Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 39(1): 2271072, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857350

RESUMEN

Background: In recent years, new combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have become available, representing an advance in terms of individualization and compliance by users.Objective: To provide recommendations regarding COCs: formulations, use, efficacy, benefits and safety.Method: For these recommendations, we have used the modified Delphi methodology and carried out a systematic review of studies found in the literature and reviews performed in humans, published in English and Spanish in Pubmed, Medline and advanced medicine and computer networks until the year 2021, using the combination of terms: 'oral contraceptives', 'estroprogestins' and 'combined oral contraceptives'.Results: Regarding the estrogen component, initially switching from mestranol (the pro-drug of ethinylestradiol) to ethinylestradiol (EE) and then reducing the EE dose helped reduce side effects and associated adverse events. Natural estradiol and estradiol valerate are already available and represent a valid alternative to EE. The use of more potent 19-nortestosterone-derived progestins, in order to lower the dose and then the appearance of non-androgenic progestins with different endocrine and metabolic characteristics, has made it possible to individualize the prescription of COC according to the profile of each woman.Conclusion: Advances in the provision of new COCs have improved the risk/benefit ratio by increasing benefits and reducing risks. Currently, the challenge is to tailor contraceptives to individual needs in terms of safety, efficacy, and protection of female reproductive health.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados , Progestinas , Femenino , Humanos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , América Latina , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Salud de la Mujer
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 37(1): 10-14, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is a global pandemic that affects more than a third of the population worldwide. The population of Latin America and the Caribbean exceeds 620 million inhabitants with diverse ethnic origins and different latitudes and altitudes, which make comparisons and generalizations difficult. AIM AND METHOD: We sought to establish an expert consensus regarding the recommendations for VD supplementation in Latin America by means of the Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The prophylactic dosage of VD in the general population should be individualized according to age, race, body weight, sun exposure of an individual, altitude, and dietary and exercise habits, without ruling out existing chronic diseases. CONCLUSION: The importance of VD has been widely documented and its deficiency is a pandemic. Many individuals have difficulty meeting daily VD requirements through food and the sun. The population of Latin America and the Caribbean has diverse ethnics, cultures, in addition to living in different latitudes and altitudes. Therefore, it is important to make a position on VD supplementation, given the different characteristics, ages and serum levels of 25(OH)D.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/prevención & control , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Técnica Delphi , Humanos
3.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 29(9): 855-8, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23802562

RESUMEN

This prospective interventional study was designed to determine the impact of providing standardized information on different methods of combined hormonal contraception on women's selection of which method to use. A total of 952 Brazilian gynecologists were randomly selected. Each gynecologist recruited 15 consecutive patients for whom combined hormonal contraception was indicated. Each patient was asked which contraceptive method she would prefer (pill, patch, vaginal ring or injectable) before and after receiving a standardized explanation on each of these methods provided by her doctor. A total of 9507 women were included in the study. Prior to counseling, 66.5% of the women stated that they would prefer the pill, 17.9% the injectable, 8.9% the patch and 6.7% the vaginal ring. After counseling, 53.7% of the women stated that they would prefer the pill, 16.3% the injectable, 14% the patch and 16% the ring. In conclusion, the combined pill remains the most popular contraceptive method among Brazilian women; however, after receiving information on the various contraceptive methods available, the proportion of women choosing the vaginal ring or patch increased, while preference for the combined pill decreased.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/uso terapéutico , Consejo/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Anticoncepción/psicología , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Formas de Dosificación , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Estándares de Referencia , Adulto Joven
4.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 13(6): 615-622, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538185

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global health emergency. Major disruption to healthcare services during the current COVID-19 pandemic will last even after its peak. Sexual and reproductive health (SRH), specially contraception, needs to be understood as an essential service. AREAS COVERED: This paper is a narrative review. Data from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and websites of scientific societies were screened during the months of April and May 2020. It addresses the main aspects related to contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic, with special emphasis on family planning services, extended use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, drug interactions, and thromboembolism risk. We also specified some issues focused on the Brazilian reality. EXPERT OPINION: Ensuring proper contraception use in the COVID-19 time is very important. We encourage women, healthcare providers, policymakers, and the society to consider SRH services as priority.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Anticoncepción , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Salud Reproductiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Salud Sexual , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
5.
Menopause ; 26(8): 919-928, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31188288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In the absence of guidelines specific for Latin America, a region where the impact of menopause is becoming increasingly important, an evidence-based specialist opinion on management of vaginal atrophy will help improve outcomes. METHODS: An advisory board meeting was convened in São Paulo, Brazil, to discuss practical recommendations for managing vaginal atrophy in women in Latin America. Before the meeting, physicians considered various aspects of the condition, summarizing information accordingly. This information was discussed during the meeting. The expert consensus is now summarized. RESULTS: In Latin America, given the relatively early age of menopause, it will be beneficial to raise awareness of vaginal atrophy among women before they enter menopause, considering cultural attitudes and involving partners as appropriate. Women should be advised about lifestyle modifications, including attention to genital hygiene, clothing, and sexual activity, and encouraged to seek help as soon as they experience vaginal discomfort. Although treatment can be started at any time, prompt treatment is preferable. A range of treatments is available. By addressing the underlying pathology, local estrogen therapy can provide effective symptom relief, with choice of preparation guided by patient preference. An individualized treatment approach should be considered, giving attention to patients' specific situations. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical that women are empowered to understand vaginal atrophy. Educating women and healthcare providers to engage in open dialogue will facilitate appreciation of the benefits and means of maintaining urogenital health, helping to improve outcomes in middle age and beyond. Women should receive this education before menopause.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia/fisiología , Enfermedades Vaginales/terapia , Atrofia/terapia , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , América Latina , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Enfermedades Vaginales/patología
6.
Contraception ; 73(3): 249-52, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16472564

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study compared two regimens of a monthly injectable contraceptive containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 150 mg and estradiol enanthate 10 mg (Perlutan) over 12 cycles of use. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-five adolescents were randomized into two groups. The patients in Group 1 received an initial injection of Perlutan on the 1st-5th day of their menstrual cycle and subsequent injections every 30 +/- 3 days, whereas those in Group 2 followed the traditional schedule of administration in which the first injection is administered between Days 7 and 10 of their menstrual cycle and subsequent injections 7-10 days after Day 1 of withdrawal bleeding. This schedule may result in an irregularity in the timing of injections. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding tolerability or pregnancy (two in Group 1 and three in Group 2). CONCLUSION: Monthly administration limits the annual number of injections to a maximum of 12, thus frequently reducing the total annual dose while maintaining efficacy and tolerability similar to those obtained with the traditional regimen.


Asunto(s)
Acetofenida de Algestona/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Estradiol/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Brasil , Esquema de Medicación , Estradiol/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones
7.
Contraception ; 71(3): 176-82, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15722066

RESUMEN

This open-label, randomized, Phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of and compliance with NuvaRing, a combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 microg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 microg of etonogestrel daily, with those of and with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 microg of levonorgestrel (LNG) and 30 microg of EE. Subjects received NuvaRing or a COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-/pill-free period). A total of 1030 subjects (NuvaRing, n=512; COC, n=518) was randomized and started treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for the NuvaRing group and 71.2% for the COC group. Five in-treatment pregnancies occurred in each group, giving Pearl indices of 1.23 for NuvaRing and 1.19 for the COC. Compliance with both treatments was excellent and both were well tolerated. In conclusion, NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability with a COC containing 150 microg of LNG and 30 microg of EE and does not require daily dosing.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/normas , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Leucorrea/etiología , Sudáfrica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vaginitis/etiología
8.
Maturitas ; 46(1): 59-68, 2003 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12963170

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to observe hysterectomized postmenopausal women (without progestogen, which could interfere in the results), using oral-conjugated oestrogen 0.625 mg daily (n=13) or 17beta-estradiol transdermal patches delivering 50 microg daily (n=10) during 12 months, and to evaluate the treatment effects on body composition, visceral fat distribution, energy expenditure and substrate oxidation. METHODS: We studied 23 postmenopausal women using oral-conjugated oestrogen (Premarin) 0.625 mg daily (n=13) or transdermal oestrogen patches (Systen TTS) 50 microg daily (n=10). Body composition was measured by DEXA, visceral adipose tissue areas were measured by abdominal computed tomography, and energy expenditure, fat oxidation and carbohydrate oxidation were measured by indirect calorimetry (Deltatrac Metabolic Monitor). RESULTS: There were: (1) a decrease in IGF-I and an increase in GH levels in the oral group and no change in the transdermal group; (2) a increase in lean body mass in the transdermal group and a decrease in the oral group; (3) a increase in total body fat mass in the oral group and no change in the transdermal group; (4) an increases in total bone mass and in total bone mineral density in the transdermal group and no change in the oral group; (5) an increase in lipid oxidation in the transdermal group and a decrease in the oral group, and (6) no significantly change about weight, visceral adipose tissue areas and energy expenditure in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The administration route of oestrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women confers distinct and divergent effects on body composition and substrate oxidation during 12-months treatment.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Adiposo/anatomía & histología , Composición Corporal , Estradiol/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Estrógenos Conjugados (USP)/uso terapéutico , Posmenopausia , Absorciometría de Fotón , Administración Cutánea , Calorimetría Indirecta , Metabolismo Energético , Estradiol/administración & dosificación , Estrógenos Conjugados (USP)/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxidación-Reducción , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 175: 62-6, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24480113

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of combined oral contraceptives has been associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Whether these drugs alter cardiac autonomic nervous system control is not completely determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a contraceptive containing 20mcg of ethinyl estradiol and 3mg of drospirenone on the heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure of healthy women. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled trial with 69 healthy women allocated in two groups: 36 volunteers under oral combined contraceptive use and 33 volunteers using of non-hormonal contraceptive methods. Subjects were tested before the introduction of the contraceptive method and 6 months after its use. For data acquisition, we used continuous non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure curve recordings. Multiple ANOVA was used to determine differences between groups and moments and p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no differences in demographic and autonomic parameters between groups. Comparing cardiac sympatho-vagal modulation, baroreceptor sensitivity and blood pressure measurements between baseline and after 6 months, no significant difference was detected in each group or between groups. CONCLUSION: A contraceptive containing 20mcg of ethinyl estradiol and 3mg of drospirenone causes no significant changes in clinical, hemodynamic and autonomic parameters of normal women.


Asunto(s)
Androstenos/efectos adversos , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/efectos de los fármacos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
Contraception ; 86(6): 698-703, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22770794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although acceptability of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is widespread, patients are often unaware of the noncontraceptive benefits. STUDY DESIGN: An opinion survey through telephone interview was conducted to evaluate the knowledge of 500 Brazilian women 15-45 years of age who were current users or had recently used COCs. Data were obtained on their knowledge of adverse events, the effects of COCs on health- and menstrual-related symptoms, noncontraceptive benefits and aspects related to sexual response. RESULTS: Most of the women interviewed learned about the pill from doctors or the Internet. Other than the pill, the best-known contraceptive methods were the condom and intrauterine device. The majority of women believe that COCs do not change the risk of gynecological cancers. Most believed that they had no significant effect on sexual response. CONCLUSIONS: COCs users in Brazil lack precise information on aspects related to general health, particularly menstrual-related symptoms and noncontraceptive health benefits.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados , Conocimiento de la Medicación por el Paciente , Salud Urbana , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil , Condones/efectos adversos , Conducta Anticonceptiva , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efectos adversos , Trastornos de la Menstruación/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Rol del Médico , Adulto Joven
11.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet ; 33(6): 303-9, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21877020

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Due to the scarce information available in Brazil in relation to the number of women who initiated the use of combined oral contraceptives and prematurely discontinued, the objective was to assess the reasons for discontinuation of the use of several combined oral contraceptives among Brazilian women living in urban areas. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 400 gynecologists registered withy the Brazilian Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Each physician interviewed 10 non-pregnant, not breastfeeding, not amenorrheic women aged 18 to 39 years who consulted requesting combined oral contraceptive (COC) with a questionnaire at the beginning of use and at six months later. The questionnaire included sociodemographic data, type of COC chosen or prescribed and reasons for discontinuation when it occurred during follow-up. The strategy of selection allowed the inclusion of women from different socioeconomic strata, however, only those attended at private or insurance offices. The sample size was estimated at 1,427 women. RESULTS: A total of 3,465 interviews were conducted at the first visit and 1,699 six months later. The women were 20 to 29 years old, 57.3% were single and an equal proportion of 45.0% attended high school or college. Most (60.7%) were nulligravidas and among those who had used some contraceptive before, 71.8% had used a COC. Among the more prescribed or chosen COC the most prevalent were monophasic with ethynil estradiol (20 µg) and regarding progestin the most prevalent was with gestodene (36.5%) followed by a COC with drosperinone (22.0%). At six months 63.5% still used COC. Among those who discontinued the main reasons were wishing to become pregnant (36.5%) and side effects (57.3%) and the most prevalent were headache (37.6%), weight gain (16.6%) and irregular bleeding (23.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The continuation rate of COC was low at six months and this study could contribute to a better counseling on the part of physicians of patients who initiate COC about side-events that are rare, minimal and temporary and about the benefits of COC use.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoncepción/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven
12.
Womens Health (Lond) ; 6(5): 721-35, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21080791

RESUMEN

Although combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are commonly used and highly effective in preventing pregnancy, they may not be suitable for some women. COC use is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular events and is not recommended in nonbreastfeeding women in the immediate postpartum period or in breastfeeding women during the initial 6 months of breastfeeding. Moreover, estrogen-related adverse effects, such as headache, are common. Estrogen-free progestin-only pills (POPs) are a valuable option in women who prefer to take an oral hormonal contraceptive, but are ineligible for, or choose not to use, COCs. Although some POPs have been associated with lower contraceptive effectiveness than COCs, the POP containing desogestrel has shown similar contraceptive effectiveness to COCs. The most commonly reported complaints in women using all POPs are bleeding problems. Counseling women interested in using POPs about the variable bleeding patterns associated with this method may improve compliance and acceptance.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/normas , Anticonceptivos Sintéticos Orales/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Sintéticos Orales/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/uso terapéutico , Dismenorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Menstruación/efectos de los fármacos , Noretindrona/farmacología , Progestinas/farmacología
13.
Contraception ; 81(3): 215-22, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20159177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare bleeding patterns of women using a contraceptive combination of 30 mcg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) continuously or cyclically. Menstrual-related symptoms were also evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: This open, prospective, randomized study evaluated 78 women using the EE/DRSP combination continuously for 168 days or for six 28-day cycles, each followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval. A diary with pre-established scales was used to assess the frequency and intensity of bleeding and menstrual-related symptoms. RESULTS: Amenorrhea increased with continuous use; 62.2% of women with continuous use were amenorrheic at the end of treatment (95% CI: 46.6-77.8%). Dysmenorrhea, headache, acne, nausea, edema and increased appetite improved significantly in the continuous-use group, and mastalgia and edema in the cyclic-use group (p<.05). Six subjects in the continuous-use group (15.4%) and three in the cyclic-use group (7.7%) discontinued due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous use was associated with amenorrhea and fewer menstrual-related symptoms compared to cyclic use.


Asunto(s)
Amenorrea/inducido químicamente , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estudios Longitudinales , Metrorragia/inducido químicamente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Salud de la Mujer
14.
Contraception ; 81(2): 102-6, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20103445

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a contraceptive pill containing ethinylestradiol (30 mcg) and drospirenone (3 mg) in a continuous regimen on lipid, carbohydrate and coagulation parameters. STUDY DESIGN: This open, prospective, randomized study included 78 participants (mean age 27.8 years) who were randomized into two groups to use the pill continuously for 168 days or for six 28-day cycles with a 7-day hormone-free interval between cycles. Markers of lipid, carbohydrate and coagulation profiles were measured prior to initiation and after the 6 months of pill use. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two contraceptive regimens with respect to carbohydrate or lipid profiles or in the parameters related to coagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The contraceptive combination of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone used in a continuous regimen was associated with metabolic alterations similar to those found during the traditional cyclic regimen of oral contraceptive use.


Asunto(s)
Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Insulina/sangre , Lípidos/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Androstenos/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea , Anticonceptivos Orales/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA