Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Sci Food Agric ; 102(3): 1271-1280, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Forty crossbred steers were supplemented with different doses (from 0 control to 6000 mg/animal/day) of natural additive blend containing clove essential oil, cashew oil, castor oil, and a microencapsulated blend of eugenol, thymol, and vanillin for 80 days. Carcass characteristics, drip loss, and antioxidant activity were evaluated 24 h post mortem on longissimus thoracis, and the effects of aging (until 14 days) were evaluated for water losses (thawing/aging and cooking), texture, color, and lipid oxidation. RESULTS: The use of the natural additive blend did not modify (P > 0.05) carcass characteristics but did, however, modify body composition (P < 0.05). Drip losses were unaffected by the treatments tested (P > 0.05). There was an observed quadratic effect (P < 0.05) on losses from thawing/aging on the first day of storage. Regarding the effects of natural additives on cooking losses, there was a quadratic effect (P < 0.05) among the treatments on day 7 of aging. Differences between days of aging were only observed with control treatment. Shear force was similar among treatments on days 1 and 7 of aging. On day 14 a linear effect (P < 0.05) was observed. Also, a linear effect (P < 0.05) appeared on meat lightness, meat from the control group being clearer on day 1. No changes were observed in redness among treatments or days of storage (P > 0.05). Yellowness was not modified by the treatments (P > 0.05)but only by the days of storage in control and the lowest dosage used. CONCLUSION: The blend of natural additives has potential use in pasture feeding and could improve meat quality. However, doses should be adjusted. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Anacardium/metabolismo , Alimentación Animal/análisis , Aceite de Ricino/metabolismo , Bovinos/metabolismo , Aditivos Alimentarios/metabolismo , Carne/análisis , Syzygium/metabolismo , Mataderos , Animales , Benzaldehídos/metabolismo , Bovinos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Eugenol/metabolismo , Aditivos Alimentarios/análisis , Músculo Esquelético/química , Músculo Esquelético/crecimiento & desarrollo , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Timol/metabolismo
2.
J Sci Food Agric ; 100(13): 4782-4790, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459006

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the acceptability (by sensorial and visual analyses) of meat from 40 Nellore heifers (finished in feedlots for 73 days) fed with different diets supplemented with essential oils (EOs) and an active principle blend. The five diets tested were: CON - a diet without essential oil and active principle blend (eugenol, thymol, and vanillin); ROS - a diet supplemented with rosemary EO; BLE - supplemented with a blend; BCL - a diet with clove EO+ blend; and BRC - a diet with rosemary, clove EOs + blend. The acceptability of diet and aging time was evaluated by consumers. RESULTS: Diet affected consumer acceptability and visual analysis (meat color). The diets with EO and the blend showed better sensory acceptance by the consumers; meat aged for 7 days received higher scores than meat aged for 1 day. Meat from heifers that received both EOs + blend (BCL, BRC) obtained the highest scores in the visual evaluation. CONCLUSION: The use of natural compounds in ruminant diets improves the sensory characteristics of meat without damaging visual acceptability and may be an alternative to the conventional additive market. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Bovinos/metabolismo , Carne/análisis , Gusto , Animales , Dieta/veterinaria , Eugenol/metabolismo , Femenino , Aditivos Alimentarios/metabolismo , Humanos , Aceites Volátiles/metabolismo , Syzygium/metabolismo , Timol/metabolismo
3.
Meat Sci ; 163: 108059, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006811

RESUMEN

Forty young bulls were fed with five different treatments (n = 8, 62 days): control, without the addition of natural additives (CON); NA15, a mixture of natural additives (1.5 g/animal/day); NA30, a mixture of natural additives (3.0 g/animal/day); NA45, a mixture of natural additives (4.5 g/animal/day); and NA60, a mixture of natural additives (6.0 g/animal/day). The hot carcass weight and dressing percentage, fat thickness, Longissimus muscle area, marbling, pH, and carcass tissue composition were measured. In addition, the instrumental meat quality (colour, water holding capacity, texture and lipid oxidation) and consumer acceptability attributes, across display were evaluated. Diet had no effect (P > .05) on the carcass characteristics evaluated (except pH). The diets significantly influenced the pH, shear force, tenderness, lipid oxidation and overall acceptability evaluated by consumers (P < .05). Globally, natural additives have some potential use in animal feed to improve meat quality.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Dieta/veterinaria , Carne Roja/normas , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , Benzaldehídos , Bovinos , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Eugenol , Humanos , Aceites de Plantas , Timol
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA