Dosimetric analysis of Co-60 source based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: A case series of ten patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

AIM: To analyse the dosimetric parameters of Co-60 based high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy plans for patients of carcinoma uterine cervix. BACKGROUND: Co-60 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy unit has been introduced in past few years and is gaining importance owing to its long half life, economical benefits and comparable clinical outcome compared to Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was conducted on ten patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (Ca Cx). Computed tomography (CT) images were taken after three channel applicator insertions. The planning for 7 Gray per fraction (7 Gy/#) was done for Co-60 HDR brachytherapy unit following the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines. All the patients were treated with 3# with one week interval between fractions. RESULTS: The mean dose to high risk clinical target volumes (HRCTV) for D90 (dose to 90% volume) was found to be 102.05% (Standard Deviation (SD): 3.07). The mean D2cc (dose to 2 cubic centimeter volume) of the bladder, rectum and sigmoid were found to be 15.9 Gy (SD: 0.58), 11.5 Gy (SD: 0.91) and 4.1 Gy (SD: 1.52), respectively. CONCLUSION: The target coverage and doses to organs at risk (OARs) were achieved as per the ABS guidelines. Hence, it can be concluded that the Co-60 HDR brachytherapy unit is a good choice especially for the centers with a small number of brachytherapy procedures as no frequent source replacement is required like in an Ir-192 HDR unit.

Correlation analysis of CT-based rectal planning dosimetric parameters with in vivo dosimetry of MOSkin and PTW 9112 detectors in Co-60 source HDR intracavitary cervix brachytherapy.

Intracavitary cervical brachytherapy delivers high doses of radiation to the target tissue and a portion of these doses will also hit the rectal organs due to their close proximity. Rectal dose can be evaluated from dosimetric parameters in the treatment planning system (TPS) and in vivo (IV) dose measurement. This study analyzed the correlation between IV rectal dose with selected volume and point dose parameters from TPS. A total of 48 insertions were performed and IV dose was measured using the commercial PTW 9112 semiconductor diode probe. In 18 of 48 insertions, a single MOSkin detector was attached on the probe surface at 50 mm from the tip. Four rectal dosimetric parameters were retrospectively collected from TPS; (a) PTW 9112 diode maximum reported dose (RPmax) and MOSkin detector, (b) minimum dose to 2 cc (D2cc), (c) ICRU reference point (ICRUr), and (d) maximum dose from additional points (Rmax). The IV doses from both detectors were analyzed for correlation with these dosimetric parameters. This study found a significantly high correlation between IV measured dose from RPmax (r = 0.916) and MOSkin (r = 0.959) with TPS planned dose. The correlation between measured RPmax with both D2cc and Rmax revealed high correlation of r > 0.7, whereas moderate correlation (r = 0.525) was observed with ICRUr. There was no significant correlation between MOSkin IV measured dose with D2cc, ICRUr and Rmax. The non-significant correlation between parameters was ascribable to differences in both detector position within patients, and dosimetric volume and point location determined on TPS, rather than detector uncertainties.

In vivo dosimetry using MOSkin detector during Cobalt-60 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of skin cancer.

The MOSkin, a metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor based detector, is suitable for evaluating skin dose due to its water equivalent depth (WED) of 0.07 mm. This study evaluates doses received by target area and unavoidable normal skin during a the case of skin brachytherapy. The MOSkin was evaluated for its feasibility as detector of choice for in vivo dosimetry during skin brachytherapy. A high-dose rate Cobalt-60 brachytherapy source was administered to the tumour located at the medial aspect of the right arm, complicated with huge lymphedema thus limiting the arm motion. The source was positioned in the middle of patients' right arm with supine, hands down position. A 5 mm lead and 5 mm bolus were sandwiched between the medial aspect of the arm and lateral chest to reduce skin dose to the chest. Two calibrated MOSkin detectors were placed on the target and normal skin area for five treatment sessions for in vivo dose monitoring. The mean dose to the target area ranged between 19.9 and 21.1 Gy and was higher in comparison with the calculated dose due to contribution of backscattered dose from lead. The mean measured dose at normal skin chest area was 1.6 Gy (1.3-1.9 Gy), less than 2 Gy per fraction. Total dose in EQD2 received by chest skin was much lower than the recommended skin tolerance. The MOSkin detector presents a reliable real-time dose measurement. This study has confirmed the applicability of the MOSkin detector in monitoring skin dose during brachytherapy treatment due to its small sensitive volume and WED 0.07 mm.

Dosimetric characterisation of the optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeter in cobalt-60 high dose rate brachytherapy system.

This study investigates the characteristics and application of the optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) in cobalt-60 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and compares the results with the dosage produced by the treatment planning system (TPS). The OSLD characteristics comprised linearity, reproducibility, angular dependence, depth dependence, signal depletion, bleaching rate and cumulative dose measurement. A phantom verification exercise was also conducted using the Farmer ionisation chamber and in vivo diodes. The OSLD signal indicated a supralinear response (R2 = 0.9998). It exhibited a depth-independent trend after a steep dose gradient region. The signal depletion per readout was negligible (0.02%), with expected deviation for angular dependence due to off-axis sensitive volume, ranging from 1 to 16%. The residual signal of the OSLDs after 1 day bleached was within 1.5%. The accumulated and bleached OSLD signals had a standard deviation of ± 0.78 and ± 0.18 Gy, respectively. The TPS was found to underestimate the measured doses with deviations of 5% in OSLD, 17% in the Farmer ionisation chamber, and 7 and 8% for bladder and rectal diode probes. Discrepancies can be due to the positional uncertainty in the high-dose gradient. This demonstrates a slight displacement of the organ at risk near the steep dose gradient region will result in a large dose uncertainty. This justifies the importance of in vivo measurements in cobalt-60 HDR brachytherapy.