CEUS in prediction of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection and to stratify the risk of early recurrence: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Early recurrence (ER) after surgery is related to early death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection. To explore the role of preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting ER of HCC after curative resection and to stratify the risk of ER. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluated consecutive 556 patients with HCC who were examined by CEUS during the 2 weeks before curative resection between January 2011 and December 2018. ER was defined as intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence within 2 year after resection of HCC. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for ER after surgical resection of HCC. Recurrence-free time (RFS) rates were analyzed and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: ER occurred in 307 (55.2%) of the 556 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that a tumor size ≥ 30 mm and satellite nodules seen on CEUS, DL(deep learning) radiomics reoccurrence score based on the frame of image with the maximum intensity of CEUS and an elevated alpha-fetoprotein level were significantly associated with ER (P < .05). Based on the number of predictors present, patients with CEUS LR-5 HCC were stratified into three risk subgroups: risk group 3 (high-risk patients, 4 predictors), risk group 2 (medium-risk patients, 2-3 predictors), and risk group 1 (low-risk patients, 0-1 predictor). The 2-year RFS rate was 19.4% in risk group 3, 40.9% in risk group 2, and 48.1% in risk group 1; the corresponding mean RFS times were 14.0 ± 2.9 months, 43.7 ± 6.6 months, and 55.5 ± 2.8 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size ≥ 30 mm and satellite nodules seen on CEUS, DL radiomics reoccurrence score based on the frame of image with the maximum intensity of CEUS and an elevated alpha-fetoprotein level can predict ER of HCC.

Comparison of Sonazoid-Contrast­Enhanced Ultrasound and Gd­EOB­DTPA­Enhanced MRI for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of Sonazoid-contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for detecting microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, we included 64 patients with histopathologically confirmed single HCC lesions. Based on post-operative pathologic data, patients were categorized into two groups: those with MVI (n = 21) and those without MVI (n = 43). The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS was compared with that of MRI in predicting MVI. RESULTS: Multifactorial analysis revealed that US features (tumor size > 4.35 cm, peritumoral enhancement, post-vascular ring enhancement, peak energy in the arterial phase of the difference between the margin area of HCC and distal liver parenchyma <-1.0 × 106 a.u), MRI features (rim enhancement, irregular tumor margin, and the halo sign) were all independent predictors of MVI (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS features in predicting MVI ranged from 61.9% to 86.4% and from 42.9% to 71.4%, respectively. For MRI features, the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 33.3% to 76.3% and from 54.7% to 90.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the area under the curve between CEUS and MRI (p > 0.05). Notably, peak energy of the difference showed the highest sensitivity at 86.4%, while the halo sign in MRI exhibited the highest specificity at 90.5%. CONCLUSION: Sonazoid-CEUS and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI demonstrate potential in predicting MVI in HCC lesions. Notably, CEUS showed higher sensitivity, whereas MRI displayed greater specificity in predicting MVI.

Liver resection versus microwave ablation for solitary and small (≤ 3 cm) HCC with early recurrence in different stages of liver cirrhosis: A propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of liver resection (LR) and microwave ablation (MWA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with early recurrence and varying stages of cirrhosis. METHOD: This study analyzed patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy and experienced early tumor recurrence (≤3 cm) between December 2002 and December 2020 at the Tongji Hospital. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: This study included 295 patients (106, LR; 189, MWA), 86 patients in each of the 2 groups were chosen for further comparison, after PSM. After PSM, both LR and MWA demonstrated similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (p = 0.060 and p = 0.118, respectively). However, the LR group had more treatment-related complications. In patients with moderate or severe cirrhosis, no significant differences in RFS or OS rates were found between the LR and MWA groups (p = 0.779 and p = 0.772, respectively). In patients without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis, LR showed better RFS and OS rates than MWA (p = 0.024 and p = 0.047, respectively). Multivariate analysis after PSM identified moderate or severe cirrhosis and recurrence intervals ≤12 months as independent predictors of poor RFS and OS in patients with early recurrence of HCC. CONCLUSION: LR is more effective than MWA for early recurrence of HCC in patients without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis, showing improved RFS and OS rates. In patients with moderate or severe cirrhosis, the OS and RFS were statistically equal between the two therapies. However, MWA may be preferred owing to its low complication rate.