Characteristics of clinical trials of new oncology drugs approved in China.

BACKGROUND: Since reforms were introduced to incentivize drug innovation in 2015, the Chinese pharmaceutical market has experienced unprecedented prosperity, with more new drugs than ever before, especially anticancer treatments. In 2021, Chinese regulatory agencies issued the new guideline for clinical research and development of antitumor drugs, triggering a series of responses on the drug market. Limited research has outlined the nature of the original new drugs in China to understand the dynamic response of the market. METHODS: The objective of this article was to map the clinical development of approved new oncology drugs in China from 2015 to 2021 and differed from previous studies by focusing on original new drugs, using the United States as a benchmark, and elaborating the endogenous features of clinical trials. RESULTS: Clinical trials conducted in China have risen to a level similar to that of the United States in many aspects of trial design, but there is still distance between the implementation and operational details of clinical trials. In the meantime, China has made significant breakthroughs in drug approval. Greater than 60% of novel anticancer drugs in China received accelerated approved for their first listing. Approximately 90% of the pivotal clinical trials supporting initial drug approval used surrogate measures as end points, and one half were nonrandomized or did not have a control group. However, duplicate development without evidence of a clinical advantage compared with current therapies was widely observed. CONCLUSIONS: By presenting a multidimensional landscape of clinical trials and approvals in the real world, this review allows interested researchers, developers, and even regulators to understand what has been done and what should be done next in anticancer drug development in China.

Clinical outcomes and biomarker exploration of first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low PD-L1-expressing of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of first-line programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma are controversial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had undergone first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy between October 2017 and May 2022. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). SPSS software V27.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of 345 enrolled patients, 290 had measurable lesions. The overall ORR was 59.3%. PD-L1 status was available in 171 patients, and 67.8% of them were considered as low PD-L1 expression level (combined positive score (CPS) < 5). Patients with PD-L1 CPS < 5 showed a lower response rate (51.1% vs 70.8%, P = 0.024) and a worse PFS (P = 0.009) compared to those with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. In the PD-L1 low-expression cohort, patients with non-diffuse type, GEJ cancer, synchronous metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, non-peritoneal metastasis, and HER2 positive were significantly associated with higher response rates to PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (P < 0.05). The presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.028) and diffuse type (P = 0.046) were identified as independent predictors of poor PFS in multivariate analysis of the PD-L1 CPS < 5 subgroup. When evaluated for correlation with overall survival (OS) in the PD-L1 low-expression subgroup, peritoneal metastasis was found to be the only independent prognostic factor of an increased risk of death (hazard ratio: 2.31, 95% CI 1.09-4.90; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 is significantly associated with improved response and extended PFS in G/GEJ cancer patients treated with a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy. Specific subgroups within the low PD-L1-expressing population, such as those with non-diffuse-type tumors and without peritoneal metastases, may also benefit from immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer after failure of at least one prior systemic therapy (CAP 04): a single-arm phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an effective treatment strategy in endometrial cancer. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib as an alternative therapeutic option in patients with previously treated endometrial cancer. METHODS: This single-arm Simon's two-stage phase II trial was conducted at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who had failed at least one prior systemic therapy were screened for potential participation. Eligible patients were treated with intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg d1 q2w) and oral apatinib (250 mg qd) every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 in the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Between January 20, 2020, and October 14, 2022, 36 patients (29 with microsatellite stability/mismatch repair proficient [MSS/pMMR] tumors; two with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient [MSI-H/dMMR] tumors) were enrolled and treated. The confirmed ORR was 44.4% (95% CI: 27.9, 61.9) and the disease control rate was 91.7% (95% CI: 77.5, 98.2). The median duration of response was 9.3 (95% CI: 4.3, not reached) months, the median progression-free survival was 6.2 (95% CI: 5.3, 11.1) months, and the median overall survival was 21.0 (95% CI: 13.4, not reached) months during a median follow-up of 14.2 (interquartile range: 10.3, 27.6) months. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20 (55.6%) patients, with the most common being increased γ-glutamyl transferase (27.8%), alanine aminotransferase (16.7%) and aspartate aminotransferase (13.9%), and hypertension (11.1%). No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who had failed at least one prior systemic therapy. The findings of this study support further investigation of camrelizumab plus apatinib as an alternative therapeutic option, especially for patients with MSS/pMMR tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered with ChiCTR.org.cn, number ChiCTR2000031932.

Pituitary-related immune adverse events induced by programmed death Protein-1 inhibitors differ clinically from hypophysitis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to elucidate the clinical features of pituitary immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by PD-1 inhibitors in a Chinese cohort and the previous literatures. PATIENTS AND DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively analysed the clinical manifestations, laboratory examination findings, imaging features and treatments of 14 patients with pituitary irAEs caused by PD-1 inhibitors in our cohort. In addition, we searched PubMed for all English articles on pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors published from 1950 to 2023. A total of 47 articles were included, and the clinical characteristics of 94 patients with pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors in these literatures were compared to the characteristics of our cohort. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients in our cohort with pituitary irAEs induced by PD-1 inhibitors, 12 patients (85.71%, 12/14) exhibited isolated ACTH deficiency (IAD), 100.0% (14/14) of the central adrenocortical insufficiency, and 2 patients showed more than one hypothalamic-pituitary axis injury (14.29%, 2/14). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in all the 14 patients showed no pituitary enlargement. In previous studies we reviewed, 82.98% of the total (78/94) presented with pituitary irAEs as IAD, 100.0% (94/94) of the central adrenocortical insufficiency, and 78.33% of the patients showed no abnormality of the pituitary gland (47/60). The pituitary irAEs caused by PD-1 inhibitors did not involve typical manifestations of hypophysitis, such as pituitary enlargement, headache, visual field defects, and multiple pituitary function impairments in our cohort and the previous literatures. CONCLUSION: In our study, pituitary immune-related adverse reactions induced by PD-1 inhibitors mainly manifested isolated ACTH deficiency rather than hypophysitis.

Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with adjuvant ablative fractional laser displays increased tumour clearance of squamous cell carcinoma, a murine study.

PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors are used as systemic immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); however, improved treatment efficacy is urgently needed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of combining systemic anti-PD-1 treatment with adjuvant ablative fractional laser (AFL) in a spontaneous SCC mouse model. Tumours induced by ultraviolet radiation in the strain C3.Cg-Hrhr /TifBomTac were divided into four groups: anti-PD-1-antibody+AFL (n = 33), AFL alone (n = 22) anti-PD-1-antibody alone (n = 31) and untreated controls (n = 46). AFL was given at Day 0 (100 mJ/mb, 5% density), while anti-PD-1-antibody (ip, 200 µg) at Days 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8. Response to treatment was evaluated by tumour growth, survival time and by dividing response to treatment into complete responders (clinically cleared tumours), partial responders (reduced tumour growth rate compared to untreated controls) and non-responders (no decrease in tumour growth rate compared to untreated controls). The strongest tumour response was observed following the combination of systemic anti-PD-1 treatment combined with laser exposure, resulting in the highest percentage of complete responders (24%) compared with untreated controls (0%, p < 0.01), AFL monotherapy (13%, p > 0.05) and anti-PD-1-antibody monotherapy (3%, p > 0.05). Moreover, all three treatment interventions demonstrated significantly reduced tumour growth rates compared with untreated controls (p < 0.01), and the mice had significantly longer survival times (p < 0.01). In conclusion, the combination treatment revealed an improved treatment effect that significantly enhanced the complete tumour clearance not observed with the monotherapies, indicating a possible additive effect of anti-PD-1 with adjuvant AFL in treatment of SCC.

Real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns in US patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) controlled clinical trials do not always reflect real-world heterogeneous patient populations. We designed a study to describe the real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns of first-line treatment in patients in the US with NSCLC. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study based on electronic medical records of US adults with locally advanced or metastatic disease in the ConcertAI Patient360 NSCLC database who initiated first-line treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) therapy between July 2016 and December 2020. The analysis used patient attributes, clinical characteristics, and treatments from each patient's medical records. RESULTS: A total of 2175 patients were eligible for analysis. The median age was 68 years, and 26.2% of the patients were ≥75 years old. At treatment initiation, 96.4% and 3.6% of the patients had Stage 4 and Stage 3 (B or C) NSCLC, respectively. The most common histology type was nonsquamous adenocarcinoma (66.4%), and 19.8% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2. Immunosuppressive medications were being used by 17.7% of patients, and 11.0% were immunocompromised. Almost all patients had metastases: 64.6% had 1, 23.2% had 2, and 8.0% had ≥3 metastatic sites. Brain metastases were present in 22.9% of patients. Treatment evolution was observed with first-line standard of care shifting from single-agent immunotherapy in 2016 (90.2%) to combination immunotherapy and chemotherapy in 2020 (60.2%). CONCLUSION: Between 2016 and 2020, the first-line treatment paradigm for advanced NSCLC in the US shifted from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy to combination chemoimmunotherapy, with increasing biomarker testing. Further research in heterogeneous patient populations to characterize treatment strategies is warranted.

Who Should Receive Immunotherapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer?

OPINION STATEMENT: This paper shines a light on the exciting progress being made in using immunotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal cancers. The positive results from trials using drugs like Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab are certainly encouraging and open new possibilities for treating this challenging disease. However, it is clear that we still have a lot to learn about how to predict which patients will benefit most from these treatments. The exploration of combining therapies and using machine learning to guide treatment shows promise. Moving forward, it is crucial that researchers and healthcare professionals continue to work together, sharing knowledge and findings to continue the advancements in this important area.

Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Practical Approach.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) with the use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), implemented with low-dosage computer tomography, is to be considered as the most important evolution of imaging in the management and assessment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients. SUMMARY: According to Lugano response criteria, FDG-PET is mandatory to define metabolic response to frontline therapy and moreover it is important in the definition of nonresponders or refractory disease patients. Refractory disease is reported in about 15% of patients, with some variations based on the choice of first-line chemotherapy, and particularly in advanced stages, up to 40% eventually relapse within 3 years. KEY MESSAGES: The aim of this review was to highlight a practical way to use FDG-PET in the subset of HL, with some notes of its use in first-line patients, and particularly centered on relapsed or refractory setting with a final focus of the evaluation of response by FDG-PET in the new treatment era of immunocheckpoint inhibitors.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab vs. camrelizumab for the treatment of second-line locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal carcinoma is a type of cancer that occurs in the esophagus. For patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have either experienced disease progression following first-line standard chemotherapy or are intolerant to it, the prognosis is typically poor. Additionally, these patients often bear a substantial economic burden during the course of their treatment. Tislelizumab is a selective PD-1 inhibitor with efficacy proven in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab versus camrelizumab as the second-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients in China. METHODS: From the perspective of China's healthcare system, the partitioned survival model with three health states was established in a 3-week cycle and a lifetime horizon. Anchored matching adjusted indirect comparison was used for survival analyses based on individual patient data from RATIONALE 302 trial and the published ESCORT study due to the lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Only direct medical costs were included. Costs and utility values were derived from local charges, the published literature, and related databases. Sensitivity analyses and a scenario analysis were also performed to verify the robustness of the model results. RESULTS: Compared with camrelizumab monotherapy, tislelizumab monotherapy incurred a lower lifetime cost ($8,346 vs. $8,851) and yielded higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.87 vs. 0.63), which resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -$2,051/QALY. Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option over camrelizumab monotherapy in China. The three primary parameters upon which this result was most sensitive were the unit cost of camrelizumab, the unit cost of tislelizumab, and the duration of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP). According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), tislelizumab monotherapy was 100% cost-effective when the WTP was 1-3 times GDP per capita in China($11,207/QALY∼$33,621/QALY). Scenario analysis showed that the result was consistent. CONCLUSION: Tislelizumab monotherapy is a dominant option compared with camrelizumab monotherapy as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

[Translated article] Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma and the V600 BRAF Mutation: Which One First? / Inmunoterapia vs. terapia diana en el paciente con melanoma avanzado y mutación BRAF V600, ¿por cuál comenzar?

Systemic treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy can significantly improve survival in patients with advanced (metastatic or high-risk) melanoma. Fifty percent of patients with melanoma have a BRAF mutation. Decisions on optimal sequencing of systemic treatments should take into account drug- and tumor-related factors and patient characteristics. Although the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is associated with the best survival outcomes, it is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapy may be a more favorable option in certain clinical situations. We review the literature on immunotherapy and targeted therapy in melanoma and present an algorithm for guiding decision-making on their use as first-line systemic treatments for advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.

Effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy plus programmed death-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) may function synergistically with immunotherapy and targeted agents (TA). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of RT combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with relapsed or refractory advanced BTC who received RT combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients who received RT combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib as a second- or later-line therapy were analyzed. RT sites were mainly distributed in the liver lesions (64.5%) and lymph nodes (58.1%). The ORR and DCR were 32.3% (10/31; 95% CI: 14.8-49.7) and 87.1% (27/31; 95% CI: 74.6-99.6), respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 7.9 (95% CI: 7.1-8.7) and 11.7 (95% CI: 8.3-15.0) months, respectively. Subgroup analyses of this cohort included 12 and 19 patients who received concurrent and salvage (> 6 weeks after commencing PD-1 inhibitor therapy) RT, respectively. The salvage RT group had higher mOS (11.7 vs. 10.5; p = 0.75) and mPFS (7.9 vs. 6.9; p = 0.85) than the concurrent RT group; however, statistical significance was not reached. All patients experienced any-grade adverse events (AEs), and excessive PD-1 inhibitors or RT toxicity were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: RT, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib may be safely combined and have antitumor effectiveness in patients with advanced BTC.

PD-1 Inhibitors combined with paclitaxel (Albumin-bound) and cisplatin for larynx preservation in locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common head and neck cancer with significant impact on quality of life due to its crucial roles in vocalization, airway protection, and swallowing. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and larynx organ preservation of neoadjuvant treatment with PD-1 inhibitors in combination with paclitaxel (Albumin-bound) and cisplatin for locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal SCC. METHODS: Medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced SCC of the larynx and hypopharynx, who received PD-1 inhibitor therapy at a single tertiary care center, were reviewed from January 1, 2019, to December 15, 2022. The patients were treated with a combination of PD-1 inhibitors, paclitaxel (Albumin-bound) 260mg/m2, and cisplatin 60mg/m2 (TP) as their first-line therapy. Survival outcomes, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) rates and response rates were assessed. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 156 patients, predominantly male, with a median age of 60.4 years. The estimated one-year overall survival (OS) rate was 94.1%, two-year OS rate was 82.5%, one-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.4%, and two-year PFS rate was 66.3%. The one-year LFS was 86.4%, and the two-year LFS rate was 73.0%. The overall response rate after TP + PD-1 inhibitors therapy was 88.5%. Common treatment-associated adverse events included rash, thyroid function abnormalities, myelosuppression, and colitis. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 inhibitors in combination with paclitaxel (Albumin-bound) and cisplatin showed promising efficacy and tolerability for larynx preservation in locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal SCC. The high response rates and favorable survival outcomes suggest this approach as a potential treatment option. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings and establish the role of immunotherapy in larynx preservation.

Somatic ARID1A mutation stratifies patients with gastric cancer to PD-1 blockade and adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) encodes a vital component of switch/sucrose non-fermentable chromatin-remodeling complex. Given its association with genomic instability, we conducted this study to determine whether ARID1A mutation status had an impact on therapeutic responsiveness in gastric cancer (GC), especially combinatory chemo-immunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 1162 patients from five independent cohorts. ZSHS Cohort and TCGA Cohort were designed to inform chemotherapeutic relevance and immunobiology of ARID1A-mutant GC based on tissue samples and sequencing data, respectively. MSKCC Cohort, mGC Cohort, and Melanoma Cohort were utilized to interrogate the predictive efficacy of ARID1A mutation to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. RESULTS: ARID1A mutation was enriched in EBV-positive, hypermutated-single nucleotide variant and microsatellite-unstable subtype GC, and was predictive of responsiveness to both fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade. Specifically, ARID1A mutation score was a highly sensitive indicator (91%) of response to pembrolizumab. Mechanistically, ARID1A mutation correlated with extensive DNA damage repair deficiency and immunogenic tumor microenvironment (TME) featured by elevated activated subsets of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and NK cells. Type 17T helper cells were typically abundant in ARID1A-mutant GC and might be a precondition for chemosensitivity conferred by ARID1A mutation. Furthermore, ARID1A mutation indicated elevated expression of VEGFA and CLDN18, as well as over-representation of ERBB2 and FGFR2 signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: ARID1A-mutant GC displayed immunogenic TME and might be a candidate for both monotherapy and the combination of frontline chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade.

Efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody combined with bevacizumab and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa injection in transplanted tumor of mouse forestomach carcinoma cell gastric cancer in mice and its mechanism in regulating tumor immune microenvironment.

Tumor immunotherapy represented by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors is considered as the most promising cancer treatment method and has been widely used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the effective rate of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy is low. In this study, we constructed a transplanted tumor model in GC mice by inoculating mouse forestomach carcinoma cell (MFC) GC cells into 615 mice. Interventions were conducted with normal saline, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), bevacizumab, Pseudomonas aeruginosa-mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (PA-MSHA), anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with PA-MSHA, bevacizumab combined with PA-MSHA, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab and PA-MSHA, respectively. The tumor growth curves were drawn. TUNEL assay, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry were used to detect tumor proliferation and apoptosis. Flow cytometry and ELISA were used to detect the expression of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and cytokines. This study found that anti-PD-1 mAb alone could not significantly inhibit the growth of transplanted tumors in mice. Anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with PA-MSHA, anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab and PA-MSHA could all significantly inhibit tumor growth in mice, and the combination of three drugs presented the highest tumor inhibition rate. Anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab and PA-MSHA could significantly upregulate the number of Th1-type cells, CD8 + T cells, and Type I tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), while downregulate the number of Th2-type cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and Type II TAMs. Therefore, we conclude that anti-PD-1 mAb combined with bevacizumab and/or PA-MSHA has a synergistic effect. Bevacizumab and PA-MSHA can transform the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment into a supportive immune microenvironment, thus maximizing the antitumor effect of anti-PD-1 mAb.

WITHDRAWN: Construction and evaluation of risk prediction model for kidney injury in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Nomogram for predicting survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors: incorporating pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical parameters.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment patterns for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in recent years. Therefore, the identification of predictive biomarkers has important clinical implications. METHODS: We collected medical records from 117 aHCC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to evaluate the association between peripheral blood biomarkers and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Finally, the prognostic nomogram was constructed. RESULTS: The mPFS and mOS were 7.0 months and 18.7 months, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis, we regarded the treatment regimen (p = 0.020), hemoglobin (Hb) at 6-week (p = 0.042), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 6-week (p < 0.001), system immune inflammation index (SII) at 6-week (p = 0.125) as predictors of PFS, and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) (p = 0.035), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p = 0.012), Hb at 6-week (p = 0.010) and NLR at 6-week (p = 0.020) as predictors of OS. Furthermore, the results suggest that the OS and PFS nomogram model were in agreement with actual observations. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers in peripheral blood can predict the prognosis of patients with aHCC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. The development of nomogram models can help us to screen potential patients who can benefit from immunotherapy.

Swiss Recommendations for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer in Switzerland and worldwide. Most BCCs can be treated in a curative setting. However, patients can develop locally destructive and, rarely, metastatic tumors that require a different treatment approach. The clinical subtype of individual lesions provides prognostic information and influences management decisions. Surgical excision, topical therapies, and radiotherapy are highly effective in the majority of subtypes as well as in low- and high-risk diseases. For patients with low-risk diseases and superficial tumors not amenable to surgery, several nonsurgical alternatives are available. Systemic therapy is indicated for high-risk BCCs, which are not amenable to either surgery or radiotherapy. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) are currently approved. Other therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors show promising results in clinical trials. This first version of Swiss recommendations for diagnosis and management of BCC was prepared through extensive literature review and an advisory board consensus of expert dermatologists and oncologists in Switzerland. The present guidelines recommend therapies based on a multidisciplinary team approach and rate of recurrence for individual lesions. Based on the risk of recurrence, two distinct groups have been identified: low-risk (easy-to-treat) and high-risk (difficult-to-treat) tumors. Based on these classifications, evidence-based recommendations of available therapies are presented herein.

Pembrolizumab induced-C3 glomerulonephritis and RBC cast nephropathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used in the treatment of several cancers. Pembrolizumab is an anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody that is approved for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab-associated renal toxicity is relatively rare, even in pembrolizumab-associated glomerulonephritis. In this study, we report a rare case of pembrolizumab-induced C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) and RBC cast nephropathy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man with NSCLC was receiving treatment with pembrolizumab. After 19 cycles of pembrolizumab therapy, he presented with gross hematuria, severe lower-limb edema and oliguria. Laboratory tests revealed hypoalbuminemia, increased serum creatinine and low serum C3 level. Renal biopsy revealed a typical membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis accompanied by remarkable RBC casts in tubular cavities and tubulointerstitial infiltration of CD8-positive lymphocytes. Based on C3-only immunofluorescence deposit on glomeruli, a diagnosis of C3GN was made. Pembrolizumab was considered the cause of C3GN. Pembrolizumab was discontinued immediately, and 60 mg/day of prednisone was initiated. One dose of cyclophosphamide (400 mg, IV) was also administered. Upon treatment, his symptoms improved rapidly and serum creatinine decreased a lot. However, the patient became dialysis dependent eventually. CONCLUSION: This is the first case of C3GN with RBC cast nephropathy caused by ICIs. This rare case caused by the prolonged use of pembrolizumab further strengthens the relationship between ICIs and C3GN. Thus, periodic evaluation of urine and renal function is recommended in patients receiving pembrolizumab and other ICIs.

Efficacy of treatment based on TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The recurrence occurs within 5 years in up to 70% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received radical liver resection, and most patients are no longer suitable for repeat surgery. There are limited treatment options for unresectable recurrent HCC. This study aimed to explore the potential efficacy of treatment based on TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent HCC. METHODS: Forty-four patients with unresectable recurrent HCC after radical surgery between January 2017 and November 2022 were retrospectively collected and screened. All patients received the combination therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, and 18 of these patients received trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or TACE combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Two patients who received TKIs in combination with PD-1 inhibitors eventually obtained repeat surgery, with one patient undergoing a repeat hepatectomy and one patient receiving a liver transplant. RESULTS: The median survival for these patients was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.2, 32.8), with a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 83.6% (95% CI 77.9%, 89.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.0 months (95.0% CI 12.1, 17.9), with a 1-year PFS rate of 77.0% (95% CI 70.6%, 83.4%). The two patients who underwent repeat surgery had a survival time of 34 and 37 months after the combined treatment with no recurrence, respectively, as of November 2022. CONCLUSION: The combination of TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable recurrent HCC is effective and can prolong the survival of patients in this group.