Improved ictal assessment performance in the epilepsy monitoring unit via standardization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the standardization and implementation of an ictal testing protocol in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) leads to improvements in ictal testing performance. METHODS: Ictal assessments completed in the EMU from a single center were retrospectively reviewed over a two-month period. Each assessment was evaluated to determine whether 8 high-yield aspects of the ictal assessment were performed. Following observation of performance, a standardized ictal testing protocol was developed based on a root cause analysis and review of consensus guidelines. This protocol was disseminated to staff in conjunction with an annual epilepsy education seminar. Ictal assessment performance was re-assessed during the subsequent two months (short-term follow-up) and again during a five- to seven-month period (long-term follow-up) beyond the initial intervention. For sub-group analysis, event characteristics (event type, time of assessment) and patient characteristics (age, gender) were also evaluated and analyzed in relation to ictal testing performance. RESULTS: All eight individual ictal testing elements were more likely to be assessed in short-term and long-term follow-up periods when compared to pre-intervention assessments. The cumulative difference in ictal testing was 20.4% (95% CI 3.7-37.2, p = 0.02) greater for the short-term period and 16.7% (95% CI -0.3% to 33.8%, p = 0.05) greater in the long-term period when compared to baseline testing. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a standardized ictal testing battery in conjunction with staff education leads to an objective improvement in ictal assessment performance. Further research is warranted to assess the replicability of our findings.

If seizures left speechless: CA-P-S C-A-R-E, a proposal of a new ictal language evaluation protocol.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to create standardized protocol for language examination in patients who underwent video-EEG recording and assessed its efficacy in the characterization of ictal language impairment, its ability to differentiate this from impaired awareness, and interobserver reliability in clinical practice. METHODS: From our database of video-EEG recordings, we selected a representative sample of 63 focal seizures with presumed language impairment. A multidisciplinary team of epileptologists, EEG technicians, and speech therapists analyzed the selected videos to highlight the critical issues of ordinary ictal language evaluation. We subsequently followed a multi-step process to develop the protocol and assess its interobserver reliability. RESULTS: A protocol based on seven tests in hierarchical succession was created, summed up in the acronym CA-P-S C-A-R-E (Closed Answers, Pro-speak question, Simple orders, Common object denomination, Audio repetition, Reading, Evoke). Following its preliminary administration for 5 months, we assessed the inter-observer reliability of 16 healthcare professionals in distinguishing between language impairment and impaired awareness among a sample of 10 seizures, finding a substantial agreement (kappa 0.61). CONCLUSION: The proposed protocol, made of simple and easy to memorize tests, is an effective tool that evaluates multiple domains beyond language. Its use could help to recognize ictal aphasia effectively and differentiate it from impaired awareness, minimizing inter-examiner variability.

Structured testing during seizures: A practical guide for assessing and interpreting ictal and postictal signs during video EEG long term monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Ictal and postictal testing carried out in long-term epilepsy monitoring units is often sub-optimal. Recently, a European consensus protocol for testing patients during and after seizures was developed by a joint taskforce of the International League Against Epilepsy - Commission on European Affairs and the European Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Association. AIM: Using this recently developed standardised assessment battery as a framework, the goal of this narrative review is to outline the proposed testing procedure in detail and explain the rationale for each individual component, focusing on the underlying neurobiology. This is intended to serve as an educational resource for staff working in epilepsy monitoring units. METHODS: A literature review of PubMed was performed; using the search terms "seizure", "ictal", "postictal", "testing", "examination", and "interview". Relevant literature was reviewed and relevant references were chosen. The work is presented as a narrative review. RESULTS: The proposed standardised assessment battery provides a comprehensive and user-friendly format for ictal-postictal testing, and examines consciousness, language, motor, sensory, and visual function. CONCLUSION: The standardised approach proposed has the potential to make full use of data recorded during video EEG increasing the diagnostic yield with regards to lateralisation and localisation, aiding both presurgical and diagnostic studies.

Video-EEG.

Indications for video-EEG monitoring (VEM) include differential diagnosis of paroxysmal events including epileptic seizures, organic nonepileptic seizures, and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures; classification of seizure types and electroclinical syndromes; quantification of seizures and of interictal and ictal epileptiform discharges; and presurgical evaluation in medically refractory epilepsy patients. Standardized questionnaires and examinations should be used on admission to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). Patients should be provided with comprehensive information concerning purpose and procedures during VEM and need to sign informed consents. Staff working in the EMU needs to be properly trained in the management of seizures and periictal testing according to written protocols as well as in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Minimum staffing ratios of dedicated healthcare professionals to patients have been recommended. Antiepileptic drug tapering/withdrawal needs to be individualized for each patient. EEG recordings have to be performed according to established guidelines. Cardiorespiratory monitoring including continuous ECG monitoring and continuous measurement of oxygen saturation is strongly recommended. Patient safety is of utmost importance during VEM. Indicators for reporting quality and safety have been developed. Standardized ictal testing protocols and standardized computer-based organized reporting should further improve standards of VEM and training of EMU staff, and facilitate data exchange and collaborations between EMUs.