Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Reprod Health Matters ; 20(39): 31-9, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22789080

RESUMEN

In 2011, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) issued two landmark decisions. In Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil, the first maternal death case decided by an international human rights body, it confirms that States have a human rights obligation to guarantee that all women, irrespective of their income or racial background, have access to timely, non-discriminatory, and appropriate maternal health services. In L.C. v. Peru, concerning a 13-year-old rape victim who was denied a therapeutic abortion and had an operation on her spine delayed that left her seriously disabled as a result, it established that the State should guarantee access to abortion when a woman's physical or mental health is in danger, decriminalise abortion when pregnancy results from rape or sexual abuse, review its restrictive interpretation of therapeutic abortion and establish a mechanism to ensure that reproductive rights are understood and observed in all health care facilities. Both cases affirm that accessible and good quality health services are vital to women's human rights and expand States' obligations in relation to these. They also affirm that States must ensure national accountability for sexual and reproductive health rights, and provide remedies and redress in the event of violations. And they reaffirm the importance of international human rights bodies as sources of accountability for sexual and reproductive rights violations, especially where national accountability is absent or ineffective.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos Humanos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cooperación Internacional , Muerte Materna/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Violación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos de la Mujer/legislación & jurisprudencia
3.
J Law Med Ethics ; 49(2): 328-331, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924043

RESUMEN

While human rights law has evolved to provide guidance to governments in realizing human rights in public health emergencies, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the foundations of human rights in global health governance. Public health responses to the pandemic have undermined international human rights obligations to realize (1) the rights to health and life, (2) human rights that underlie public health, and (3) international assistance and cooperation. As governments prepare for revisions of global health law, new opportunities are presented to harmonize global health law and human rights law, strengthening rights-based governance to respond to future threats.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Salud Global , Derechos Humanos , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA