Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Geriatr Nurs ; 36(1): 9-14, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25660190

RESUMEN

This pilot study evaluated effects of a video-guided T'ai Chi group intervention on center of balance (COB) and falls efficacy, using a one arm, pre/post design. Thirty-two participants began the study, 17 completed pre- and post-testing and 15 were lost to follow-up. Outcomes were compared for the 17 participants who completed pre- and post-testing and subgroups based on session attendance. Irrespective of session attendance, participant COB scores improved. There was a significant negative correlation between number of sessions attended and pre and post scores on the fall efficacy (fear of falling) measure, indicating those with higher fear of falling were less likely to complete the study. Older participants were also less likely to continue participation. Findings indicate potential benefits of T'ai Chi in improving COB (a fall risk factor) among community-dwelling older adults. However, those with greater potential benefit (higher fear scores, older participants) were less likely to continue participation.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Taichi Chuan/organización & administración , Grabación en Video , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 145(2): 249-55, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485740

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The correction of a deviated midline can involve complicated mechanics and a protracted treatment. The threshold below which midline deviations are considered acceptable might depend on multiple factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of facial type on laypersons' perceptions of various degrees of midline deviation. METHODS: Smiling photographs of male and female subjects were altered to create 3 facial type variations (euryprosopic, mesoprosopic, and leptoprosopic) and deviations in the midline ranging from 0.0 to 4.0 mm. Evaluators rated the overall attractiveness and acceptability of each photograph. RESULTS: Data were collected from 160 raters. The overall threshold for the acceptability of a midline deviation was 2.92 ± 1.10 mm, with the threshold for the male subject significantly lower than that for the female subject. The euryprosopic facial type showed no decrease in mean attractiveness until the deviations were 2 mm or more. All other facial types were rated as decreasingly attractive from 1 mm onward. Among all facial types, the attractiveness of the male subject was only affected at deviations of 2 mm or greater; for the female subject, the attractiveness scores were significantly decreased at 1 mm. The mesoprosopic facial type was most attractive for the male subject but was the least attractive for the female subject. CONCLUSIONS: Facial type and sex may affect the thresholds at which a midline deviation is detected and above which a midline deviation is considered unacceptable. Both the euryprosopic facial type and male sex were associated with higher levels of attractiveness at relatively small levels of deviations.


Asunto(s)
Arco Dental/anatomía & histología , Cara/anatomía & histología , Incisivo/anatomía & histología , Percepción Visual/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud , Belleza , Umbral Diferencial/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maloclusión/patología , Maloclusión/psicología , Umbral Sensorial/fisiología , Factores Sexuales , Sonrisa , Adulto Joven
3.
J Adv Nurs ; 66(10): 2182-93, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20636471

RESUMEN

AIM: This paper is a report of an examination of the relationship between metrics of critical thinking skills and performance in simulated clinical scenarios. BACKGROUND: Paper and pencil assessments are commonly used to assess critical thinking but may not reflect simulated performance. METHODS: In 2007, a convenience sample of 36 nursing students participated in measurement of critical thinking skills and simulation-based performance using videotaped vignettes, high-fidelity human simulation, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory and California Critical Thinking Skills Test. Simulation-based performance was rated as 'meeting' or 'not meeting' overall expectations. Test scores were categorized as strong, average, or weak. RESULTS: Most (75.0%) students did not meet overall performance expectations using videotaped vignettes or high-fidelity human simulation; most difficulty related to problem recognition and reporting findings to the physician. There was no difference between overall performance based on method of assessment (P = 0.277). More students met subcategory expectations for initiating nursing interventions (P ≤ 0.001) using high-fidelity human simulation. The relationship between videotaped vignette performance and critical thinking disposition or skills scores was not statistically significant, except for problem recognition and overall critical thinking skills scores (Cramer's V = 0.444, P = 0.029). There was a statistically significant relationship between overall high-fidelity human simulation performance and overall critical thinking disposition scores (Cramer's V = 0.413, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Students' performance reflected difficulty meeting expectations in simulated clinical scenarios. High-fidelity human simulation performance appeared to approximate scores on metrics of critical thinking best. Further research is needed to determine if simulation-based performance correlates with critical thinking skills in the clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación en Enfermería , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Pensamiento , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Simulación de Paciente , Solución de Problemas , Psicometría , Grabación de Cinta de Video , Adulto Joven
4.
J Adv Nurs ; 65(1): 139-48, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032517

RESUMEN

AIM: This paper is a report of a study to identify critical thinking learning needs of new and experienced nurses. BACKGROUND: Concern for patient safety has grown worldwide as high rates of error and injury continue to be reported. In order to improve patient safety, nurses must be able to recognize changes in patient condition, perform independent nursing interventions, anticipate orders and prioritize. METHODS: In 2004-2006, a consecutive sample of 2144 newly hired nurses in a university-affiliated healthcare system completed the Performance Based Development System Assessment consisting of 10 videotaped vignettes depicting change in patient status. Results were reported as meeting or not meeting expectations. For nurses not meeting expectations, learning needs were identified in one of six subcategories. RESULTS: Overall, 74.9% met assessment expectations. Learning needs identified for nurses not meeting expectations included initiating independent nursing interventions (97.2%), differentiation of urgency (67%), reporting essential clinical data (65.4%), anticipating relevant medical orders (62.8%), providing relevant rationale to support decisions (62.6%) and problem recognition (57.1%). Controlling for level of preparation, associate (P=0.007) and baccalaureate (P<0.0001) nurses were more likely to meet expectations as years of experience increased; a similar trend was not seen for diploma nurses (P=0.10). Controlling for years of experience, new graduates were less likely to meet expectations compared with nurses with >or=10 years experience (P=0.046). CONCLUSION: Patient safety may be compromised if a nurse cannot provide clinically competent care. Assessments such as the Performance Based Development System can provide information about learning needs and facilitate individualized orientation targeted to increase performance level.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Personal de Enfermería/normas , Educación en Enfermería/normas , Bachillerato en Enfermería/normas , Evaluación del Rendimiento de Empleados/métodos , Humanos , Modelos de Enfermería , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Personal de Enfermería/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Pensamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Grabación de Cinta de Video
5.
Respir Care ; 51(11): 1230-6, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17067404

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 models for managing patients admitted to a subacute medical intensive care unit (MICU) who required prolonged mechanical ventilation (> or = 7 d). METHODS: The subjects were 192 consecutive patients (mean +/- SD age 61.5 +/- 16.1 y, 52% male, 86% white) managed during alternating 7-month blocks of time by an attending physician in collaboration with an acute care nurse practitioner (ACNP) (n = 98 patients) or by an attending physician in collaboration with critical care/pulmonary fellows (n = 94 patients). The total observation time was 28 months (14 mo per team). RESULTS: At unit entry, there were no significant differences in age, sex, race, comorbidity, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, or time of tracheostomy between the patients managed by the 2 teams. Patients managed by the ACNP team were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation due to an acute pulmonary problem (p = 0.005). At subacute MICU discharge, the groups were not significantly different in regard to subacute MICU length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, or discharge weaning status (p > 0.05). The number of readmissions to the MICU was similar for the ACNP team (n = 7) and fellows team (n = 8), as were readmissions to the subacute MICU < or = 72 h after discharge (ACNP = 2, fellows = 1). Each team had 2 deaths without treatment limitation. CONCLUSION: As hypothesized, management of patients who required prolonged mechanical ventilation with tracheostomy had equivalent outcomes with the ACNP team or the fellows team.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos de Enfermería , Atención Subaguda , Traqueotomía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pennsylvania , Respiración Artificial , Estados Unidos
6.
Orthop Nurs ; 35(2): 108-17; quiz 118-9, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27028687

RESUMEN

Patient satisfaction with pain management has increasing importance with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores tied to reimbursement. Previous studies indicate patient satisfaction is influenced by staff interactions. This single-group pre/post design study aimed to improve satisfaction with pain management in older adults undergoing total joint replacement. This was a single-group pre-/posttest design. Nurse (knowledge assessment) and patient (American Pain Society Patient Outcomes Questionnaire Revised [APS-POQ-R], HCAHPS) responses evaluated pre- and postimplementation of the online educational program. Nurse focus group followed intervention. Nurses' knowledge improved significantly (p < .006) postintervention. HCAHPS scores (3-month average) for items reflecting patient satisfaction improved from 70.2 ± 9.5 to 73.9 ± 6.0. APS-POQ-R scores did not change. Focus group comments indicated need for education regarding linkages between pain management and patient satisfaction. Education on linkages between patient satisfaction and pain management can improve outcomes; education on strategies to further improve practice may enhance ability to achieve benchmarks.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Manejo del Dolor/enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor/enfermería , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo/enfermería , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Crit Care ; 14(2): 121-30; quiz 131-2, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15728954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many academic medical centers employ nurse practitioners as substitutes to provide care normally supplied by house staff. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in a subacute medical intensive care unit of patients managed by a team consisting of either an acute care nurse practitioner and an attending physician or an attending physician and critical care/pulmonary fellows. METHODS: During a 31-month period, in 7-month blocks of time, 526 consecutive patients admitted to the unit for more than 24 hours were managed by one or the other of the teams. Patients managed by the 2 teams were compared for a variety of outcomes. RESULTS: Patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ significantly for any workload, demographic, or medical condition variable. The patients also did not differ in readmission to the high acuity unit (P = .25) or subacute unit (P = .44) within 72 hours of discharge or in mortality with (P = .25) or without (P = .89) treatment limitations. Among patients who had multiple weaning trials, patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ in length of stay in the subacute unit (P = .42), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .18), weaning status at time of discharge from the unit (P = .80), or disposition (P = .28). Acute Physiology Scores were significantly different over time (P = .046). Patients managed by the fellows had more reintubations (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a subacute intensive care unit, management by the 2 teams produced equivalent outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Enfermeras Practicantes , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Médicos , Anciano , Educación Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Estados Unidos
8.
Int Orthod ; 13(2): 195-209, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés, Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26008224

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how laypeople perceive persons with straight teeth and nose, mild to moderate modification of the nose, and mild to moderate modification of the teeth. The objectives were to determine: (1) how modification of the nose or teeth affects others' perceptions of target persons' facial attractiveness, (2) whether these evaluations are affected by the target persons' or raters' gender, (3) whether the frontal view or three-quarter view has any effect on the ratings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey data were collected from 226 college students at Seton Hill University (49% male, 51% female; age range, 18-25 years) who rated, on a 100mm VAS, photos of subjects with straight teeth and nose (control), mild to moderate modification of the nose, and mild to moderate modification of the teeth from the frontal and three-quarter views. RESULTS: Male and female target photos with teeth modification were considered the least attractive. Both male and female target photos showed that female raters evaluated both control and nose modification conditions more positively than did male raters. For male and female target photos, the frontal view was less esthetically pleasing under teeth modification. CONCLUSIONS: Both male and female evaluators judged teeth modification as the least attractive compared to nose modification. It is recommended for rhinoplasty patients with malaligned teeth that it may be beneficial for cosmetic surgeons to establish an interdisciplinary approach working with orthodontists.


Asunto(s)
Belleza , Dentición , Cara/anatomía & histología , Nariz/anatomía & histología , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maloclusión/psicología , Enfermedades Nasales/psicología , Fotograbar , Factores Sexuales , Escala Visual Analógica , Adulto Joven
9.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 6(2): 121-32, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26649245

RESUMEN

Postthoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is a common complication following thoracic surgery. Most studies examining the influence of PTPS on patient-reported symptoms include few patients managed using a minimally invasive approach. Associated sensory changes, potentially neuropathic in origin, are not well described. We therefore examined the symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of patients with and without PTPS who underwent a standard thoracotomy (n = 43) or minimally invasive surgery (n = 54). Patients in this prospective, cross-sectional study completed questionnaires to assess pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire), neuropathic symptoms (Neuropathic Symptom Questionnaire), symptom distress (Symptom Distress Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and QOL (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Lung). Excepting younger age (p = .009), no demographic or surgical characteristic differentiated patients with and without PTPS. Patients with PTPS described discomfort as pain only (15.1%), neuropathic symptoms only (30.2%) or pain and neuropathic symptoms (54.7%). Scores differed between patients with and without PTPS for symptom distress (p < .001), anxiety and depression (p < .001), and QOL (p = .009), with higher distress associated with PTPS. Despite new surgical techniques, PTPS remains common and results in considerable distress. A focused assessment is needed to identify all experiencing this condition, with referral to pain management specialists if symptoms persist.

10.
Chest ; 122(3): 948-54, 2002 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12226037

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if distractive auditory stimuli (DAS) in the form of music would promote adherence to a walking regimen following completion of a pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) and, thereby, maintenance of gains achieved during the program. DESIGN: Experimental, randomized, two-group design with testing at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. SETTING: Outpatient. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients (4 men and 20 women) with moderate-to-severe COPD (FEV(1) 41.3 +/- 13% predicted [mean +/- SD]). INTERVENTION: Experimental group subjects (n = 12) were instructed to walk at their own pace for 20 to 45 min, two to five times a week, using DAS with a portable audiocassette player. The control group (n = 12) received the same instructions, but no DAS. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary outcome measures were perceived dyspnea during activities of daily living (ADL) and 6-min walk (6MW) distance. Secondary outcome measures were anxiety, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life (QoL), global QoL, and breathlessness and fatigue at completion of the 6MW. In addition, all subjects recorded the distance and time walked using self-report (pedometers and daily logs). There was a significant decrease in perceived dyspnea during ADL (p = 0.0004) and a significant increase in 6MW distance (p = 0.0004) over time in the DAS group compared to the control group. DAS subjects increased 6MW distance 445 +/- 264 feet (mean +/- SD) from baseline to 8 weeks, whereas control subjects decreased 6MW distance to 169 +/- 154 feet. No significant differences were noted for the remaining variables. The cumulative distance walked by the DAS group was 19.1 +/- 16.7 miles compared to 15.4 +/- 8.0 miles for the control group, a 24% difference (p = 0.49). Despite this difference, self-report exercise log data were similar for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Subjects who used DAS while walking had improved functional performance and decreased perceptions of dyspnea, whereas control subjects could not maintain post-PRP gains. DAS is a simple, cost-effective strategy that may have the potential to augment the effectiveness of post-PRP maintenance training.


Asunto(s)
Atención , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Música , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Anciano , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Caminata/psicología
11.
Am J Crit Care ; 11(1): 65-75, 2002 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11785558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many benefits and adverse effects of positioning are related to changes in ventilation and perfusion. A number of unique factors related to the allograft make the effects of positioning difficult to determine in single-lung transplant recipients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of 3 body positions (supine, lateral with allograft lung down, and lateral with native lung down) on oxygenation and blood flow in single-lung transplant recipients in the 24 hours immediately after surgery. METHODS: A quasi-experimental repeated-measures design with stratified assignment to 1 of 3 different sequencing patterns for turning group was used to study 15 transplant recipients, 9 with emphysema and 6 with fibrosis. Oxygenation, ventilation, and blood flow measures (heart rate, blood pressure) were assessed after each turn. The effect of ischemic reperfusion injury was also explored. RESULTS: The oxygenation, ventilation, and bloodflow variables did not differ significantly across group, diagnosis, or time. Oxygenation variables measured when the allograft lung was dependent did not differ significantly from such measurements obtained when the native lung was dependent. CONCLUSIONS: No single position maximizes oxygenation in the immediate postoperative period in single-lung transplant recipients. Although a single standard protocol for positioning cannot be supported, the study does support the idea that transplant recipients can be safely turned in the immediate postoperative period without compromising oxygenation or hemodynamic status.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Postura/fisiología , Análisis de Varianza , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Am J Crit Care ; 11(3): 228-38, 2002 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12022486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies of resource utilization by patients with new-onset atrialfibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting have addressed only length of stay and bed charges. OBJECTIVE: To compare resource utilization between patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and patients without atrialfibrillation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical and administrative electronic databases for 720 subjects who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass in 25 months at one medical center The prevalence of atrial fibrillation was determined, and resource utilization in various hospital cost centers was compared between subjects with and without atrialfibrillation. RESULTS: The prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation was 33.1%. Compared with subjects without atrialfibrillation, subjects with atrialfibrillation had a longer stay (5.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 4.4+/-1.2 days, P<.001), more days receiving mechanical ventilation (P =.002) and oxygen therapy (P<.001), and higher rates of readmission to the intensive care unit (4.6% vs. 0.2%, P<.001). Subjects with atrial fibrillation also had more laboratory tests (P<.001) and more days receiving cardiac drugs, heparin, diuretics, and electrolytes. Subjects with atrialfibrillation had higher total postoperative charges ($57261 +/- $17101 vs. $50905 +/- $10062, P = .001), a mean difference of $6356. The mean differences were greatest for bed charges ($1642), laboratory charges ($1215), pharmacy ($989), and respiratory care ($582). CONCLUSION: The economic impact of atrialfibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting has been underestimated.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Recursos en Salud , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Am J Crit Care ; 12(5): 436-43, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14503427

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about aspects of practice that differ between acute care nurse practitioners and physicians that might affect patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if time spent in work activities differs between an acute care nurse practitioner and physicians in training (pulmonary/critical care fellows) managing patients' care in a step-down medical intensive care unit. METHODS: Work sampling techniques were used to collect data when the nurse practitioner had 6 months' or less experience in the role (T1), after the nurse practitioner had 12 months' experience in the role (T2), and when physicians in training provided care on a rotational schedule (nurse practitioner not present, T3). These data were used to estimate the time spent in direct management of patients, coordination of care, and nonunit activities. RESULTS: Results for T1 and T2 were similar. When T2 and T3 were compared, the nurse practitioner and the physicians in training spent approximately half their time in activities directly related to management of patients (40% vs 44%, not significantly different). The nurse practitioner spent more time in activities related to coordination of care (45% vs 18%; P < .001) and less time in nonunit activities (15% vs 37%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The nurse practitioner and the physicians in training spent a similar proportion of time performing required tasks. Because of training requirements, physicians spent more time than the nurse practitioner in nonunit activities. Conversely, the nurse practitioner spent more time interacting with patients and patients' families and collaborating with health team members.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Aguda/enfermería , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Enfermeras Practicantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento , Anciano , Competencia Clínica , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania
14.
Am J Crit Care ; 12(1): 31-9, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12526235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tracheal gas insufflation reduces inspired tidal volume and minute ventilation in spontaneously breathing patients and may facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To determine if tracheal gas insufflation can reduce ventilatory demand during weaning trials in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A reduction in ventilatory demand was defined as a relative decrease in tidal volume, minute ventilation, and mean inspiratory flow during trials with tracheal gas insufflation compared with the values during trials without this therapy. A total of 14 subjects underwent T-piece trials with and without insufflation (flow rate 6 L/min) on 2 consecutive days; the order of insufflation was randomized. Tidal volume, minute ventilation, and mean inspiratory flow were measured at baseline (without insufflation) and 2 hours later. RESULTS: Differences in ventilatory demand were not significant when comparisons were made for condition (tracheal gas insufflation vs no flow) or time (baseline vs 2 hours) for the total group (P = .48). Subjects were classified post hoc as responders (n = 9) or nonresponders (n = 5). Comparisons between responders and nonresponders indicated a significant (P = .02) 3-way multivariate interaction for group (responder vs nonresponder), condition (tracheal gas insufflation vs no flow), and time (baseline vs 2 hours) for ventilatory demand variables. CONCLUSION: Tracheal gas insufflation can reduce ventilatory demand during weaning trials in some patients who require mechanical ventilation.


Asunto(s)
Insuflación/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Desconexión del Ventilador , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximetría , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar/fisiología , Traqueostomía
15.
Am J Crit Care ; 12(6): 497-507, 2003 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14619355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most lung transplant recipients experience improvement in their underlying pulmonary condition but are faced with the threat of allograft rejection, the primary determinant of long-term survival. Several studies examined predictors of rejection, but few focused on the early period after transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To describe the pattern and predictors of early rejection during the first year after transplantation to guide the development of interventions to facilitate earlier detection and treatment of rejection. METHODS: Data for donor, recipient, and posttransplant variables were retrieved retrospectively for 250 recipients of single or double lung transplants. RESULTS: Most recipients (85%) had at least 1 episode of acute rejection; 33% had a single episode; 23% had recurrent rejection; 3% had persistent rejection; 13% had refractory rejection; and 14% had clinicopathological evidence of chronic rejection. Serious rejection (refractory acute rejection or chronic rejection) developed in 27% of recipients. Compared with other recipients, recipients who had serious rejection had more episodes of acute rejection (P = .004), and the first acute episodes occurred sooner after transplantation (P = .01) and were of a higher grade (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Recipients who experienced higher grades for their first episode of acute rejection (P = .03) and higher cumulative rejection scores (P = .004) were significantly more likely than other recipients to have serious rejection during the first year after transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/clasificación , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Am J Crit Care ; 13(6): 499-507; discussion 508, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15568655

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that patients who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) have fewer short-term complications and use fewer inpatient resources than do patients who undergo standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with extracorporeal circulation. However, dissimilarity between groups in risk factors for complications has hindered interpretation of results. OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of selected complications (atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation, and bleeding) and inpatient resource utilization (length of stay, discharge disposition, total charges) between subjects undergoing primary isolated CABG or OPCABG who were matched with respect to key risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective, causal-comparative survey conducted in 1 center for 18 months. Patients who underwent primary isolated CABG or OPCABG were matched for sex, age (within 2 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (within 0.05), and graft-patient ratio (exact match) and compared for prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation within 24 hours, and bleeding. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon and t tests for paired comparisons. RESULTS: The sample (107 matched pairs) was 63% male, with a mean age of 66 (SD 9.5) years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.51 (SD 0.13), and a mean graft-patient ratio of 3.41 (SD 0.74). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in New York Heart Association class (P = .43), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (P = .22), postoperative beta-blocker use (P = .73), or comorbid conditions. None of the complications examined differed significantly between pairs. CONCLUSION: Patients with comparable risk profiles have similar prevalences of selected complications after CABG and OPCABG.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/economía , Puente Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
17.
Heart Lung ; 33(6): 372-80, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15597291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prompt treatment of acute rejection and pulmonary infection reduces morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Symptoms, spirometry, and bronchoscopy are used to detect these complications. Of these, symptom reporting is the least invasive, yet has received little critical examination. OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential for using reports of symptoms, such as cough and shortness of breath, to recognize clinically significant acute rejection and pulmonary infection after lung transplantation. METHODS: Symptoms reported during routine follow-up visits were compared between lung transplant recipients (LTR) with clinically significant acute rejection (grade >or= A2) and those without (grade A0 or A1) and between LTR with rejection (grade >or= A2) and those with pulmonary infection. RESULTS: LTR with rejection (grade >or= A2) reported more symptoms (P < .01) than did those without (grade A0, A1); however, the magnitude of difference was minimal. LTR with clinically significant acute rejection (grade >or= A2) reported symptoms at a rate comparable with those having pulmonary infection. CONCLUSIONS: Although symptoms may alert LTR to changes in their condition, no symptoms (respiratory, general, or activities of daily living [ADL]) differentiate between grades of rejection or pulmonary infection.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Actividades Cotidianas , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Tos/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Voice ; 28(6): 775-82, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311596

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To (1) develop and validate the Dyspnea Index (DI); (2) quantify severity of symptoms in upper airway dyspnea; and (3) validate the DI as an outcome measure. STUDY DESIGN: Survey development and validation. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-nine participants were recruited for different phases of the study. Two hundred participants with chief complaints of dyspnea were given a 41-item questionnaire addressing common symptoms of dyspnea related to the upper airway. The questions were then reduced based on principal component analysis (PCA) and internal consistency resulting in a 10-item questionnaire. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 15 participants. Test-retest reliability and discriminant validity were measured from 51 participants. The DI was further validated by administering the index to 57 healthy controls (HC). Validation of the DI as a treatment outcome tool occurred with 46 participants' pre- and post-treatment scores. RESULTS: PCA revealed that only a single factor was being measured in both the original 41- and 10-item questionnaires. Additional cognitive interviewing suggested that no modification was needed to the DI. Test-retest reliability was r = 0.83. Discriminant validity was r = 0.62. The Mann-Whitney test demonstrated significant differences between healthy/symptomatic participants. Scores from the HC cohort resulted in a mean of 3.12 (SEM = 0.484; SD = 3.65) for the normative values. CONCLUSIONS: The DI is an effective and efficient instrument to quantify patients' symptoms of upper airway dyspnea. It is a statistically robust index, with significant reliability and validity, and can be dependably used as a treatment outcome measure.


Asunto(s)
Disnea/diagnóstico , Respiración , Sistema Respiratorio/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cognición , Disnea/fisiopatología , Disnea/psicología , Disnea/terapia , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de Componente Principal , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
19.
J Voice ; 27(2): 210-6, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23352061

RESUMEN

Voice therapy changes how people use and care for their voices. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have a multitude of choices from which to modify patient's vocal behaviors. Six SLPs performed 1461 voice therapy sessions and quantified the percentage of time spent in eight component parts of indirect and four component parts of direct voice therapy across five common voice disorders. Voice therapy data collection forms were prospectively completed immediately following each therapy visit. The SLPs were free to choose the component parts of voice therapy best suited for their respective patients. Results showed that direct voice therapy represented more than 75% of the treatment time across all voice therapy sessions. In the components of direct voice therapy, there was no statistical difference between percentages of time spent in resonant voice and flow phonation across all voice disorders. However, a significant difference was found for the time spent addressing transfer to conversational speech for muscle tension dysphonia, lesions, and scar than for vocal immobility and atrophy. Interestingly, while SLPs used a more common approach to direct voice therapy across voice disorders, they tended to vary the use of indirect components of therapy across voice disorders with certain components being addressed in greater length for specific voice disorders. Collectively, these results indicate that although SLPs may individualize their approach to indirect voice therapy, when it comes to direct voice therapy, SLPs have a common approach to voice therapy regardless of voice disorder.


Asunto(s)
Disfonía/terapia , Fonación , Acústica del Lenguaje , Patología del Habla y Lenguaje/métodos , Calidad de la Voz , Entrenamiento de la Voz , Adulto , Anciano , Consejo , Dieta/efectos adversos , Disfonía/diagnóstico , Disfonía/fisiopatología , Disfonía/psicología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Autocuidado , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Laryngoscope ; 123(8): 1931-6, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To develop and validate a cough severity index (CSI) which quantifies patients' symptoms associated with upper airway chronic cough and to provide a tool for treatment outcome measures. METHODS: Two hundred patients who had a complaint of chronic cough and/or dyspnea were given a 49- item questionnaire developed through a clinical consensus of the most common symptoms of chronic cough of upper airway origin. The instrument was reduced to 10 questions using statistical methodology. Fifty subsequent patients were given the CSI to measure test-retest reliability at two different moments in time. Twenty healthy controls (HC) were given the instrument to obtain validity. An additional 95 participants provided pre- and posttreatment outcomes using the CSI. RESULTS: Principle Component Analysis (PCA) revealed a single factor with the original 49 questions. A combination of PCA, rank-ordering item-total correlation and communality, as well as clinical consensus further reduced the questionnaire to 10 items. Internal consistency of the CSI was 0.97. Test-retest reliability was r = 0.83. An r = 0.60 for divergent validity between the CSI and the Cough-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) demonstrated two fairly separate instruments, although both measured cough. Mann-Whitney test was significant between symptomatic patients and healthy controls (P < 0.0004). The results of 20 HC showed a mean of 0.45 (standard deviation = 1.39). Results for treatment outcomes revealed significance with the Wilcoxon test (P < 0.0001) and paired samples t test showed significantly different correlations between pre- and postmeasures. CONCLUSION: The CSI is a short, simple instrument that can be used in the clinical setting to quantify a patient's symptoms of chronic cough of upper airway origin. It represents a statistically reliable, valid, and clinically relevant instrument that can be used to measure treatment outcomes for chronic cough.


Asunto(s)
Tos/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA