Primary Epiploic Appendagitis: Not Rare But Rarely Diagnosed Pathology.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical and laboratory parameters which may be suggestive of or even pathognomonic for primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA) and to discuss the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound (US) compared to computed tomography (CT) in patients with PEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, 92 patients diagnosed with PEA using US, CT or both modalities were included. All patient symptoms, clinical findings and laboratory parameters were reviewed. The CT and US images of the PEA were evaluated for lesion size and location, the relationship of the lesion to the colon and the distance of the lesion to the skin. RESULTS: There were 16 female and 76 male patients in the study group. The mean age was 35 years (range: 38-79 years). Well-localized abdominal pain was the primary symptom in all patients. The mean leukocyte count was 7857±1326 mm-3. The most frequent localization of PEA was sigmoiddescending colon junction (79/92). In patients who were examined by both US and CT, the size of the fatty central core was between 15-48 mm (mean:28.10 mm) and 9-22 mm (mean:15.07 mm) in its long-axis and short-axis diameter, respectively on US, whilst that by CT was between 15-46 mm (mean:26.88 mm) and 9-21 mm (mean:14.40 mm) in its long-axis and short-axis diameter, respectively. In patients who were examined by both US and CT, the mean distance of the lesions to the skin was 20.80 mm and 33.97 mm, respectively. All patients were treated conservatively with complete resolution of symptoms within a week of presentation. CONCLUSION: PEA is an unrare self-limiting condition that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. To support clinicians and radiologists regarding PEA and its clinical, laboratory and radiological findings, targeted sonographic examination - which is radiation and contrast agent-free - could be highly sufficient for the diagnosis of PEA and may prevent unnecessary further imaging and mistreatment.

Primary Epiploic Appendagitis of the Appendix Vermiformis.

INTRODUCTION: Primary epiploic appendagitis, a relatively rare and self-limiting disease, often clinically mimics conditions of the acute abdomen such as acute appendicitis and acute diverticulitis. It is important to make accurate diagnoses because its treatment is conservative. Ultrasonography and computed tomographic studies enable a reliable diagnosis to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures. Herein, we report a case of primary epiploic appendagitis of the appendix vermiformis with clinical, laboratory and CT findings to improve awareness of this condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old female presented with acute abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Her medical history was not significant for surgery. She had no nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or fever. On physical examination, she had right lower quadrant tenderness with mild defense and rebound upon palpation. The leukocyte count (6300 mm-3) and other laboratory parameters, including urine tests, were unremarkable. With these findings, the provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis was made, and a CT examination (Mx 8000 IDT 16, Philips, USA) was done upon the request of the referring physicians. The abdominal CT showed normal appendix vermiformis. However, a fat density lesion surrounding a hyperdense rim was seen adjacent to the appendix vermiformis. The diagnosis of PEA was thus established based on the characteristic radiologic findings. The patient was managed conservative treatment with pain medication as an outpatient. After a one-week follow-up, the patient was observed to be symptom-free and concluded to have recovered fully from their physician. CONCLUSION: To conclude, PEA needs to be considered by emergency clinicians and radiologists in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. With this in mind, it becomes easier for a substantive diagnosis to be made by ultrasound alone or combined with CT to prevent unnecessary surgical interventions, antibiotherapy and hospitalization.

Chest X-Ray Findings in COVID-19 Patients Presenting to Primary Care during the Peak of the First Wave of the Pandemic in Qatar: Their Association with Clinical and Laboratory Findings.

When managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, radiological imaging complements clinical evaluation and laboratory parameters. We aimed to assess the sensitivity of chest radiography findings in detecting COVID-19, describe those findings, and assess the association of positive chest radiography findings with clinical and laboratory findings. A multicentre, cross-sectional study was conducted involving all primary health care corporation-registered patients (2485 patients) enrolled over a 1-month period during the peak of the 2020 pandemic wave in Qatar. These patients had reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 and underwent chest radiography within 72 hours of the swab test. A positive result on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was the gold standard for diagnosing COVID-19. The sensitivity of chest radiography was calculated. The airspace opacities were mostly distributed in the peripheral and lower lung zones, and most of the patients had bilateral involvement. Pleural effusion was detected in some cases. The risk of having positive chest X-ray findings increased with age, Southeast Asian nationality, fever, or a history of fever and diarrhoea. Patients with cardiac disease, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease were at a higher risk of having positive chest X-ray findings. There was a statistically significant increase in the mean serum albumin, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and serum C-reactive protein, hepatic enzymes, and total bilirubin with an increase in the radiographic severity score.

Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.

PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the differential diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. METHODS: Forty-two pediatric patients (mean age 7.76 ± 4.58 years) with intra-axial tumors in the infra-tentorial region underwent magnetic resonance imaging. ADC measurement was performed using regions of interest, obtained from the solid component of the mass lesions. ADC ratios were calculated by dividing the ADC values from the mass lesions by the ADC values from normal cerebellar parenchyma. Lesions were categorized as juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma (JPA), ependymoma and medulloblastoma based on histopathological diagnosis. ADC values of the lesions and histopathological diagnoses were statistically correlated. RESULTS: Histopathological diagnosis showed that 14 lesions were JPA, 10 were ependymoma; 18 were medulloblastoma. Both ADC values and ADC ratios were significantly correlated with tumor types (p <0.05). Astrocytoma was distinguished from ependymoma with sensitivity 85.7% and specificity 90% using an ADC ratio ≥1.7 and medulloblastoma was distinguished from ependymoma with sensitivity 100% and specificity 88.89% using an ADC ratio ≤1.18. CONCLUSION: Preoperative ADC values could differentiate the main histological subtypes of pediatric posterior fossa tumors with high sensitivity and specificity.