The RecA-directed recombination pathway of natural transformation initiates at chromosomal replication forks in the pneumococcus.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a crucial mechanism of DNA strand exchange that promotes genetic repair and diversity in all kingdoms of life. Bacterial HR is driven by the universal recombinase RecA, assisted in the early steps by dedicated mediators that promote its polymerization on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). In bacteria, natural transformation is a prominent HR-driven mechanism of horizontal gene transfer specifically dependent on the conserved DprA recombination mediator. Transformation involves internalization of exogenous DNA as ssDNA, followed by its integration into the chromosome by RecA-directed HR. How DprA-mediated RecA filamentation on transforming ssDNA is spatiotemporally coordinated with other cellular processes remains unknown. Here, we tracked the localization of fluorescent fusions to DprA and RecA in Streptococcus pneumoniae and revealed that both accumulate in an interdependent manner with internalized ssDNA at replication forks. In addition, dynamic RecA filaments were observed emanating from replication forks, even with heterologous transforming DNA, which probably represent chromosomal homology search. In conclusion, this unveiled interaction between HR transformation and replication machineries highlights an unprecedented role for replisomes as landing pads for chromosomal access of tDNA, which would define a pivotal early HR step for its chromosomal integration.

The recombination initiation functions DprA and RecFOR suppress microindel mutations in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1.

Short-Patch Double Illegitimate Recombination (SPDIR) has been recently identified as a rare mutation mechanism. During SPDIR, ectopic DNA single-strands anneal with genomic DNA at microhomologies and get integrated during DNA replication, presumably acting as primers for Okazaki fragments. The resulting microindel mutations are highly variable in size and sequence. In the soil bacterium Acinetobacter baylyi, SPDIR is tightly controlled by genome maintenance functions including RecA. It is thought that RecA scavenges DNA single-strands and renders them unable to anneal. To further elucidate the role of RecA in this process, we investigate the roles of the upstream functions DprA, RecFOR, and RecBCD, all of which load DNA single-strands with RecA. Here we show that all three functions suppress SPDIR mutations in the wildtype to levels below the detection limit. While SPDIR mutations are slightly elevated in the absence of DprA, they are strongly increased in the absence of both DprA and RecA. This SPDIR-avoiding function of DprA is not related to its role in natural transformation. These results suggest a function for DprA in combination with RecA to avoid potentially harmful microindel mutations, and offer an explanation for the ubiquity of dprA in the genomes of naturally non-transformable bacteria.

Natural transformation-specific DprA coordinate DNA double-strand break repair pathways in heavily irradiated D. radiodurans.

Deinococcus radiodurans exhibits remarkable survival under extreme conditions, including ionizing radiation, desiccation, and various DNA-damaging agents. It employs unique repair mechanisms, such as single-strand annealing (SSA) and extended synthesis-dependent strand annealing (ESDSA), to efficiently restore damaged genome. In this study, we investigate the role of the natural transformation-specific protein DprA in DNA repair pathways following acute gamma radiation exposure. Our findings demonstrate that the absence of DprA leads to rapid repair of gamma radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks primarily occur through SSA repair pathway. Additionally, our findings suggest that the DprA protein may hinder both the SSA and ESDSA repair pathways, albeit in distinct manners. Overall, our results highlight the crucial function of DprA in the selection between SSA and ESDSA pathways for DNA repair in heavily irradiated D. radiodurans.IMPORTANCEDeinococcus radiodurans exhibits an extraordinary ability to endure and thrive in extreme environments, including exposure to radiation, desiccation, and damaging chemicals, as well as intense UV radiation. The bacterium has evolved highly efficient repair mechanisms capable of rapidly mending hundreds of DNA fragments in its genome. Our research indicates that natural transformation (NT)-specific dprA genes play a pivotal role in regulating DNA repair in response to radiation. Remarkably, we found that DprA is instrumental in selecting DNA double-strand break repair pathways, a novel function that has not been reported before. This unique regulatory mechanism highlights the indispensable role of DprA beyond its native function in NT and underscores its ubiquitous presence across various bacterial species, regardless of their NT proficiency. These findings shed new light on the resilience and adaptability of Deinococcus radiodurans, opening avenues for further exploration into its exceptional survival strategies.

The dimer effect: A refinement approach towards skin sensitization assessment in-chemico using Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay.

Skin sensitization is a key endpoint for safety assessment, especially for cosmetics and personal care products. The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization and the chemical and biological events driving the induction of human skin sensitization are now well understood. Several non-animal test methods have been developed to predict sensitizer potential by measuring the impact of chemical sensitizers on these key events. In this work, we have focused on Key Event 1 (the molecular initiating step), which is based on formation of a covalent adduct between skin sensitizers and endogenous proteins and/or peptides in the skin. There exists three in-chemico assays approved by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development-(1) Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA), (2) Amino Acid Derivative Reactivity Assay (ADRA), and (3) Kinetic Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (kDPRA) to quantify peptide/amino acid derivative depletion after incubation with test chemicals. However, overestimated depletion of the cysteine-based peptide/amino acid derivatives is known in such assays because of the dimerization of the thiol group. In this present work, we report the synthesis and structural confirmation of the dimer of N-(2-[1-naphthyl]acetyl)-L-cysteine (NAC) from the ADRA assay to allow simultaneous determination of (a) peptide depletion by quantifying NAC monomer and (b) peptide dimerization by quantifying NAC dimer thereby eliminating the overestimation. We present a case study with three chemicals to demonstrate the importance of this approach. Thus, this simultaneous assay gives a more informed view of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to better identify skin sensitizers.

Biochemical Properties and Roles of DprA Protein in Bacterial Natural Transformation, Virulence, and Pilin Variation.

Natural transformation enables bacteria to acquire DNA from the environment and contributes to genetic diversity, DNA repair, and nutritional requirements. DNA processing protein A (DprA) receives incoming single-stranded DNA and assists RecA loading for homology-directed natural chromosomal transformation and DNA strand annealing during plasmid transformation. The dprA gene occurs in the genomes of all known bacteria, irrespective of their natural transformation status. The DprA protein has been characterized by its molecular, cellular, biochemical, and biophysical properties in several bacteria. This review summarizes different aspects of DprA biology, collectively describing its biochemical properties, molecular interaction with DNA, and function interaction with bacterial RecA during natural transformation. Furthermore, the roles of DprA in natural transformation, bacterial virulence, and pilin variation are discussed.

Applicability of the DPRA on mixture testing: challenges and opportunities.

The in chemico direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is validated to assess protein reactivity of chemical compounds, relating to the molecular initiating event of skin sensitization induction. According to OECD TG 442C, the DPRA is technically applicable to test multi-constituent substances and mixtures of known composition, even though limited experimental data are publicly available. First, we assessed the DPRA's predictive capability for individual substances, but at concentrations other than the recommended 100 mM, i.e., based on the LLNA EC3 concentration (Experiment A). Next, the applicability of the DPRA to test unknown mixtures was assessed (Experiment B). Here, the complexity of unknown mixtures was reduced to mixtures containing either two known skin sensitizers with varying potencies, or a combination of a skin sensitizer with a non-skin sensitizer, or multiple non-sensitizers. Experiments A and B revealed that one extremely potent sensitizer (oxazolone) was incorrectly classified as a non-sensitizer when tested at its low EC3 concentration of 0.4 mM instead of the suggested molar excess conditions of 100 mM (Experiments A). For binary mixtures tested in experiments B, the DPRA was able to distinguish all skin sensitizers and the strongest skin sensitizer in the mixture was determinant for the overall peptide depletion of a sensitizer. In conclusion, we confirmed that the DPRA test method can be used efficiently for well-known characterized mixtures. However, when deviating from the recommended testing concentration of 100 mM, caution should be taken in case of negative results, limiting the DPRA's applicability for mixtures of unknown composition.

Plant extracts, polymers and new approach methods: Practical experience with skin sensitization assessment.

Over the last decade, research into methodologies to identify skin sensitization hazards has led to the adoption of several non-animal methods as OECD test guidelines. However, predictive accuracy beyond the chemical domains of the individual validation studies remains largely untested. In the present study, skin sensitization test results from in vitro and in chemico methods for 12 plant extracts and 15 polymeric materials are reported and compared to available in vivo skin sensitization data. Eight plant extracts were tested in the DPRA and h-CLAT, with the 2 out of 3 approach resulting in a balanced accuracy of 50%. The balanced accuracy for the 11 plant extracts assessed in the SENS-IS was 88%. Excluding 5 polymers inconclusive in vitro, the remainder, assessed using the 2 out of 3 approach, resulted in 63% balanced accuracy. The SENS-IS method, excluding one polymeric material due to technical inapplicability, showed 68% balanced accuracy. Although based on limited numbers, the results presented here indicate that some substance subgroups may not be in the applicability domains of the method used and careful analysis is required before positive or negative results can be accepted.

Peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation - scope and limitations.

The direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is an OECD test guideline method that aims to determine if a chemical is reactive enough to be a skin sensitiser. It involves incubation of the test chemical at 5 mMolar concentration for 24 h with a cysteine-based peptide at 0.5 mMolar concentration and measurement of the percentage depletion (DP) of the peptide. The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) is derived from the DPRA and involves incubating the peptide with the test chemical at a range of concentrations and incubation times to produce a data matrix of DP values, which is analysed to give a reactivity parameter logkmax that assigns chemicals to the 1A potency class (high potency) if logkmax reaches the threshold value of -2. Here the DPRA, with a threshold of 47% DP, is compared against the kDPRA for their abilities to distinguish between the 1A and non-1A potency classes. It is found that they perform very similarly against a dataset of 157 chemicals with known potency, with only marginal differences in predictive performance. The thresholds of -2.0 (kDPRA) and 47% DP (DPRA) to distinguish 1A sensitisers are not scientific absolutes but the best compromises for a heterogenous set of data containing classes of chemicals for which different thresholds would be applicable. It is concluded that although the kDPRA represents a major advance towards predicting skin sensitisation potency on a continuous basis without animal testing, it offers no significant advantage over the DPRA for the purpose of 1A classification.

The activity of methacrylate esters in skin sensitisation test methods II. A review of complementary and additional analyses.

Allergic contact dermatitis is an important occupational health issue, and there is a need to identify accurately those chemicals that have the potential to induce skin sensitisation. Hazard identification was performed initially using animal (guinea pig and mouse) models. More recently, as a result of the drive towards non-animal methods, alternative in vitro and in silico approaches have been developed. Some of these new in vitro methods have been formally validated and have been assigned OECD Test Guideline status. The performance of some of these recently developed in vitro methods, and of 2 quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) approaches, with a series of methacrylate esters has been reviewed and reported previously. In this article that first review has been extended further with additional data and complementary analyses. Results obtained using in vitro methods (Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay, DPRA; ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test methods, KeratinoSens and LuSens; Epidermal Sensitisation Assay, EpiSensA; human Cell Line Activation Test, h-CLAT, and the myeloid U937 Skin Sensitisation test, U-SENS), and 2 QSAR approaches (DEREK™-nexus and TIMES-SS), with 11 methacrylate esters and methacrylic acid are reported here, and compared with existing data from the guinea pig maximisation test and the local lymph node assay. With this series of chemicals it was found that some in vitro tests (DPRA and ARE-Nrf2 luciferase) performed well in comparison with animal test results and available human skin sensitisation data. Other in vitro tests (EpiSensA and h-CLAT) proved rather more problematic. Results with DEREK™-nexus and TIMES-SS failed to reflect accurately the skin sensitisation potential of the methacrylate esters. The implications for assessment of skin sensitising activity are discussed.

Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.

The regulatory community is transitioning to the use of nonanimal methods for dermal sensitization assessments; however, some in vitro assays have limitations in their domain of applicability depending on the properties of chemicals being tested. This study explored the utility of epidermal sensitization assay (EpiSensA) to evaluate the sensitization potential of complex and/or "difficult to test" chemicals. Assay performance was evaluated by testing a set of 20 test chemicals including 10 methacrylate esters, 5 silicone-based compounds, 3 crop protection formulations, and 2 surfactant mixtures; each had prior in vivo data plus some in silico and in vitro data. Using the weight of evidence (WoE) assessments by REACH Lead Registrants, 14 of these chemicals were sensitizers and, six were nonsensitizers based on in vivo studies (local lymph node assay [LLNA] and/or guinea pig studies). The EpiSensA correctly predicted 16/20 materials with three test materials as false positive and one silane as false negative. This silane, classified as weak sensitizer via LLNA, also gave a "false negative" result in the KeratinoSens™ assay. Overall, consistent with prior evaluations, the EpiSensA demonstrated an accuracy level of 80% relative to available in vivo WoE assessments. In addition, potency classification based on the concentration showing positive marker gene expression of EpiSensA was performed. The EpiSensA correctly predicted the potency for all seven sensitizing methacrylates classified as weak potency via LLNA (EC3 ≥ 10%). In summary, EpiSensA could identify dermal sensitization potential of these test substances and mixtures, and continues to show promise as an in vitro alternative method for dermal sensitization.

Streptococcus pneumoniae Elaborates Persistent and Prolonged Competent State during Pneumonia-Derived Sepsis.

The competence regulon of pneumococcus regulates both genetic transformation and virulence. However, competence induction during host infection has not been examined. By using the serotype 2 strain D39, we transcriptionally fused the firefly luciferase (luc) to competence-specific genes and spatiotemporally monitored the competence development in a mouse model of pneumonia-derived sepsis. In contrast to the universally reported short transient burst of competent state in vitro, the naturally developed competent state was prolonged and persistent during pneumonia-derived sepsis. The competent state began at approximately 20 h postinfection (hpi) and facilitated systemic invasion and sepsis development and progressed in different manners. In some mice, acute pneumonia quickly led to sepsis and death, accompanied by increasing intensity of the competence signal. In the remaining mice, pneumonia lasted longer, with the competence signal decreasing at first but increasing as the infection became septic. The concentration of pneumococcal inoculum (1 × 106 to 1 × 108 CFU/mouse) and postinfection lung bacterial burden did not appreciably impact the kinetics of competence induction. Exogenously provided competence stimulating peptide 1 (CSP1) failed to modulate the onset kinetics of competence development in vivo The competence shutoff regulator DprA was highly expressed during pneumonia-derived sepsis but failed to turn off the competent state in mice. Competent D39 bacteria propagated the competence signal through cell-to-cell contact rather than the classically described quorum-sensing mechanism. Finally, clinical pneumococcal strains of different serotypes were also able to develop natural competence during pneumonia-derived sepsis.

Development of photo-amino acid derivative reactivity assay: a novel in chemico alternative method for predicting photoallergy.

Photoallergy test of cosmetics and several types of pharmaceutical substances is often necessary for obtaining approval from authorities. However, there are no official test guidelines for photoallergy evaluation. Therefore, we tried to establish a photoallergy test by utilizing an in chemico alternative sensitization method, amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA). To determine the criteria for judging the photoallergy potential, photo-ADRA with or without photoirradiation was performed using 60 photoallergenic chemicals, and cysteine and lysine derivatives were detected using high-performance liquid chromatography either by absorbance or fluorescence measurement. The accuracy of prediction was 81.4% (48 of 59) and 80.0% (48 of 60) using the absorbance and fluorescence methods, respectively. However, as chemicals can breakdown into multiple chemicals during photoirradiation, the absorbance method often cannot perform accurate detection due to co-elution, whereas the fluorescence method can do this due to lack of co-elution. Moreover, all eight chemicals that were found to be negative or false-positive for photoirritation in the 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test were confirmed as positive for photoallergy using this method. Furthermore, we prepared three types of pseudo-mixtures where we added one photoallergen along with five nonphotoallergens and performed the photo-ADRA by the ultraviolet and fluorescence methods. The result of the fluorescence method was almost the same as that obtained with the use of a single photoallergen and hence the outcome was not affected by the mixture. Thus, this study not only showed a method of evaluating the photoallergy potential of a single chemical but also a mixture, making it useful as an in chemico photoallergy alternative test.

Application of Spectro-DPRA, KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT to estimation of the skin sensitization potential of cosmetics ingredients.

Ethical issues in animal toxicity testing have led to the search for alternative methods to determine the skin sensitization potential of cosmetic products. The emergence of ethical testing issues has led to the development of many alternative methods that can reliably estimate skin sensitization potentials. However, a single alternative method may not be able to achieve high predictivity due to the complexity of the skin sensitization mechanism. Therefore, several prediction assays, including both in chemico and in vitro test methods, were investigated and integrated based on the skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway. In this study, we evaluated three different integrated approaches to predict a human skin sensitization hazard using data from in vitro assays (KeratinoSens™ and human cell line activation test [h-CLAT]), and a newly developed in chemico assay (spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay [Spectro-DPRA]). When the results of the in chemico and in vitro assays were combined, the predictivity of human data increased compared with that of a single assay. The highest predictivity was obtained for the approach in which sensitization potential was determined by Spectro-DPRA followed by final determination using the result of KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT assays (96.3% sensitivity, 87.1% specificity, 86.7% positive predictive value, 96.4% negative predictive value and 91.4% accuracy compared with human data). While further optimization is needed, we believe this integrated approach may provide useful predictive data when determining the human skin sensitization potential of chemicals.

Oxidation of a cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagent by dimethyl sulfoxide in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA), which is an in chemico alternative to the use of animals in testing for skin sensitization potential, offers significant advantages over the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) in that it utilizes nucleophilic reagents that are sensitive enough to be used with test chemical solutions prepared to concentrations of 1 mm, which is one-hundredth that of DPRA. ADRA testing of hydrophobic or other poorly soluble compounds requires that they be dissolved in a solvent consisting of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetonitrile. DMSO is known to promote dimerization by oxidizing thiols, which then form disulfide bonds. We investigated the extent to which DMSO oxidizes the cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagents used in both DPRA and ADRA and found that oxidation of both N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC) and cysteine peptide increases as the concentration of DMSO increases, thereby lowering the concentration of the nucleophilic reagent. We also found that use of a solvent consisting of 5% DMSO in acetonitrile consistently lowered NAC concentrations by about 0.4 µm relative to the use of solvents containing no DMSO. We also tested nine sensitizers and four nonsensitizers having different sensitization potencies to compare NAC depletion with and without 5% DMSO and found that reactivity was about the same with either solvent. Based on the above, we conclude that the use of a solvent containing 5% DMSO has no effect on the accuracy of ADRA test results. We plan to review and propose revisions to OECD Test Guideline 442C based on the above investigation.

DprA-Dependent Exit from the Competent State Regulates Multifaceted Streptococcus pneumoniae Virulence.

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) causes multiple infectious diseases. The pneumococcal competence system facilitates genetic transformation, spreads antibiotic resistance, and contributes to virulence. DNA-processing protein A (DprA) regulates the exit of pneumococcus from the competent state. Previously, we have shown that DprA is important in both bacteremia and pneumonia infections. Here, we examined the mechanisms of virulence attenuation in a ΔdprA mutant. Compared to the parental wild-type D39, the ΔdprA mutant enters the competent state when exposed to lower concentrations of the competence-stimulating peptide CSP1. The ΔdprA mutant overexpresses ComM, which delays cell separation after division. Additionally, the ΔdprA mutant overexpresses allolytic factors LytA, CbpD, and CibAB and is more susceptible to detergent-triggered lysis. Disabling of the competent-state-specific induction of ComM and allolytic factors compensated for the virulence loss in the ΔdprA mutant, suggesting that overexpression of these factors contributes to virulence attenuation. Finally, the ΔdprA mutant fails to downregulate the expression of multiple competence-regulated genes, leading to the excessive energy consumption. Collectively, these results indicate that an inability to properly exit the competent state disrupts multiple cellular processes that cause virulence attenuation in the ΔdprA mutant.

REACH alternative testing strategy for skin sensitization in practice: Fact or fiction?

From October 2016 the REACH Regulation requires an alternative testing strategy for skin sensitization. The current paper describes our experience when putting into practice the REACH alternative testing strategy with a modification for 50 industrial chemicals in total, including mono-constituents, multi-constituents and UVCBs. For mono- and multi-constituents, a tiered approach was followed starting with an in silico (Derek Nexus) assessment, DPRA and KeratinoSens™ assay, followed by a weight of evidence conclusion based on the generated data, or further testing using the U-SENS™ assay. For UVCBs testing started with the KeratinoSens™ assay followed by the U-SENS™ assay if additional relevant information could be gained for an overall conclusion. From the 50 substances tested, for 46% a conclusion on skin sensitization potential and potency could be drawn based on the non-animal testing strategy; however, 54% of the substances still needed to be studied in vivo due to discordant results from non-animal testing or the need for reliable potency data. Important issues with the currently available, validated non-animal methods are the lack or comparability of skin metabolism and lack of potency indication, which is present in the in vivo assays. Skin sensitization testing for UVCBs and multi-constituents is still in a grey area, as neither the in chemico, in vitro assays, and in vivo LLNA have been validated for UVCBs and multi-constituents.

In chemico assessment of potential sensitizers: Stability and direct peptide reactivity of 24 fragrance ingredients.

Twenty-four pure fragrance ingredients of concern as potential skin sensitizers were previously subjected to degradation studies and evaluated using the high throughput with dansyl cysteamine (HTS-DCYA) method. The experimental results showed that two-thirds of the 24 fragrance ingredients underwent chemical degradation. In some cases, such degradation was accompanied by an increase in thio-reactivity. These results prompted us to investigate the reactivity of the same ingredients using the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). In the present work, the 24 chemicals were subjected to forced degradation for 150 days, and evaluated with both DPRA and HTS-DCYA methods. At the end of the study, four and eight compounds remained non-reactive in the DPRA and DCYA assay, respectively. Coumarin, benzyl salicylate, benzyl cinnamate and hexyl cinnamal were found unreactive in both assays, while cinnamal, cinnamyl alcohol, hydroxycitronellal and lilial were found negative in the DCYA but positive in the DPRA method. The incongruity in reactivity of these four compounds was attributed to a possible role of pro-oxidants formed upon degradation, resulting in depletion of peptide without formation of apparent covalent adducts with the test chemical. To validate this hypothesis, the effect of hydrogen peroxide as model pro-oxidant on both lysine- and cysteine-heptapeptide depletion in the DPRA method was thus investigated. The obtained results showed little effect of oxidative conditions on lysine depletion, while cysteine depletion was significantly affected by concentrations above 1.1 mg/L of hydrogen peroxide. Overall, both in chemico methods confirmed chemical instability should be considered when assessing the skin sensitization potential of (un)known chemicals with alternative methods.

Cause of and countermeasures for oxidation of the cysteine-derived reagent used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.

The amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) is an in chemico alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization that solves certain problems found in the use of the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). During a recent validation study conducted at multiple laboratories as part of the process to include ADRA in an existing OECD test guideline, one of the nucleophilic reagents used in ADRA-N-(2-(1-naphthyl)acetyl)-l-cysteine (NAC)-was found to be susceptible to oxidation in much the same manner that the cysteine peptide used in DPRA was. Owing to this, we undertook a study to clarify the cause of the promotion of NAC oxidation. In general, cysteine and other chemicals that have thiol groups are known to oxidize in the presence of even minute quantities of metal ions. When metal ions were added to the ADRA reaction solution, Cu2+ promoted NAC oxidation significantly. When 0.25 µm of EDTA was added in the presence of Cu2+ , NAC oxidation was suppressed. Based on this, we predicted that the addition of EDTA to the NAC stock solution would suppress NAC oxidation. Next, we tested 82 chemicals used in developing ADRA to determine whether EDTA affects ADRA's ability to predict sensitization. The results showed that the addition of EDTA has virtually no effect on the reactivity of NAC with a test chemical, yielding an accuracy of 87% for predictions of skin sensitization, which was roughly the same as ADRA.

Assessment of the skin sensitisation hazard of functional polysiloxanes and silanes in the SENS-IS assay.

In the context of a larger testing programme that aimed at assessing the skin sensitisation potential of functional polysiloxanes and silanes, this investigation complements the available in vitro and in vivo data with data in the SENS-IS assay, a human in vitro 3D skin-based model. The SENS-IS assay allowed testing of all functional polysiloxanes and silanes without any solubility issues or limitations related to the multiconstituent nature of the commercial grade test substances. It appeared to encompass skin metabolism, a factor which we considered important for the skin sensitisation hazard assessment particularly of aminofunctionalised siloxanes and silanes. These three technical aspects posed significant challenges in the first part of the in vitro programme with the OECD-validated in vitro assays. The SENS-IS assay delivered promising results for this group of substances. On its own, it was the best performing model, as it did not pose any technical issues with the assay and it matched all in vivo outcomes. Considering its performance and avoidance of any limitations due to lack of solubility or chemical composition aspects, we concluded that the SENS-IS assay to be a suitable starting point for an integrated testing strategy for skin sensitisation for the group of functional polysiloxanes and silanes.

Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™ and in silico structure alert parameter.

It is important to predict the potential of cosmetic ingredients to cause skin sensitization, and in accordance with the European Union cosmetic directive for the replacement of animal tests, several in vitro tests based on the adverse outcome pathway have been developed for hazard identification, such as the direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™ and the human cell line activation test. Here, we describe the development of an artificial neural network (ANN) prediction model for skin sensitization risk assessment based on the integrated testing strategy concept, using direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens™, human cell line activation test and an in silico or structure alert parameter. We first investigated the relationship between published murine local lymph node assay EC3 values, which represent skin sensitization potency, and in vitro test results using a panel of about 134 chemicals for which all the required data were available. Predictions based on ANN analysis using combinations of parameters from all three in vitro tests showed a good correlation with local lymph node assay EC3 values. However, when the ANN model was applied to a testing set of 28 chemicals that had not been included in the training set, predicted EC3s were overestimated for some chemicals. Incorporation of an additional in silico or structure alert descriptor (obtained with TIMES-M or Toxtree software) in the ANN model improved the results. Our findings suggest that the ANN model based on the integrated testing strategy concept could be useful for evaluating the skin sensitization potential.