Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 163: 280-291, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679530

RESUMEN

A significant amount of European basic and clinical neuroscience research includes the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), mainly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Two recent changes in the EU regulations, the introduction of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (2017/745) and the Annex XVI have caused significant problems and confusions in the brain stimulation field. The negative consequences of the MDR for non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) have been largely overlooked and until today, have not been consequently addressed by National Competent Authorities, local ethical committees, politicians and by the scientific communities. In addition, a rushed bureaucratic decision led to seemingly wrong classification of NIBS products without an intended medical purpose into the same risk group III as invasive stimulators. Overregulation is detrimental for any research and for future developments, therefore researchers, clinicians, industry, patient representatives and an ethicist were invited to contribute to this document with the aim of starting a constructive dialogue and enacting positive changes in the regulatory environment.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Humanos , Investigación Biomédica , Aprobación de Recursos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Europa (Continente) , Unión Europea , Legislación de Dispositivos Médicos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA