Hepatic Oxygenation Changes and Symptomatic Intradialytic Hypotension.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical studies on differences among changes in cerebral and hepatic oxygenation during hemodialysis (HD) in patients with and without intradialytic hypotension (IDH) are limited. We investigated changes in intradialytic cerebral and hepatic oxygenation before systolic blood pressure (SBP) reached the nadir during HD and compared these differences between patients with and without symptomatic IDH. METHODS: We analyzed data from 109 patients with (n = 23) and without (n = 86) symptomatic IDH who were treated with HD. Cerebral and hepatic regional oxygen saturation (rSO2), as a marker of tissue oxygenation and circulation, was monitored during HD using an INVOS 5100c oxygen saturation monitor. Changes in cerebral or hepatic rSO2 when SBP reached the nadir during HD were compared between the groups of patients. RESULTS: The cerebral rSO2 before HD in patients with and without symptomatic IDH was 49.7 ± 11.2% and 51.3 ± 9.1% (p = 0.491). %Changes in cerebral rSO2 did not significantly differ between the two groups from 60 min before the SBP nadir during HD. Hepatic rSO2 before HD in patients with and without symptomatic IDH was 58.5 ± 15.4% and 57.8 ± 15.9% (p = 0.869). The %changes in hepatic rSO2 were significantly lower in patients with symptomatic IDH than in those without throughout the observational period (p < 0.001). We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and estimated cutoff values for changes in hepatic rSO2 as a symptomatic IDH predictor. The predictive ability at 5 and 40 min before symptomatic IDH onset was excellent, with AUCs and cutoff values of 0.847 and 0.841, and -10.9% and -5.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic oxygenation significantly decreased more in patients with symptomatic IDH before its onset, than in those without symptomatic IDH, whereas changes in cerebral oxygenation did not differ. Evaluating changes in hepatic oxygenation during HD might help to predict symptomatic IDH.

Association of frequent intradialytic hypotension with the clinical outcomes of patients on hemodialysis: a prospective cohort study.

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of hemodialysis (HD), but there is no consensus on its definition. In 2015, Flythe proposed a definition of IDH (Definition 1 in this study): nadir systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg during hemodialysis for patients with pre-dialysis SBP <159 mmHg, and nadir SBP <100 mmHg during hemodialysis for patients with pre-dialysis SBP ≥160 mmHg. This prospective observational cohort study investigated the association of frequent IDH based on Definition 1 with clinical outcomes and compared Definition 1 with a commonly used definition (nadir SBP <90 mmHg during hemodialysis, Definition 2). The incidence of IDH was observed over a 3-month exposure assessment period. Patients with IDH events ≥30% were classified as 'frequent IDH'; the others were 'infrequent IDH'. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause hospitalization events were followed up for 36 months. This study enrolled 163 HD patients. The incidence of IDH was 11.1% according to Definition 1 and 10.5% according to Definition 2. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that frequent IDH patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (p = 0.009, Definition 1; p = 0.002, Definition 2) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.021, Definition 1). Multivariable Cox regression analysis indicated that frequent IDH was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (Model 1: HR = 2.553, 95%CI 1.334-4.886, p = 0.005; Model 2: HR = 2.406, 95%CI 1.253-4.621, p = 0.008). In conclusion, HD patients classified as frequent IDH are at a greater risk of all-cause mortality. This highlights the significance of acknowledging and proactively managing frequent IDH within the HD patients.

Associations of Iron Sucrose and Intradialytic Blood Pressure.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension are associated with morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD). Many factors can contribute to intra-HD blood pressure (BP) changes, such as drugs with vasoactive properties that can destabilize an already tenuous BP. Intravenous iron sucrose is commonly administered to correct iron deficiency; however, its reported associations with altered hemodynamics have not been consistent. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 950 outpatients receiving maintenance HD. EXPOSURE: Iron sucrose administered during HD. OUTCOME: Intradialytic hypotension, intradialytic hypertension, systolic blood pressure parameters. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Unadjusted and adjusted Poisson and linear repeated measures regression models. RESULTS: The mean age of patients included in the study was 53±22 years, 43% were female, and 38% were Black. Mean pre-HD SBP was 152±26 (SD) mm Hg. At baseline, the patients who received higher doses of iron sucrose tended to have diabetes, have longer HD sessions, and have a higher frequency of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use, compared with those who did not receive iron sucrose. In adjusted models, higher doses of iron sucrose were associated with an 11% lower rate of intradialytic hypotension (incidence rate ratio [IRR] for iron sucrose≥100mg vs 0 mg, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.94]). In adjusted analyses, the administration of higher doses of iron sucrose during HD was associated with intradialytic hypertension (IRR for iron sucrose≥100mg vs 0 mg, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10]). LIMITATIONS: Nonavailability of the precise iron sucrose formulation (volume), laboratory data for each HD session, and outpatient medications. Objective measures of volume status, home medications, and symptom data were not recorded in this study. CONCLUSIONS: We observed an independent association of intravenous iron sucrose administration during HD with a lower risk of intradialytic hypotension and higher risk of intradialytic hypertension. Future studies to better understand the mechanisms underlying these associations are warranted. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension are common among patients on hemodialysis, and they are associated with morbidity and mortality. Although many factors may contribute to these risks, medications administered during hemodialysis play an important role. We studied the significance of the intravenous iron sucrose used to treat iron deficiency and the impact it may have on blood pressure during dialysis. In our study of 950 outpatient hemodialysis patients, we observed that administration of iron sucrose was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (during and after hemodialysis sessions) as well as a lower risk of intradialytic hypotension. We also observed that higher doses of iron sucrose are associated with the development of intradialytic hypertension.

Prediction of intradialytic hypotension using pre-dialysis features-a deep learning-based artificial intelligence model.

BACKGROUND: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a serious complication of hemodialysis (HD) that is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, its accurate prediction remains a clinical challenge. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict IDH using pre-dialysis features. METHODS: Data from 2007 patients with 943 220 HD sessions at seven university hospitals were used. The performance of the deep learning model was compared with three machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest and XGBoost). RESULTS: IDH occurred in 5.39% of all studied HD sessions. A lower pre-dialysis blood pressure (BP), and a higher ultrafiltration (UF) target rate and interdialytic weight gain in IDH sessions compared with non-IDH sessions, and the occurrence of IDH in previous sessions was more frequent among IDH sessions compared with non-IDH sessions. Matthews correlation coefficient and macro-averaged F1 score were used to evaluate both positive and negative prediction performances. Both values were similar in logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost and deep learning models, developed with data from a single session. When combining data from the previous three sessions, the prediction performance of the deep learning model improved and became superior to that of other models. The common top-ranked features for IDH prediction were mean systolic BP (SBP) during the previous session, UF target rate, pre-dialysis SBP, and IDH experience during the previous session. CONCLUSIONS: Our AI model predicts IDH accurately, suggesting it as a reliable tool for HD treatment.

Real-time prediction of intradialytic hypotension using machine learning and cloud computing infrastructure.

BACKGROUND: In maintenance hemodialysis patients, intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a frequent complication that has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. Prediction of IDH may facilitate timely interventions and eventually reduce IDH rates. METHODS: We developed a machine learning model to predict IDH in in-center hemodialysis patients 15-75 min in advance. IDH was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg. Demographic, clinical, treatment-related and laboratory data were retrieved from electronic health records and merged with intradialytic machine data that were sent in real-time to the cloud. For model development, dialysis sessions were randomly split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as a measure of the model's predictive performance. RESULTS: We utilized data from 693 patients who contributed 42 656 hemodialysis sessions and 355 693 intradialytic SBP measurements. IDH occurred in 16.2% of hemodialysis treatments. Our model predicted IDH 15-75 min in advance with an AUROC of 0.89. Top IDH predictors were the most recent intradialytic SBP and IDH rate, as well as mean nadir SBP of the previous 10 dialysis sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time prediction of IDH during an ongoing hemodialysis session is feasible and has a clinically actionable predictive performance. If and to what degree this predictive information facilitates the timely deployment of preventive interventions and translates into lower IDH rates and improved patient outcomes warrants prospective studies.

Application Value of Limb Ischemic Preconditioning in Preventing Intradialytic Hypotension during Maintenance Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of limb ischemia preconditioning (LIPC) in the treatment of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled case study. A total of 38 patients with MHD who met the inclusion criteria from September 2021 to August 2022 were selected from the Blood Purification Center of our hospital. They were randomly divided into the LIPC group (n = 19) and the control group (n = 19). For patients in the LIPC group, the femoral artery blood flow was blocked with an LIPC instrument for 5 min (pressurized to 200 mm Hg) before each dialysis, and they were reperfused for 5 min. The cycle was repeated five times, with a total of 50 min for 12 weeks. The control group was pressurized to 20 mm Hg with an LIPC instrument, and the rest was the same as the LIPC group. The blood pressure of 0 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and body weight before and after hemodialysis were measured in the two groups during hemodialysis, the incidence of IDH and the changes of serum troponin I (TNI) and creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) levels before and after the intervention were observed, and the ultrafiltration volume and ultrafiltration rate were recorded. RESULTS: At the 8th and 12th week after intervention, the MAP in the LIPC group was higher than that in the control group (103.28 ± 12.19 mm Hg vs. 93.18 ± 11.11 mm Hg, p = 0.04; 101.81 ± 11.36 mm Hg vs. 91.81 ± 11.92 mm Hg, p = 0.047). The incidence of IDH in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (36.5% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.01). The incidence of clinical treatment in IDH patients in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (6.3% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.00). The incidence of early termination of hemodialysis in the LIPC group was lower than that in the control group (1.6% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01). The levels of TNI and CK-MB in the LIPC group after the intervention were lower than those in the control group (322.30 ± 13.72 ng/dL vs. 438.50 ± 24.72 ng/dL, p = 0.00; 159.78 ± 8.48 U/dL vs. 207.00 ± 8.70 U/dL, p = 0.00). The changes of MAP before and after the intervention were negatively correlated with the changes of TNI and CK-MB before and after the intervention (r = -0.473, p = 0.04; r = -0.469, p = 0.04). There were no differences in dry body mass and ultrafiltration rate between the two groups before and after the LIPC intervention (p > 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis shows that TNI is the main influencing factor of ΔMAP. No LIPC-related adverse events were found during the study period. CONCLUSION: LIPC can effectively reduce the incidence of IDH in patients with MHD and may be associated with the alleviation of myocardial damage.

Effect of Fludrocortisone on Intradialytic Hypotension: An Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is an important complication during chronic hemodialysis due to its adverse cardiovascular and hemodialysis outcomes. Case reports have demonstrated that administration of fludrocortisone before undergoing hemodialysis might increase intradialytic blood pressure. This study is a randomized crossover study aiming to evaluate the intradialytic hemodynamic effects of fludrocortisone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, controlled two-period crossover trial was conducted at Lampang Hospital in stable chronic hemodialysis patients who experienced IDH >30% in their sessions during the past 3 months. All participants have randomly received a single dose of 0.2-mg fludrocortisone 30 min before each hemodialysis session, or had no treatment for 4 weeks. After a 2-week washout period, the participants were then switched to the other treatment for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean lowest intradialytic mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the hemodialysis session. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were recruited with a mean age of 61.7 ± 14.8 years. By analysis of crossover design, the mean lowest intradialytic MAP was not different between receiving fludrocortisone or with no treatment (76.1 ± 12.5 vs. 73.9 ± 11.5 mm Hg, p for treatment effect = 0.331, p for period effect = 0.855, p for sequence effect = 0.870). There was no difference in the incidence of IDH between the two groups (34.4% in fludrocortisone vs. 42.7% in no treatment, p = 0.137). However, in diabetic patients and patients with residual kidney function, the incidence of IDH was significantly lower when receiving fludrocortisone (30.8 vs. 52.6%, p < 0.001, and 27.6 vs. 74.3%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In chronic hemodialysis patients who had IDH, fludrocortisone administration did not improve intradialytic hemodynamics and did not decrease the incidence of IDH.

Prediction of Intradialytic Blood Pressure Variation Based on Big Data.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) events are the major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with blood pressure (BP) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. BP varies significantly during HD treatment, and the dramatic variation in BP is a well-recognized risk factor for increased mortality. The development of an intelligent system capable of predicting BP profiles for real-time monitoring is important. Our aim was to build a web-based system to predict changes in systolic BP (SBP) during HD. METHODS: In this study, dialysis equipment connected to the Vital Info Portal gateway collected HD parameters that were linked to demographic data stored in the hospital information system. There were 3 types of patients: training, test, and new. A multiple linear regression model was built using the training group with SBP change as the dependent variable and dialysis parameters as the independent variables. We tested the model's performance on test and new patient groups using coverage rates with different thresholds. The model's performance was visualized using a web-based interactive system. RESULTS: A total of 542,424 BP records were used for model building. The accuracy was greater than 80% in the prediction error range of 15%, and 20 mm Hg of true SBP in the test and new patient groups for the model of SBP changes suggested the good performance of our prediction model. In the analysis of absolute SBP values (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg), the accuracy of the SBP prediction increased as the threshold value increased. DISCUSSION: This databae supported our prediction model in reducing the frequency of intradialytic SBP variability, which may help in clinical decision-making when a new patient receives HD treatment. Further investigations are needed to determine whether the introduction of the intelligent SBP prediction system decreases the incidence of CV events in HD patients.

Impact of frequent intradialytic hypotension on quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is frequently accompanied by symptoms of nausea, dizziness, fatigue, muscle spasm, and arrhythmia, which can adversely impact the daily lives of patients who undergo hemodialysis and may lead to decreased quality of life (QoL). This study employed the KDQOL™-36 scale to evaluate the impact of frequent IDH, based on the definition determined by predialysis blood pressure (BP) and nadir systolic blood pressure (SBP) thresholds, on the QoL of patients. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective cohort study involving 160 hemodialysis patients. We enrolled adult patients with uremia who received routine hemodialysis (4 h/time, 3 times/week) from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021. Frequent IDH was defined as an absolute nadir SBP < 90 mmHg occurring in no less than 30% of hemodialysis sessions when predialysis SBP < 159 mmHg (or < 100 mmHg when predialysis BP ≥ 160 mmHg).The differences between patients with and without frequent IDH were compared using the independent t test, Kruskal‒Wallis test, or chi-square test. The primary visit was at month 36, and the remaining visits were exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to patients with infrequent IDH at baseline, those with frequent IDH had significantly lower scores on the symptoms and discomfort of kidney disease dimension at all follow-up points (P < 0.05). The symptoms and discomfort of kidney disease dimension were worse in patients with frequent IDH. Those with frequent IDH had a significantly poorer QoL regarding the dimensions of symptoms and discomfort of kidney disease and the impact of kidney disease on life. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study suggest an association between frequent IDH and QoL dimensions of symptoms and discomfort of kidney disease and the impact of kidney disease on life dimension under the definition of frequent IDH.

Influence of blood pressure variations during hemodialysis on the prognosis of dialysis patients.

The prognosis of dialysis patients is poorer than that of the general population. The relationship between dialysis patients' blood pressure (BP) and mortality is controversial. We investigated the relationships between mortality and (i) pre-dialysis BP and (ii) BP variation during hemodialysis in maintenance dialysis patients.We retroactively analyzed the cases of the 284 patients on hemodialysis (mean age 68 ± 13 years old) who had been regularly followed at Kokura Daiichi Hospital, Japan in 2018. We assessed the relationship between the patients' BP components and risk of mortality over a 40-month follow-up.The patients' average systolic/diastolic BP values before dialysis in 2018 were 145 ± 18/77 ± 11, and those after dialysis were 129 ± 17/71 ± 10 mmHg. The prevalence of intradialytic hypotension was 46.8%. During an average follow-up of 35 months, 72 patients died, including from infectious diseases (n = 41), cardiovascular diseases (n = 9), malignancies (n = 5), and others (n = 17). The mortality rate was 32.7% in the pre-dialysis SBP < 140 mmHg group, 20.6% in the 140-159 mmHg group, and 22.2% in ≥ 160 mmHg group. In a multivariable-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio for mortality in the pre-dialysis SBP < 140 mmHg group with intradialytic hypotension was significantly higher than that in the 140-159 mmHg group.In dialysis patients, pre-dialysis SBP < 140 mmHg and intradialytic hypotension posed a significantly higher risk for mortality. Our findings suggest that not only lower pre-dialysis BP, but also intradialytic hypotension is associated with poor prognosis in dialysis patients.

Vascular Access in Hemodialysis: Peculiarities in a Low-Income Setting, Pattern, Prevalence and Relationship with Intradialysis Events and Dialysis Dose.

OBJECTIVES: Dialysis vascular access has remained a major determinant of intra and inter-dialytic events and the dialysis dose, and this impacts the quality of life, morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients. Assessing the different access types would help minimize peri-dialytic events and improve outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective, age and sex-matched, comparative study that assessed dialysis sessions with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) with arteriovenous fistula (AVF). RESULTS: Two hundred and four participants with 1062 sessions were involved. The male participants had 66.7% of all sessions, 60.6% of sessions with TDCs and 87.3% of sessions with AVF, P=0.001. The elderly constituted 23.5% of all participants but 37.7% of sessions with AVF, P=0.04. The percentage of the health-insured was more in sessions with AVF compared to the study population, P<0.001. Diabetics were more likely to use the TDCs, P=0.06. Participants using AVF were more likely to receive full dialysis and erythropoietin treatment, P<0.001. Intradialytic hypotension and dialysis termination were commoner with AVF than TDCs, P=0.03 and P=0.04 respectively. The dialysis dose was higher with AVF than TDCs, P=0.02. Predictors of AVF as dialysis access were male gender, advancing age, health insurance and full treatment compliance. CONCLUSION: There is predominance of venous catheters in our dialysis population. The AVF gave better BP control, fluid and solute clearance, and dialysis dose, and was commoner with males, the health insured and older participants. Intradialytic hypotension was commoner with AVF as IDHT was commoner with TDCs.

OBJECTIFS: L'accès vasculaire à la dialyse reste un déterminant majeur des événements intra et inter-dialytiques et de la dose de dialyse, ce qui a un impact sur la qualité de vie, la morbidité et lamortalité des dialysés. L'évaluation des différents types d'accès permettrait de minimiser les événements péridialytiques et d'améliorer les résultats. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une étude comparative rétrospective, appariée selon l'âge et le sexe, qui a évalué les séances de dialyse avec des cathéters de dialyse tunnellisés (CDT) et des fistules artérioveineuses (FAV). RÉSULTATS: Deux cent quatre participants ont participé à 1 062 séances. Les hommes représentaient 66,7 % de toutes les séances, 60,6 % des séances avec CDT et 87,3 % des séances avec FAV, P=0,001. Les personnes âgées représentaient 23,5 % de l'ensemble des participants, mais 37,7 % des séances avec FVA, P=0,04. Le pourcentage d'assurés sociaux était plus élevé dans les sessions avec AVF que dans la population étudiée, P<0.001. Les diabétiques étaient plus susceptibles d'utiliser les CDT, P=0,06. Les participants utilisant la FVA étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir une dialyse complète et un traitement à l'érythropoïétine, P<0,001. L'hypotension intradialytique et l'arrêt de la dialyse étaient plus fréquents avec l'AVF qu'avec les CDT, P=0,03 et P=0,04. La dose de dialyse était plus élevée en cas de FVA qu'en cas de CDT, P=0,02. Les facteurs prédictifs de l'utilisation de la FVA comme accès à la dialyse étaient le sexe masculin, l'âge avancé, l'assurance maladie et l'observance totale du traitement. CONCLUSION: Il y a une prédominance des cathéters veineux dans notre population de dialysés. Le FVA permet un meilleur contrôle de la PA, de la clairance des fluides et des solutés et de la dose de dialyse, et il est plus fréquent chez les hommes, les assurés sociaux et les participants plus âgés. L'hypotension intradialytique était plus fréquente avec le FVA que l'IDHT était plus fréquente avec les CDT. Mots-clés: Cathéters veineux centraux, fistule artério-veineuse, veine jugulaire interne tunnellisée.

Circumferential Strain as a Marker of Vessel Reactivity in Patients with Intradialytic Hypotension.

Background and Objectives: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) complicates 4 to 39.9% of hemodialysis (HD) sessions. Vessels' reactivity disturbances may be responsible for this complication. Two-dimensional speckle tracking is used to assess arterial circumferential strain (CS) as a marker of the effectiveness of the cardiovascular response to the reduction of circulating plasma. Materials and Methods: The common carotid artery (CCA) and common iliac artery (CIA) CSs were recorded using ultrasonography in 68 chronically dialyzed patients before and after one HD session. Results: In patients with IDH episodes (n = 26), the CCA-CS was significantly lower both before (6.28 ± 2.34 vs. 4.63 ± 1.74 p = 0.003) and after HD (5.00 (3.53-6.78) vs. 3.79 ± 1.47 p = 0.010) than it was in patients without this complication. No relationship was observed between CIA-CS and IDH. IDH patients had a significantly higher UF rate; however, they did not differ compared to complication-free patients either in anthropometric or laboratory parameters. Conclusions: Patients with IDH were characterized by lower pre- and post-HD circumferential strain of the common carotid artery. The lower CCA-CS showed that impaired vascular reactivity is one of the most important risk factors for this complication's occurrence.

Association of cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessed by heart rate response during exercise with intradialytic hypotension and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

The heart rate (HR) reflects the dynamic behavior of the autonomic nervous system, and HR profiles during the exercise test provide prognostic information. However, there are no reports of these factors in hemodialysis patients. Data from 256 patients (mean 68.8 years old) who underwent an exercise test were statistically analyzed. Patients were evaluated for the percent HR reserve from HR at peak exercise, HR recovery for one minute after peak exercise, and exercise capacity, as well as intradialytic hypotension (IDH). The prevalence of chronotropic incompetence (96.1%), defined as under 80% HR reserve, and abnormal HR recovery (60.5%), defined as under 12 beats, were very common. Eighty-four deaths occurred during the follow-up period (median, 3.8 years). A slow HR recovery under 7 beats was associated with IDH after adjustment (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.4). HR recovery under 12 beats (hazard ratio over study period 5.1, 95% confidence interval 2.5-10.5), HR reserve under 26.2% (3.4, 1.7-6.8), and IDH (1.7, 1.1-2.8) were associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment. Considering the confounding of all three variables, only HR recovery under 12 beats remained associated with the all-cause and cause-specific mortality ("cardiovascular" and "non-cardiovascular"). This association was consistent even in subgroup analyses based on the presence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Thus, HR profiles during the exercise can reflect potential health conditions related to cardiac autonomic neuropathy in hemodialysis patients that affect IDH and their survival.

A randomized controlled trial of two dialysate sodium concentrations in hospitalized hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Several large dialysis organizations have lowered the dialysate sodium concentration (DNa) in an effort to ameliorate hypervolemia. The implications of lower DNa on intra-dialytic hypotension (IDH) during hospitalizations of hemodialysis (HD) patients is unclear. METHODS: In this double-blind, single center, randomized controlled trial (RCT), hospitalized maintenance HD patients were randomized to receive higher (142 mmol/L) or lower (138 mmol/L) DNa for up to six sessions. Blood pressure (BP) was measured in a standardized fashion pre-HD, post-HD and every 15 min during HD. The endpoints were: (i) the average decline in systolic BP (pre-HD minus lowest intra-HD, primary endpoint) and (ii) the proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH (drop of ≥20 mmHg from the pre-HD systolic BP, secondary endpoint). RESULTS: A total of 139 patients completed the trial, contributing 311 study visits. There were no significant differences in the average systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline between the higher and lower DNa groups (23 ± 16 versus 26 ± 16 mmHg; P = 0.57). The proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH was similar in the higher DNa group, compared with the lower DNa group [54% versus 59%; odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.36-1.44; P = 0.35]. In post hoc analyses adjusting for imbalances in baseline characteristics, higher DNa was associated with 8 mmHg (95% CI 2-13 mmHg) less decline in SBP, compared with lower DNa. Patient symptoms and adverse events were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT for hospitalized maintenance of HD patients, we found no difference in the absolute SBP decline between those who received higher versus lower DNa in intention-to-treat analyses. Post hoc adjusted analyses suggested a lower risk of IDH with higher DNa; thus, larger, multi-center studies to confirm these findings are warranted.

Prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a critical complication in patients undergoing dialysis. Although the improvement of AIS management is an urgent requirement, few studies have evaluated the prognostic factors of AIS in these patients. This study aimed to assess the relationship between clinical factors in patients undergoing dialysis and the prognosis of AIS. METHODS: Among 1267 patients who were hospitalized for AIS in Sendai City Hospital from January 2015 to June 2020, 81 patients undergoing hemodialysis were retrospectively enrolled. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of baseline characteristics, dialysis factors, and neurological severity of patients at admission [National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score] on in-hospital mortality, physical disability, and the need for rehabilitation transfer. RESULTS: A higher NIHSS score was a critical risk factor for each outcome and the only significant factor for in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR)/point 1.156, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.054-1.267]. The risk factors of physical disability were NIHSS score (OR/point 1.458, 95% CI 1.064-1.998), older age (OR/year 1.141, 95% CI 1.022-1.274), diabetic nephropathy (OR 7.096, 95% CI 1.066-47.218), and higher premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (OR/grade 2.144, 95% CI 1.155-3.978); while those of rehabilitation transfer were a higher NIHSS score (OR/point 1.253, 95% CI 1.080-1.455), dialysis vintage (OR/year 1.175, 95% CI 1.024-1.349), and intradialytic hypotension before onset (OR 5.430, 95% CI 1.320-22.338). CONCLUSIONS: Along with neurological severity, dialysis vintage, intradialytic hypotension, and diabetic nephropathy could worsen the prognosis of patients with AIS undergoing hemodialysis.

Changes in total and segmental extracellular and intracellular volumes with hypotension during hemodialysis measured with bioimpedance spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices have been advocated to guide volume management in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We hypothesized that understanding the dynamics of fluid shifts in different body segments may provide additional insight on preventive measures to reduce the risk of intradialytic hypotension. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among 42 HD patients at risk of hypotension who were admitted as emergencies inpatient. RESULTS: A total of 191 BIA measurements were made during the 42 HD sessions, and hypotension occurred during 52 measurements (27%). The extracellular water (ECW) to intracellular water ratio (EIR) was measured in different body segments and declined significantly only in the non-access arm with increasing HD session duration (ß = -0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.05 to -0.03, p < 0.01). There was no significant association between EIR and hypotension with respect to the different body segments. Only pre-HD N-terminal-pro b-type natriuretic peptide was significantly associated with hypotension (ß = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.89, p = 0.04). There was no association between relative blood volume monitoring change and EIR. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found that segmental BIA during HD was unable to detect or predict hypotension during dialysis. Although BIA is able to provide information about ECW and guide clinical assessment of volume in HD patients prior to dialysis, our findings did not suggest the use of serial measurements of changes in EIR in different body segments during HD provided sufficient information to predict intradialytic hypotension. Similarly, changes in EIR did not provide information on changes in plasma volume that could potentially trigger interventions to prevent or reduce intra-dialytic hypotension.

Benefit of an Internet-Based Management System among Hemodialysis Patients at the Risk of Intradialytic Hypotension and Muscle Cramps: A Controlled before and after Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to observe the impact of an internet-based management system on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) and muscle cramps in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: The patients, who underwent maintenance hemodialysis in the center from January 2018 to June 2020, were recruited and divided into the pre-intervention group (before operation of the internet-based hemodialysis management system, from January 2018 to December 2018) and intervention group (after operation of the system, from June 2019 to June 2020). The clinical outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The compound endpoint of >1 IDH or muscle cramps happened in 182 patients (61.7%) in the pre-intervention group and 99 participants (30.8%) in the intervention group (relative risk [RR] = 0.50 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42; 0.60]). IDH occurred in 122 patients (1-5 episodes in 47 patients, 6-10 episodes in 25 patients, and >10 episodes in 50 patients) and 33 patients (30 patients had 1-5 episodes and 3 patients had 6-10 episodes) before and after execution of the internet-based management system, respectively (RR = 0.25 [95% CI, 0.18; 0.35]). The incidence of muscle cramps was significantly decreased (RR = 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45; 0.73]) after the implementation of the system, and the number of patients with 6-10 episodes dropped from 10 to 1. Multivariate analyses also showed significantly lower RRs in the intervention group: 0.29 ([95% CI, 0.20; 0.41]) for IDH and 0.58 ([95% CI, 0.45; 0.74]) for muscle cramps. Compared with the pre-intervention, participants in the intervention group had a large improvement in self-management (p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study found that the internet-based hemodialysis management system was effective in reducing the IDH and muscle cramp events and improving self-management. It provided a significant implication for the development and application of internet-based programs in hemodialysis management.

Use of an RN-Initiated Protocol for Recognition, Management, and Documentation of Intradialytic Hypotension in Patients with End Stage Kidney Disease on In-Center Hemodialysis: A Quality Improvement Project.

Although intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is the most frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD), there is currently no standardized definition or uniform practice recommendations for response. A quality improvement project included nine registered nurses (RNs) and 96 adult patients receiving HD at a 30-station Midwest urban dialysis clinic. The project focused on development of an evidence-based RN-initiated protocol, RN education, and implementation of the RN-initiated protocol to recognize, treat, and document IDH. IDH was recognized in 7.02% of dialysis treatments, with protocol use doubling from Week 1 to Week 8. Most IDH episodes were resolved after one (36%) or two (49.33%) 10-minute ultrafiltration (UF) pauses with interventions. The use of an RN-initiated IDH protocol standardized care and led to positive patient outcomes in this dialysis clinic.

The time of onset of intradialytic hypotension during a hemodialysis session associates with clinical parameters and mortality.

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of hemodialysis, but there is no data about the time of onset during treatment. Here we describe the incidence of IDH throughout hemodialysis and associations of time of hypotension with clinical parameters and survival by analyzing data from 21 dialysis clinics in the United States to include 785682 treatments from 4348 patients. IDH was defined as a systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or under while IDH incidence was calculated in 30-minute intervals throughout the hemodialysis session. Associations of time of IDH with clinical and treatment parameters were explored using logistic regression and with survival using Cox-regression. Sensitivity analysis considered further IDH definitions. IDH occurred in 12% of sessions at a median time interval of 120-149 minutes. There was no notable change in IDH incidence across hemodialysis intervals (range: 2.6-3.2 episodes per 100 session-intervals). Relative blood volume and ultrafiltration volume did not notably associate with IDH in the first 90 minutes but did thereafter. Associations between central venous but not arterial oxygen saturation and IDH were present throughout hemodialysis. Patients prone to IDH early as compared to late in a session had worse survival. Sensitivity analyses suggested IDH definition affects time of onset but other analyses were comparable. Thus, our study highlights the incidence of IDH during the early part of hemodialysis which, when compared to later episodes, associates with clinical parameters and mortality.

Intradialytic Hypotension and Newly Recognized Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) may decrease systemic circulation to the legs, exacerbating symptoms of peripheral artery disease (PAD). We sought to evaluate the relationship between IDH and newly recognized lower extremity PAD among hemodialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Linking data from the US Renal Data System to the electronic health records of a large dialysis provider, we identified adult patients (≥18 years of age) with Medicare Parts A and B who initiated dialysis (2006-2011) without previously recognized PAD. EXPOSURE: The time-varying proportion of hemodialysis sessions with IDH defined as the nadir intradialytic systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg. We categorized the proportion of sessions with IDH within serial 30-day intervals as 0%, >0% to <15%, 15% to <30%, and ≥30%. OUTCOMES: Newly recognized PAD was ascertained using PAD diagnostic and procedure codes for amputation or revascularization, in serial 30-day intervals subsequent to each 30-day exposure interval. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: To account for the competing risks of death and kidney transplantation, we estimated unadjusted and adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios using the Kaplan-Meier multiple imputation method in combination with the extended Cox model to account for IDH as a time-varying exposure. RESULTS: Among 45,591 patients, those with more frequent baseline IDH had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. During 61,725 person-years of follow-up, 7,886 patients had newly recognized PAD. We found a graded, direct association between IDH and newly recognized PAD. For example, having IDH in ≥30% of dialysis sessions during a given 30-day interval (vs 0%) was associated with a 24% (95% CI, 17%-32%) higher hazard than having newly recognized PAD in the subsequent 30 days. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounding; ascertainment of PAD from claims. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving hemodialysis who had more frequent IDH had higher rates of newly recognized PAD. Patients with frequent IDH may warrant careful examination for PAD.