The impact of nurses' experiences of hospital violence on resilience: A mediated moderation model.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the impact of nurses' experiences of hospital violence on resilience, the mediating effect of trust in patients and the moderating effect of organizational trust. BACKGROUND: Despite belonging to the central part of health care worldwide and being the leading provider of medical services, nurses are often subjected to hospital violence, which affects their physical and mental well-being. Trust is a high-order mechanism that encourages positive thinking and personal and professional development. However, research into the impact of trust on resilience concerning nurses' experiences of hospital violence is limited. METHODS: The participants were 2331 nurses working in general hospitals in China. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and data were collected via questionnaires from July to October 2022 and analysed using SPSS 25.0 and SPSS PROCESS 3.3 macros. This study was prepared and reported according to the STROBE checklist. RESULTS: Mean trust in patients was 48.00 ± 10.86 (12-60), mean organizational trust was 56.19 ± 8.90 (13-65) and mean resilience was 78.63 ± 19.26 (0-100). Nurses' experience of hospital violence had a direct negative effect on resilience (ß = -.096, p = .871), a significant adverse effect on trust in patients (ß = -3.022, p < .001) and a significant positive effect on trust in patients on resilience (ß = 1.464, p < .001). Trusting patients played a mediating role. The significant moderating effect of organizational trust between experience of hospital violence and trust in patients was moderated by a mediating effect index of -0.1867 (95% CI = [-0.3408, -0.0345]). CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' experience of hospital violence exerted a negative effect on resilience, trust in patients had a fully mediated effect and organizational trust had a significant moderating influence in the pathway from nurses' experience of hospital violence to patients' trust-mediated resilience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: This study highlights the impact of nurses' experiences of hospital violence on resilience and explores the importance of trust from the nurses' perspective. Measures taken by managers to provide nurses with a safe, trusting and positive work environment can be highly beneficial in enhancing nurse resilience.

Plastic Events of the Vestibular Nucleus: the Initiation of Central Vestibular Compensation.

Vestibular compensation is a physiological response of the vestibular organs within the inner ear. This adaptation manifests during consistent exposure to acceleration or deceleration, with the vestibular organs incrementally adjusting to such changes. The molecular underpinnings of vestibular compensation remain to be fully elucidated, yet emerging studies implicate associations with neuroplasticity and signal transduction pathways. Throughout the compensation process, the vestibular sensory neurons maintain signal transmission to the central equilibrium system, facilitating adaptability through alterations in synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability. Notable molecular candidates implicated in this process include variations in ion channels and neurotransmitter profiles, as well as neuronal and synaptic plasticity, metabolic processes, and electrophysiological modifications. This study consolidates the current understanding of the molecular events in vestibular compensation, augments the existing research landscape, and evaluates contemporary therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, this review posits potential avenues for future research that could enhance our comprehension of vestibular compensation mechanisms.

Mendelian randomization of stroke risk after total hip and knee replacements.

Objective: Previous epidemiological studies have indicated an increased risk of neurovascular diseases in patients following total hip and knee replacements. However, definitive conclusions regarding the increased risk of stroke post-replacement remain elusive. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal relationship between total hip and knee replacements and stroke. Methods: We utilized summary data from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Data concerning total hip replacements (THR, N = 319,037) and total knee replacements (TKR, N = 252,041) were sourced from the Genetics of Osteoarthritis (GO) Consortium. Stroke-related data were obtained from the International Stroke Genetics Consortium, encompassing any stroke (AS), any ischemic stroke (AIS), large vessel ischemic stroke (LV-IS), cardioembolic ischemic stroke (CE-IS), and small vessel ischemic stroke (SV-IS). Our primary causal inference method was the inverse variance weighted (IVW) approach, supplemented by weighted median and MR-Egger regression as secondary inference methods. We utilized the MR-PRESSO global test for outlier detection, Cochran's Q statistic to assess heterogeneity, and assessed the multiplicity and stability of our findings using p-values from MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger regressions, and the leave-one-out method, respectively. Results: We identified significant genetic associations between THR and both AS (IVW p = 0.0001, OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12) and AIS (IVW p = 0.0016, OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.12). Significant associations were also observed between TKR and AS (IVW p = 0.0002, OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), as well as AIS (IVW p = 0.0005, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06-1.24). Conclusion: Our findings genetically support an increased risk of stroke following total hip and knee replacements. However, further studies are necessary to elucidate the specific mechanisms underlying stroke episodes post-replacement.