference from autoantibodies.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Fúngicos/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Criptococosis/diagnóstico , Cryptococcus/inmunología , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Criptococosis/complicaciones , Criptococosis/microbiología , Endocarditis/complicaciones , Endocarditis/microbiología , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(12): 7362-6, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26369973

RESUMEN

Vancomycin-resistant urinary tract infections are often challenging to treat. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes between patients treated for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infection with an aminopenicillin and those treated with a non-ß-lactam antibiotic. Inpatients treated with an enterococcus-active agent for their first symptomatic vancomycin-resistant enterococcal urinary tract infection between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 were considered for inclusion. Patients with colonization, on hospice, or receiving comfort care only were excluded. The primary endpoint of clinical cure was defined as resolution of clinical symptoms, or symptom improvement to the extent that no additional antibacterial drug therapy was necessary, and lack of microbiologic persistence. Secondary endpoints of 30-day readmission or retreatment and 30-day all-cause mortality were also compared. A total of 316 urinary isolates were screened, and 61 patients with symptomatic urinary tract infection were included. Twenty (35%) of the 57 isolates tested were ampicillin susceptible. Thirty-one patients received an aminopenicillin, and 30 received a non-ß-lactam. Rates of clinical cure for aminopenicillin versus non-ß-lactam treatment were 26/31 (83.9%) and 22/30 (73.3%) (P = 0.315), respectively. Rates of 30-day readmission (6/31, or 19.4%, versus 9/30, or 30%, respectively; P = 0.334), 30-day retreatment (4/31, or 12.9%, versus 4/30, 13.3%, respectively; P = 0.960), and 30-day all-cause mortality (2/31, or 6.5%, versus 1/30, or 3.3%, respectively; P = 0.573) were also not significantly different between groups. Aminopenicillins may be a viable option for treating vancomycin-resistant urinary tract infection regardless of the organism's ampicillin susceptibility. Prospective validation with larger cohorts of patients should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/patogenicidad , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/patogenicidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos
13.
Malar J ; 14: 237, 2015 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26043728

RESUMEN

Haiti and the Dominican Republic, which share the island of Hispaniola, are the last locations in the Caribbean where malaria still persists. Malaria is an important public health concern in Haiti with 17,094 reported cases in 2014. Further, on January 12, 2010, a record earthquake devastated densely populated areas in Haiti including many healthcare and laboratory facilities. Weakened infrastructure provided fertile reservoirs for uncontrolled transmission of infectious pathogens. This situation results in unique challenges for malaria epidemiology and elimination efforts. To help Haiti achieve its malaria elimination goals by year 2020, the Laboratoire National de Santé Publique and Henry Ford Health System, in close collaboration with the Direction d'Épidémiologie, de Laboratoire et de Recherches and the Programme National de Contrôle de la Malaria, hosted a scientific meeting on "Elimination Strategies for Malaria in Haiti" on January 29-30, 2015 at the National Laboratory in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. The meeting brought together laboratory personnel, researchers, clinicians, academics, public health professionals, and other stakeholders to discuss main stakes and perspectives on malaria elimination. Several themes and recommendations emerged during discussions at this meeting. First, more information and research on malaria transmission in Haiti are needed including information from active surveillance of cases and vectors. Second, many healthcare personnel need additional training and critical resources on how to properly identify malaria cases so as to improve accurate and timely case reporting. Third, it is necessary to continue studies genotyping strains of Plasmodium falciparum in different sites with active transmission to evaluate for drug resistance and impacts on health. Fourth, elimination strategies outlined in this report will continue to incorporate use of primaquine in addition to chloroquine and active surveillance of cases. Elimination of malaria in Haiti will require collaborative multidisciplinary approaches, sound strategic planning, and strong ownership of strategies by the Haiti Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population.


Asunto(s)
Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Haití/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Prevalencia , Factores de Tiempo
14.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(5): 1617-21, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24599978

RESUMEN

Tigecycline is one of the few remaining therapeutic options for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). MICs of tigecycline to Acinetobacter baumannii have been reported to be elevated when determined by the Etest compared to determinations by the broth microdilution (BMD) method. The study aim was to compare the susceptibility of GNB to tigecycline by four different testing methods. GNB were collected from six health care systems (25 hospitals) in southeast Michigan from January 2010 to September 2011. Tigecycline MICs among A. baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates were determined by Etest, BMD, Vitek-2, and MicroScan. Nonsusceptibility was categorized as a tigecycline MIC of ≥4 µg/ml for both A. baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae. The study included 4,427 isolates: 2,065 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, 1,105 A. baumannii, 888 susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, and 369 CRE isolates. Tigecycline nonsusceptibility among A. baumannii isolates was significantly more common as determined by Etest compared to that determined by BMD (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; P<0.001), MicroScan (OR, 12.4; P<0.001), or Vitek-2 (OR, 9.4; P<0.001). These differences were not evident with the other pathogens. Tigecycline MICs varied greatly according to the in vitro testing methods among A. baumannii isolates. Etest should probably not be used by laboratories for tigecycline MIC testing of A. baumannii isolates, since MICs are significantly elevated with Etest compared to those determined by the three other methods.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Minociclina/análogos & derivados , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Michigan , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Minociclina/farmacología , Tigeciclina , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
15.
Crit Care ; 18(3): R118, 2014 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24916853

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical success of linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with MRSA VAP. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients with VAP (defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) due to MRSA who were treated with linezolid or vancomycin. MRSA VAP was considered when MRSA was isolated from a tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage. Clinical success was evaluated by assessing improvement or resolution of signs and symptoms of VAP by day 14. After matching on confounding factors, logistic regression models were used to determine if an association existed between treatment arm and clinical success. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were evaluated (101 treated with linezolid and 87 with vancomycin). The mean ± standard deviation Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 21 ± 11 for linezolid- and 19 ± 9 for vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.041). Clinical success occurred in 85% of linezolid-treated patients compared with 69% of vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.009). After adjusting for confounding factors, linezolid-treated patients were 24% more likely to experience clinical success than vancomycin-treated patients (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the evidence indicating that patients with MRSA VAP who are treated with linezolid are more likely to respond favorably compared with patients treated with vancomycin.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , APACHE , Acetamidas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Linezolid , Masculino , Oxazolidinonas/efectos adversos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/efectos adversos
16.
Infect Dis Ther ; 13(4): 685-697, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483775

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Influenza is a common, seasonal infectious disease with broad medical, economic, and social consequences. Real-world evidence on the effect of influenza treatment on household transmission and healthcare resource utilization is limited in outpatient settings in the USA. This study examined the real-world effectiveness of baloxavir vs oseltamivir in reducing influenza household transmission and healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: This prospective electronic survey on patient-reported outcomes was conducted between October 2022 and May 2023 via CVS Pharmacy in the USA. Adult participants (≥ 18 years old) were eligible if they filled a prescription for baloxavir or oseltamivir at a CVS Pharmacy within 2 days of influenza symptom onset. Participant demographics, household transmission, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization were collected. Transmission and utilization outcomes were assessed using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Of 87,871 unique patients contacted, 1346 (1.5%) consented. Of 374 eligible patients, 286 (90 baloxavir- and 196 oseltamivir-treated patients) completed the survey and were included in the analysis. Mean age of participants was 45.4 years, 65.6% were female, and 86.7% were White. Lower household transmission was observed with baloxavir compared with oseltamivir therapy (17.8% vs 26.5%; relative risk = 0.67; 95% CI 0.41-1.11). Healthcare resource utilization, particularly emergency department visits (0.0% vs 4.6%), was also numerically lower in the baloxavir-treated group; no hospitalizations were reported in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this real-world study suggest that antiviral treatment of influenza with baloxavir may decrease household transmission and reduce healthcare resource utilization compared with oseltamivir.

17.
JAMA ; 310(15): 1571-80, 2013 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24097234

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the intensive care unit (ICU) decreases acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether wearing gloves and gowns for all patient contact in the ICU decreases acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) compared with usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cluster-randomized trial in 20 medical and surgical ICUs in 20 US hospitals from January 4, 2012, to October 4, 2012. INTERVENTIONS: In the intervention ICUs, all health care workers were required to wear gloves and gowns for all patient contact and when entering any patient room. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was acquisition of MRSA or VRE based on surveillance cultures collected on admission and discharge from the ICU. Secondary outcomes included individual VRE acquisition, MRSA acquisition, frequency of health care worker visits, hand hygiene compliance, health care­associated infections, and adverse events. RESULTS: From the 26,180 patients included, 92,241 swabs were collected for the primary outcome. Intervention ICUs had a decrease in the primary outcome of MRSA or VRE from 21.35 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 17.57 to 25.94) in the baseline period to 16.91 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 14.09 to 20.28) in the study period, whereas control ICUs had a decrease in MRSA or VRE from 19.02 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 14.20 to 25.49) in the baseline period to 16.29 acquisitions per 1000 patient-days (95% CI, 13.48 to 19.68) in the study period, a difference in changes that was not statistically significant (difference, −1.71 acquisitions per 1000 person-days, 95% CI, −6.15 to 2.73; P = .57). For key secondary outcomes, there was no difference in VRE acquisition with the intervention (difference, 0.89 acquisitions per 1000 person-days; 95% CI, −4.27 to 6.04, P = .70), whereas for MRSA, there were fewer acquisitions with the intervention (difference, −2.98 acquisitions per 1000 person-days; 95% CI, −5.58 to −0.38; P = .046). Universal glove and gown use also decreased health care worker room entry (4.28 vs 5.24 entries per hour, difference, −0.96; 95% CI, −1.71 to −0.21, P = .02), increased room-exit hand hygiene compliance (78.3% vs 62.9%, difference, 15.4%; 95% CI, 8.99% to 21.8%; P = .02) and had no statistically significant effect on rates of adverse events (58.7 events per 1000 patient days vs 74.4 events per 1000 patient days; difference, −15.7; 95% CI, −40.7 to 9.2, P = .24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of gloves and gowns for all patient contact compared with usual care among patients in medical and surgical ICUs did not result in a difference in the primary outcome of acquisition of MRSA or VRE. Although there was a lower risk of MRSA acquisition alone and no difference in adverse events, these secondary outcomes require replication before reaching definitive conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT0131821.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guantes Protectores , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Vestimenta Quirúrgica , Anciano , Enterococcus , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Hospital , Resistencia a la Vancomicina
18.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 61(6): 106800, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37004756

RESUMEN

Aminopenicillins (APs) achieve urinary concentrations that exceed typical minimum inhibitory concentrations for enterococcal lower urinary tract infection (UTI). The local clinical microbiology laboratory discontinued routine susceptibilities on enterococcal urine isolates, and reports that 'APs are predictably reliable for uncomplicated enterococcal UTI'. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of APs with non-APs (NAPs) for enterococcal lower UTIs. This was an institutional-review-board-approved, retrospective cohort of adults hospitalized with symptomatic enterococcal lower UTIs from 2013 to 2021. The primary endpoint was composite clinical success at 14 days, defined as resolution of symptoms without new symptoms and no repeat culture growth of the index organism. A non-inferiority analysis was utilized with a 15% margin, and logistic regression evaluated characteristics associated with 14-day failure. In total, 178 subjects were included: 89 AP patients and 89 NAP patients. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were identified in 73 (82%) AP patients and 76 (85%) NAP patients (P=0.54); in total, 34 (38.2%) AP patients and 66 (74.2%) NAP patients had confirmed Enterococcus faecium (P<0.001). Amoxicillin (n=36, 40.5%) and ampicillin (n=36, 40.5%) were the most commonly used APs, and linezolid (n=41, 46%) and fosfomycin (n=30, 34%) were the most commonly used NAPs. Fourteen-day clinical success rates for APs and NAPs were 83.1% and 82.0%, respectively [1.1% difference, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) -0.117 to 0.139]. Among the E. faecium subgroup, 14-day clinical success was observed in 27/34 (79.4%) AP patients and 53/66 (80.3%) NAP patients (P=0.916). On logistic regression, APs were not associated with 14-day clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.38-1.86). APs were non-inferior to NAPs for treating enterococcal lower UTIs, and may be considered irrespective of susceptibility results.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus faecium , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Enterococcus , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(6): 915-919, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35946316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations among skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents in Detroit increased in mid-March 2020 due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Outbreak response teams were deployed from local healthcare systems, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Detroit Health Department (DHD) to understand the infection prevention and control (IPC) gaps in SNFs that may have accelerated the outbreak. METHODS: We conducted 2 point-prevalence surveys (PPS-1 and PPS-2) at 13 Detroit SNFs from April 8 to May 8, 2020. The DHD and partners conducted facility-wide severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing of all residents and staff and collected information regarding resident cohorting, staff cohorting, and personnel protective equipment (PPE) utilized during that time. RESULTS: Resident cohorting had been implemented in 7 of 13 (58.3%) SNFs prior to point-prevalence survey 1 (PPS-1), and other facilities initiated cohorting after obtaining PPS-1 results. Cohorting protocols of healthcare practitioners and environmental service staff were not established in 4 (31%) of 13 facilities, and in 3 facilities (23.1%) the ancillary staff were not assigned to cohorts. Also, 2 SNFs (15%) had an observation unit prior to PPS-1, 2 (15%) had an observation unit after PPS-1, 4 (31%) could not establish an observation unit due to inadequate space, and 5 (38.4%) created an observation unit after PPS-2. CONCLUSION: On-site consultations identified gaps in IPC knowledge and cohorting that may have contributed to ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among SNF residents despite aggressive testing measures. Infection preventionists (IPs) are critical in guiding ongoing IPC practices in SNFs to reduce spread of COVID-19 through response and prevention.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Michigan/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54(1): 51-8, 2012 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22109947

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reports have found a link between vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) and higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), despite MICs being below the susceptibility breakpoint of 2 µg/mL. Consensus guidelines recommend considering use of alternative agents for infections involving a higher vancomycin MIC, despite few data to support this approach. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of vancomycin, compared with that of daptomycin, in the treatment of MRSA BSIs with a high vancomycin MIC (ie, >1 µg/mL). RESULTS: A total of 118 vancomycin-treated subjects were compared with 59 daptomycin-treated subjects. Clinical failure, defined compositely as mortality, microbiologic failure, and/or recurrence of infection, was numerically lower in daptomycin-treated subjects (31% vs 17%; P = .084) and was mainly driven by a lower incidence of mortality in the daptomycin group (20% vs 9%; P = .046). Factors independently associated with clinical failure included acute renal failure (odds ratio [OR], 3.91 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-14.56]) and vancomycin treatment group (OR, 3.13 [95%, CI, 1.00-9.76]). Right-sided endocarditis was independently associated with clinical success (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, .01-.83]). A comparison of 60-day mortality between vancomycin- and daptomycin-treated subjects found a higher probability of survival in the daptomycin-treated group (P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that daptomycin was associated with a better outcome compared with vancomycin for the treatment of BSIs due to MRSA with higher vancomycin MICs. These findings support the recommendations of recent guidelines, which suggest consideration of the switch to alternative agents when the isolate has a high vancomycin MIC or when patients are not improving during receipt of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Daptomicina/efectos adversos , Daptomicina/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA