The effect of preoperative steroids for at least 10 days on complications following craniotomy for tumor resection: A database, retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: The effect of chronic steroid therapy on postoperative outcomes after craniotomy for tumor resection remains understudied. Research question: This study aimed to fill this gap and to identify risk factors of postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients on chronic steroid use undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection. Materials and methods: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used. Patients who underwent craniotomy for tumor resection between 2011 and 2019 were included. Perioperative characteristics and complications were compared among patients with and without chronic steroid therapy, defined as steroid use for at least 10 days. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of steroid therapy on postoperative outcomes. Subgroup analyses involving patients on steroid therapy were conducted to explore risk factors of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: Of 27,037 patients, 16.2% were on steroid therapy. On regression analyses, steroid use was significantly associated with any postoperative complication, infectious complication, urinary tract infection, septic shock, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, non-infectious, pulmonary, and thromboembolic complications, cardiac arrest, blood transfusion, unplanned reoperation, readmission, and mortality. On subgroup analysis, risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients on steroid therapy included older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiology physical status, functional dependence, pulmonary and cardiovascular comorbidities, anemia, dirty/infected wounds, prolonged operative time, disseminated cancer, and a diagnosis of meningioma. Discussion and conclusion: Preoperative brain tumor patients on steroids for 10 or more days are at a relatively high risk of postoperative complications. We recommend a judicious use of steroids in brain tumor patients, both in terms of dosage and duration of treatment.

Orthopaedic Surgery Complications at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Low- and Middle-Income Country: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Through a comparison of orthopaedic surgical procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan with other participating hospitals of National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), we aim to identify the areas of orthopaedic surgical care at our center that need improvement and also those which are at par with international standards. METHODS: The study analyses orthopaedic surgeries at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using NSQIP registry to compare complication rates with other American College of Surgeons-NSQIP participant hospitals. Two reviewers collect data in different days every 8 days to reduce bias, and the results are reported in odds ratios using quarterly reports. This study included 584 eligible orthopaedic cases performed in 2021. Yearly institutional reports with odds ratios were also used to identify areas needing improvement and to implement changes to improve orthopaedic surgical outcomes at said institute. RESULTS: The quarterly reports suggest a relatively higher OR for certain indicators such as cardiac events, surgical site infection, mortality, and morbidity throughout. The renal failure rate was very high in the third and fourth quarters with odds ratios of 4.57 and 10.31, respectively. However, the official NSQIP annual institutional report for 2021 identified sepsis, surgical site infections, and cardiac complications as areas 'needing improvement'. It also indicated that the hospital performed exemplarily when it came to venous thromboembolism (VTE). As for the rest of the indicators, the hospital fell in the 'as expected' category of the NSQIP standards. CONCLUSION: This initial report helps the hospital's orthopaedic department in recognizing areas for improvement and making system-level changes to improve patient outcomes. The implementation of these interventions has yielded favorable outcomes, as evidenced by the findings in the NSQIP yearly report for 2022. Reinforcements and measures are needed to be taken to reduce the adverse events even further and to improve the patient outcomes and quality.

First American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Report from a Low-Middle-Income Country: A 1-Year Outcome Analysis of Neurosurgical Cases.

BACKGROUND: Low-middle-income countries (LMICs) share a substantial proportion of global surgical complications. This is compounded by the seemingly deficient documentation of postsurgical complications and the lack of a national average for comparison. In this context, the implementation of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) that compares hospital performance based on postsurgical complication data provided by a wide array of centers, could be a major initiative in a resource-challenged setting. Implementation of the NSQIP has provenly mitigated postoperative morbidity and mortality across many centers all over the world. To our knowledge, this report is the first from an LMIC to report its postoperative neurosurgical complications in comparison with international benchmarks. METHODS: Our hospital joined the NSQIP in 2019. Through a standardized ACS protocol, ACS-trained surgical clinical reviewers (SCRs) reviewed and extracted data from randomly assigned neurosurgical patients' medical records from preoperative to postoperative (30-day) data using validated, standardized data definitions. SCRs entered deidentified data in an online Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act web-based secure platform. The validated data were then consigned to the ACS NSQIP head office in the United States where the data were analyzed and compared with similar data from other centers registered with the NSQIP. In this way, our hospital was rated for each of the variables related to postsurgical complications after both spinal and cranial procedures, and the results were sent back to us in the form of text, tables, and graphs. RESULTS: Our initial report suggested a relatively higher odds ratio for sepsis and readmissions after spinal procedures at our hospital, and a similarly higher odds ratio for morbidity, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and surgical site infection for cranial procedures. For these variables, our hospital fell in the needs improvement category of the NSQIP. For the rest of the variables studied for both spinal and cranial procedures, the hospital fell in the as expected category of the NSQIP. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the NSQIP is an important first step in creating a culture of transparency, safety, and quality. This is the first report of NSQIP implementation in an LMIC, and we have shown comparable results to developed countries.