In Vitro Hepatotoxicity of Routinely Used Opioids and Sedative Drugs.

A hepatocyte cell line was used to determine the hepatotoxicity of sedatives and opioids, as the hepatotoxicity of these drugs has not yet been well characterized. This might pose a threat, especially to critically ill patients, as they often receive high cumulative doses for daily analgosedation and often already have impaired liver function due to an underlying disease or complications during treatment. A well-established biosensor based on HepG2/C3A cells was used for the determination of the hepatotoxicity of commonly used sedatives and opioids in the intensive care setting (midazolam, propofol, s-ketamin, thiopental, fentanyl, remifentanil, and sufentanil). The incubation time was 2 × 3 days with clinically relevant (Cmax) and higher concentrations (C5× and C10×) of each drug in cell culture medium or human plasma. Afterward, we measured the cell count, vitality, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, cytochrome P 450 1A2 (CYP1A2), and albumin synthesis. All tested substances reduced the viability of hepatocyte cells, but sufentanil and remifentanil showed more pronounced effects. The cell count was diminished by sufentanil in both the medium and plasma and by remifentanil only in plasma. Sufentanil and remifentanil also led to higher values of LDH in the cell culture supernatant. A reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity was seen with the use of midazolam and s-ketamine. Microalbumin synthesis was reduced in plasma after its incubation with higher concentrations of sufentanil and remifentanil. Remifentanil and s-ketamine reduced CYP1A2 activity, while propofol and thiopental increased it. Our findings suggest that none of the tested sedatives and opioids have pronounced hepatotoxicity. Sufentanil, remifentanil, and s-ketamine showed moderate hepatotoxic effects in vitro. These drugs should be given with caution to patients vulnerable to hepatotoxic drugs, e.g., patients with pre-existing liver disease or liver impairment as part of their underlying disease (e.g., hypoxic hepatitis or cholestatic liver dysfunction in sepsis). Further studies are indicated for this topic, which may use more complex cell culture models and global pharmacovigilance reports, addressing the limitation of the used cell model: HepG2/C3A cells have a lower metabolic capacity due to their low levels of CYP enzymes compared to primary hepatocytes. However, while the test model is suitable for parental substances, it is not for toxicity testing of metabolites.

Models of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of attrition during the early and late stages of drug development and after a drug is marketed. DILI is generally classified as either intrinsic or idiosyncratic. Intrinsic DILI is dose dependent and predictable (e.g., acetaminophen toxicity). However, predicting the occurrence of idiosyncratic DILI, which has a very low incidence and is associated with severe liver damage, is difficult because of its complex nature and the poor understanding of its mechanism. Considering drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, we established experimental animal models of DILI for 14 clinical drugs that cause idiosyncratic DILI in humans, which is characterized by the formation of reactive metabolites and the involvement of both innate and adaptive immunity. On the basis of the biomarker data obtained from the animal models, we developed a cell-based assay system that predicts the potential risks of drugs for inducing DILI. These findings increase our understanding of the mechanisms of DILI and may help predict and prevent idiosyncratic DILI due to certain drugs.

Control compounds for preclinical drug-induced liver injury assessment: Consensus-driven systematic review by the ProEuroDILI network.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex and unpredictable event caused by drugs, and herbal or dietary supplements. Early identification of human hepatotoxicity at preclinical stages remains a major challenge, in which the selection of validated in vitro systems and test drugs has a significant impact. In this systematic review, we analyzed the compounds used in hepatotoxicity assays and established a list of DILI-positive and -negative control drugs for validation of in vitro models of DILI, supported by literature and clinical evidence and endorsed by an expert committee from the COST Action ProEuroDILI Network (CA17112). METHODS: Following 2020 PRISMA guidelines, original research articles focusing on DILI which used in vitro human models and performed at least one hepatotoxicity assay with positive and negative control compounds, were included. Bias of the studies was assessed by a modified 'Toxicological Data Reliability Assessment Tool'. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies (out of 2,936) met the inclusion criteria, with 30 categorized as reliable without restrictions. Although there was a broad consensus on positive compounds, the selection of negative compounds lacked clarity. 2D monoculture, short exposure times and cytotoxicity endpoints were the most tested, although there was no consensus on drug concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive analysis highlighted the lack of agreement on control compounds for in vitro DILI assessment. Following comprehensive in vitro and clinical data analysis together with input from the expert committee, an evidence-based consensus-driven list of 10 positive and negative control drugs for validation of in vitro models of DILI is proposed. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Prediction of human toxicity early in the drug development process remains a major challenge, necessitating the development of more physiologically relevant liver models and careful selection of drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-positive and -negative control drugs to better predict the risk of DILI associated with new drug candidates. Thus, this systematic study has crucial implications for standardizing the validation of new in vitro models of DILI. By establishing a consensus-driven list of positive and negative control drugs, the study provides a scientifically justified framework for enhancing the consistency of preclinical testing, thereby addressing a significant challenge in early hepatotoxicity identification. Practically, these findings can guide researchers in evaluating safety profiles of new drugs, refining in vitro models, and informing regulatory agencies on potential improvements to regulatory guidelines, ensuring a more systematic and efficient approach to drug safety assessment.

Identification of Reduced ERAP2 Expression and a Novel HLA Allele as Components of a Risk Score for Susceptibility to Liver Injury Due to Amoxicillin-Clavulanate.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to amoxicillin-clavulanate (AC) has been associated with HLA-A∗02:01, HLA-DRB1∗15:01, and rs2476601, a missense variant in PTPN22. The aim of this study was to identify novel risk factors for AC-DILI and to construct a genetic risk score (GRS). METHODS: Transcriptome-wide association study and genome-wide association study analyses were performed on 444 AC-DILI cases and 10,397 population-based controls of European descent. Associations were confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 133 cases and 17,836 population-based controls). Discovery and validation AC-DILI cases were also compared with 1358 and 403 non-AC-DILI cases. RESULTS: Transcriptome-wide association study revealed a significant association of AC-DILI risk with reduced liver expression of ERAP2 (P = 3.7 × 10-7), coding for an aminopeptidase involved in antigen presentation. The lead eQTL single nucleotide polymorphism, rs1363907 (G), was associated with AC-DILI risk in the discovery (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.23-1.66; P = 1.7 × 10-7) and validation cohorts (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.04-2.05; P = .03), following a recessive model. We also identified HLA-B∗15:18 as a novel AC-DILI risk factor in both discovery (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.09-8.36; P = 4.9 × 10-5) and validation (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 2.75-21.99; P = .0001) cohorts. GRS, incorporating rs1363907, rs2476601, HLA-B∗15:18, HLA-A∗02:01, and HLA-DRB1∗15:01, was highly predictive of AC-DILI risk when cases were analyzed against both general population and non-AC-DILI control cohorts. GRS was the most significant predictor in a regression model containing known AC-DILI clinical risk characteristics and significantly improved the predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: We identified novel associations of AC-DILI risk with ERAP2 low expression and with HLA-B∗15:18. GRS based on the 5 risk variants may assist AC-DILI causality assessment and risk management.

Roadmap to DILI research in Europe. A proposal from COST action ProEuroDILINet.

In the current article the aims for a constructive way forward in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) are to highlight the most important priorities in research and clinical science, therefore supporting a more informed, focused, and better funded future for European DILI research. This Roadmap aims to identify key challenges, define a shared vision across all stakeholders for the opportunities to overcome these challenges and propose a high-quality research program to achieve progress on the prediction, prevention, diagnosis and management of this condition and impact on healthcare practice in the field of DILI. This will involve 1. Creation of a database encompassing optimised case report form for prospectively identified DILI cases with well-characterised controls with competing diagnoses, biological samples, and imaging data; 2. Establishing of preclinical models to improve the assessment and prediction of hepatotoxicity in humans to guide future drug safety testing; 3. Emphasis on implementation science and 4. Enhanced collaboration between drug-developers, clinicians and regulatory scientists. This proposed operational framework will advance DILI research and may bring together basic, applied, translational and clinical research in DILI.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics, and outcome in 33 patients with ceftriaxone-induced liver injury.

PURPOSE: To summarize the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with ceftriaxone-induced liver injury and guide the selection of safe medication. METHODS: Retrieved domestic and foreign databases from inception to October 2023, collected case data conforming to ceftriaxone-induced liver injury, and statistically analyzed the data. RESULTS: A total of 617 articles were retrieved, and 16 articles with 33 cases (10 children, 23 adults) were included. Males represented 60% (18/30), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.5:1. The age of onset ranged from 2 days to 96 years, with 15 of 23 adults (65%) over 55 years old. The time from ceftriaxone use to liver injury fluctuated between 0.5 and 47 days. Only 9 patients (27.3%, 9/33) had clinical symptoms, and the clinical classification was dominated by cholestatic injury (46.2%, 12/26). There was a significant difference in the clinical classification of ceftriaxone-induced liver injury between children and adults (P = 0.0126), with hepatocellular injury predominating in children and cholestatic injury predominating in adults. The severity of liver injury was mainly mild (66.7%, 12/18). Peak values of alanine aminotransferase ranging from 228.5 to 8098 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase ranging from 86.7 to 21575 U/L, alkaline phosphatase ranging from 143 to 2434 U/L, and total bilirubin ranging from 3.35 to 66.1 mg/dL. There was a significant difference in peak values of alkaline phosphatase between children and adults (P = 0.027), with a higher peak value of alkaline phosphatase in adults (1039 ± 716.4 U/L vs. 257 ± 134.9 U/L). Patients with normal imaging examinations accounted for the majority (61.5%, 7/13). The prognosis of 32 patients (97%, 32/33) was good, and one child with sickle cell anemia who developed immune hemolysis, progressive renal failure, and acute liver injury after using ceftriaxone died in the end. CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone-induced liver injury can occur at any age, with a higher risk in the elderly, and age may be related to the clinical classification. Although the clinical manifestations are not specific, close monitoring of liver biochemical indicators during the use can detect liver injury early. Most cases have a good prognosis, but for people with concomitant sickle cell anemia, it is necessary to be vigilant about the occurrence of severe hemolytic anemia.

Discovery of LH10, a novel fexaramine-based FXR agonist for the treatment of liver disease.

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) was considered as a promising drug target in the treatment of cholestasis, drug-induced liver injury, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, the existing FXR agonists have shown different degrees of side effects in clinical trials without clear interpretation. MET-409 in clinical phase Ⅲ, has been proven significantly fewer side effects than that of other FXR agonists. This may be due to the completely different structure of FEX and other non-steroidal FXR agonists. Herein, the structure-based drug design was carried out based on FEX, and the more active FXR agonist LH10 (FEX EC50 = 0,3 µM; LH10 EC50 = 0.14 µM)) was screened out by the comprehensive SAR studies. Furthermore, LH10 exhibited robust hepatoprotective activity on the ANIT-induced cholestatic model and APAP-induced acute liver injury model, which was even better than positive control OCA. In the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model, LH10 significantly improved the pathological characteristics of NASH by regulating several major pathways including lipid metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis. With the above attractive results, LH10 is worthy of further evaluation as a novel agent for the treatment of liver disorders.

Identification of reversible OATP1B1 and time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibition as the major risk factors for drug-induced cholestasis (DIC).

Hepatic bile acid regulation is a multifaceted process modulated by several hepatic transporters and enzymes. Drug-induced cholestasis (DIC), a main type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), denotes any drug-mediated condition in which hepatic bile flow is impaired. Our ability in translating preclinical toxicological findings to human DIC risk is currently very limited, mainly due to important interspecies differences. Accordingly, the anticipation of clinical DIC with available in vitro or in silico models is also challenging, due to the complexity of the bile acid homeostasis. Herein, we assessed the in vitro inhibition potential of 47 marketed drugs with various degrees of reported DILI severity towards all metabolic and transport mechanisms currently known to be involved in the hepatic regulation of bile acids. The reported DILI concern and/or cholestatic annotation correlated with the number of investigated processes being inhibited. Furthermore, we employed univariate and multivariate statistical methods to determine the important processes for DILI discrimination. We identified time-dependent inhibition (TDI) of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and reversible inhibition of the organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 as the major risk factors for DIC among the tested mechanisms related to bile acid transport and metabolism. These results were consistent across multiple statistical methods and DILI classification systems applied in our dataset. We anticipate that our assessment of the two most important processes in the development of cholestasis will enable a risk assessment for DIC to be efficiently integrated into the preclinical development process.

Unveiling the therapeutic promise of natural products in alleviating drug-induced liver injury: Present advancements and future prospects.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) refers to adverse reactions to small chemical compounds, biological agents, and medical products. These reactions can manifest as acute or chronic damage to the liver. From 1997 to 2016, eight drugs, including troglitazone, nefazodone, and lumiracoxib, were removed from the market due to their liver-damaging effects, which can cause diseases. We aimed to review the recent research on natural products and their bioactive components as hepatoprotective agents in mitigating DILI. Recent articles were fetched via searching the PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases from 2010 to January 2023 using relevant keywords such as "natural products," "acetaminophen," "antibiotics," "paracetamol," "DILI," "hepatoprotective," "drug-induced liver injury," "liver failure," and "mitigation." The studies reveal that the antituberculosis drug (acetaminophen) is the most frequent cause of DILI, and natural products have been largely explored in alleviating acetaminophen-induced liver injury. They exert significant hepatoprotective effects by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation, inhibiting oxidative/nitrative stress, and macromolecular damage. Due to the bioavailability and dietary nature, using natural products alone or as an adjuvant with existing drugs is promising. To advance DILI management, it is crucial to conduct well-designed randomized clinical trials to evaluate natural products' efficacy and develop new molecules clinically. However, natural products are a promising solution for remedying drug-induced hepatotoxicity and lowering the risk of DILI.

Exploring Individual Variability in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Responses through Metabolomic Analysis.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a serious adverse hepatic event presenting diagnostic and prognostic challenges. The clinical categorization of DILI into hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed phenotype is based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values; however, this classification may not capture the full spectrum of DILI subtypes. With this aim, we explored the utility of assessing changes in the plasma metabolomic profiles of 79 DILI patients assessed by the RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score to better characterize this condition and compare results obtained with the standard clinical characterization. Through the identification of various metabolites in the plasma (including free and conjugated bile acids and glycerophospholipids), and the integration of this information into predictive models, we were able to evaluate the extent of the hepatocellular or cholestatic phenotype and to assign a numeric value with the contribution of each specific DILI sub-phenotype into the patient's general condition. Additionally, our results showed that metabolomic analysis enabled the monitoring of DILI variability responses to the same drug, the transitions between sub-phenotypes during disease progression, and identified a spectrum of residual DILI metabolic features, which can be overlooked using standard clinical diagnosis during patient follow-up.

Clinical features, outcomes, and HLA risk factors associated with nitrofurantoin-induced liver injury.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nitrofurantoin (NTF) is widely used for the treatment (short-term) and prevention (long-term) of urinary tract infections. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and HLA risk factors for NTF-induced liver injury (NTF-DILI) among individuals enrolled in the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN). METHODS: Seventy-eight individuals with definite, highly likely, or probable NTF-DILI were enrolled into DILIN studies between 2004-2020. HLA alleles were compared between NTF-DILI and three control groups: population (n = 14,001), idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (n = 231), and non-NTF DILI (n = 661). RESULTS: Liver injury was hepatocellular in 69% and icteric in 55%. AST > ALT was more common in the 44 long-exposure (≥1 year) NTF-DILI cases than in the 18 short (≤7 days) and 16 intermediate (>7 to <365 days) exposure cases (73% vs. 33% vs. 50%, respectively, p = 0.018), as was ANA or SMA positivity (91% vs. 44% vs. 50%, respectively, p <0.001), and corticosteroid use (61% vs. 27% vs. 44%, respectively, p = 0.06). In long-term NTF-DILI, bridging fibrosis, nodularity or cirrhosis, or clinical and imaging evidence for cirrhosis were present in 38%, with massive or sub-massive necrosis in 20%. No one in the short-term exposure group died or underwent transplantation, whereas 7 (12%) patients from the other groups died or underwent transplantation. After covariate adjustments, HLA-DRB1∗11:04 was significantly more frequent in NTF-DILI compared to population controls (odds ratio [OR] 4.29, p = 1.15 × 10-4), idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (OR 11.77, p = 7.76 × 10-5), and non-NTF DILI (OR 3.34, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: NTF-DILI can result in parenchymal necrosis, bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, and death or liver transplantation, especially with long-term exposure, and is associated with HLA-DRB1∗11:04. To mitigate against serious liver injury associated with NTF, regulators should revise the prescribing information and consider other mitigation strategies. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Nitrofurantoin is a recognized cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). In this study consisting of a large cohort of well-phenotyped individuals with nitrofurantoin-induced liver injury, two distinct patterns of liver injury were identified: liver injury associated with short-term exposure, which is generally self-limiting, and liver injury associated with long-term exposure, which can lead to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver failure. HLA DRB1∗11:04 is a risk factor for liver injury due to long-term nitrofurantoin exposure. Our findings are important for regulators as well as physicians prescribing and pharmacists dispensing nitrofurantoin.

Kratom-induced acute liver injury: A case study and the importance of herbal supplement regulation.

Alternative medicine supplements have become the second most common cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in the US. Kratom is a herbal supplement that is popular for its psychotropic and opioid-like activity. It has become increasingly available in western countries, which often have no specific regulations on its use. However, reports of adverse events linked to kratom use have been increasing; it has been implicated in acute liver injury (mostly cholestatic), acute liver failure, organ dysfunction, toxicity, coma, seizures, and death. Herein, we aim to increase healthcare provider and public awareness of the risks posed by kratom and ultimately support increased regulation of its use.

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

Clinical Pattern of Tolvaptan-Associated Liver Injury in Trial Participants With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD): An Analysis of Pivotal Clinical Trials.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Tolvaptan is associated with risk of drug-induced liver injury when used to treat autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). After this risk was described based on the clinical trials TEMPO 3:4 and TEMPO 4:4, additional data from the REPRISE trial and a long-term extension of TEMPO 4:4, REPRISE, and other tolvaptan trials in ADPKD have become available. To further characterize the hepatic safety profile of tolvaptan, an analysis of the expanded dataset was conducted. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of safety data from prospective clinical trials of tolvaptan. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter clinical trials including more than 2,900 tolvaptan-treated participants, more than 2,300 with at least 18 months of drug exposure. INTERVENTION: Tolvaptan administered twice daily in split-dose regimens. OUTCOMES: Frequency of liver enzyme level increases detected by regular laboratory monitoring. RESULTS: In the placebo-controlled REPRISE trial, more tolvaptan- than placebo-treated participants (38 of 681 [5.6%] vs 8 of 685 [1.2%]) experienced alanine aminotransferase level increases to >3× the upper limit of normal (ULN), similar to TEMPO 3:4 (40 of 957 [4.4%] vs 5 of 484 [1.0%]). No participant in REPRISE or the long-term extension experienced concurrent alanine aminotransferase level increases to >3× ULN and total bilirubin increases to >2× ULN ("Hy's Law" laboratory criteria). Based on the expanded dataset, liver enzyme increases most often occurred within 18 months after tolvaptan initiation and were less frequent thereafter. Increased levels returned to normal or near normal after treatment interruption or discontinuation. Thirty-eight patients were rechallenged with tolvaptan after the initial drug-induced liver injury episode, with return of liver enzyme level increases in 30; 1 additional participant showed a clinical "adaptation" after the initial episode, with resolution of the enzyme level increases despite continuation of tolvaptan. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of Hy's Law cases in REPRISE and the long-term extension trial support monthly liver enzyme monitoring during the first 18 months of tolvaptan exposure and every 3 months thereafter to detect and manage enzyme level increases, as is recommended on the drug label. FUNDING: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trials included in the dataset were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study numbers NCT00428948 (TEMPO 3:4), NCT01214421 (TEMPO 4:4), NCT02160145 (REPRISE), and NCT02251275 (long-term extension).

Good cells go bad: immune dysregulation in the transition from acute liver injury to liver failure after acetaminophen overdose.

The role of inflammatory cells and other components of the immune system in acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury and repair has been extensively investigated. Although this has resulted in a wealth of information regarding the function and regulation of immune cells in the liver after injury, apparent contradictions have fueled controversy around the central question of whether the immune system is beneficial or detrimental after APAP overdose. Ultimately, this may not be a simple assignment of "good" or "bad." Clinical studies have clearly demonstrated an association between immune dysregulation and a poor outcome in patients with severe liver damage/liver failure induced by APAP overdose. To date, studies in mice have not uniformly replicated this connection. The apparent disconnect between clinical and experimental studies has perhaps stymied progress and further complicated investigation of the immune system in APAP-induced liver injury. Mouse models are often dismissed as not recapitulating the clinical scenario. Moreover, clinical investigation is most often focused on the most severe APAP overdose patients, those with liver failure. Notably, recent studies have made it apparent that the functional role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of APAP-induced liver injury is highly context dependent and greatly influenced by the experimental conditions. In this review, we highlight some of these recent findings, and suggest strategies seeking to resolve and build on existing disconnects in the literature. Significance Statement Acetaminophen overdose is the most frequent cause of acute liver failure in the United States. Studies indicate that dysregulated innate immunity contributes to the transition from acute liver injury to acute liver failure. In this review, we discuss the evidence for this and the potential underlying causes.

Serum levels of IL-6/IL-10/GLDH may be early recognition markers of anti-tuberculosis drugs (ATB) -induced liver injury.

To explore the potential value of serum glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) combined with inflammatory cytokines as diagnostic biomarkers for anti-tuberculosis drug -induced liver injury (ATB-DILI). We collected the residual serum from the patients who met the criteria after liver function tests. We have examined these parameters including GLDH which were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and cytokines which were determined by cytokine combination detection kit. Multivariate logistics stepwise forward regression was applied to establish regression models. A total of 138 tuberculosis patients were included in the diagnostic markers study of ATB-DILI, including normal liver function group (n = 108) and ATB-DILI group(n = 30). Serum GLDH, IL-6 and IL-10 levels were significantly increased in the ATB-DILI group. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve showed that the area under curve (AUC) of serum GLDH, IL-6 and IL-10 for the diagnosis of ATB-DILI were 0.870, 0.714 and 0.811, respectively. In logistic regression modeling, the AUC of GLDH combined with IL-10 as an ATB-DILI marker is 0.912. Serum IL-6、IL-10 and GLDH levels began to rise preceded the increase in ALT by 7 days, with significant differences in IL-6 compared with 7 days. Serum GLDH, IL-6 and IL-10 levels were correlated with the severity of liver injury. In conclusion, we found that GLDH, IL-6 and IL-10 alone as diagnostic markers of ATB-DILI had good diagnostic efficacy. Logistic regression model established by GLDH and IL-10 had better diagnostic efficacy and IL-6 may be an early predictor of liver injury in the setting of ATB poisoning.

Polygenic modelling and machine learning approaches in pharmacogenomics: Importance in downstream analysis of genome-wide association study data.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variations associated with adverse drug effects in pharmacogenomics (PGx) research. However, interpreting the biological implications of these associations remains a challenge. This review highlights 2 promising post-GWAS methods for PGx. First, we discuss the polygenic architecture of the PGx traits, especially for drug-induced liver injury. Experimental modelling using multiple donors' human primary hepatocytes and human liver organoids demonstrated the polygenic architecture of drug-induced liver injury susceptibility and found biological vulnerability in genetically high-risk tissue donors. Second, we discuss the challenges of interpreting the roles of variants in noncoding regions. Beyond methods involving expression quantitative trait locus analysis and massively parallel reporter assays, we suggest the use of in silico mutagenesis through machine learning methods to understand the roles of variants in transcriptional regulation. This review underscores the importance of these post-GWAS methods in providing critical insights into PGx, potentially facilitating drug development and personalized treatment.

An analysis of silybin meglumine tablets in the treatment of drug-induced liver injury as assessed for causality with the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method using a nationwide database.

AIM: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses significant challenges to clinical practice. Currently, there is no recommended therapy to treat DILI; therefore, it is vital to explore new therapeutic agents. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of silybin meglumine tablets in treating DILI. METHODS: This study analysed 34 296 DILI cases assessed by the updated RUCAM from a nationwide database. A total of 301 patients with RUCAM scores ≥6 were directly enrolled in this study, while an additional 340 patients with RUCAM scores <6 who were adjudged as probable DILI by a panel of three hepatologists were also included in the analysis. The enrolled patients were divided into the silybin meglumine group and the control group. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to obtain comparable characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 129 cases in the silybin meglumine group and 512 cases in the control group. After applying PSM, 129 matched pairs were obtained. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) resumption rates in the silybin meglumine group were significantly higher than the control group (58.91% vs. 20.93%, P ≤ .0001 and 63.49% vs. 37.50%, P ≤ .0001). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that grouping factor (odds raio [OR], 5.42; 95% confidenxe interval [CI], 3.12-9.39; P < .0001 and OR, 6.10; 95% CI, 2.98-12.48; P < .0001) and ALT levels (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; P = .0015 and OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; P = .0157) were essential influencing factors for ALT normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Silybin meglumine tablets are safe and effective in DILI treatment. Large-scale and randomized controlled trials are required to further confirm their efficacy.

Evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic candidate biomarkers in drug-induced liver injury vs. other forms of acute liver damage.

AIMS: Detection and characterization of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) currently rely on standard liver tests, which are suboptimal in terms of specificity, sensitivity and prognosis. Therefore, DILI diagnosis can be delayed, with important consequences for the patient. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of osteopontin, cytokeratin-18 (caspase-cleaved: ccK18 and total: K18), α-glutathione-S-transferase and microRNA-122 as new DILI biomarkers. METHODS: Serial blood samples were collected from 32 DILI and 34 non-DILI acute liver injury (ALI) cases and a single sample from 43 population controls without liver injury (HLC) and analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or single-molecule arrays. RESULTS: All biomarkers differentiated DILI and ALI from HLC with an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) value of >0.75 but were less efficient in distinguishing DILI from ALI, with ccK18 (0.79) and K18 (0.76) demonstrating highest potential. However, the AUC improved considerably (0.98) for ccK18 when comparing DILI and a subgroup of autoimmune hepatitis cases. Cytokeratin-18, microRNA-122 and α-glutathione-S-transferase correlated well with traditional transaminases, while osteopontin correlated most strongly with the international normalized ratio (INR). CONCLUSIONS: ccK18 appears promising in distinguishing DILI from autoimmune hepatitis but less so from other forms of acute liver injury. Osteopontin demonstrates prognostic potential with higher levels detected in more severe cases regardless of aetiology.

Drug induced liver injury - a 2023 update.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) constitutes hepatic damage attributed to drug exposure. DILI may be categorized as hepatocellular, cholestatic or mixed and might also involve immune responses. When DILI occurs in dose-dependent manner, it is referred to as intrinsic, while if the injury occurs spontaneously, it is termed as idiosyncratic. This review predominately focused on idiosyncratic liver injury. The established molecular mechanisms for DILI include (1) mitochondria dysfunction, (2) increased reactive oxygen species levels, (3) presence of elevated apoptosis and necrosis, (4) and bile duct injuries associated with immune mediated pathways. However, it should be emphasized that the underlying mechanisms responsible for DILI are still unknown. Prevention strategies are critical as incidences occur frequently, and treatment options are limited once the injury has developed. The aim of this review was to utilize retrospective cohort studies from across the globe to gain insight into epidemiological patterns. This review considers (1) what is currently known regarding the mechanisms underlying DILI, (2) discusses potential risk factors and (3) implications of the coronavirus pandemic on DILI presentation and research. Future perspectives are also considered and discussed and include potential new biomarkers, causality assessment and reporting methods.