Ceftriaxone Reduced Susceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Netherlands, 2009 to 2017: From PenA Mosaicism to A501T/V Nonmosaicism.

OBJECTIVES: To compare molecular and epidemiological differences between ceftriaxone-reduced susceptible (CRO-RS) and ceftriaxone-susceptible (CRO-S) N. gonorrhoeae (Ng) and to study the genetic relatedness of CRO-RS isolates. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data and samples for cultures were routinely collected from gonorrhoea patients visiting the Amsterdam STI clinic in 2009 to 2017. Ng multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) and penA types were compared between CRO-RS and CRO-S Ng (frequency matched on year of isolation and sexual risk group). Minimum spanning trees were produced based on multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis for Ng (NG-MLVA) genotypes. RESULTS: We selected 174 CRO-RS isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration, ≥0.064 mg/L) and 174 CRO-S isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration, ≤0.016 mg/L). Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were overall comparable between those infected with CRO-RS Ng and CRO-S Ng. However, CRO-RS isolates were more often collected from the pharyngeal site (odds ratios [OR], 3.64; P < 0.001), and patients with CRO-RS Ng were less often human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis positive (OR, 0.63; P = 0.041 and OR, 0.58; P = 0.028, respectively). We identified 12 clusters based on NG-MLVA genotypes, including 3 large (>25 isolates) clusters predominantly containing CRO-RS isolates. Those from cluster 1 (n = 32) were mostly from 2009 to 2012 (n = 24; 75.0%), with a mosaic penA XXXIV pattern (n = 27; 84.4%) and belonging to NG-MAST genogroup G1407 (n = 24; 75.0%). Isolates from cluster 2 (n = 29) were mostly from 2013 to 2015 (n = 24; 82.7%), had a nonmosaic penA IX + A501T mutation (n = 22; 75.9%) and NG-MAST G2400 (n = 14; 48.3%). Most isolates from cluster 3 (n = 37) were from 2015 to 2017 (n = 26; 70.2%), had a nonmosaic penA IV + A501V mutation (n = 24; 64.9%) and NG-MAST G2318 (n = 22; 59.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a shift in the predominant penA (from mosaic toward nonmosaic plus A501T/V mutation), NG-MAST and NG-MLVA types among CRO-RS Ng over time. This indicates a successive spread of different CRO-RS Ng clones.

Pharmacodynamics of Ceftriaxone, Ertapenem, Fosfomycin and Gentamicin in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro effect of select antimicrobials on the growth of N. gonorrhoeae and its pharmacodynamic parameters. METHODS: Time-kill assays were performed on two reference N. gonorrhoeae strains (ceftriaxone-resistant WHO X and ceftriaxone-susceptible WHO F) and one clinical N. gonorrhoeae strain (ceftriaxone-susceptible CS03307). Time-kill curves were constructed for each strain by measuring bacterial growth rates at doubling antimicrobial concentrations of ceftriaxone, ertapenem, fosfomycin and gentamicin. Inputs from these curves were used to estimate minimal bacterial growth rates at high antimicrobial concentrations (ψmin), maximum bacterial growth rates in the absence of antimicrobials (ψmax), pharmacodynamic minimum inhibitory concentrations (zMIC), and Hill's coefficients (κ). RESULTS: Ceftriaxone, ertapenem and fosfomycin showed gradual death overtime at higher antimicrobial concentrations with a relatively high ψmin, demonstrating time-dependent activity. Compared to WHO F, the ψmin for WHO X was significantly increased, reflecting decreased killing activity for ceftriaxone, ertapenem and fosfomycin. At high ceftriaxone concentrations, WHO X was still efficiently killed. CS03307 also showed a high ψmin for ceftriaxone in spite of a low MIC and no difference in ψmin for fosfomycin in spite of significant MIC and zMIC differences. Gentamicin showed rapid killing for all three strains at high concentrations, demonstrating concentration-dependent activity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on time-kill assays, high-dosage ceftriaxone could be used to treat N. gonorrhoeae strains with MIC above breakpoint, with gentamicin as a potential alternative. Whether ertapenem or fosfomycin would be effective to treat strains with a high MIC to ceftriaxone is questionable.

Efficacy of ertapenem, gentamicin, fosfomycin, and ceftriaxone for the treatment of anogenital gonorrhoea (NABOGO): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae causes gonorrhoea, a common sexually transmitted infection. Emerging strains resistant to first-line ceftriaxone threaten N gonorrhoeae management. Hence, alternative treatments are needed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ertapenem, gentamicin, and fosfomycin as alternative treatments for anogenital N gonorrhoeae. METHODS: In a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial (three experimental groups and one control group) at the Centre for Sexual Health in Amsterdam, Netherlands, we included adults aged 18 years or older, with anorectal or urogenital gonorrhoea. With random permuted blocks, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive intramuscular 500 mg ceftriaxone (control group), intramuscular 1000 mg ertapenem, intramuscular 5 mg/kg gentamicin (maximum 400 mg), or oral 6 g fosfomycin. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a negative nucleic acid amplification test of the predefined primary infected site, 7-14 days after treatment. The primary analysis was per protocol (ie, excluding those lost to follow-up). The modified intention-to-treat analysis included all randomly assigned patients with anogenital gonorrhoea considering those lost-to-follow-up as treatment failure. Non-inferiority was established if the lower Hochberg-corrected 95% CI for difference between the experimental and control groups was greater than -10%. For the analysis of adverse events, we included all participants who received medication. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03294395) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 18, 2017, and June 5, 2020, from 2160 patients invited to participate, we assigned 346 (16%) participants to receive either ceftriaxone (n=103), ertapenem (n=103), gentamicin (n=102), or fosfomycin (n=38). The fosfomycin group was terminated early after interim analysis revealed less than 60% efficacy. In the primary per-protocol analysis, 93 (100%) of 93 patients in the ceftriaxone group, 86 (99%) of 87 patients in the ertapenem group, 79 (93%) of 85 patients in the gentamicin group, and four (12%) of 33 patients in the fosfomycin group cleared N gonorrhoeae (risk difference vs ceftriaxone -0·01 [95% CI -0·08 to 0·05] for ertapenem and -0·07 [-0·16 to -0·01] for gentamicin). Thus, ertapenem proved non-inferior to ceftriaxone. In mITT analysis, risk differences versus ceftriaxone were -0·08 (-0·17 to 0·003) for ertapenem and -0·11 (-0·21 to -0·04) for gentamicin. We observed a higher proportion of patients with at least one adverse event in the ertapenem group (58 [56%] of 103) and fosfomycin group (36 [95%] of 38) versus the ceftriaxone group (24 [23%] of 103). INTERPRETATION: Single-dose 1000 mg ertapenem is non-inferior to single-dose 500 mg ceftriaxone in gonorrhoea treatment. Yet, 5 mg/kg gentamicin (maximum 400 mg) is not non-inferior to ceftriaxone. Ertapenem is a potential effective alternative for anogenital N gonorrhoeae infections and merits evaluation for ceftriaxone-resistant infections. FUNDING: ZonMw and GGD-Amsterdam. TRANSLATION: For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Assessing the consequences of stigma for tuberculosis patients in urban Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Stigma is one of the many factors hindering tuberculosis (TB) control by negatively affecting hospital delay and treatment compliance. In Zambia, the morbidity and mortality due to TB remains high, despite extended public health attempts to control the epidemic and to diminish stigma. STUDY AIM: To enhance understanding of TB-related stigmatizing perceptions and to describe TB patients' experiences of stigma in order to point out recommendations to improve TB policy. METHODS: We conducted a mixed method study at Kanyama clinic and surrounding areas, in Lusaka, Zambia; structured interviews with 300 TB patients, multiple in-depth interviews with 30 TB patients and 10 biomedical health workers, 3 focus group discussions with TB patients and treatment supporters, complemented by participant observation and policy analysis of the TB control program. Predictors of stigma were identified by use of multivariate regression analyses; qualitative analysis of the in-depth interviews, focus group discussions and participant observation was used for triangulation of the study findings. RESULTS: We focused on the 138/300 patients that described TB-related perceptions and attitudes, of whom 113 (82%) reported stigma. Stigma provoking TB conceptions were associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infection, alleged immoral behaviour, (perceived) incurability, and (traditional) myths about TB aetiology. Consequences of stigma prevailed both among children and adults and included low self-esteem, insults, ridicule, discrimination, social exclusion, and isolation leading to a decreased quality of life and social status, non-disclosure, and/or difficulties with treatment compliance and adherence. Women had significantly more stigma-related problems than men. CONCLUSIONS: The findings illustrate that many TB patients faced stigma-related issues, often hindering effective TB control and suggesting that current efforts to reduce stigma are not yet optimal. The content and implementation of sensitization programs should be improved and more emphasis needs to be placed on women and children.