Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Surg ; 22(1): 219, 2022 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672812

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is technically feasible and associated with favorable outcomes. We compared the clinical efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HLS) and total laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for gastric GISTs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 69 consecutive patients diagnosed with a gastric GIST in a tertiary referral teaching hospital from December 2016 to December 2020. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (TLS group: n = 36; HLS group: n = 17) were included. The mean age was 56.9 and 58.1 years in the TLS and HLS groups, respectively. The maximum tumor margin was significantly shorter in the HLS group than in the TLS group (2.3 ± 0.9. vs. 3.0 ± 0.8 cm; P = 0.004). The operative time of the HLS group was significantly shorter than that of the TLS group (70.6 ± 19.1 min vs. 134.4 ± 53.7 min; P < 0.001). The HLS group had less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter time to first flatus, and a shorter time to fluid diet than the TLS group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in the incidence or severity of complications within 30 days after surgery. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in four cases (HLS group; n = 1; TLS group; n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that compared with TLS, HLS for gastric GISTs has the advantages of simpler operation, shorter operative time, and faster postoperative recovery.


Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Gastrectomía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(8): 1790-1798, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279349

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the association between the pattern and time point of recurrence in different groups stratified by age in postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological data and recurrence data of 2028 patients with GC who underwent curative surgery from January 2010 to March 2015 were enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped according to age: young group (YG) (≤45 years old) (n = 180) and non-young group (OG) (>45 years old) (n = 1848). RESULTS: A total of 2028 patients were enrolled. The young group had better 5-year OS and DFS than the non-young group. In peritoneal recurrence, the cumulative incidence of recurrence in YG was higher than that in OG (P < 0.001). In distant recurrence, the cumulative incidence of recurrence YG was always lower than that of OG (P = 0.004). Recurrence hazard function varied over time between the two groups:in the peritoneal metastasis, the recurrence hazard for YG was higher and earlier than that of OG and the YG was observed during five years after surgery with two recurrence peaks in 8.5 months and in 41.5 months. In distant recurrence, the recurrence hazard for OG had an earlier and higher single peak than that of YG (6.0 months). CONCLUSION: The recurrence characteristics of patients with gastric cancer after curative resection between young group and older group are different. Personalized follow-up strategies should be developed according to the age and time point after operation for the early detection of recurrence and making decision for further treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(10 Pt B): e7-e13, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32709375

RESUMEN

Most gastric cancer (GC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage in China. Because of its high morbidity and mortality, GC remains a major health crisis in China. Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for GC. Owing to being minimally invasive, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has been widely used in various countries, especially in East Asia, since Kitano first reported the feasibility and safety of this technique. Although laparoscopic gastric surgery was introduced relatively late in China, Chinese surgeons have made unique contributions to the research and clinical practice of laparoscopic gastric surgery due to the large number of clinical cases. This review focuses on the progress in laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced stage GC in China, including reasonable approaches in different areas and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic surgery, and introduce advanced technology to facilitate surgeons to rapidly overcome the learning curve in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux , Carcinoma/patología , China , Colorantes , Esófago/cirugía , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Verde de Indocianina , Yeyuno/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Imagen Óptica , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA