RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Emotional prosody is known to play an important role in social communication. Research has shown that children with cochlear implants (CCIs) may face challenges in their ability to express prosody, as their expressions may have less distinct acoustic contrasts and therefore may be judged less accurately. The prosody of children with milder degrees of hearing loss, wearing hearing aids, has sparsely been investigated. More understanding of the prosodic expression by children with hearing loss, hearing aid users in particular, could create more awareness among healthcare professionals and parents on limitations in social communication, which awareness may lead to more targeted rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare the prosodic expression potential of children wearing hearing aids (CHA) with that of CCIs and children with normal hearing (CNH). DESIGN: In this prospective experimental study, utterances of pediatric hearing aid users, cochlear implant users, and CNH containing emotional expressions (happy, sad, and angry) were recorded during a reading task. Of the utterances, three acoustic properties were calculated: fundamental frequency (F0), variance in fundamental frequency (SD of F0), and intensity. Acoustic properties of the utterances were compared within subjects and between groups. RESULTS: A total of 75 children were included (CHA: 26, CCI: 23, and CNH: 26). Participants were between 7 and 13 years of age. The 15 CCI with congenital hearing loss had received the cochlear implant at median age of 8 months. The acoustic patterns of emotions uttered by CHA were similar to those of CCI and CNH. Only in CCI, we found no difference in F0 variation between happiness and anger, although an intensity difference was present. In addition, CCI and CHA produced poorer happy-sad contrasts than did CNH. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that on a fundamental, acoustic level, both CHA and CCI have a prosodic expression potential that is almost on par with normal hearing peers. However, there were some minor limitations observed in the prosodic expression of these children, it is important to determine whether these differences are perceptible to listeners and could affect social communication. This study sets the groundwork for more research that will help us fully understand the implications of these findings and how they may affect the communication abilities of these children. With a clearer understanding of these factors, we can develop effective ways to help improve their communication skills.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva , Percepción del Habla , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Estudios Prospectivos , Emociones , Audición , LingüísticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The emotional prosodic expression potential of children with cochlear implants is poorer than that of normal hearing peers. Though little is known about children with hearing aids. DESIGN: This study was set up to generate a better understanding of hearing aid users' prosodic identifiability compared to cochlear implant users and peers without hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: Emotional utterances of 75 Dutch speaking children (7 - 12 yr; 26 CHA, 23 CCI, 26 CNH) were gathered. Utterances were evaluated blindly by normal hearing Dutch listeners: 22 children and 9 adults (17 - 24 yrs) for resemblance to three emotions (happiness, sadness, anger). RESULTS: Emotions were more accurately recognised by adults than by children. Both children and adults correctly judged happiness significantly less often in CCI than in CNH. Also, adult listeners confused happiness with sadness more often in both CHA and CCI than in CNH. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adults are able to accurately evaluate the emotions expressed through speech by children with varying degrees of hearing loss, ranging from mild to profound, nearly as well as they can with typically hearing children. The favourable outcomes emphasise the resilience of children with hearing loss in developing effective emotional communication skills.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Despite major improvements in rehabilitation possibilities, children with sensorineural hearing loss are at risk for psychosocial difficulties. These difficulties can impact their educational and career achievements and may be two to three times more common in children with hearing loss compared to those with normal hearing. Early identification of psychosocial difficulties can be facilitated using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and may improve outcomes and quality of life. We implemented the SDQ into the clinical follow-up of children with hearing loss in a tertiary referral hospital. With this, prevalence and severity of difficulties in specific psychosocial domains and several predictors were investigated. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional investigation was performed of the following factors in association with the SDQ results: type of hearing device, type and degree of hearing loss, speech perception in quiet and in noise, and type of schooling. RESULTS: Between June 2020 and January 2022, parents of 312 children (age 4-18) completed the SDQ. An additional 113 child-reports were completed. The response rate of the parents was 69%. Problems with peer relationships and prosocial behavior were the most affected areas with clinically elevated scores in 22% of the children. Psychosocial difficulties were distributed similarly across types of hearing device, nature and degrees of hearing loss, and educational settings. Better speech perception in quiet was significantly associated with fewer parent-reported conduct problems. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that children with hearing loss may be at risk of experiencing challenges with social interactions and attachment in social contexts. Using the SDQ in clinical follow-up may improve the chances for early psychological assessment and intervention. In addition, the study found that children's mental health may be impacted by their communication abilities.
Asunto(s)
Audiología , Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Approximately 20% to 40% of children with hearing loss encounter psychosocial difficulties. This prevalence may be outdated, given the advancements in hearing technology and rehabilitation efforts to enhance the psychosocial well-being of these children. A systematic review of up-to-date literature can help to identify factors that may contribute to the children's psychosocial well-being. DESIGN/STUDY SAMPLE: A systematic review was conducted. Original articles were identified through systematic searches in Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. The quality of the papers was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and custom Reviewers' Criteria. RESULTS: A search was performed on 20 October 2022. A total of 1561 articles were identified, and 36 were included for review. Critical appraisal led to 24 good to fair quality articles, and 12 poor quality articles. CONCLUSION: Children with hearing loss have a twofold risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties compared to normal hearing peers. Estimates for functioning in social interactions, like speech perception (in noise) or language proficiency, have proven to be more adequate predictors for psychosocial difficulties than the degree of hearing loss. Our findings can be useful for identifying children at risk for difficulties and offering them earlier and more elaborate psychological interventions.
RESUMEN
Many young people are potentially at risk of noise-induced hearing loss due to unsafe use of personal listening devices. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the association of sociodemographic factors and risk behavior with unsafe use of personal listening devices in adolescents to identify a target group for prevention. A smartphone application was developed to objectively measure music listening habits among 314 adolescents with a mean age of 13 years and 7 months (SD ±5 months). Listening habits were characterized as safe or unsafe based on the weekly noise dose. Data on sociodemographic factors and traditional health risk behaviors were obtained by questionnaires. Within the study group, 10.5% of the participants exceeded the 50%, and 4.8% the 100% recommended weekly noise dose. Adolescents with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to engage in unsafe listening habits as compared to adolescents with a higher socioeconomic status. Additionally, risk behavior was associated with higher odds of having unsafe listening habits as compared to no risk behavior. Age, sex and educational levels were not significantly associated with unsafe listening habits. The findings of the present study indicate that interventions to promote safe listening habits should target adolescents with a lower socioeconomic status and higher risk behavior. Future research is needed to investigate how these adolescents can be motivated to adopt safe listening habits.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Factores Sociodemográficos , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Percepción Auditiva , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have shown an association between poorer hearing thresholds and smaller brain tissue volumes in older adults. Several underlying causal mechanisms have been opted, with a sensory deprivation hypothesis as one of the most prominent. If hearing deprivation would lead to less brain volume, hearing aids could be hypothesized to moderate this pathway by restoration of hearing. This study aims to investigate whether such a moderating effect of hearing aids exists. DESIGN: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study involving aging participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study. Hearing aid use was assessed by interview and hearing loss was quantified using pure-tone audiometry. Total brain volume, gray matter and white matter volume and white matter integrity [fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity] were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Only participants with a pure tone average at 1, 2, and 4 kHz (PTA1,2,4) of ≥35 dB HL were included. Associations of hearing loss with brain volume and global measures of white matter integrity were analyzed using linear regression, with hearing aid use and interaction between hearing aid use and PTA1,2,4 included as independent variables. Models were adjusted for age, sex, time between audiometry and magnetic resonance imaging, level of education, and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Out of 459 included participants with mean age (range) 70.4 (52 to 92) 41% were female. Distributions of age and sex among hearing aid users (n = 172) did not significantly differ from those without hearing aids. PTA1,2,4 was associated with lower FA, but not with a difference in total brain volume, gray matter volume, white matter volume, or mean diffusivity. Interaction between hearing aid use and PTA1,2,4 was not associated with FA or any of the other outcome measures. Additional analysis revealed that interaction between hearing aid use and age was associated with lower FA. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for a moderating effect of hearing aids on the relationship between hearing loss and brain structure in a population of older adults. However, use of hearing aids did appear as an effect modifier in the association between age and white matter integrity. Future longitudinal research is needed to clarify these results.
Asunto(s)
Sordera , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva , Anciano , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the hearing outcome after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty (BOT), canal wall up (CWU) without mastoid obliteration and canal wall down (CWD) without mastoid obliteration in a large patient cohort. As the aeration of the middle ear is associated with hearing outcome, we hypothesized that the post-operative hearing after the BOT may be better compared to CWU and CWD without obliteration. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study on all adult patients who underwent the BOT, CWU without obliteration or CWD without obliteration for primary or revision cholesteatoma between January 2003 and March 2019 with audiological follow-up at our institution. Pre-operative, short-term post-operative and long-term post-operative hearing tests were analyzed and potential factors influencing post-operative hearing were assessed. RESULTS: 626 ears were included. We found no significant differences between the short-term and long-term post-operative audiometry. The pre-operative air-bone gap (ABG) was the factor with the largest effect size on change in air-bone gap (ABG) between pre- and post-operative. When stratifying for this factor along with the type of ossicular chain reconstruction to account for differences at baseline, no significant differences in post-operative ABG were found between BOT and non-obliteration CWU and CWD. CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective cohort study, we found no significant differences in post-operative ABG between the BOT and the non-obliteration CWU and CWD. A solid comparison of hearing between groups remains very challenging as hearing outcome seems to be dependent on many different factors. Hearing outcome seems to be no additional argument to choose for BOT over non-obliteration surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio , Timpanoplastia , Adulto , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/cirugía , Audición , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Apófisis Mastoides/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical results of revision canal wall down (CWD) surgery for chronically discharging mastoid cavities and to compare the non-obliteration approach to mastoid obliteration with canal wall reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent revision surgery for chronically draining mastoid cavities between January 2013 and January 2020 were included. Primary outcome measures included the dry ear rate, complications and postoperative hearing. RESULTS: 79 ears were included; 56 ears received revision CWD with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction and 23 ears received CWD without mastoid obliteration. The dry ear rate at the most recent outpatient clinic visit (median 28.0 months postoperative) was significantly higher in the obliteration group with 96.4% compared to 73.9% for the non-obliteration group (p = .002). There were no differences in audiological outcome and incidence of complications between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: We show that in our study population revision CWD surgery with mastoid obliteration and posterior canal wall reconstruction is superior to revision CWD surgery without mastoid obliteration in the management of chronically discharging mastoid cavities. In the obliteration group, a dry ear was achieved in 96.4% as this was 73.9% in the non-obliteration group. We found no differences in audiological outcome and in incidence of complications between the two techniques.
Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio , Apófisis Mastoides , Adulto , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/cirugía , Conducto Auditivo Externo/cirugía , Humanos , Apófisis Mastoides/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Timpanoplastia/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify possibly distinct acute otitis media (AOM) trajectories in childhood and identify determinants associated with specific AOM trajectories. To explore which child will become prone to recurrent AOM episodes and which will not. DESIGN: Population-based prospective cohort study among 7863 children from birth until 10 years and their mothers. METHODS: This study was embedded in the Generation R Study: a population-based prospective cohort study. Data on AOM and determinants were collected by repeated parental questionnaires. Distinct AOM trajectories within the population were identified with latent-class analyses. Next, using multivariate analysis we checked whether specific determinants were associated with specific trajectories. RESULTS: Three distinct trajectories were identified; that is, non-otitis prone, early AOM-that is children who suffered AOM episodes until 3 years of age but not beyond, and persistent AOM-that is children who remained otitis-prone. Male gender (OR: 1.26, CI: 1.11-1.43) and day-care attendance (OR: 1.31, CI: 1.06-1.60) were associated with increased odds of early AOM. Breastfeeding was beneficial for children in both the early-AOM and persistent-AOM trajectories (OR: 0.78 and 0.77, respectively). Birth in the summer or autumn as compared with birth in the spring decreased odds of AOM only in the persistent-AOM trajectory. Half of all AOM-prone children recovered after the age of 3 years. CONCLUSION: Specific determinants are associated with different AOM trajectories. Future research is needed to better predict which child will remain otitis-prone and which recovers after the age of 3 years to better tailor treatment towards the needs of the individual child.
Asunto(s)
Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Otitis Media/patología , Enfermedad Aguda , Lactancia Materna , Niño , Cuidado del Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estaciones del Año , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
In children, intense levels of anxiety during anesthetic induction are associated with a higher risk of pain, poor recovery, and emergence delirium. Therefore, it is important to identify these high-risk children at hospital arrival. The current study examined internalizing behavior (Child Behavior Checklist, CBCL) and state anxiety measures (modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale, mYPAS, and State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, STAIC) at hospital arrival as predictors of anxiety during induction of anesthesia. One hundred children (aged 4 to 12 years) undergoing elective daycare surgery were included. The STAIC and mYPAS at hospital arrival were significant predictors of anxiety during induction, whereas CBCL was not. The STAIC state form at hospital arrival was the strongest predictor and could be used to identify children who will experience intense levels of anxiety during anesthetic induction, with sufficient to good diagnostic accuracy. Using the STAIC at hospital arrival allows targeted interventions to reduce anxiety in children.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Delirio del Despertar , Anestesia General , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Niño , Hospitales , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common pediatric disease and frequent reason for antibiotic treatment. We aimed to identify environmental and host factors associated with AOM and assess which determinants were associated with AOM at specific ages. METHODS: This study among 7863 children was embedded in the Generation R Study: a population-based prospective cohort study from fetal life onwards. Data on outcome and possible determinants were collected using questionnaires until 6 years. We used generalized estimating equation models to examine associations with AOM with longitudinal odds at different ages, considering correlations between repeated measurements. RESULTS: Male gender increased odds of AOM in children at 2, 3, and 4 years but not at other ages. Postnatal household smoking, presence of siblings, and pet birds increased odds of AOM. Breastfeeding decreased AOM odds, most notably in the first 2 months of life. No association was found for season of birth, maternal age, ethnicity, aberrant birth weight for gestational age, prenatal smoking, furry pets, and daycare attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of childhood AOM varies with age. Significant association with AOM was found for gender and breastfeeding at specific ages and for household smoking, presence of siblings, and pet birds at all the studied ages.
Asunto(s)
Ambiente , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Animales , Aves , Lactancia Materna , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Otitis Media/diagnóstico , Mascotas , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Hermanos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possible advantage of the use of a dedicated bimodal hearing aid fitting formula, the Adaptive Phonak Digital Bimodal (APDB), compared with a frequently used standard hearing aid fitting formula, the NAL-NL2. We evaluated the effects of bimodal hearing aid fitting on provided hearing aid gain and on bimodal auditory functioning in a group of experienced bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. A second aim of our study was to determine the effect of broadband loudness balancing on the prescribed gain of those two fitting formulas. DESIGN: This prospective study used a crossover design in which two fitting methods were compared varying in basic prescription formula (NAL-NL2 or APDB fitting formula). The study consisted of a three-visit crossover design with 3 weeks between sessions. Nineteen postlingually deafened experienced bimodal CI users participated in this study. Auditory functioning was evaluated by a speech in quiet test, a speech in noise test, and a questionnaire on auditory performance. RESULTS: Significant differences between the two fitting formulas were found for frequencies of 2000 Hz and above. For these frequencies, less gain was provided by the APDB fitting formula compared with NAL-NL2. For the APDB fitting formula, a higher compression ratio for frequencies of 1000 Hz and above was found compared with the NAL-NL2 fitting formula. Loudness balancing did not result in large deviations from the prescribed gain by the initial fitting formula. Bimodal benefit was found for speech perception in quiet and for speech perception in noise. No differences in auditory performance were found between the two fitting formulas for any of the auditory performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that CI users with residual hearing at the contralateral ear can benefit from bimodal stimulation, regardless of the fitting method that was applied. Although significant differences between the output and compression ratio of the NAL-NL2 and the APDB fitting formula existed, no differences in bimodal auditory performance were observed. Therefore, NAL-NL2 or the APDB fitting prescription both seem suited for bimodal fitting purposes. Additional loudness balancing has a marginal effect on the provided hearing aid output.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Implantes Cocleares , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Audífonos , Ajuste de Prótesis/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación Coclear , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common problem in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM); however, the exact pathophysiology in patients with CFM remains unclear. The first aim of this study was to evaluate upper airway volume and morphology in patients with CFM. The second aim was to identify risk factors for the presence of OSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was set up and 3 study groups were identified: 1) CFM with OSA, 2) CFM without OSA, and 3) control. Computed tomographic (CT) scans of the head and neck were included and used to create 3-dimensional models. The age-matched control group consisted of patients evaluated for traumatic head injury or epilepsy. Volumetric and morphologic parameters were measured. The results of patients with CFM were compared among the 3 study groups. Descriptive statistics were computed using the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables and nonparametric tests for continuous variables. A multiple variable regression model was used to identify risk factors for OSA. RESULTS: In total, 79 patients with CFM were included, of which 25 patients were diagnosed with OSA. A total of 145 CT scans could be analyzed. In addition, a control population of 88 patients was identified. Oropharynx volume, mean cross-sectional area (CSA), minimal CSA, and minimal retropalatal area were found to be markedly smaller in patients with CFM compared with the control population. In contrast, in patients with CFM and OSA, minimal retroglossal area, sphericity, and uniformity markedly differed from those in patients without OSA. Sphericity was identified as the main predicting variable of OSA in patients with CFM. CONCLUSIONS: The upper airway of patients with CFM is markedly smaller and puts them at risk for developing OSA. Patients with CFM diagnosed with OSA have a markedly smaller CSA behind the base of the tongue and a difference in sphericity.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Goldenhar , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Síndrome de Goldenhar/complicaciones , Síndrome de Goldenhar/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Orofaringe , Faringe , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , LenguaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pre-operative anxiety in children is very common and is associated with adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate if virtual reality exposure (VRE) as a preparation tool for elective day care surgery in children is associated with lower levels of anxiety, pain and emergence delirium compared with a control group receiving care as usual (CAU). DESIGN: A randomised controlled single-blind trial. SETTING: A single university children's hospital in the Netherlands from March 2017 to October 2018. PATIENTS: Two-hundred children, 4 to 12 years old, undergoing elective day care surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTION: On the day of surgery, children receiving VRE were exposed to a realistic child-friendly immersive virtual version of the operating theatre, so that they could get accustomed to the environment and general anaesthesia procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anxiety during induction of anaesthesia (modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale, mYPAS). Secondary outcomes were self-reported anxiety, self-reported and observed pain, emergence delirium, need for rescue analgesia (morphine) and parental anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 191 children were included in the analysis. During induction of anaesthesia, mYPAS levels (median [IQR] were similar in VRE, 40.0 [28.3 to 58.3] and CAU, 38.3 [28.3 to 53.3]; Pâ=â0.862). No differences between groups were found in self-reported anxiety, pain, emergence delirium or parental anxiety. However, after adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy, children in the VRE condition needed rescue analgesia significantly less often (55.0%) than in the CAU condition (95.7%) (Pâ=â0.002). CONCLUSION: In children undergoing elective day care surgery, VRE did not have a beneficial effect on anxiety, pain, emergence delirium or parental anxiety. However, after more painful surgery, children in the VRE group needed rescue analgesia significantly less often, a clinically important finding because of the side effects associated with analgesic drugs. Options for future research are to include children with higher levels of anxiety and pain and to examine the timing and duration of VRE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry: NTR6116.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Ansiedad/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Terapia de Exposición Mediante Realidad Virtual , Analgesia , Anestesia General/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Delirio del Despertar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Periodo Preoperatorio , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Otitis media (OM) is one of the most common pediatric infections worldwide, but the complex microbiology associated with OM is poorly understood. Previous studies have shown an association between OM and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children. Therefore, in order to bridge the gap in our current understanding of the interaction between GER and OM, we investigated the nasopharyngeal and middle ear microbiota of children suffering from GER-associated OM and OM only, using culture-independent 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Middle ear fluid, nasopharyngeal swabs, and clinical data were collected as part of a prospective pilot study conducted at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. A total of 30 children up to 12 years of age who suffered from recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) (5), chronic otitis media with effusion (OME) (23), or both (2), and who were listed for tympanostomy tube placement, were included in the study. Nine children were included in the GER-associated OM cohort and 21 in the OM-only cohort. We found no obvious effect of GER on the nasopharyngeal and middle ear microbiota between the two groups of children. However, our results highlight the need to assess the true role of Alloiococcus spp. and Turicella spp. in children presenting with a high prevalence of recurrent AOM and chronic OME.
Asunto(s)
Oído Medio/microbiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Microbiota , Nasofaringitis/etiología , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Otitis Media/etiología , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Biodiversidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Metagenoma , Metagenómica/métodos , Nasofaringitis/diagnóstico , Otitis Media/diagnóstico , ARN Ribosómico 16SRESUMEN
Although the benefit of bimodal listening in cochlear implant users has been agreed on, speech comprehension remains a challenge in acoustically complex real-life environments due to reverberation and disturbing background noises. One way to additionally improve bimodal auditory performance is the use of directional microphones. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a binaural beamformer for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. This prospective study measured speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise in a repeated-measures design that varied in listening modality for static and dynamic listening conditions. A significant improvement in SRT of 4.7 dB was found with the binaural beamformer switched on in the bimodal static listening condition. No significant improvement was found in the dynamic listening condition. We conclude that there is a clear additional advantage of the binaural beamformer in bimodal CI users for predictable/static listening conditions with frontal target speech and spatially separated noise sources.
Asunto(s)
Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Inteligibilidad del Habla/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Umbral Auditivo , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido , Estudios Prospectivos , Percepción del Habla/fisiologíaRESUMEN
We quantified changes in the auditory acuity of 675 aging adults (mean age 71.1 years, 52.0% female, mean follow-up 4.4 years ± 0.2) of an ongoing cohort study with a pure-tone audiogram and a speech-in-noise test. Generalized estimating equation models were used to study the association between hearing loss and the progression with age, sex, education, cognition, BMI, blood pressure, having type 2 diabetes mellitus, cholesterol ratio, smoking and alcohol consumption. The mean progression of hearing loss was 0.29 and 1.35 dB/year (low and high frequencies). Progression of hearing loss was associated with baseline hearing thresholds. Besides, the presence of type 2 diabetes, smoking, age, sex and time were associated with worse hearing at baseline, but there was no statistical evidence that the tested determinants were associated with progression of hearing loss. This finding indicates that the 4-year progression of hearing loss in older adults in this study is not influenced by the measured determinants. More research with multiple follow-up rounds is desired.
Asunto(s)
Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Audición/fisiología , Anciano , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Cognición/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva/fisiopatología , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Bimodal hearing has shown to improve speech recognition in quiet and in noise and to improve sound localization compared with unilateral cochlear implant (CI) use alone. Fitting the CI and hearing aid (HA) separately has been described well, but HA fitting procedures for bimodal CI users are not well researched or widely accepted. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the literature on the effect of different HA fitting strategies on auditory performance in bimodal CI users. DESIGN: Original articles, written in English, were identified through systematic searches in Medline (OvidSP), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed publisher, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was assessed on five aspects: methodologic quality (with the methodological index for nonrandomized studies score), number of subjects, quality of the description of contralateral hearing loss, quality of HA verification, and direct comparison of HA fitting procedures based on auditory performance. RESULTS: A total of 1665 records were retrieved, of which 17 were included for systematical reviews. Critical appraisal led to three high-quality studies, 10 medium-quality studies, and four low-quality studies. The results of the studies were structured according to four topics: frequency response, frequency translation/transposition, dynamic range compression, and loudness. In general, a bimodal benefit was found in most studies, using various strategies for the HA fitting. Using a standard prescription rule such as National Acoustics Laboratory formula-non-linear 1, National Acoustics Laboratory formula-non-linear 2, or desired sensation level is a good starting point in children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Although a bimodal benefit was found in most studies, there is no clear evidence how certain choices in HA fitting contribute to optimal bimodal performance. A generally accepted HA prescription rule is an essential part of most fitting procedures used in the studies. Current evidence suggests that frequency lowering or transposition is not beneficial. Individual fine tuning based on loudness or general preference is often applied, but its additional value for auditory performance should be investigated more thoroughly. Good quality comparative studies are needed to further develop evidence-based fitting procedures in case of bimodal listening.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Audífonos , Ajuste de Prótesis/métodos , Percepción Auditiva , Umbral Auditivo , HumanosRESUMEN
To evaluate whether speech recognition in noise differs according to whether a wireless remote microphone is connected to just the cochlear implant (CI) or to both the CI and to the hearing aid (HA) in bimodal CI users. The second aim was to evaluate the additional benefit of the directional microphone mode compared with the omnidirectional microphone mode of the wireless microphone. This prospective study measured Speech Recognition Thresholds (SRT) in babble noise in a 'within-subjects repeated measures design' for different listening conditions. Eighteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal CI users. No difference in speech recognition in noise in the bimodal listening condition was found between the wireless microphone connected to the CI only and to both the CI and the HA. An improvement of 4.1 dB was found for switching from the omnidirectional microphone mode to the directional mode in the CI only condition. The use of a wireless microphone improved speech recognition in noise for bimodal CI users. The use of the directional microphone mode led to a substantial additional improvement of speech perception in noise for situations with one target signal.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/instrumentación , Implantes Cocleares , Sordera/rehabilitación , Audífonos , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/rehabilitación , Percepción del Habla , Tecnología Inalámbrica/instrumentación , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sordera/diagnóstico , Sordera/fisiopatología , Sordera/psicología , Estimulación Eléctrica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Enmascaramiento Perceptual , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reconocimiento en Psicología , Prueba del Umbral de Recepción del HablaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: With current cochlear implants (CIs), CI recipients achieve good speech perception in quiet surroundings. However, in acoustically complex, real-life environments, speech comprehension remains difficult and sound quality often remains poor. It is, therefore, a challenge to program CIs for such environments in a clinic. The CI manufacturer Cochlear Ltd. recently introduced a remote control that enables CI recipients to alter the upper stimulation levels of their user programs themselves. In this concept, called remote assistant fitting (RAF), bass and treble controls can be adjusted by applying a tilt to emphasize either the low- or high-frequency C-levels, respectively. This concept of self-programming may be able to overcome limitations associated with fine-tuning the CI sound processor in a clinic. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent CI recipients already accustomed to their clinically fitted program would adjust the settings in daily life if able to do so. Additionally, we studied the effects of these changes on auditory functioning in terms of speech intelligibility (in quiet and in noise), noise tolerance, and subjectively perceived speech perception and sound quality. DESIGN: Twenty-two experienced adult CI recipients (implant use >12 months) participated in this prospective clinical study, which used a within-subject repeated measures design. All participants had phoneme scores of ≥70% at 65 dB SPL in quiet conditions, and all used a Cochlear Nucleus CP810 sound processor. Auditory performance was tested by a speech-in-quiet test, a speech-in-noise test, an acceptable noise level test, and a questionnaire about perceived auditory functioning, that is, a speech and sound quality (SSQ-C) questionnaire. The first session consisted of a baseline test in which the participants used their own CI program and were instructed on how to use RAF. After the first session, participants used RAF for 3 weeks at home. After these 3 weeks, the participants returned to the clinic for auditory functioning tests with their self-adjusted programs and completed the SSQ-C. RESULTS: Fifteen participants (68%) adjusted their C-level frequency profile by more than 5 clinical levels for at least one electrode. Seven participants preferred a higher contribution of the high frequencies relative to the low frequencies, while five participants preferred more low-frequency stimulation. One-third of the participants adjusted the high and low frequencies equally, while some participants mainly used the overall volume to change their settings. Several parts of the SSQ-C questionnaire scores showed an improvement in perceived auditory functioning after the subjects used RAF. No significant change was found on the auditory functioning tests for speech-in-quiet, speech-in-noise, or acceptable noise level. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the majority of experienced CI users made modest changes in the settings of their programs in various ways and were able to do so with the RAF. After altering the programs, the participants experienced an improvement in speech perception in quiet environments and improved perceived sound quality without compromising auditory performance. Therefore, it can be concluded that self-adjustment of CI settings is a useful and clinically applicable tool that may help CI recipients to improve perceived sound quality in their daily lives.