Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Heart J ; 41(8): 921-928, 2020 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31408096

RESUMEN

AIMS: To assess the contemporary trends in aortic stenosis (AS) interventions in the USA before and after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized the National-Inpatient-Sample to assess temporal trends in the incidence, cost, and outcomes of AS interventions between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2016. During the study's period, AS interventions increased from 96 to 137 per 100 000 individuals > 60 years old, P < 0.001. In-hospital expenditure on AS interventions increased from $2.28 billion in 2003 to $4.33 in 2016 P < 0.001. Among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, the proportion of TAVI increased from 11.9% in 2012 to 43.2% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Males and Hispanics had lower proportions of TAVI compared with females and White patients. Adjusted in-hospital mortality of isolated SAVR decreased from 5.4% in 2003 to 3.3% in 2016 (P < 0.001), whereas adjusted in-hospital mortality of TAVI decreased from 4.7% in 2012 to 2.2% in 2016, P < 0.001. The incidence of new dialysis, permanent pacemaker implantation, and blood transfusion decreased after both TAVI and SAVR between 2012 and 2016. However, the rate of post-operative stroke did not significantly decrease. Length of stay and cost of hospitalization decreased after both SAVR and TAVI, although the later remained higher with TAVI. Rates of non-home discharge decreased over time after TAVI but remained stable after isolated SAVR. CONCLUSION: This nationwide survey documents the increasing incidence of AS interventions, the rising cost of modern AS care, and the paradigm shift in aortic valve replacement practice in the USA.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/epidemiología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Circulation ; 137(4): 376-387, 2018 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regional variations in reperfusion times and mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction are influenced by differences in coordinating care between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals. Building on the Accelerator-1 Project, we hypothesized that time to reperfusion could be further reduced with enhanced regional efforts. METHODS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, we worked with 12 metropolitan regions across the United States with 132 percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and 946 EMS agencies. Data were collected in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports. The primary end point was the change in the proportion of EMS-transported patients with first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes from baseline to final quarter. We also compared treatment times and mortality with patients treated in hospitals not participating in the project during the corresponding time period. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 730 patients were transported to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals, including 974 in the baseline quarter and 972 in the final quarter who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 61 years; 27% were women, 6% had cardiac arrest, and 6% had shock on admission; 10% were black, 12% were Latino, and 10% were uninsured. By the end of the intervention, all process measures reflecting coordination between EMS and hospitals had improved, including the proportion of patients with a first medical contact to device time of ≤90 minutes (67%-74%; P<0.002), a first medical contact to device time to catheterization laboratory activation of ≤20 minutes (38%-56%; P<0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of ≤20 minutes (33%-43%; P<0.0001). Of the 12 regions, 9 regions reduced first medical contact to device time, and 8 met or exceeded the national goal of 75% of patients treated in ≤90 minutes. Improvements in treatment times corresponded with a significant reduction in mortality (in-hospital death, 4.4%-2.3%; P=0.001) that was not apparent in hospitals not participating in the project during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Organization of care among EMS and hospitals in 12 regions was associated with significant reductions in time to reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction as well as in in-hospital mortality. These findings support a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Regionalización/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Transporte de Pacientes/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 94(5): 714-721, 2019 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature comparing fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements after administration of adenosine using intracoronary (IC) bolus versus standard continuous intravenous (IV) infusion. BACKGROUND: FFR is considered the gold standard for invasive assessment of coronary lesions of intermediate severity. IV adenosine is recommended to induce hyperemia; however, IC adenosine is widely used for convenience. The difference between IV and IC administration in lesions assessment is not well studied. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE and relevant databases for studies comparing IV with IC adenosine administration for FFR measurement. We reviewed data pertaining to adenosine doses, side effects, and FFR values. RESULTS: Eight studies addressing the primary question were identified. Dose of IC adenosine varied between 36 and 600 µg. Compared to IV adenosine infusion, the sensitivity of IC administration is 0.805 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.664-0.896; p < .001), specificity is 0.965 (95% CI: 0.932-0.983; p < .001), positive likelihood ratio is 24.218 (95% CI: 12,263-47.830; p < .001), negative likelihood ratio is 0.117 (95% CI: 0.033-0.411; p < .01), and diagnostic odds ratio is 274.225 [95% CI: 92.731-810.946; p < .001]. Overall, hemodynamic side effects and symptoms were reported more frequently with IV adenosine. CONCLUSIONS: The available literature suggests that IC adenosine is well tolerated and may provide equivalent diagnostic accuracy compared to IV administration. However, variability in dosing regimens does not allow definitive conclusions regarding noninferiority of IC approach compared to IV administration.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Hiperemia/fisiopatología , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Adenosina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estenosis Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2019: 2872607, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31341419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Myocardial inflammation following acute ischemic injury has been linked to poor cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Many studies have linked myeloperoxidase (MPO), a neutrophil and inflammatory marker, to cardiac inflammation in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the prognostic role of MPO for adverse clinical outcomes in ACS patients has not been well established. METHODS: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies from 1975 to March 2018 that investigated the prognostic value of serum MPO in ACS patients. Studies which have dichotomized patients into a high MPO group and a low MPO group reported clinical outcomes accordingly and followed up patients for at least 30 days to be eligible for enrollment. Data were analyzed using random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for quality control. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 13 studies with 9090 subjects and a median follow-up of 11.4 months. High MPO level significantly predicted mortality (odds ratio (OR) 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-2.94; P < 0.001), whereas it was not significantly predictive of major adverse cardiac events and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.28; CI: 0.92-1.77, P = 0.14 and OR 1.23; CI: 0.96-1.58, P = 0.101, respectively). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and age did not affect the prognostic value of MPO for clinical outcomes, whereas female gender and smoking status have a strong influence on the prognostic value of MPO in terms of mortality and recurrent MI (metaregression coefficient -8.616: 95% CI -14.59 to -2.633, P = 0.0048 and 4.88: 95% CI 0.756 to 9.0133, P = 0.0204, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that high MPO levels are associated with the risk of mortality and that MPO can be incorporated in risk stratification models that guide therapy of high-risk ACS patients.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/enzimología , Peroxidasa/sangre , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Humanos , Inflamación , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/sangre , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Análisis de Regresión , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Transducción de Señal , Fumar , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 21(5): 39, 2019 04 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30969393

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is an urgent medical condition that requires prompt application of simultaneous pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies. The variation in patient clinical characteristics coupled with the multitude of treatment modalities makes optimal and timely management challenging. This review summarizes risk stratification of patients, the role and timing of revascularization, and highlights important considerations in the revascularization approach with attention to individual patient characteristics. RECENT FINDINGS: The early invasive management of NSTEMI has fostered a reduction in future ischemic events. Risk calculators are helpful in determining which patients should receive early invasive management. As many patients have multivessel disease, identifying the true culprit lesion can be challenging. Special attention should be given to those at the highest risk, such as diabetics, patients with renal failure, and those with left main disease. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, the decision and mode of revascularization should carefully integrate the patient's clinical characteristics as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Revascularización Miocárdica/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Circ J ; 82(1): 203-210, 2017 12 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28757520

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that routine follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increases the incidence of revascularization without a clear reduction in major adverse clinical events. However, none of these prior studies were adequately powered to evaluate hard clinical endpoints such as myocardial infarction (MI) or death and thus the clinical utility of such practice remains to be determined.Methods and Results:We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared clinical outcomes after PCI between patients who underwent routine follow-up CAG and those who only had clinical follow-up. Five randomized trials, totaling 4,584 patients met our inclusion criteria, including studies that used sub-randomization and ones that assigned consecutive patients per study protocol. Our results showed that routine follow-up CAG was associated with a lower rate of MI (odds ratio [OR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.91; P=0.01) without reduction in all-cause mortality (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.59-1.28; P=0.48), and a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.42-2.11; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that routine follow-up CAG after PCI was associated with a higher rate of revascularization, but also with a reduction in the rate of subsequent MI. Further studies investigating the potential role of routine follow-up angiography may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Determinación de Punto Final , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(4): 722-732, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26309050

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for ≥12 months following coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) to reduce risk of major adverse ischemic events. Randomized trials suggest an abbreviated DAPT duration (≤6 months) is adequately protective. However, these trials are individually underpowered to detect differences in rare but serious events such as stent thrombosis (ST). OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized trials to define the impact of abbreviated DAPT (≤6 months) on death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), and bleeding complications compared to standard-duration DAPT (≥12 months). METHODS: Seven randomized controlled trials comparing abbreviated vs. standard DAPT regimens following DES use were identified by two independent investigators. Study characteristics were reviewed and clinical endpoint data were abstracted and analyzed in aggregate using fixed and random-effects models. RESULTS: The seven trials included 15,874 randomized patients. Second-generation DES were used in most patients. Compared to standard-duration DAPT, abbreviated DAPT was not associated with an increase in mortality (OR 0.93; CI: 0.73 to 1.17; P = 0.52), MI (OR 1.14; CI: 0.89 to 1.45; P = 0.30) or ST (OR 1.25; CI: 0.81 to 1.93; P = 0.31). Abbreviated DAPT was associated with significantly fewer major bleeding complications (OR 0.52; CI: 0.34 to 0.82; P = 0.005). The results were consistent between fixed and random-effects models, with no heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for inclusion of bare metal stents, 1st generation DES and/or abbreviated DAPT regimens of 3 months resulted in similar conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of >15,000 patients primarily treated with second-generation DES, abbreviated-duration DAPT (≤6 months) was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications with no evidence of a significant increase in risk of death, MI or ST. Accordingly, abbreviated DAPT should be strongly considered for patients receiving second generation DES.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(2): 163-73, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26698636

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated outcomes associated with transradial vs. transfemoral approaches and vorapaxar in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the TRACER trial. BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar reduces ischemic events but increases the risk of major bleeding. METHODS: We compared 30-day and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, recurrent ischemia with rehospitalization, and urgent coronary revascularization) and noncoronary artery bypass graft (CABG)-related bleedings in 2,192 transradial and 4,880 transfemoral patients undergoing PCI after adjusting for confounding variables, including propensity for transradial access. RESULTS: Overall, 30-day GUSTO moderate/severe and non-CABG TIMI major/minor bleeding occurred less frequently in transradial (0.9% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.001) vs. transfemoral (1.1% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.005) patients. A similar reduction was seen at 2 years (3.3% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.008; 3.3% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). Transradial was associated with an increased risk of ischemic events at 30 days (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.72; P = 0.004), driven primarily by increased periprocedural myocardial infarctions. At 2 years, rates of MACE were comparable (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.98-1.33; P = 0.096). Although bleeding rates were higher with vorapaxar in transfemoral vs. transradial patients, there was no significant treatment interaction. Also, the access site did not modulate the association between vorapaxar and MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial access was associated with lower bleeding rates and similar long-term ischemic outcomes, suggesting transradial access is safer than transfemoral access among ACS patients receiving potent antiplatelet therapies. Because of the nonrandomized allocation of arterial access, these results should be considered exploratory. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Arteria Femoral , Lactonas/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Arteria Radial , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/mortalidad , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Lactonas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Punciones , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 41(3): 384-93, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26743061

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been increasingly used to treat patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Despite improvements in valve deployment, patients that have undergone TAVR are at high risk for major adverse events following the procedure. Blood cell numbers, platelet function, and biomarkers of systemic inflammation were analyzed in 58 patients undergoing TAVR with the Edward's SAPIEN valve. Following valve deployment, platelet count and agonist-induced platelet activity declined and plasma markers of systemic inflammation (interleukin-6 and S100A8/A9) increased. Baseline platelet activity prior to TAVR correlated with perioperative changes plasma interleukin-6 levels. Moreover, perioperative changes in plasma inflammatory markers predicted the decline in platelet count in the days following the TAVR procedure. Additionally, a significant effect of gender on platelet count following TAVR and was observed. Finally, post-procedural mortality was associated with sustained thrombocytopenia after TAVR. Our findings suggest that TAVR elicits a thromboinflammatory state that may contribute to post-procedural thrombocytopenia. Importantly, our results add to the growing body of literature that suggests the thromboinflammatory changes that occur early after TAVR may predict long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis/sangre , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Calgranulina A/sangre , Calgranulina B/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/sangre , Interleucina-6/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria
11.
South Med J ; 109(1): 61-76, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26741877

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Radial artery access (RA) for left heart catheterization and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective. Despite consistent data showing less bleeding complications compared with femoral artery access (FA), it continues to be underused in the United States, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in whom aggressive anticoagulation and platelet inhibition regimens are needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare major cardiovascular outcomes and safety endpoints in patients with ACS managed with PCI using radial versus femoral access. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing RA versus FA in patients with ACS were analyzed. Our primary outcomes were mortality, major adverse cardiac event, major bleeding, and access-related complications. A fixed-effects model was used for the primary analyses. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials and 17 cohort studies involving 44,854 patients with ACS were identified. Compared with FA, RA was associated with a reduction in major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.61, P < 0.001), access-related complications (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.39, P < 0.001), mortality (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.75, P < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac event (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, P < 0.001). These significant reductions were consistent across different study designs and clinical presentations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this large meta-analysis, RA for primary PCI in the setting of ACS is associated with reduction in cardiac and safety endpoints when compared with FA in both urgent and elective procedures. This should encourage a wider adoption of this technique among centers and interventional cardiologists.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 86(2): 211-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25323046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of adverse events with noncardiac procedures (NCP) after the use of drug eluting stents (DES) is not well studied. We sought to determine the incidence and temporal trends of adverse events in patients undergoing NCP after coronary DES. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving DES during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Lexington VAMC between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2010 to determine the circumstances and the results of their NCP. RESULTS: We identified 1,092 patients who underwent at least one PCI with DES who were followed for at least 3 years. Of those, 452 patients (41%) had a NCP at a median of 534 days after PCI with 1,081 procedures (894 low-, 160 Intermediate-, and 27 high-risk) performed. Clinically relevant NCP-related complications were defined as significant bleeding or stent thrombosis and occurred in 13 individuals (nine perioperative bleeding and four probable/possible stent thrombosis including two mortalities). Five adverse events occurred within the first year at a rate of 0.014 event/patient-year. During the remainder of follow-up (up to 9 years), eight events were documented at a rate of 0.0004 event/patient-years. During the first year of follow-up, there was no significant increase in risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR) in patients undergoing NCP but higher risk of all-cause mortality in those who did not undergo NCP. However, in patients who underwent NCP, there was a statistically significant increase in myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and rehospitalization for cardiac reasons compared with those without NCP during long term follow-up (median of 5.6 years). CONCLUSION: NCP after DES requiring management of DAT are relatively common among veterans following PCI using DES. The risk of bleeding and stent thrombosis is concentrated in the first year but remains very low.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Trombosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Salud de los Veteranos , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Trombosis Coronaria/mortalidad , Trombosis Coronaria/terapia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
13.
South Med J ; 108(8): 502-6, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26280780

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the United States. Although AMD shares multiple risk factors with coronary artery disease (CAD), the association between AMD and CAD has not been established. The objective of our study was to demonstrate an association between the diagnosis of AMD and CAD and/or major cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of >13,000 patients at the Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Patients diagnosed as having AMD served as cases, and patients diagnosed with cataract and no AMD served as controls. We examined the prevalence of CAD and associated risk factors in both groups using univariate analysis followed by multivariate analyses to examine the association between AMD and CAD after adjusting for known common risk factors. RESULTS: We identified 3950 patients with AMD and 9166 controls. Patients with AMD were on average 6 years older than controls (P < 0.001) and had a significantly higher prevalence of CAD (39% vs 34%) and hypertension (88% vs 83%) but lower incidence of diabetes mellitus and smoking. Estimated odds ratio relating CAD to AMD was 1.22 (95% confidence interval 1.13-1.32; P < 0.001). The association between CAD and AMD remained significant in multivariate analyses in older individuals (76 years and older). When we conducted a secondary analysis and matched the AMD and non-AMD groups based on age, the association between CAD and AMD remained significant (39.4% in the AMD group vs 36.6% in the non-AMD group; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the existence of an association between CAD and AMD, particularly in older adult patients in the predominantly male Veterans Affairs population. Such an association between AMD and systemic vascular disease justifies the potential coscreening for these conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Medicina Militar , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663889

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the relationship between the degree of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment and the frequency and type of bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective cohort analysis. Patients who underwent PCI from 2009 to 2017 were identified from our institutional National Cardiovascular Disease Registry (NCDR) CathPCI database. Patients were stratified by pre-PCI LVEF: preserved (≥50%), mildly reduced (41%-49%) and reduced (≤40%) LVEF. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome was major bleeding, defined by NCDR criteria. Events were classified based on bleeding aetiology and analysed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 13 537 PCIs, there were 817 bleeding events (6%). The rate of bleeding due to any cause, blood transfusion, gastrointestinal bleeding and coronary artery perforation or tamponade each increased in a stepwise fashion comparing preserved, mildly reduced and reduced LVEF reduction (p<0.05 for all comparisons). However, there were no differences in bleeding due to asymptomatic drops in haemoglobin, access site haematoma or retroperitoneal bleeding. After multivariable adjustment, mildly reduced and reduced LVEF remained independent predictors of bleeding events (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74, p<0.05 and OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.06, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of LV dysfunction is an independent predictor of post-PCI major bleeding events. Patients with mildly reduced or reduced LVEF are at greatest risk of post-PCI bleeding, driven by an increased need for blood transfusion, major GI bleeding events and coronary artery perforation or tamponade. Pre-PCI LV dysfunction does not predict asymptomatic declines in haemoglobin, access site haematoma or retroperitoneal bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Sistema de Registros , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Incidencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo
16.
EuroIntervention ; 20(2): e123-e134, 2024 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224252

RESUMEN

Increasing evidence has shown that coronary spasm and vasomotor dysfunction may be the underlying cause in more than half of myocardial infarctions with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) as well as an important cause of chronic chest pain in the outpatient setting. We review the contemporary understanding of coronary spasm and related vasomotor dysfunction of the coronary arteries, the pathophysiology and prognosis, and current and emerging approaches to diagnosis and evidence-based treatment.


Asunto(s)
Vasoespasmo Coronario , MINOCA , Humanos , Vasoespasmo Coronario/complicaciones , Vasoespasmo Coronario/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Espasmo
17.
South Med J ; 106(7): 391-8, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23820318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolytic therapy is recommended for ST-segment myocardial infarctions (STEMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is not available or cannot be performed in a timely manner. Despite this recommendation, patients often are transferred to PPCI centers with prolonged transfer times, leading to delayed reperfusion. Regional approaches have been developed with success and we sought to increase guideline compliance in Kentucky. METHODS: A total of 191 consecutive STEMI patients presented to the University of Kentucky (UK) Chandler Medical Center between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2011. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, extent of myocardial injury, bleeding, and 4) length of stay. Patients were analyzed by presenting facility-the UK hospital versus an outside hospital (OSH)-and treatment strategy (PPCI vs fibrinolytic therapy). Further analyses assessed primary and secondary outcomes by treatment strategy within transfer distance and compliance with American Heart Association guidelines. RESULTS: Patients presenting directly to the UK hospital had significantly shorter door-to-balloon times than those presenting to an OSH (83 vs 170 minutes; P < 0.001). This did not affect short-term mortality or secondary outcomes. By comparison, OSH patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy had a numeric reduction in mortality (4.0% vs 12.3%; P = 0.45). Overall, only 20% of OSH patients received timely reperfusion, 13% PPCI, and 42% fibrinolytics. In a multivariable model, delayed reperfusion significantly predicted major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio 3.87, 95% confidence interval 1.15-13.0; P = 0.02), whereas the presenting institution did not. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary treatment of STEMI in Kentucky, ongoing delays to reperfusion therapy remain regardless of treatment strategy. For further improvement in care, acceptance of transfer delays is necessary and institutions should adopt standardized protocols in association with a regional system of care.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Terapia Trombolítica , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Kentucky , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(13): 1561-1578, 2023 07 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438024

RESUMEN

Percutaneous transcatheter interventions have evolved as standard therapies for a variety of cardiovascular diseases, from revascularization for atherosclerotic vascular lesions to the treatment of structural cardiac diseases. Concomitant technological innovations, procedural advancements, and operator experience have contributed to effective therapies with low complication rates, making early hospital discharge safe and common. Same-day discharge presents numerous potential benefits for patients, providers, and health care systems. There are several key elements that are shared across the spectrum of interventional cardiology procedures to create a successful same-day discharge pathway. These include appropriate patient and procedure selection, close postprocedural observation, predischarge assessments specific for each type of procedure, and the existence of a patient support system beyond hospital discharge. This review provides the rationale, available data, and a framework for same-day discharge across the spectrum of coronary, peripheral, and structural cardiovascular interventions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Cardiopatías , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Corazón , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia
19.
JAMA Cardiol ; 7(10): 1016-1024, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36044196

RESUMEN

Importance: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) living in rural settings often have worse clinical outcomes compared with their urban counterparts. Whether this discrepancy is due to clinical characteristics or delays in timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or fibrinolysis is unclear. Objective: To assess process metrics and outcomes among patients with STEMI in rural and urban settings across the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional multicenter study analyzed data for 70 424 adult patients with STEMI from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI Registry in 686 participating US hospitals between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020. Patients without a valid zip code were excluded, and those transferred to a different hospital during the course of the study were excluded from outcome analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality and time-to-reperfusion metrics. Results: This study included 70 424 patients with STEMI (median [IQR] age, 63 [54-73] years; 49 850 [70.8%] male and 20 574 [29.2%] female; patient self-reported race: 6753 [9.6%] Black, 60 114 [85.4%] White, and 2096 [3.0%] of another race [including American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander]; 5281 [7.5%] individuals of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) in 686 hospitals (50 702 [72.0%] living in urban zip codes and 19 722 [28.0%] in rural zip codes). Patients from rural settings were less likely to undergo PPCI compared with patients from urban settings (14 443 [73.2%] vs 43 142 [85.1%], respectively; P < .001) and more often received fibrinolytics (2848 [19.7%] vs 937 [2.7%]; P < .001). Compared with patients from urban settings, those in rural settings undergoing PPCI had longer median (IQR) time from first medical contact to catheterization laboratory activation (30 [12-42] minutes vs 22 [15-59] minutes; P < .001) and longer median (IQR) time from first medical contact to device (99 minutes [75-131] vs 81 [66-103] minutes; P < .001), including those who arrived directly at PPCI centers (83 [66-107] minutes vs 78 [64-97] minutes; P < .001) and those who transferred to PPCI centers from another treatment center (125 [102-163] minutes vs 103 [85-135] minutes; P < .001). Among those who transferred in, median (IQR) door-in-door-out time was longer in patients from rural settings (63 [41-100] minutes vs 50 [35-80] minutes; P < .001). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was more common in patients from urban vs rural settings (3099 [6.1%] vs 958 [4.9%]; P < .001), and patients from urban settings were more likely to present with heart failure (4112 [8.1%] vs 1314 [6.7%]; P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between rural and urban groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.06). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort of patients with STEMI from US hospitals participating in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Chest Pain-MI Registry, patients living in rural settings had longer times to reperfusion, were less likely to receive PPCI or meet guideline-recommended time to reperfusion, and more frequently received fibrinolytics than patients living in urban settings. However, there was no difference in adjusted in-hospital mortality between patients with STEMI from urban and rural settings.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Adulto , Dolor en el Pecho , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(22): e026676, 2022 11 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36326048

RESUMEN

Background Compared with White Americans, Black Americans have a greater prevalence of cardiac events following percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated the association between race and neighborhood income on post-percutaneous coronary intervention cardiac events and assessed whether income modifies the effect of race on this relationship. Methods and Results Consecutive patients (n=23 822) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016, were included. All-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event were assessed at 3 years. Extended 10-year follow-up was performed for those residing locally (n=1285). Neighborhood income was derived using median adjusted annual gross household income reported within the patient's zip code. We compared differences in treatment and outcomes, adjusting for race, income, and their interaction. In total, 3173 (13.3%) patients self-identified as Black Americans, and 20 649 (86.7%) self-identified as White Americans. Black Americans had a worse baseline cardiac risk profile and lower neighborhood income compared with White Americans. Although risk profile improved with increasing income in White Americans, no difference was observed across incomes among Black Americans. Despite similar long-term outpatient cardiology follow-up and medication prescription, risk profiles among Black Americans remained worse. At 3 years, unadjusted all-cause mortality (18.0% versus 15.2%; P<0.001) and major adverse cardiac event (37.3% versus 34.6%; P<0.001) were greater among Black Americans and with lower income (both P<0.001); race, income, and their interaction were not significant predictors in multivariable models. At 10-year follow-up, increasing income was associated with improved outcomes only in White Americans but not Black Americans. In multivariable models for major adverse cardiac event, income (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.98]; P=0.005), Black race (HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.58-1.96]; P=0.006), and their interaction (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]; P=0.003) were significant predictors. Similar findings were observed for cardiac death. Conclusions Early 3-year post-percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes were driven by worse risk factor profiles in both Black Americans and those with lower neighborhood income. However, late 10-year outcomes showed an independent effect of race and income, with improving outcomes with greater income limited to White Americans. These findings illustrate the importance of developing novel care strategies that address both risk factor modification and social determinants of health to mitigate disparities in cardiac outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Población Blanca , Renta , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA