Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMC Emerg Med ; 9: 3, 2009 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19216796

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrests are handled by teams rather than by individual health-care workers. Recent investigations demonstrate that adherence to CPR guidelines can be less than optimal, that deviations from treatment algorithms are associated with lower survival rates, and that deficits in performance are associated with shortcomings in the process of team-building. The aim of this study was to explore and quantify the effects of ad-hoc team-building on the adherence to the algorithms of CPR among two types of physicians that play an important role as first responders during CPR: general practitioners and hospital physicians. METHODS: To unmask team-building this prospective randomised study compared the performance of preformed teams, i.e. teams that had undergone their process of team-building prior to the onset of a cardiac arrest, with that of teams that had to form ad-hoc during the cardiac arrest. 50 teams consisting of three general practitioners each and 50 teams consisting of three hospital physicians each, were randomised to two different versions of a simulated witnessed cardiac arrest: the arrest occurred either in the presence of only one physician while the remaining two physicians were summoned to help ("ad-hoc"), or it occurred in the presence of all three physicians ("preformed"). All scenarios were videotaped and performance was analysed post-hoc by two independent observers. RESULTS: Compared to preformed teams, ad-hoc forming teams had less hands-on time during the first 180 seconds of the arrest (93 +/- 37 vs. 124 +/- 33 sec, P < 0.0001), delayed their first defibrillation (67 +/- 42 vs. 107 +/- 46 sec, P < 0.0001), and made less leadership statements (15 +/- 5 vs. 21 +/- 6, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Hands-on time and time to defibrillation, two performance markers of CPR with a proven relevance for medical outcome, are negatively affected by shortcomings in the process of ad-hoc team-building and particularly deficits in leadership. Team-building has thus to be regarded as an additional task imposed on teams forming ad-hoc during CPR. All physicians should be aware that early structuring of the own team is a prerequisite for timely and effective execution of CPR.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Adulto , Algoritmos , Comunicación , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Simulación de Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Grabación de Cinta de Video
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 16(4): 264-71, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11927808

RESUMEN

Technology for endoscopic surgery has developed rapidly during the last decade. Applications of endoscopic techniques to orthopaedic surgery have been made possible by the use of balloon dissectors. Balloon dissectors create an optical cavity by separating fascial layers of a constant anatomic plane called the fascial cleft. The optical cavity can be maintained with either carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation or manual retractors. The authors of the present study have developed a safe, reliable technique using a balloon dissector to create such optical cavities in the extremities, pelvis, and acetabulum to facilitate minimally invasive surgery in these areas. The authors' clinical work and fresh cadaver dissection confirms that the fascial cleft is a universal anatomic constant. It can be accessed quickly to facilitate endoscopic procedures, such as bone grafting for delayed unions, tissue expansion for reconstructive surgery, sural nerve harvesting for nerve cable grafting, and microvascular tissue transfer harvesting and flap prefabrication for extremity reconstruction. Twenty-five cases, each with an average follow-up of 34 months, are presented. Indications, results, and complications of balloon-assisted endoscopic surgery are described.


Asunto(s)
Huesos de la Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Huesos de la Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Cateterismo/métodos , Disección/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Fascia/patología , Fasciotomía , Huesos de la Pierna/lesiones , Huesos de la Pierna/cirugía , Huesos de la Extremidad Superior/patología , Humanos , Huesos de la Pierna/patología
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 16(7): 515-9, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12172283

RESUMEN

This report describes the technique of endoscopic-assisted reduction and stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring with endoscopic visualization of all critical bone and soft tissue structures. Compared with the conventional ilioinguinal approach of Letournel, the endoscopic technique facilitates a reliable internal fixation of anterior pelvic ring fractures with minimal soft tissue trauma. Thus, the use of the endoscope enables us to apply the concept of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis to the pelvis. We recommend the described technique for complex anterior pelvic ring fractures, in which the anterior stabilization has to be achieved with a plate from the symphyseal region to the iliac wing.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de Cadera/patología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/patología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Adulto , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Masculino , Huesos Pélvicos/patología
4.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 143: w13856, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24018896

RESUMEN

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: After years of advocating ABC (Airway-Breathing-Circulation), current guidelines of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend CAB (Circulation-Airway-Breathing). This trial compared ABC with CAB as initial approach to CPR from the arrival of rescuers until the completion of the first resuscitation cycle. METHODS: 108 teams, consisting of two physicians each, were randomized to receive a graphical display of either the ABC algorithm or the CAB algorithm. Subsequently teams had to treat a simulated cardiac arrest. Data analysis was performed using video recordings obtained during simulations. The primary endpoint was the time to completion of the first resuscitation cycle of 30 compressions and two ventilations. RESULTS: The time to execution of the first resuscitation measure was 32 ± 12 seconds in ABC teams and 25 ± 10 seconds in CAB teams (P = 0.002). 18/53 ABC teams (34%) and none of the 55 CAB teams (P = 0.006) applied more than the recommended two initial rescue breaths which caused a longer duration of the first cycle of 30 compressions and two ventilations in ABC teams (31 ± 13 vs.23 ± 6 sec; P = 0.001). Overall, the time to completion of the first resuscitation cycle was longer in ABC teams (63 ± 17 vs. 48 ± 10 sec; P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial found CAB superior to ABC with an earlier start of CPR and a shorter time to completion of the first 30:2 resuscitation cycle. These findings endorse the change from ABC to CAB in international resuscitation guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Masaje Cardíaco/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Adulto , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maniquíes , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA