Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 279
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Cancer ; 155(1): 19-26, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532545

RESUMEN

Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) prior to an epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis has been suggested to be associated with improved survival. In a recent nationwide cohort study, we found that prediagnostic long-term MHT use, especially estrogen therapy (ET), was associated with improved long-term survival in women with nonlocalized EOC. Our aim was to investigate the influence of prediagnostic MHT use on long-term survival among women with localized EOC in the same nationwide study. Our study cohort comprised all women aged 50 years or older with an EOC diagnosis in Denmark 2000-2014 (n = 2097) identified from the Extreme study. We collected information on usage of systemic ET and estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT) from the Danish National Prescription Registry. By using pseudo-values, 5- and 10-year absolute and relative survival probabilities were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) while adjusting for histology, comorbidity, and income. Relative survival probabilities >1 indicate better survival. The 5-year absolute survival probabilities were 61% and 56%, respectively, among women who were nonusers and users of prediagnostic MHT, whereas these numbers were 46% and 41%, respectively, regarding 10-year survival. Use of MHT was not significantly associated with an improved 5- or 10-year survival in women with localized EOC (5-year relative survival probability = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89-1.02; 10-year relative survival probability = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.02). Similar findings were seen for systemic ET or EPT use. Our findings do not suggest a positive benefit from prediagnostic MHT use on long-term survival of localized EOC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Anciano , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios de Cohortes , Menopausia , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Progestinas/administración & dosificación
2.
Int J Cancer ; 2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222307

RESUMEN

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use before ovarian cancer diagnosis has been associated with improved survival but whether the association varies by type and duration of use is inconclusive; data on MHT use after treatment, particularly the effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), are scarce. We investigated survival in women with ovarian cancer according to MHT use before and after diagnosis, and post-treatment MHT use and its association with HRQOL in a prospective nationwide cohort in Australia. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and propensity scores to reduce confounding by indication. Among 690 women who were peri-/postmenopausal at diagnosis, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with a significant 26% improvement in ovarian cancer-specific survival; with a slightly stronger association for high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.87). The associations did not differ by recency or duration of use. Among women with HGSC who were pre-/perimenopausal or aged ≤55 years at diagnosis (n = 259), MHT use after treatment was not associated with a difference in survival (HR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.48-2.22). Compared to non-users, women who started MHT after treatment reported poorer overall HRQOL before starting MHT and this difference was still seen 1-3 months after starting MHT. In conclusion, pre-diagnosis MHT use was associated with improved survival, particularly in HGSC. Among women ≤55 years, use of MHT following treatment was not associated with poorer survival for HGSC. Further large-scale studies are needed to understand menopause-specific HRQOL issues in ovarian cancer.

3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 203(1): 121-124, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728692

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Over the past half century, the annual age-adjusted breast cancer incidence in the USA has fluctuated, potentially influenced by changes in mammography screening, obesity, and menopausal hormone therapy. As the relative contributions of these factors on breast cancer incidence have not been resolved, we assembled reliable sources of year-to-year changes in mammography, obesity, and hormone therapy to graphically display their relationship to breast cancer incidence through 50 years. METHODS: Year-to-year trends were assembled: for mammography from the Center for Disease Control National Health Interviews; for hormone therapy from the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer report; for obesity from the NCD (Non-Communicable Diseases) Risk Factor Collaboration; and for breast cancer for US women 50-64 years of age from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry findings. RESULTS: Increases in age-adjusted breast cancer incidence trend from about 1982 to 2002 track both mammography and hormone therapy use but not obesity. However, the sudden decrease in breast cancer incidence in 2003, subsequently sustained at a lower incidence level, only tracks the parallel reduction in hormone therapy use. CONCLUSION: The sustained reduction in hormone therapy use from 2003 provides a plausible explanation for most of the lower breast cancer incidence seen in US postmenopausal women during the last two decades. The strong observational study obesity association with higher breast cancer risk is not reflected in breast cancer incidence trends.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Incidencia , Mamografía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Menopausia , Hormonas
4.
HIV Med ; 25(2): 174-187, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776176

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of women living with HIV are transitioning through midlife and menopause. Women living with HIV may experience earlier menopause and a higher symptom burden than women without HIV, but more evidence is needed. Data collection on menopause in women living with HIV is scarce and often not standardized. We sought to assess how menopause data are collected in cohorts and studies of women living with HIV. METHODS: This was a literature review conducted within the PubMed database. We included original studies and cohorts assessing menopause and/or menopausal symptoms in women living with HIV. Study characteristics and menopause data collection, including the definition of menopause, symptom assessment tools, and measurement of biomedical parameters, were noted and summarized systematically in data tables. RESULTS: We included 40 articles describing 37 separate studies published between 2000 and 2023; 27 of these were conducted in high-income countries, the majority in the USA (n = 16). Ten studies were from low- and middle-income countries; four of these were conducted in Brazil. In 20 studies, menopause was defined according to the World Health Organization's definition of over 12 months of amenorrhea. Twelve studies used the Menopause Rating Scale to characterize menopausal symptoms, five studies used other specified symptom assessment tools, and 12 studies used a study-specific tool. CONCLUSIONS: Menopause data collection in women living with HIV is heterogeneous. We propose that standardized tools should be used to enable comparisons between studies and countries, thereby improving the quality of research and clinical treatment. Further research into the validity of menopausal symptom scoring tools is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Menopausia , Recolección de Datos , Brasil
5.
AIDS Care ; 36(1): 107-114, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321982

RESUMEN

ABSTRACTWomen living with HIV are reaching older age and experiencing menopause and age-related comorbidities. Data suggest that women living with HIV experience earlier menopause and more menopausal symptoms and age-related comorbidities compared to women without HIV. However, there are no guidelines on the screening for and management of age-related comorbidities and events in women living with HIV. Moreover, little is known about provision of care to this population across Europe. We surveyed 121 HIV healthcare providers in 25 World Health Organization European countries to ascertain screening practices for, and management of, menopause, psychosocial and sexual well-being and age-related comorbidities in women with HIV. Most respondents screened for diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and poor mental health at least annually. Low bone mineral density (BMD) was regularly checked but less than once a year. Fewer regularly screened for sexual well-being and intimate partner violence. Menstrual pattern and menopausal symptoms in women aged 45-54 were assessed by 67% and 59% of respondents. 44% stated that they were not confident assessing menopausal status and/or symptoms. CVD, diabetes, low BMD and poor mental health were managed mainly within HIV clinics, whereas menopause care was mainly provided by gynaecology or primary care. Most respondents stated a need for HIV and menopause guidelines. In conclusion, we found that whilst metabolic risk factors and poor mental health are regularly screened for, psychosocial and sexual well-being and menopausal symptoms could be improved. This highlights the need for international recommendations and clinician training to ensure the health of this population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Infecciones por VIH , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Menopausia/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología
6.
BJOG ; 131(4): 500-507, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667667

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in premenopausal women after bilateral oophorectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective register-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden. POPULATION: Swedish women aged 35-44 years without malignancy who underwent bilateral oophorectomy in 2005-2020 were identified using The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). METHODS: Data from GynOp were cross-linked with data on dispensed drugs extracted from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of women dispensed MHT at least once within 1 year after surgery. Repeated treatment episodes were defined, and the proportion of 'person time' covered by dispensations was analysed. RESULTS: In total, 1231 of all women (n = 1706) were dispensed MHT at some point after surgery, with 1177 women dispensed MHT within 1 year. This proportion increased from 64% in 2005 to 84% in 2019 (p < 0.001). In the total population, 4537 'treatment years' transpired, corresponding to 43% of the mean time covered. In women dispensed MHT within 1 year, the proportion of time covered was 63%. CONCLUSIONS: Only 69% of all women without malignancy of any kind who underwent bilateral oophorectomy were dispensed MHT within 1 year after surgery, and the duration of treatment was limited. It is important to study further the reasons behind the low dispensation rate in this group to increase adherence to current treatment guidelines, improve quality of life, and avoid increased morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia Prematura , Neoplasias , Femenino , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ovariectomía , Menopausia
7.
BJOG ; 131(9): 1306-1317, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465460

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), according to various regimens, dosages, routes of administration and starting ages of MHT. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Services database. SETTING: Nationwide health insurance database. POPULATION: Women who reported entering menopause at an age of ≥40 years with no history of CVD in the national health examination. METHODS: The study population comprised 1 120 705 subjects enrolled between 2002 and 2019, categorised according to MHT status (MHT group, n = 319 007; non-MHT group, n = 801 698). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of CVD (a composite of myocardial infarction and stroke). RESULTS: The incidence of CVD was 59 266 (7.4%) in the non-MHT group and 17 674 (5.5%) in the MHT group. After adjusting for confounding factors, an increased risk of CVD was observed with the administration of tibolone (hazard ratio, HR 1.143, 95% CI 1.117-1.170), oral estrogen (HR 1.246, 95% CI 1.198-1.295) or transdermal estrogen (HR 1.289, 95% CI 1.066-1.558), compared with the non-MHT group; the risk was based on an increased risk of stroke. The risk trends were consistent regardless of the age of starting MHT or the physicians' specialty. Among tibolone users, a longer period from entering menopause to taking tibolone and the use of any dosage (1.25 or 2.5 mg) were linked with a higher risk of CVD, compared with non-MHT users. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide cohort study demonstrated an increased risk of CVD, driven mainly by an increased risk of stroke, among tibolone and oral or transdermal estrogen users, compared with that of non-MHT users.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Norpregnenos , Posmenopausia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/estadística & datos numéricos , Norpregnenos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Incidencia , Adulto , Anciano , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Bases de Datos Factuales
8.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 24(1): 1-15, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102502

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the potential for exogenous hormones to influence risk and course of MS, this narrative review aims to summarize current knowledge from observational and interventional studies of exogenous hormones in humans with MS. RECENT FINDINGS: Large randomized clinical trials for combined oral contraceptives and estriol both show modest effect on inflammatory activity, with the latter showing potential neuroprotective effect. After fertility treatment, large actively treated cohorts have not confirmed any elevated risk of relapse. Preclinical data suggest that androgens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) may be neuroprotective but clinical data are lacking. Gender affirming treatment, particularly estrogen in trans-women, could possibly be associated with elevated risk of inflammation. For women with MS entering menopause, hormone therapy appears safe during the appropriate menopausal window, but its long-term effects on neuroprotection are unknown. Exogenous hormones, used in varied doses and for diverse indications, have variable effects on MS risk, inflammatory activity, and neuroprotection. Large randomized trials are needed before it is possible to determine the true effect of exogenous hormones in a condition as complex as MS.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Menopausia
9.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 39(3): 313-322, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212490

RESUMEN

Sarcoidosis incidence peaks in women between 50 and 60 years old, which coincides with menopause, suggesting that certain sex hormones, mainly estrogen, may play a role in disease development. We investigated whether menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was associated with sarcoidosis risk in women and whether the risk varied by treatment type. We performed a nested case-control study (2007-2020) including incident sarcoidosis cases from the Swedish National Patient Register (n = 2593) and matched (1:10) to general population controls (n = 20,003) on birth year, county, and living in Sweden at the time of sarcoidosis diagnosis. Dispensations of MHT were obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register before sarcoidosis diagnosis/matching. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of sarcoidosis were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Ever MHT use was associated with a 25% higher risk of sarcoidosis compared with never use (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38). When MHT type and route of administration were considered together, systemic estrogen was associated with the highest risk of sarcoidosis (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.23-1.85), followed by local estrogen (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.42), while systemic estrogen-progestogen combined was associated with the lowest risk compared to never users (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.96-1.31). The aOR of sarcoidosis did not differ greatly by duration of MHT use. Our findings suggest that a history of MHT use is associated with increased risk of sarcoidosis, with women receiving estrogen administered systemically having the highest risk.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia , Sarcoidosis , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Suecia/epidemiología , Sarcoidosis/epidemiología , Sarcoidosis/etiología , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos
10.
Climacteric ; 27(1): 93-103, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933495

RESUMEN

This systematic review assesses the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on cardiovascular outcomes and risk factors in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies using methodology from a previous Cochrane review. Quality assessment used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale, respectively. From 5647 studies identified, 29 (23 RCTs and six observational studies) were included. Most studies were conducted in North America or Europe and investigated oral estrogens. Participants were older with varying frequency of cardiac risk factors and underlying CVD. No significant difference was observed between MHT users and controls regarding primary outcomes of non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death or stroke. No difference in frequency of angina, heart failure and transient ischemic attacks was observed. Inconsistent effects of MHT on angiographic progression were seen and varied with glycemic status. Estradiol had a positive effect on flow-mediated dilatation. Limited studies identified differing effects of MHT on cardiac risk factors, varying with estrogen preparation. This study confirms no benefit of MHT for secondary CVD prevention, highlighting evidence limitations and the importance of shared decision-making when managing menopausal symptoms in women with CVD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Menopausia , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Estrógenos/farmacología , Estradiol/uso terapéutico , Estradiol/farmacología
11.
Climacteric ; 27(2): 165-170, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947171

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Long-term protective effects of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) at fractures with different doses and components are controversial. We analyzed the effect of MHT on the incidence of spine and femur fractures according to MHT type, age at commencement, duration and dose of hormones in Korean women. METHOD: This retrospective study evaluated propensity score-matched patients with MHT from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Among women aged ≥50 years with menopause between 2004 and 2007, spine and femur fracture incidence until 2017 was analyzed in 36,446 women who had received MHT for >1 year. Estrogen-progesterone therapy (EPT), estrogen-only therapy (ET) or tibolone therapy was conducted. RESULTS: EPT significantly lowered the incidence of spine and femur fractures with a conventional dose, but not with a low dose. Tibolone significantly decreased the incidence of spine fractures in women aged 50-59 years when used for >5 years, and the incidence of femur fractures in women older than 60 years when used for >3 years. ET significantly lowered the risk of femur fractures when estradiol was used for >5 years. CONCLUSION: In menopausal women, all MHT including conventional-dose EPT, ET and tibolone tended to lower the incidence of fractures. The effects, however, varied with the type of fracture and type of MHT.


Asunto(s)
Menopausia , Posmenopausia , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Estrógenos/farmacología , Progesterona/farmacología , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno
12.
Climacteric ; : 1-8, 2024 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39037037

RESUMEN

Fibromyalgia (FM) and climacteric conditions share common epidemiological and clinical features, with FM symptoms often beginning during menopause. Musculoskeletal pain, arthralgia, myalgia and other symptoms are frequently seen in both conditions. Some research suggests a link between the cessation of sex hormones and FM symptoms. Women with FM tend to experience more severe symptoms after menopause, and the severity of FM symptoms can worsen in women who have had a hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy. Despite these similarities, it is essential to treat FM and climacteric conditions separately and follow established guidelines for management. However, it is also important to recognize that both conditions can coexist in the same patient. It is crucial to note that there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of menopausal hormone therapy for primary FM management. Therefore, menopausal hormone therapy should not be recommended for FM unless the patient also has climacteric syndrome.

13.
Climacteric ; 27(2): 171-177, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and transdermal estradiol in alleviating menopausal symptoms. METHOD: A total of 257 recently menopausal women were randomized into two groups. The t-E2 group received transdermal estradiol (2.5 g per day) (n = 128) and the o-E2V group received oral estradiol valerate (2 mg per day) (n = 129) for 24 weeks; both groups received micronized progesterone (200 mg per day). The primary outcome measure is the change in the modified Kupperman Menopausal Index (KMI) after 24 weeks of treatment. Menopausal symptoms were recorded at screening and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks using both the KMI and the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). RESULTS: Significant amelioration was observed by KMI and MRS scores for both groups after treatment (p < 0.001). The mean KMI scores showed no difference between the two groups. The mean MRS scores were similar between the two groups at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. The results showed statistical differences after 12 weeks and 24 weeks of treatment (p = 0.005 and p = 0.011). Both the after-treatment scores minus the baseline scores of KMI and MRS and the incidence of adverse effects showed no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both transdermal and oral estradiol are effective in relieving menopausal symptoms, with little difference in treatment efficacy and safety. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2300073146.


Asunto(s)
Estradiol , Menopausia , Femenino , Humanos , Progesterona , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Administración Cutánea
14.
Climacteric ; 27(1): 89-92, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931647

RESUMEN

Individual risk assessment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is important for safe menopausal hormone prescription. Besides the traditional risk factors, female-specific risk variables related to pregnancy and gynecologic conditions importantly contribute to a more tailored risk assessment in women at middle age. Of these, prior pre-eclampsia/HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome and early spontaneous menopause (<40 years) seem to be the strongest adverse risk variables. Concomitant inflammatory disorders should also be taken into account. Adding a coronary artery calcium score with a computed tomography scan to risk assessment has a high predictive value for future cardiovascular events. This should be considered to discriminate between low-risk and high-risk women when uncertainty exists. In women at intermediate risk, menopausal hormone therapy can be easily combined with preventive medication if cardiovascular risk factors are present. In women at higher risk who have severe disabling vasomotor symptoms, a lower dosage of hormone therapy can be considered in good collaboration between the gynecologist and the cardiologist/vascular specialist.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Menopausia Prematura , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Menopausia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca
15.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol ; 102(8): 442-451, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739947

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women. After menopause, sex-specific and gender-specific factors may play an important role in increasing CVD risk, with changes in sex hormones, body fat distribution, lipid and metabolic profile, and structural and functional vascular modifications. Premature and early-onset menopause are detrimental to cardiovascular health due to the early cessation of the protective effect of endogenous estrogen. An independent association of menopause with an increased risk of CVD has been documented in early menopause (<45 years). Sex-related differences are relevant in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; different enzyme formations, drug compatibility, efficacy, and side effects vary for different sexes. Despite some progress in sex and gender research in CVD, disparities remain. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is available at mid-life for symptoms of menopause and may impact cardiovascular risk. Taken early, MHT may reduce CVD morbimortality. However, this is balanced against the risk of increased thrombosis. This paper reviews physiologic changes that contribute to cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women and discusses clinical implications. Specifically, it explores the atheroprotective effects of estrogen and MHT and the associations between menopause with lipid levels, hypertension, body composition, and diabetes for women at mid-life and beyond.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Menopausia , Humanos , Femenino , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Menopausia/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Estrógenos/metabolismo
16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686660

RESUMEN

Oestrogen is considered by many to be a major cause of breast cancer, and yet hormonal contraception and menopausal hormonal therapy have a paradoxically small effect on breast cancer risk. Also, in the oestrogen-only arm of the Women's Health Initiative, subjects given oestrogen had a reduced risk of breast cancer compared to controls. Initiation of breast cancer likely begins early in life, in the long-lived ER-PR- breast stem cell. The main mitogen of ER+PR+ breast cancers is oestrogen derived from local breast fat and the tumour itself, rather than circulating oestrogens. Progesterone is relatively breast neutral, but progestins in the laboratory have been shown to expand malignant breast stem cell number.

17.
Alzheimers Dement ; 20(1): 63-73, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37450421

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have comprehensively examined the impact of reproductive factors (i.e., reproductive window, parity, hormonal contraception [HC], and menopausal hormone therapy [MHT]) on global and domain-specific cognition in later life. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 2458 women (median age 74.2 years) residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota; participants underwent a clinical evaluation and comprehensive cognitive testing. RESULTS: The length of a woman's reproductive window was not associated with cognition. Higher parity was associated with greater cognitive decline in all domains. Ever HC use was associated with less decline in all domains. Ever MHT use was associated with greater decline in global cognition and all domain-specific z-scores except visuospatial; results were driven by women who initiated MHT 5 or more years after menopause. Additional adjustments for APOE and vascular-related covariates did not attenuate the results. DISCUSSION: Multiple reproductive risk factors are associated with cognitive decline in later life. HIGHLIGHTS: The length of a woman's reproductive window was not associated with cognition longitudinally. Greater parity was associated with greater cognitive decline longitudinally. Ever HC use was associated with less decline in global cognition and all domain-specific z-scores longitudinally (all p < 0.01). Ever MHT use was associated with greater decline in global cognition and all domain-specific z-scores except visuospatial longitudinally (all p < 0.01). The greatest cognitive decline was among women who initiated MHT more than 5 years after menopause.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Estrógenos , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Menopausia , Cognición , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Alzheimers Dement ; 20(7): 4613-4624, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38859736

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Female-specific reproductive factors and exogeneous estrogen use are associated with cognition in later life. However, the underlying mechanisms are not understood. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of reproductive factors on neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebrovascular pathologies. METHODS: We evaluated 389 females (median age of 71.7 years) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with reproductive history data and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used linear mixed effect models to examine the associations between reproductive factors and changes in neuroimaging measures. RESULTS: Ever hormonal contraception (HC) use was longitudinally associated with higher fractional anisotropy across the corpus callosum, lower white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and greater cortical thickness in an AD meta-region of interest (ROI). The initiation of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) > 5 years post menopause was associated with higher WMH volume. DISCUSSION: HC use and initiation of MHT >5 years post menopause were generally associated with neuroimaging biomarkers of cerebrovascular pathologies. HIGHLIGHTS: Hormonal contraception use was associated with better brain white matter (WM) integrity. Initiation of menopausal hormone therapy >5 years post menopause was associated with worsening brain WM integrity. Hormonal contraception use was associated with greater cortical thickness. Ages at menarche and menopause and number of pregnancies were not associated with imaging measures. There were few associations between reproductive factors or exogenous estrogens and amyloid or tau PET.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Biomarcadores , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen , Humanos , Femenino , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Longitudinales , Estrógenos , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Blanca/patología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Historia Reproductiva , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 28(3): 122-129, 2024 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583076

RESUMEN

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is known to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and less frequently cerebral vein thrombosis, but the absolute risk for a given patient is very low. After starting MHT, the risk of VTE seems to be at its highest, declining to the non-HRT user baseline level of risk after stopping. Whether estrogen-only or estrogen-progestin HRT combination is linked to a similar risk of VTE is unclear from the available evidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risks of developing VTE in relation to different types as well as different modes of administration of MHT through a database search including PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and others in order to provide the women carers with the up-to-date and evidence-based guidelines and recommendations while counseling the post-menopausal women enquiring on use of hormonal therapies either to alleviate the menopausal symptoms or to prevent the long-term sequelae of estrogen deficiency.


On sait que l'hormonothérapie ménopausique (MHT) augmente le risque de thromboembolie veineuse (TEV), qui comprend la thrombose veineuse profonde, l'embolie pulmonaire et, moins fréquemment, la thrombose veineuse cérébrale, mais le risque absolu pour un patient donné est très faible. Après le début du MHT, le risque de TEV semble être à son plus haut niveau, diminuant jusqu'au niveau de risque de base des non-utilisatrices de THS après l'arrêt. Les preuves disponibles ne permettent pas de savoir si un THS à base d'œstrogène seul ou d'association œstroprogestative est lié à un risque similaire de TEV. Le but de cette étude est d'évaluer les risques de développer une TEV par rapport à différents types ainsi qu'à différents modes d'administration du MHT grâce à une recherche dans des bases de données comprenant PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library et autres afin de fournir aux femmes les soignants avec les lignes directrices et recommandations à jour et fondées sur des preuves tout en conseillant les femmes ménopausées qui se renseignent sur l'utilisation de thérapies hormonales, soit pour soulager les symptômes de la ménopause, soit pour prévenir les séquelles à long terme d'une carence en œstrogènes.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Menopausia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Progestinas/efectos adversos , Progestinas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad
20.
BMC Med ; 21(1): 337, 2023 09 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the role of exogenous female sex steroid hormones in asthma development in women remains conflicting. We sought to quantify the potential causal role of hormonal contraceptives and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in the development of asthma in women. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study based on the West Sweden Asthma Study, nested in a representative cohort of 15,003 women aged 16-75 years, with 8-year follow-up (2008-2016). Data were analyzed using Frequentist and Bayesian conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: We included 114 cases and 717 controls. In Frequentist analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for new-onset asthma with ever use of hormonal contraceptives was 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.38). Subgroup analyses showed that the OR increased consistently with older baseline age. The OR for new-onset asthma with ever MHT use among menopausal women was 1.17 (95% CI 0.49-2.82). In Bayesian analysis, the ORs for ever use of hormonal contraceptives and MHT were, respectively, 1.11 (95% posterior interval [PI] 0.79-1.55) and 1.18 (95% PI 0.92-1.52). The respective probability of each OR being larger than 1 was 72.3% and 90.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Although use of hormonal contraceptives was associated with an increased risk of asthma, this may be explained by selection of women by baseline asthma status, given the upward trend in the effect estimate with older age. This indicates that use of hormonal contraceptives may in fact decrease asthma risk in women. Use of MHT may increase asthma risk in menopausal women.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Teorema de Bayes , Asma/inducido químicamente , Asma/epidemiología , Anticonceptivos , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA