RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in sonographic (US) distance and volume measurements from different sonologists and identify the optimal parameters to avoid clinically relevant variations in the measurement of BI-RADS 3 breast masses. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study with prospectively collected data, four physicians with various levels of experience in US, herein called sonologists, performed distance and volume US measurements of 80 masses classified as BI-RADS 3. The Cochran Q test was used to compare the matched sets of rates of clinically relevant variability between all pairs of sonologists' measurements. RESULTS: There were clinically relevant differences between sonologists in the measurements of the longest diameter (range, 17.5-43.7%, p = 0.003), the longest diameter perpendicular to the previous one (anteroposterior diameter) (17.5-33.7%, p = 0.06), the third diameter orthogonal to the plane defined by the previous two (transverse diameter) (28.7-55%, p = 0.001), and at least two of those three diameters (18.7-38.7%, p = 0.015). The smallest clinically relevant differences were observed with volume measurements (range of differences, 6.2-13.7%, p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Volume measurement technique was associated with the least variations, whereas distance measurements, which are used routinely, were associated with unacceptable rates of clinically relevant variations. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:252-260, 2017.