The short and long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention in children with mental illnesses: a randomized controlled trial (Movementss study).

BACKGROUND: A lifestyle including poor diet, physical inactivity, excessive gaming and inadequate sleep hygiene is frequently seen among Dutch children. These lifestyle behaviors can cause long-term health problems later in life. Unhealthy lifestyle and poor physical health are even more prevalent among children with mental illness (MI) such as autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, and anxiety. However, research on lifestyle interventions among children with MI is lacking. As a result, there are currently no guidelines, or treatment programs where children with MI and poor lifestyle can receive effective support. To address these issues and to provide insight into the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in children with MI and their families, the Movementss study was designed. This paper describes the rationale, study design, and methods of an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the short-term (12 weeks) and long-term (1 year) effects of a lifestyle intervention with care as usual (CAU) in children with MI and an unhealthy lifestyle. METHODS: A total of 80 children (6-12 years) with MI according to DSM-V and an unhealthy lifestyle are randomized to the lifestyle intervention group or CAU at a specialized child and adolescent mental hospital. The primary outcome measure is quality of life measured with the KIDSCREEN. Secondary outcomes include emotional and behavior symptoms, lifestyle parameters regarding diet, physical activity, sleep, and screen time, cognitive assessment (intelligence and executive functions), physical measurements (e.g., BMI), parenting styles, and family functioning, prior beliefs, adherence, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Assessments will take place at the start of the study (T0), after 12 weeks (T1), six months (T2), and 12 months of baseline (T3) to measure long-term effects. DISCUSSION: This RCT will likely contribute to the currently lacking knowledge on lifestyle interventions in children with MI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialsearch.who.int/ NL9822. Registered at November 2nd, 2021.

Prenatal Anxiety and Depression: Treatment Uptake, Barriers, and Facilitators in Midwifery Care.

Background: While many women experience prenatal symptoms of anxiety and/or depression (PSAD), treatment uptake rates are relatively low. Left untreated, symptoms can unfavorably affect maternal and infant health. The first aim of this study was to identify the treatment uptake rate and modalities of treatment received in a community sample of Dutch pregnant women. The second aim was to investigate reasons for not engaging in treatment and to describe facilitators for treatment uptake. The third aim was to determine facilitators and barriers for self-disclosure of feelings to midwives. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from a convenience sample of 1439 Dutch women with low-risk mid-term pregnancies in midwifery care. PSAD was assessed with online questionnaires on symptoms. Reasons, facilitators, and barriers were determined with checklists and open questions. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis and open code quantification. Results: Only 15% of women with PSAD (scoring above cutoffs; 22% of the full sample) received treatment. Psychotherapy was the most commonly received treatment. The main reason for not engaging in treatment was regarding PSAD as a natural part of pregnancy (71%). The main facilitator to engage in treatment was referral by midwives (16%), and for self-disclosure was the midwife asking about PSAD (59%), whereas not asking formed the main barrier for self-disclosure (23%). Conclusions: Relatively few pregnant women received treatment for PSAD. Midwives play an essential role in identifying and referring women for treatment. Routine screening may be a starting point to offer support and, if needed, referral.