RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SCN5A variants are associated with a spectrum of cardiac electrical disorders with clear phenotypes. However, they may also be associated with complex phenotypic traits like overlap syndromes, or pleiotropy, which have not been systematically described. Additionally, the involvement of SCN5A in dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to (1) evaluate the different phenotypes associated with pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) SCN5A variants and (2) determine the prevalence of pleiotropy in a large multicentric cohort of P/LP SCN5A variant carriers. METHODS: The DNA of 13,510 consecutive probands (9960 with cardiomyopathies) was sequenced using a custom panel of genes. Individuals carrying a heterozygous single P/LP SCN5A variant were selected and phenotyped. RESULTS: The study included 170 P/LP variants found in 495 patients. Among them, 119 (70%) were exclusively associated with a single well-established phenotype: 91 with Brugada syndrome, 15 with type 3 long QT syndrome, six with progressive cardiac conduction disease, four with multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contraction, and three with sick sinus syndrome. Thirty-two variants (19%) were associated with overlap syndromes and/or pleiotropy. The 19 remaining variants (11%) were associated with atypical or unclear phenotypes. Among those, eight were carried by eight patients presenting with DCM with a debatable causative genotype/phenotype link. CONCLUSION: Most P/LP SCN5A variants were found in patients with primary electrical disorders, mainly Brugada syndrome. Nearly 20% were associated with overlap syndromes or pleiotropy, underscoring the need for comprehensive phenotypic evaluation. The concept of SCN5A variants causing DCM is extremely rare (8/9960), if not questionable.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To assess the safety, feasibility, and prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with pacemaker (PM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2021, we conducted a bi-centre longitudinal study with all consecutive patients with MR-conditional PM referred for vasodilator stress CMR at 1.5 T in the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud and Lariboisiere University Hospital. They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of CMR parameters. The quality of CMR was rated by two observers blinded to clinical details. Of 304 patients who completed the CMR protocol, 273 patients (70% male, mean age 71 ± 9 years) completed the follow-up (median [interquartile range], 7.1 [5.4-7.5] years). Among those, 32 experienced a MACE (11.7%). Stress CMR was well tolerated with no significant change in lead thresholds or pacing parameters. Overall, the image quality was rated good or excellent in 84.9% of segments. Ischaemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio, HR: 11.71 [95% CI: 4.60-28.2]; and HR: 5.62 [95% CI: 2.02-16.21], both P < 0.001). After adjustment for traditional risk factors, ischaemia and LGE were independent predictors of MACE (HR: 5.08 [95% CI: 2.58-14.0]; and HR: 2.28 [95% CI: 2.05-3.76]; both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stress CMR is safe, feasible and has a good discriminative prognostic value in consecutive patients with PM.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Pronóstico , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios de Factibilidad , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Gadolinio , Factores de Riesgo , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Perfusión , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
Acute myocarditis is associated with cardiac arrhythmia in 25% of cases; a third of these arrhythmias are ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). The implantation of a cardiac defibrillator (ICD) following sustained ventricular arrhythmia remains controversial in these patients. We sought to assess the risk of major arrhythmic ventricular events (MAEs) over time in patients implanted with an ICD following sustained VT/VF in the acute phase of myocarditis compared to those implanted for VT/VF occurring on myocarditis sequelae. Our retrospective observational study included patients implanted with an ICD following VT/VF during acute myocarditis or VT/VF on myocarditis sequelae, from 2007 to 2017, in 15 French university hospitals. Over a median follow-up period of 3 years, MAE occurred in 11 (39%) patients of the acute myocarditis group and 24 (60%) patients of the myocarditis sequelae group. Kaplan-Meier MAE rate estimates at one and three years of follow-up were 19% and 45% in the acute group, and 43% and 64% in the sequelae group. Patients who experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias during acute myocarditis had a very high risk of VT/VF recurrence during follow-up. These results show that the risk of MAE recurrence remains high after resolution of the acute episode.