A comparison of results from antihuman globulin-graded reactions with the monocyte monolayer assay.

Blood transfusions are a common medical treatment. Risks arise when compatible blood is not available. This study assesses the correlation between antibody reaction strength at the antihuman globulin (AHG) phase of testing and the antibody clinical significance as predicted using the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA). Multiple examples of anti-K donor plasma samples were selected to sensitize K+k+ red blood cells (RBCs). Reactivity was confirmed by testing the sensitized K+k+ RBCs at saline-AHG. Antibody titers were determined by serial dilution using neat plasma. Sixteen samples were selected for the study based on comparable graded reactions with neat plasma (1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+) and similar titration endpoints. Each sample was used to sensitize the same Kk donor and then tested by monocytes to evaluate the clinical significance using the MMA, an in vitro procedure that mimics in vivo extravascular hemolysis to predict the survivability of incompatible transfused RBCs. The monocyte index (MI), i.e., the percentage of RBCs adhered, ingested, or both versus free monocytes, was calculated for each sample. Regardless of the reaction strength, all examples of anti-K were predicted to be clinically significant. While anti-K is known to be clinically significant, the immunogenicity rate of K ensures ample supply of antibody samples for inclusion in this project. This study demonstrates that in vitro antibody strength is highly subjective and variable. These results show no correlation between graded reaction strength at AHG and the predicted clinical significance of an antibody as assessed using the MMA.

Prevalence and laboratorial determinants of the clinical relevance of antibodies of undetermined specificity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibodies of unknown specificity (AUS) are frequently identified in the pre-transfusion testing. These antibodies can be insignificant or potentially cause post-transfusion haemolysis. Information about the prevalence of clinically relevant AUS is still lacking. Our aim was to predict the potential clinical relevance of AUS using the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) and to identify the clinical and laboratorial determinants of AUS' significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antibodies of unknown specificity identified at a single institution from 2015-2017 were evaluated through MMA. A monocyte index (MI) of more than 5% was predictive of potential post-transfusion haemolysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with AUS were included in the study. Of the studied AUS, 37·5% (12/32) presented with a monocyte index (MI) more than 5%. In the group of significant AUS, 41·7% of the patients presented with sickle cell disease (SCD) and the AUS were associated with Rh antibodies in 75% of the cases. In the group of insignificant AUS, only 10% of the patients had SCD and the association with Rh antibodies was detected in 20% of the cases. The presence of Rh antibodies was independently associated with the AUS clinical relevance (P = 0·012). CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the AUS are potentially clinically relevant, and the association with Rh antibodies is predictive of AUS relevance. Services must honour AUS in the pre-transfusion process in order to ensure transfusion safety.

Defining the clinical relevance of red blood cell autoantibodies by Monocyte Monolayer Assay.

BACKGROUND: The Monocyte Monolayer Assay (MMA) is an in vitro simulation of red blood cell (RBC) alloantibody behavior. It has been classically applied to predict the risks of post-transfusion hemolytic reactions when transfusing incompatible RBC units. Quantifying erythrophagocytosis by MMA may be an interesting option for situations where there is doubt whether a RBC autoantibody is mediating significant hemolysis. Here, we present three situations involving RBC autoantibodies in which the MMA was decisive for clarifying the diagnosis and choosing the best clinical treatment. CASE REPORT: Case 1. Pregnant patient with severely anemic fetus exhibited warm autoantibody without signs of hemolysis. MMA revealed 30% of monocyte index (MI) highlighting that fetal hemolysis was caused by maternal autoantibody. Prednisone was prescribed with fetal clinical improvement. Cases 2 and 3. Two patients with the diagnosis of mixed auto-immune hemolytic anemia and poor response to corticosteroids were evaluated using MMA. The resulting MI was less than 10% in both cases, suggesting that the cold-agglutinin rather than the warm auto-IgG was responsible for overt hemolysis. Treatment with rituximab was begun, with good clinical response. CONCLUSION: MMA can be used to evaluate the ability of RBC autoantibodies to mediate overt hemolysis. It can be especially useful to determine the role played by cold and warm auto-antibodies in mixed auto-immune hemolytic disease, helping to define the best treatment option.

Methods to Evaluate the Potential Clinical Significance of Antibodies to Red Blood Cells.

Immune-mediated red blood cell (RBC) destruction due to antibodies is an ongoing problem in transfusion medicine for the selection of the safest blood. Serological testing often revealed incompatibility with donors' RBCs. When this incompatible blood was transfused, destruction was due mostly to extravascular-mediated phagocytosis of the antibody-opsonized RBCs; however, intravascular hemolysis was sometimes observed without explanation. Based on serology, antibodies with potential for clinical sequalae could not be ascertained; thus, antigen-negative blood was usually selected for transfusion to avoid problems. Antibodies to antigens having very high frequency in the general population (>95%), however, made selection of antigen-negative blood difficult and sometimes impossible. Some patients, who were sensitized by previous transfusions or by pregnancy, developed multiple antibodies, again creating a problem for finding compatible blood for transfusion, without the ability to discern which of the antibodies may be clinically irrelevant and ignored. Transfusion medicine scientists began searching for an in vitro means to determine the in vivo outcome of transfusion of blood that was serologically incompatible. Methods such as chemiluminescence, monocyte-macrophage phagocytosis, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were described. Over the years, the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) has emerged as the most reliable in vitro assay for the prediction of the clinical relevance of a given antibody. ADCC has not been fully studied but has the potential to be useful for predicting which antibodies may result in intravascular hemolysis. This article captures the protocols for the implementation and readout of the MMA and ADCC assays for use in predicting the clinical significance of antibodies in a transfusion setting. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) Basic Protocol 2: Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay (ADCC).

The Monocyte Monolayer Assay: Past, Present and Future.

Serologic testing using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is known to be insufficient to determine the clinical significance or insignificance of a given antibody to red blood cells (RBC), particularly in cases of antibodies to high-prevalence antigens, such as anti-Ge or anti-Yta. An in vitro functional cellular assay, the monocyte monolayer assay (MMA), has been studied for more than 40 years for its potential use to differentiate between clinically significant and insignificant RBC antibodies. The MMA has recently been used to select donor blood for transfusion into patients having a serologically incompatible crossmatch, without any obvious sequalae. Thus, the MMA shows great potential for future use to select donor blood for transfusion in situations where antibodies to high-prevalence antigens or complex multiple alloantibody problems confront transfusion services. In this report, we review the history leading up to the current uses of the MMA, its optimization, and potential use for the selection of serologically incompatible donor blood for transfusion. We describe current ongoing work to document and improve the efficacy of the MMA. Finally, we briefly describe possible future directions to make the MMA more amenable to routine laboratories.