Comparison of Urinary Tract Infection Rates Associated with Transurethral Catheterization, Suprapubic Tube and Clean Intermittent Catheterization in the Postoperative Setting: A Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We performed a network meta-analysis of available randomized, controlled trials to elucidate the risks of urinary tract infection associated with transurethral catheterization, suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization in the postoperative setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed®, EMBASE® and Google Scholar™ searches were performed for eligible randomized, controlled trials from January 1980 to July 2015 that included patients who underwent transurethral catheterization, suprapubic tube placement or intermittent catheterization at the time of surgery and catheterization lasting up to postoperative day 30. The primary outcome of comparison was the urinary tract infection rate via a network meta-analysis with random effects model using the netmeta package in R 3.2 (www.r-project.org/). RESULTS: Included in analysis were 14 randomized, controlled trials in a total of 1,391 patients. Intermittent catheterization and suprapubic tubes showed no evidence of decreased urinary tract infection rates compared to transurethral catheterization. Suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization had comparable urinary tract infection rates (OR 0.903, 95% CI 0.479-2.555). On subgroup analysis of 10 randomized, controlled trials with available mean catheterization duration data in a total of 928 patients intermittent catheterization and suprapubic tube were associated with significantly decreased risk of urinary tract infection compared to transurethral catheterization when catheterization duration was greater than 5 days (OR 0.173, 95% CI 0.073-0.412 and OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.073-0.276, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral catheterization is not associated with an increased urinary tract infection risk compared to suprapubic tubes and intermittent catheterization if catheterization duration is 5 days or less. However, a suprapubic tube or intermittent catheterization is associated with a lower rate of urinary tract infection if longer term catheterization is expected in the postoperative period.

Can Activities of Daily Living Predict Complications following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

PURPOSE: Activities of daily living provide information about the functional status of an individual and can predict postoperative complications after general and oncological surgery. However, they have rarely been applied to urology. We evaluated whether deficits in activities of daily living could predict complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and how this compares with the Charlson comorbidity index and the ASA(®) (American Society of Anesthesiologists(®)) classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between March 2013 and March 2014. Those with complete assessment of activities of daily living were included in analysis. Perioperative outcomes, complications and hospital length of stay were examined according to the degree of deficits in daily living activities. RESULTS: Overall 176 patients underwent a total of 192 percutaneous nephrolithotomies. Deficits in activities of daily living were seen in 16% of patients, including minor in 9% and major in 7%. Complications developed more frequently in those with vs without deficits in daily living activities (53% vs 31%, p = 0.029) and length of stay was longer (2.0 vs 4.5 days, p = 0.005). On multivariate logistic regression activities of daily living were an independent predictor of complications (OR 1.11, p = 0.01) but ASA classification and Charlson comorbidity index were not. CONCLUSIONS: Activities of daily living are easily evaluated prior to surgery. They independently predict complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy better than the Charlson comorbidity index or the ASA classification. Preoperative assessment of daily living activities can help risk stratify patients and may inform treatment decisions.

Bullying has a potential role in pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms.

PURPOSE: National statistics estimate that a quarter of American school children are regularly bullied, making this issue the main parental concern and the leading form of school violence. To our knowledge no study in the literature has examined the association of bullying with lower urinary tract symptoms. We evaluated the relationship between being bullied and lower urinary tract symptoms in the pediatric population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We accrued 100 patients from a pediatric urology practice in prospective case-control fashion. The degree of lower urinary tract symptoms was determined by the voiding severity score obtained by a single pediatric urologist. Using the Peer Relations Questionnaire and a thermometer scale we surveyed participants for evidence of victimization from bullying and school related anxiety. We then correlated voiding symptom severity with the degree of bullying. RESULTS: After applying our study exclusion criteria we examined and analyzed data on 38 control children without lower urinary tract symptoms and on 38 children with lower urinary tract symptoms. Mean age was similar in the 2 groups. There were more females in the group with lower urinary tract symptoms (22 vs 13). Mean case voiding severity score was 3.82 (range 2 to 5). As measured by Bullied Index Score the degree of being bullied was significantly higher in the case group (4.76 vs 1.95, p <0.001), as was the anxiety level estimated by the thermometer score (3.68 vs 0.97, p <0.001). We also found that physical forms of bullying accounted for worse voiding severity scores (4.56 vs 3.67, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge our study is the first to show that 1) bullying is significantly associated with pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms and 2) physical forms of bullying accompany worsened symptoms.

Preoperative serum albumin is associated with mortality and complications after radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between preoperative serum albumin and mortality and postoperative complications after radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 1097 RCs performed for the treatment of bladder cancer between 1992 and 2005. All data were entered prospectively into a hospital-based complications database. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between preoperative serum albumin and complications and mortality ≤90 days of RC, while controlling for preoperative patient and disease characteristics. RESULTS: Low preoperative serum albumin was identified in 14% of the cohort. Preoperative serum albumin was a predictor of postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per unit increase in albumin: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.90) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.75) when controlling for sex, race, age-adjusted Charlson score, body mass index, prior history of abdominal surgery, clinical stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As serum albumin decreased, the risk of complications and mortality increased. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to age-adjusted Charlson score, low preoperative serum albumin is a significant predictor of complications and mortality after RC. Serum albumin testing can be used to identify individuals at high-risk of morbidity and mortality.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) compares favorably to traditional open nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in terms of oncologic and surgical principles for kidney tumors. Studies have shown the modality to be feasible with similar oncologic efficacy and superior renal functional outcomes compared with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for tumors. The main advantages of LPN include marked improvements in estimated blood loss, decreased surgical site pain, shorter postoperative convalescence, better cosmesis, and nephron preservation. This review article evaluates the literature regarding LPN and discusses the main steps of the operation, the perioperative workup and management, surgical complications, and its role in the surgical management of kidney masses.

A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Nephrostomy Drainage vs Ureteral Stent Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using the Wisconsin StoneQOL.

OBJECTIVE: We compared postoperative outcomes and quality of life (QoL) between patients who received a nephrostomy tube vs a ureteral stent following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a prospective, double-blind, randomized manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2015 and March 2016, we randomized 30 patients undergoing PCNL to receive nephrostomy drainage (Group 1: 8F or 10F) or Double-J ureteral stent (Group 2) at conclusion of surgery. Nephrostomy tubes were removed within 48 hours (before discharge) and ureteral stents were removed at least 2 weeks after surgery. Patients' QoL was assessed with the Wisconsin StoneQOL questionnaire preoperatively and then 7 to 10 days and 30 days following surgery. Inclusion criteria included an uncomplicated procedure, normal preoperative renal function, and clinically insignificant residual stone fragments on postoperative imaging. We calculated the preoperative and postoperative QoL score difference between the two groups. We also evaluated perioperative characteristics, inpatient analgesic requirements, length of stay (LOS), and postsurgical complications. OUTCOME: Patient characteristics between Groups 1 and 2 were comparable with similar age (58.3 vs 54.7, p = 0.534), gender ratio, and stone burden (276.6 mm2 vs 259 mm2, p = 0.84) and composition. There was no significant difference between perioperative outcomes, including stone-free rate (93.3% vs 86.7%), operative times (125.7 minutes vs 115 minutes, p = 0.29), estimated blood loss (103.3 mL vs 100.7 mL, p = 0.9), LOS (3.2 days vs 1.9 days, p = 0.1), and complications (2 in each group). Inpatient analgesic requirements were also the same (both 21.1 mg, p = 1.0). Assessment of QoL using the Wisconsin StoneQOL questionnaire showed significant differences between preoperative and postoperative health-related QoL in 18 of the 28-question instrument at 7 to 10 days. Patients in Group 2 had significantly worse QoL change and a multitude of negative responses on the StoneQOL assessment, not only those commonly associated with stent irritation. Eighty percent of participants in Group 2 also attributed their complaints to having a stent placed. Both groups had similar QoL status at 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite the literature advocating "tubeless" PCNL with ureteral stent placement at conclusion of surgery, our randomized prospective study shows that QoL is significantly worse with stent placement than with temporary nephrostomy drainage in the immediate aftermath following PCNL, using a validated QoL assessment instrument specific for nephrolithiasis.

Impact of Stone Density on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes with a Dual Frequency Ultrasonic Lithotripter: Computerized Tomography Based Outcomes at a Low Volume Center.

INTRODUCTION: We studied the safety and efficacy of the CyberWand™ lithotripter and how stone density affects the efficacy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed using the CyberWand dual frequency ultrasonic lithotripter at our institution between November 2009 and July 2015. A total of 63 procedures were performed on 57 renal units and, thus, we may be considered a low volume center. We assessed the outcomes of each renal unit in terms of the clinically insignificant residual fragment rate, complication rate, operating room time, estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization. We evaluated the effect of HU of the stone (less than 1,000 HU considered soft and greater than 1,000 HU considered hard) on outcome. RESULTS: Our outcomes using the CyberWand lithotripter were comparable to those of other lithotripsy modalities in terms of the complication rate and clinically insignificant residual fragment rate. We achieved clinically insignificant residual fragment status (defined as less than 4 mm residual stone size) in 54% of renal units and the overall complication rate was 24%. There were no appreciable differences between soft stones and hard stones in terms of any outcome parameter including complication rate, clinically insignificant residual fragment rate and operative time. CONCLUSIONS: The CyberWand lithotripter is an acceptable, noninferior modality of percutaneous lithotripsy of renal calculi. The efficacy of the CyberWand lithotripter is not affected by stone density.

Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pneumoperitoneum of 20 mm Hg: A Study of 751 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early studies describing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) reported the use of pneumoperitoneum at a pressure of 15 mm Hg. While higher insufflation pressures (20 mm Hg) may reduce venous oozing and improve visualization, the safety of this method has not been confirmed. This study evaluates the short-term perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RARP with insufflation pressures of 20 mm Hg. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-surgeon, prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing RARP was retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent RARP with a pneumoperitoneum pressure of 15 and 20 mm Hg for the entire procedure were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared. Complications, operative time, and estimated blood loss were also examined. RESULTS: The number of patients in the experimental (20 mm Hg) and control (15 mm Hg) groups were 550 and 201, respectively. The groups were well matched with respect to age and operative time. The experimental group had a significantly smaller decrease in mean hemoglobin levels after surgery (-1.18 vs-2.13 mg/dL, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the eGFR on the first day after surgery (postoperative day [POD]1) (88.4 vs 85.0 mL/min/1.73m(2), P=0.11) or in the change in eGFR from preoperative to POD1 levels (-0.49 vs 1.54 mL/min/1.73m(2), P=0.18). The complication rate in the experimental group was 8.55% vs 8.46% in the control group. CONCLUSION: Pneumoperitoneum using a pressure of 20 mm Hg for RARP is safe and has no significant short-term effects on renal function and hemoglobin. Increased insufflation pressure was not associated with a higher complication rate.