Thermal Ablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Mass in a Solitary Kidney: A Matched Cohort Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nephron-sparing approaches are preferred for renal mass in a solitary kidney (RMSK), with partial nephrectomy (PN) generally prioritized. Thermal ablation (TA) also is an option for small renal masses in this setting; however, comparative functional/survival outcomes are not well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective study of 504 patients (1975-2022) with cT1 RMSK managed with PN (n = 409)/TA (n = 95) with necessary data for analysis was performed. Propensity score was used for matching patients, including age, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), tumor diameter, R.E.N.A.L. ((R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor, and (L)ocation relative to polar lines), and comorbidities. Functional outcomes were compared, and Kaplan-Meier was used to analyze survival. RESULTS: The matched cohort included 132 patients (TA = 66/PN = 66), with median tumor diameter of 2.4 cm, R.E.N.A.L. of 6, and preoperative GFR of 52 ml/min/1.73 m2. Acute kidney injury occurred in 11%/61% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). After recovery, median GFR preserved was 89%/83% for TA/PN, respectively (p = 0.02), and 5-year dialysis-free survival was 96% in both cohorts. Median follow-up was 53 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62%/86% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year local recurrence (LR)-free survival was 74%/95% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p < 0.01). Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 96%/98% in the TA/PN cohorts, respectively (p = 0.7). Local recurrence was observed in nine of 36 (25%) and five of 30 (17%) patients managed with laparoscopic versus percutaneous TA, respectively. For TA with LR (n = 14), nine patients presented with multifocality and/or cT1b tumors. Twelve LR were managed with salvage TA, and seven remained cancer-free, while five developed systemic recurrence, three with concomitant LR. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes for TA for RMSK were improved compared with PN. Local recurrence was more common after TA and often was associated with the laparoscopic approach, multifocality, and large tumor size. Improved patient selection and greater experience with TA should improve outcomes. Salvage of LR was not always possible. Partial nephrectomy remains the reference standard for RMSK.

Tumor Contact Surface Area As a Predictor of Functional Outcomes After Standard Partial Nephrectomy: Utility and Limitations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contact surface area (CSA) between the tumor and parenchyma as a predictor of ipsilateral parenchyma and function preserved after partial nephrectomy (PN). Previous studies suggested that CSA is a strong predictor of functional outcomes but the limitations of CSA have not been adequately explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred nineteen patients managed with standard PN for solitary tumor with necessary studies to evaluate and analyze ipsilateral preoperative or postoperative parenchymal mass and function. Parenchymal mass and CSA were measured using contrast-enhanced computed tomography <2 months prior and 3-12months after PN. CSA was calculated: 2πrd, where r = radius and d = intraparenchymal depth. Pearson-correlation evaluated relationships between CSA and ipsilateral parenchymal mass or function preserved. Multivariable regression assessed predictors of function preserved. Conceptually, the CSA paradigm should function better for exophytic tumors than endophytic ones. RESULTS: Median tumor size was 3.5 cm and R.E.N.A.L. was 8. Median global and ipsilateral glomerular filtration rate preserved were 89% and 79%, respectively. Median ipsilateral parenchymal mass preserved was 85% and significantly higher for exophytic masses (P = .001). Median CSA was 22.8 cm2 and significantly less for exophytic masses (P = .02). CSA associated with both ipsilateral function and mass preserved (both P < .05), but the correlations were only modest (r = 0.25 and 0.36, respectively). On multivariable analysis, CSA associated with function preserved for exophytic masses (P = .01), but not for endophytic ones (P = .27). CONCLUSION: CSA associates with functional outcomes after standard PN, although the strength of the correlations was modest, unlike previous studies, and CSA was not an independent predictor for endophytic tumors. Further study will be required to evaluate the utility of CSA in various clinical settings.