Surgical Efficacy among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors in Adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ultrasonic dissectors for adenomyomectomy using the double/multiple-flap method combined with temporary occlusion of the temporary bilateral uterine artery and the utero-ovarian vessels for the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 162 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis were included, and all of them had originally been scheduled to group A (n = 82) and group B (n = 80) with each group representing a different surgical application. All eligible women were informed of the potential complications, benefits, and alternatives of each approach before they were assigned to one of the two groups, and patients chose group A or group B by themselves. In group A, we performed laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors in adenomyosis with the double/multiple-flap method combined with temporary occlusion of the bilateral uterine artery and utero-ovarian vessels, while in group B, we performed adenomyomectomy with scissors. During the period of treatment, we evaluated operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and the degree of fatigue of surgeons' fingers. RESULTS: The estimated blood loss, operative time, and the degree of fatigue of surgeons' fingers in group A were significantly lower than that in group B (p < 0.001). No serious perioperative complications were observed in either group. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSION: The use of ultrasonic dissectors in laparoscopic adenomyomectomy with temporary occlusion of the bilateral uterine artery and the utero-ovarian vessels leads to improvements and releases the fatigue of surgeons' fingers in laparoscopic adenomyomectomy.

Laparoscopically assisted Adenomyomectomy Using the Double/Multiple-Flap Method with Temporary Occlusion of the Bilateral Uterine Artery and Utero-Ovarian Vessels in Comparison with the Double/Multiple-Flap Only Method.

Introduction Adenomyomectomy is the most conservative surgical treatment for adenomyosis. However, the surgical efficacy of this treatment and the best approach to use are still debated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using the double/multiple-flap method combined with temporary occlusion of the bilateral uterine artery and the utero-ovarian vessels to treat symptomatic adenomyosis. Patients We recruited 155 patients with symptomatic adenomyosis and divided them into group A (n = 76) and group B (n = 79), with each group treated using a different surgical approach. All eligible women were informed of the potential complications, benefits, and alternatives of each approach before they were assigned into one of the two groups. In group A, we performed laparoscopic adenomyomectomy with the double/multiple-flap method while in group B, we performed a double/multiple-flap adenomyomectomy combined with temporary occlusion of the bilateral uterine artery and utero-ovarian vessels. Over a 24-month follow-up period, we evaluated operating time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, anti-Mullerian hormone levels, uterine volume, and relief of menorrhagia. Results There were no significant differences between groups A and B with respect to VAS scores, relief of menorrhagia and uterine volume at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement of these parameters after surgery compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). Blood loss in group B was significantly lower than in group A (p < 0.001) while there was no significant difference in operating times (p > 0.05). Levels of AMH did not differ significantly between the groups throughout the follow-up period (p > 0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy with temporary occlusion of the bilateral uterine artery and the utero-ovarian vessels offers a feasible surgical option to treat symptomatic adenomyoma.